Solid-phase techniques in blood transfusion serology

Evaluation of Pre-Transfusion Crossmatch Test Using Microscanner C3

A pre-transfusion crossmatch test is crucial for ensuring safe blood transfusions by identifying the compatibility between donor and recipient blood samples. Conventional tube methods for crossmatching have limitations, including subjectivity in result interpretation and the potential for human error. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a new crossmatch test using Microscanner C3, which can overcome these shortcomings. The crossmatch test results using the method were obtained in 323 clinical samples. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance rate of the crossmatch test using Microscanner C3 were 98.20%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 98.11%, and 99.07%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the new system offers a promising alternative to conventional tube methods for pre-transfusion crossmatch testing. Microscanner C3 could also increase the automation, standardization, and accuracy of crossmatch tests. The crossmatch test using Microscanner C3 is thought to increase the efficiency and reliability in identifying blood samples suitable for transfusion, thereby improving patient safety and optimizing the use of blood products in clinical settings.

Comparison of automated solid phase versus manual saline indirect antiglobulin test methodology for non-ABO antibody titration: Implications for perinatal antibody monitoring

BACKGROUND

Accurate antibody titration is crucial in prenatal evaluations to identify patients who need clinical monitoring for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) causing fetal anemia. This study compares the established gold standard method of manual tube saline indirect antiglobulin testing (SIAT) with the newer automated solid phase (ASP) method of antibody titration and aims to establish the critical titer threshold for ASP that corresponds to the previously established SIAT critical threshold of ≥16 used in our laboratory.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-seven prenatal and donor plasma samples with known antibodies were tested using both SIAT and ASP methodologies and results were compared.

RESULTS

The study found that ASP titers were, on average, 1.33 dilutions higher than SIAT titers. The critical titer cutoff for ASP was determined to be ≥32, which is one tube higher than the SIAT cutoff of ≥16.

DISCUSSION

The ASP method for antibody titration offers greater reproducibility and efficiency compared with manual SIAT titration. This study suggests that a titer cutoff of ≥32 is appropriate for most clinically significant antibodies using ASP. However, further research is needed to determine the comparability of ASP with SIAT in samples with multiple antibodies, anti-M antibodies, and other less common antibodies. Validation of the ASP titer cutoff against HDFN clinical outcomes is required before implementing this test for routine use in perinatal antibody titration.

Bleeding risk and platelet transfusion refractoriness in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

Therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia can be complicated by alloimmunization to histocompatibility antigens (HLA), with resultant refractoriness to platelet transfusions. Autologous peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cell transplantation (referred here collectively as 'autoBMT') is emerging as a standard consolidative strategy in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We had noted life-threatening bleeding associated with platelet transfusion refractoriness following autoBMT; we therefore retrospectively analyzed 39 AML patients for this complication following BMT. All patients received high-dose chemoradiotherapy, followed by infusion of allogeneic sibling donor (n = 12, alloBMT) or autologous (n = 27, autoBMT) stem cells. HLA alloimmunization was assessed if patients were suspected of immune refractoriness to random donor platelet transfusions. Within 100 days of stem cell infusion, one of three alloBMT and six of 12 autoBMT recipients tested were HLA alloimmunized (not statistically significant, NS). Five of six HLA alloimmunized autoBMT patients experienced delayed bleeding, which contributed to their demise while still in remission (P < 0.001). Increased platelet requirements in HLA alloimmunized autoBMT recipients were observed between days 61 and 100 post-BMT, at a median of 211 platelet transfusions vs 0 in non-alloimmunized autoBMT patients (P < 0.01) and 17 in alloBMT patients. Our data suggest that platelet transfusion refractoriness, when associated with HLA alloimmunization, is a risk factor for increased platelet transfusion requirements, delayed bleeding, and poor outcome following autoBMT for AML.

Platelet crossmatch evaluation in refractory hematologic patients

Although previous investigators have attempted to identify platelet crossmatching methods that could be used routinely for pretransfusion testing, such studies have excluded patients with underlying clinical conditions inherently associated with low corrected platelet increments. Because many refractory hematologic patients have such underlying conditions, we decided to assess the usefulness of platelet crossmatching (in addition to HLA matching) in determining the posttransfusion corrected platelet count increment in eight medically complicated patients who received a total of 35 single-donor platelet transfusions. In this limited study, the predictive value of a negative crossmatch was only 55%, whereas that of a positive crossmatch was 88%. The test used had a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 83%. The results of our study suggest that platelet crossmatching may be a useful additional study for predicting the outcome of transfusion--even in medically complex cases--if it can be done rapidly and relatively inexpensively.