Mitoxantrone and fludarabine in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma failing primary therapy with a doxorubicinor mitoxantrone-containing regimen

Efficacy and safety evaluation of fludarabine-based chemotherapy regimen for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fludarabine (F)-based regimen for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) compared with other regimens with no F contained.PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI databases were searched to identify eligible literatures. R software version 3.12 was used for statistical analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to express the complete response, overall response and adverse events outcomes. Egger test was carried out to examine the publication bias and sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of our results.Twelve eligible literatures consisting of 1587 patients were included in this study. Greater complete response (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.98-2.80) and overall response (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.85-2.24) were found for patients who received F-based regimen than those received other regimens, although the results were not statistically significant. In addition, F-based regimen was associated with significantly lower risk of adverse events compared with other regimens (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74). Results of subgroup analysis showed that significantly lower incidence was presented only for constipation among the 7 specific adverse events (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.14).F-based chemotherapy regimen was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with NHL.

Liposomal Coencapsulated Fludarabine and Mitoxantrone for Lymphoproliferative Disorder Treatment**Xiaobin Zhao and Jianmei Wu contributed equally to this study

Fludarabine (FLU)-based combination therapies are commonly used to treat low-grade lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. In vitro and clinical studies have indicated advantages when FLU and mitoxantrone (MTO) are applied in combination. To further enhance this effect, these two agents were coencapsulated in liposomes. FLU was passively encapsulated during liposome formation, and MTO was loaded with a transmembrane pH gradient. Entrapment efficiency, particle size, stability, and drug release kinetics were characterized. In vitro cytotoxicity study was carried out in two representative B-cell lines: Wac3CD5 and Raji. Synergism as measured by combination index (CI) was observed in cells treated with liposomes coencapsulating FLU and MTO. Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) analysis further confirmed that coencapsulated FLU and MTO improved the percentage of apoptosis among primary CLL cells. These data suggest that adopting liposomes containing coencapsulated drug combinations constitutes a potential strategy to promote drug synergism and may have utility in the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma.

STAT1 signaling is associated with acquired crossresistance to doxorubicin and radiation in myeloma cell lines

The myeloma cell line RPMI 8226/S and its doxorubicin resistant subline 8226/Dox40 were used as models to explore the potential importance of the STAT1 signaling pathway in drug and radiation resistance. The 40-fold doxorubicin resistant subline 8226/Dox40 was found to be crossresistant to single doses of 4 and 8 Gy of radiation. A genome-wide mRNA expression study comparing the 8226/Dox40 cell line to its parental line was performed to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms. Seventeen of the top 50 overexpressed genes have previously been implicated in the STAT1 signaling pathway. STAT1 was over expressed both at the mRNA and protein level. Moreover, analyses of nuclear extracts showed higher abundance of phosphorylated STAT1 (Tyr 701) in the resistant subline. Preexposure of the crossresistant cells to the STAT1 inhibiting drug fludarabine reduced expression of overexpressed genes and enhanced the effects of both doxorubicin and radiation. These results show that resistance to doxorubicin and radiation is associated with increased STAT1 signaling and can be modulated by fludarabine. The data support further development of therapies combining fludarabine and radiation.

Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of fludarabine–mitoxantrone, compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone (CHVP), as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before the era of monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND

This randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of fludarabine-mitoxantrone (FM) with mini-CHVP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone) in elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

End points were remission rates [overall response (OR) and complete response (CR)], failure-free survival (FFS), survival and toxicity. One hundred and fifty-five patients were randomized, 144 were evaluable for safety and 142 for response. Each treatment arm was given as six monthly cycles, followed by three bimonthly cycles. FM comprised fludarabine (20 mg/m(2) i.v.), days 1-5, plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2) i.v.), day 1. CHVP cycles comprised cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion), doxorubicin (25 mg/m(2) i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg/m(2) i.v.) on day 1, and prednisone (50 mg/m(2)) on days 1-5.

RESULTS

FM therapy resulted in superior remission rates (OR 81% versus 64%, CR 49% versus 17%; P = 0.0004). Median FFS for FM patients was 36 months, compared with 19 months for CHVP patients, and has not yet been reached for early CR patients at 53 months. Treatment arm was the major risk factor influencing survival. Both treatments were well tolerated, with only few infectious complications.

CONCLUSION

FM was more effective than CHVP in achieving OR and CR, and favorably affected the outcome.

Fludarabine and mitoxantrone for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to assess the efficacy of combination therapy with fludarabine and mitoxantrone in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients were treated with fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) intravenously daily for 3 days and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) on Day 1 (FN). Patients were divided into four groups based on expected response to single-agent fludarabine. These four groups included previously untreated patients, patients who previously were treated with alkylating agents, patients who were successfully treated with alkylating agents and fludarabine but who developed recurrent disease, and patients whose disease was refractory to fludarabine with or without alkylating agents.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 66%. The response rates were 83% in previously untreated patients, 87% in patients previously treated with alkylating agents, 50% in patients whose disease was not refractory to fludarabine at the start of therapy, and 25% in patients whose disease was refractory to fludarabine. The complete remission (CR) rate was 20% for previously untreated patients, which was not significantly different from the CR rate for a group of historical control patients who were treated with single-agent fludarabine. The median follow-up was 8 years for surviving patients. The median progression free survival was 24 months for all patients and 34 months for previously untreated patients. The median overall survival was 40 months, and the median survival of previously untreated patients was 88 months. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression and infection. Eleven patients (12.5%) developed a second malignancy after a median of 62 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The FN regimen did not have a significant advantage over fludarabine alone in the treatment of patients with CLL.

Fludarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone in the treatment of indolent B- and T-cell lymphoid malignancies in Chinese patients

The treatment results of indolent lymphoid malignancies in Chinese are poorly reported. The efficacy of FND (fludarabine 25 mg/m2/d, x3; mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/d, x1; dexamethasone 20 mg/d, x5; monthly cycles, x6) in 95 Chinese patients with indolent B-cell malignancies (at diagnosis: 55, relapse/refractory disease: 40) and nine Chinese patients with T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukaemia (T-LGL leukaemia) (at diagnosis: two, refractory disease: seven) was evaluated. For B-cell malignancies, the complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and overall response (OR) rates were 50.5%, 18% and 68.5% respectively. Better results were obtained for primary versus relapse/refractory disease (CR: 60% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.03; OR: 84% vs. 47.5%, P < 0.001; median progression-free survival (PFS): 44 months vs. 22 months; 2-year PFS: 66% vs. 47%, P = 0.039; overall survival (OS): not reached vs. 32%; 2-year OS: 92% vs. 58%, P < 0.001). Responsive patients (CR/PR) had a better median PFS (44 months vs. 5 months, P < 0.001) and OS (67 months vs. 13 months, P < 0.001) than unresponsive patients. For T-LGL leukaemia, the CR and molecular-remission rates were 56% and 67% (median follow-up: 23 months). FND is an active regimen for the treatment of indolent B- and T-cell malignancies in Chinese patients, with results comparable with Western patients with similar indolent lymphomas.

Fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone (FND) compared with an alternating triple therapy (ATT) regimen in patients with stage IV indolent lymphoma

Treatment for patients with stage IV indolent lymphoma ranges from watchful waiting to intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. In this trial we compared 2 induction regimens followed by 1 year of interferon maintenance therapy. Fludarabine, mitoxantrone (Novantrone), and dexamethasone (FND) were compared with an alternating triple therapy (ATT) regimen (CHOD-Bleo, ESHAP, and NOPP). Maintenance interferon/dexamethasone was given for 1 year in both treatment arms. Endpoints were comparisons of remission rates, survival, failure-free survival (FFS), molecular response rates, and toxicities. One hundred forty-two patients with previously untreated stage IV indolent lymphoma were evaluable (73 on FND; 69 on ATT). The overall response rates were 97% for FND and 97% for ATT (P =.9). The median follow-up is 5.9 years. The 5-year survival rates were 84% with FND and 82% with ATT (P =.9); the 5-year FFS rates were 41% with FND and 50% with ATT (P =.02). In a multivariate analysis, factors predicting for longer FFS were beta(2)-microglobulin less than 3 mg/L (P =.01) and ATT treatment (P =.03). ATT was associated with a substantially higher rate of grade 3-4 toxicities than FND. In conclusion, both regimens were associated with high rates of response and survival. ATT was associated with substantially longer FFS, but it was more toxic than FND.

Phase II study of fludarabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and GM-CSF (FACPGM) in patients with Richter's syndrome or refractory lymphoproliferative disorders

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fludarabine, cytarabine (ara-C), cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and GM-CSF (FACPGM) treatment in patients with Richter's syndrome (RS), refractory prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL) or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Twenty-two patients with RS, refractory PLL, or refractory NHL were entered into this trial between March 1997 and February 2001. Median age was 62 years (42-74); 77% were over 60 years of age. Histologic diagnosis was large cell NHL transformation in 15 patients with CLL, immunoblastic transformation of CLL in one, refractory PLL in three, and refractory NHL in three patients. Treatment consisted of fludarabine 30mg/m2 (days 1-3), ara-C 0.5g/m2 (days 3-4), cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 (days 2-4), cisplatin 15 mg/m2 IV CI (days 1-4) with GM-CSF 250 microg/m2 from day 5 to recovery of neutrophils and antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients with response were to receive a maximum of six cycles of therapy. Eighteen patients were evaluable for response; one patient achieved a complete remission (5%), 12 stable disease/no response (67%) and five patients had progressive disease (28%). The median survival was 2.2 months (range, 1-19); the median failure-free survival was 1.5 months (range, 0.5-18.6). Grade III/IV toxicities were as follows: anemia in 62% of cycles; leucopoenia in 66%; granulocytopenia in 90%; thrombocytopenia in 83%; hyperbilirubinemia in 14%; hyperuricemia in 17%; hyponatremia in 17%; hypokalemia in 14%; hypophosphatemia in 10%; hypoalbulinemia in 14%; hypocalcemia in 7%; and hypercalcemia in 3%. One (3%) patient developed cardiac failure. Forty-one percent of the cycles were complicated with fever, 34% with non-neutropenic fever, and 55% cycles with infections (fungal 31%; bacterial 57%; HSV 6%; VZV 6%). FACPGM had very limited activity and significant toxicity in a cohort of patients with heavily pretreated refractory lymphoproliferative disorders.

Current therapeutic approaches in the treatment of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

To review the causes, classification, treatment, and new treatment modalities of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature and experimental therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma can be attributed to a growth in the number of immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, infectious agents, and human T-cell leukemia-lymphoma virus. Treatment options include watch-and-wait, radiation, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, and stem cell/bone marrow transplant. New therapies include the use of monoclonal antibodies and radioimmunotherapy. Experimental therapies include high-dose radioimmunotherapy and stem cell transplantation, vaccines, and antisense antiangiogensis agents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses will need to become versed in this modality, and will play an important part not only in therapy but also in patient education.