Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Droplet Digital PCR: A New View on Minimal Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements has been used as the gold standard for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for >20 years. Recently, new PCR-based technologies have emerged, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which could offer several methodologic advances for MRD monitoring. In the current work, qPCR and ddPCR were compared in an unbiased blinded prospective study (n = 88 measurements) and in a retrospective study with selected critical low positive samples (n = 65 measurements). The former included flow cytometry (Flow; n = 31 measurements) as a third MRD detection method. Published guidelines (qPCR) and the latest, revised evaluation criteria (ie, ddPCR, Flow) have been applied for data analysis. The prospective study shows that ddPCR outperforms qPCR with a significantly better quantitative limit of detection and sensitivity. The number of critical MRD estimates below quantitative limit was reduced by sixfold and by threefold in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of quantitative values between ddPCR and Flow was higher than between ddPCR and qPCR, probably because ddPCR and Flow are absolute quantification methods independent of the diagnostic sample, unlike qPCR. In summary, our data highlight the advantages of ddPCR as a more precise and sensitive technology that could be used to refine response monitoring in ALL.

Remission, treatment failure, and relapse in pediatric ALL: an international consensus of the Ponte-di-Legno Consortium

Comparison of treatment strategies in de novo pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) requires standardized measures of efficacy. Key parameters that define disease-related events, including complete remission (CR), treatment failure (TF; not achieving CR), and relapse (loss of CR) require an updated consensus incorporating modern diagnostics. We collected the definitions of CR, TF, and relapse from recent and current pediatric clinical trials for the treatment of ALL, including the key components of response evaluation (timing, anatomic sites, detection methods, and thresholds) and found significant heterogeneity, most notably in the definition of TF. Representatives of the major international ALL clinical trial groups convened to establish consensus definitions. CR should be defined at a time point no earlier than at the end of induction and should include the reduction of blasts below a specific threshold in bone marrow and extramedullary sites, incorporating minimal residual disease (MRD) techniques for marrow evaluations. TF should be defined as failure to achieve CR by a prespecified time point in therapy. Relapse can only be defined in patients who have achieved CR and must include a specific threshold of leukemic cells in the bone marrow confirmed by MRD, the detection of central nervous system leukemia, or documentation of extramedullary disease. Definitions of TF and relapse should harmonize with eligibility criteria for clinical trials in relapsed/refractory ALL. These consensus definitions will enhance the ability to compare outcomes across pediatric ALL trials and facilitate development of future international collaborative trials.

Current Strategies for the Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in children. Current treatment strategies for childhood ALL result in long-term remission for approximately 90% of patients. However, the therapeutic response is worse among those who relapse. Several risk stratification approaches based on clinical and biological aspects have been proposed to intensify treatment in patients with high risk of relapse and reduce toxicity on those with a greater probability of cure.

The detection of residual leukemic cells (minimal residual disease, MRD) is the most important prognostic factor to identify high-risk patients, allowing redefinition of chemotherapy. In the last decades, several standardized research protocols evaluated MRD using immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and/or real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction at different time points during treatment. Both methods are highly sensitive (10⁻³ a 10⁻⁵), but expensive, complex, and, because of that, require qualified staff and frequently are restricted to reference centers.

The aim of this article was to review technical aspects of immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to evaluate MRD in ALL.

Minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: optimal methods and clinical relevance, pitfalls and recent approaches

After advances in experimental and clinical testing, minimal residual disease (MRD) assay results are considered a determining factor in treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. According to MRD assay results, bone marrow (BM) leukemic burden and the rate of its decline after treatment can be directly evaluated. Detailed knowledge of the leukemic burden in BM can minimize toxicity and treatment complications in patients by tailoring the therapeutic dose based on patients' conditions. In addition, reduction of MRD before allo-HSCT is an important prerequisite for reception of transplant by the patient. In direct examination of MRD by morphological methods (even by a professional hematologist), leukemic cells can be under- or over-estimated due to similarity with hematopoietic precursor cells. As a result, considering the importance of MRD, it is necessary to use other methods including flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and RQ-PCR to detect MRD. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy and sensitivity. In this review article, different MRD assay methods and their sensitivity, correlation of MRD assay results with clinical symptoms of the patient as well as pitfalls in results of these methods are evaluated. In the final section, recent advances in MRD have been addressed.

Flow minimal residual disease monitoring of candidate leukemic stem cells defined by the immunophenotype, CD34+CD38lowCD19+ in B-lineage childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring could become more powerful if directed towards the disease-maintaining leukemic stem cell (LSC) compartment. Using a cohort of 48 children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we sought the newly proposed candidate-LSC population, CD34(+)CD38(low)CD19(+), at presentation and in end of induction bone marrow samples. We identified the candidate LSC population in 60% of diagnostic samples and its presence correlated with expression of CD38, relative to that of normal B-cell progenitors. In addition, the candidate LSC was not detectable in all MRD positive samples. The absence of the population in 40% of diagnostic and 40% of MRD positive samples does not support the use of this phenotype as a generic biomarker to track LSCs and suggests that this phenotype may be an artifact of CD38 underexpression rather than a biologically distinct LSC population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00222612.

CD9 correlates with cancer stem cell potentials in human B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

Cancer stem cell (CSC) theory suggests that only a small subpopulation of cells having stem cell-like potentials can initiate tumor development. While recent data on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are conflicting, some studies have demonstrated the existence of such cells following CD34-targeted isolation of primary samples. Although CD34 is a useful marker for the isolation of CSCs in leukemias, the identification of other specific markers besides CD34 has been relatively unsuccessful. To identify new markers, we first performed extensive analysis of surface markers on several B-ALL cell lines. Our data demonstrated that every B-ALL cell line tested did not express CD34 but certain lines contained cell populations with marked heterogeneity in marker expression. Moreover, the CD9(+) cell population possessed stem cell characteristics within the clone, as demonstrated by in vitro and transplantation experiments. These results suggest that CD9 is a useful positive-selection marker for the identification of CSCs in B-ALL.

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important predictor of relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but its relationship to other prognostic variables has not been fully assessed. The Children's Oncology Group studied the prognostic impact of MRD measured by flow cytometry in the peripheral blood at day 8, and in end-induction (day 29) and end-consolidation marrows in 2143 children with precursor B-cell ALL (B-ALL). The presence of MRD in day-8 blood and day-29 marrow MRD was associated with shorter event-free survival (EFS) in all risk groups; even patients with 0.01% to 0.1% day-29 MRD had poor outcome compared with patients negative for MRD patients (59% +/- 5% vs 88% +/- 1% 5-year EFS). Presence of good prognostic markers TEL-AML1 or trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10 still provided additional prognostic information, but not in National Cancer Institute high-risk (NCI HR) patients who were MRD(+). The few patients with detectable MRD at end of consolidation fared especially poorly, with only a 43% plus or minus 7% 5-year EFS. Day-29 marrow MRD was the most important prognostic variable in multi-variate analysis. The 12% of patients with all favorable risk factors, including NCI risk group, genetics, and absence of days 8 and 29 MRD, had a 97% plus or minus 1% 5-year EFS with nonintensive therapy. These studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00005585, NCT00005596, and NCT00005603.