Overcoming resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia

Practical Laboratory Tools for Monitoring of BCR-ABL1 Transcripts and Tyrosine Kinase (TK) Domain Mutations in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing TK Inhibitor Therapy: A Single-Center Experience in Thailand

Objective:

The genetic hallmark of CML is known as the appearance of t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) (BCR-ABL1) which is present in more than 95% of cases. Here, we demonstrated practical laboratory tools for monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing TK inhibitor therapy.

Methods:

Real time quantitative PCR and direct sequencing were performed for monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in 245 treated CML.

Results:

At month 3 after first time point of monitoring, we found that 89% (218/245), 2% (5/245), and 9% (22/245) of patients are determined as optimal, warning, and failure response, respectively. The responses to TKI were slightly decreased at months 6 as following 73% optimal (180/245), 18% warning (43/245), and 9% failure response (22/245). Additionally, responses to TKI were gradually decreased at month 12 after first time point of monitoring as following 65% optimal (160/245), 13% warning (31/245), and 22% failure (54/245). We could detect 20% (49/245) of patients positive for BCR-ABL1 TKD mutations. Interestingly, one third (17 of 49) of TKD mutated cases were positive for compound/polyclonal mutation patterns. While major molecular response were observed in the majority of patients without TKD mutation, resistant to TKI were detected in patients with T315I mutation (n = 9; % mean IS = 8.1510, % median IS = 9.7000), compound/polyclonal mutations with T315I (n = 9; % mean IS = 13.0779, % median IS = 5.404), and other TKD mutations (n = 14; % mean IS = 8.1416, % median IS = 1.060), respectively.

Conlusion:

These practical laboratory techniques provided a more comprehensive understanding of CML progression during drug therapy and could be of benefit in earlier prognosis.

A phase 2 study of MK-0457 in patients with BCR-ABL T315I mutant chronic myelogenous leukemia and philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Aurora kinase overexpression has been observed in patients with hematologic malignancies. MK-0457, a pan-aurora kinase inhibitor that also inhibits the ABL T315I mutant, was evaluated to treat patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with the T315I mutation. Adults with Ph+ chronic phase (CP)-, accelerated phase (AP)- or blast phase (BP)-CML, or ALL and documented BCR-ABL T315I mutation were treated with a 5-day continuous infusion of MK-0457 administered every 14 days at 40 mg/m²/h, 32 mg/m²/h or 24 mg/m²/h. Fifty-two patients (CP, n=15; AP, n=14; BP, n=11; Ph+ ALL, n=12) were treated. Overall, 8% of patients achieved major cytogenetic response; 6% achieved unconfirmed complete or partial response; 39% had no response. Two patients (CP CML) achieved complete hematologic response. No patients with advanced CML or Ph+ ALL achieved major hematologic response. The most common adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (50%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (46%) and febrile neutropenia (35%). MK-0457 demonstrated minimal efficacy and only at higher, intolerable doses; lower doses were tolerated and no unexpected toxicities were observed. These data will assist in the development of future aurora kinase inhibitors and in the selection of appropriate target patient populations.

Molecular diagnostics: parallels between infectious disease and emerging oncology testing

Evolving molecular techniques used in the clinical laboratory are becoming increasingly important across nearly all fields of medicine. An increased understanding of carcinogenesis and the use of targeted cancer therapies has resulted in a demand for new types of molecular oncology test to help in cancer diagnosis and as tools to predict response to targeted therapeutics for cancer patients. Understanding the need for and the function of these emerging molecular oncology tests by both clinicians and laboratorians is often problematic. Although many of these molecular testing techniques and strategies are relatively new to oncology, similar testing has been performed in the field of infectious diseases for many years and is now widely accepted and understood. Recognizing the parallels between the molecular testing that is now standard for infectious diseases and testing being introduced to aid in the care of cancer patients will accelerate the acceptance, implementation and correct utilization of molecular assays for oncology.

Rapid quantitative detection of the T315I mutation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia

Acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is frequently caused by point mutations in the ABL kinase domain of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. The T315I mutation is the most common mutation found in the kinase domain and leads to complete resistance to existing TKIs. Sensitive and specific approaches for detecting this mutation in patient specimens can provide valuable information to guide treatment decisions and monitor their effectiveness. Here, we describe an allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction method to distinguish and quantify wild type or T315I mutant ABL transcripts. This approach has high specificity in identifying mutant transcripts and shows minimal interference from wild-type transcripts. As few as 5 copies of the T315I mutant transcript or 0.025% (2.5×10(-4)) T315I mutant transcripts could be detected by this method. This approach requires no additional specialized reagents other than those used in standard real-time polymerase chain reaction and therefore may be easily incorporated as an effective strategy for the early detection and monitoring of TKI resistance in patients with CML.

From Hen House to Bedside: Tracing Hanafusa's Legacy from Avian Leukemia Viruses to SRC to ABL and Beyond

The discovery of the Src oncogene was the first step on a long journey toward improved cancer chemotherapy. In this review, we explore Src and BCR-ABL, signal transduction, and recent advances in oncogene addiction and celebrate Hidesaboro Hanafusa and the many researchers who ushered in the age of target-directed therapy against tyrosine kinase oncoproteins.

Chronic myeloid leukemia: cytogenetic methods and applications for diagnosis and treatment

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disease caused by recombination between the BCR gene on chromosome 22 and the ABL1 gene on chromosome 9. This rearrangement generates the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene that characterizes leukemic cells in all CML cases. In about 90% of cases, the BCR-ABL1 rearrangement is manifest cytogenetically by the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, a derivative of the reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). For the remaining cases, recombination may be more complex, involving BCR, ABL1, and genomic sites on one or more other chromosomal regions, or it may occur cryptically within an apparently normal karyotype. Detection of the Ph and associated t(9;22) translocation is a recognized clinical hallmark for CML diagnosis. The disease has a natural multistep pathogenesis, and during chronic phase CML, the t(9;22) or complex variant is usually the sole abnormality. In 60-80% of cases, additional cytogenetic changes appear and often forecast progression to an accelerated disease phase or a terminal blast crisis. Because new frontline therapies such as imatinib specifically target the abnormal protein product of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene to eliminate BCR-ABL1 positive cells, there is a new reliance on the cytogenetic evaluation of bone marrow cells at diagnosis, then at regular posttreatment intervals. Combined with other parameters, presence or absence of Ph-positive cells in the bone marrow is a powerful early indicator for clinical risk stratification. Cytogenetic changes detected at any stage during treatment, including in the BCR-ABL1-negative cells, may also provide useful prognostic information. Laboratory methods detailed here extend from initial collection of peripheral blood or bone marrow samples through cell culture with or without synchronization, metaphase or interphase harvest, hypotonic treatment and fixation, slide preparation for G-banding or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and final interpretation.