Development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient with non-Hodgkin lymphoma 13 years after treatment with cladribine

Prevention and management of adverse effects of disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the currently known side effects of the approved therapies of multiple sclerosis and to suggest monitoring procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with new very effective therapies is accompanied by a number of side effects. Some of these have already been described in the approval studies, but some only after approval in a real world situation. The reason for this is the short duration of the clinical studies, the very heterogeneous patient profile in the real world setting with a number of comorbidities, pretherapies, and wider age range. The side effects may occur during application of therapies or afterwards during the course of the treatment. The side effects may range from mild infections, mild laboratory abnormalities, secondary autoimmune diseases to life-threatening side effects such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

SUMMARY

It has to be pointed out that these side effects are not to be considered as final and neurologists should be vigilant against new unknown side effects. The doctor should be aware of these undesirable effects, should weigh the benefits of the therapies against the risks, but at the same time she/he should keep in mind that multiple sclerosis can be a very disabling disease if not treated properly.

Safety of Newer Disease Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis has expanded greatly. Newer more potent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) with varying mechanisms of actions are increasingly used early in the disease course. These newer DMTs include oral therapies (teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and cladribine) and infusion therapies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab), and are associated with better control of disease activity and long-term outcomes in patients with MS compared to older injectable therapies (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). However, they are associated with safety concerns and subsequent monitoring requirements. Adverse events are initially observed in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and further long-term data are collected in phase 3 extension studies, case series, and post-marketing reports, which highlight the need to periodically re-evaluate and adjust monitoring strategies to optimize treatment safety in an individualized approach.

Pharmacotherapy in Children and Adolescents: Oncology

Pharmacotherapy in paediatric oncology is a difficult task. It is challenging to determine the optimal dose in children of different age groups. In addition, anticancer drugs display severe side effects reducing the quality of life. Late effects like secondary tumours and cardiotoxicity can be apparent years after treatment and must be taken into account when planning treatment schedules. Classical cytoreducing agents are still of great importance in treating children with leukaemia and solid tumours. In addition, drugs developed by rational drug design (targeted drugs) are a very important part of many treatment protocols, and newer drugs are emerging in several types of cancer. Unfortunately, there is only limited experience with newer drugs in children, because new drugs are mostly developed for adults. Complicated therapy regimens require a solid knowledge of the pharmacology of the drugs applied. This chapter attempts to introduce some pharmacological knowledge for the most important anticancer drugs in children with a focus on side effects and age-specific considerations.

Risks and risk management in modern multiple sclerosis immunotherapeutic treatment

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) owing to the approval of a number of new drugs with very distinct mechanisms of action. All approved disease-modifying drugs primarily work directly on the immune system. However, the identification of an ‘optimal choice’ for individual patients with regard to treatment efficacy, treatment adherence and side-effect profile has become increasingly complex including conceptual as well as practical considerations. Similarly, there are peculiarities and specific requirements with regard to treatment monitoring, especially in relation to immunosuppression, the development of secondary immune-related complications, as well as the existence of drug-specific on- and off-target effects. Both classical immunosuppression and selective immune interventions generate a spectrum of potential therapy-related complications. This article provides a comprehensive overview of available immunotherapeutics for MS and their risks, detailing individual mechanisms of action and side-effect profiles. Furthermore, practical recommendations for patients treated with modern MS immunotherapeutics are provided.

Oral Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis treatment faces tremendous changes owing to the approval of new medications, some of which are available as oral formulations. Until now, the four orally available medications, fingolimod, dimethylfumarate (BG-12), teriflunomide, and cladribine have received market authorization, whereas laquinimod is still under development. Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate inhibitor, which is typically used as escalation therapy and leads to up to 60% reduction of the annualized relapse rate, but might also have neuroprotective properties. In addition, there are three more specific S1P agonists in late stages of development: siponimod, ponesimod, and ozanimod. Dimethylfumarate has immunomodulatory and cytoprotective functions and is used as baseline therapy. Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of the rheumatoid arthritis medication leflunomide, targets the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thus inhibiting the proliferation of lymphocytes by depletion of pyrimidines. Here we will review the mechanisms of action, clinical trial data, as well as data about safety and tolerability of the compounds.

Efficacy and Safety of the Newer Multiple Sclerosis Drugs Approved Since 2010

Multiple sclerosis treatment faces tremendous changes as a result of the approval of new medications. The new medications have differing safety considerations and risks after long-term treatment, which are important for treating physicians to optimize and individualize multiple sclerosis care. Since the approval of the first multiple sclerosis capsule, fingolimod, the armamentarium of multiple sclerosis therapy has grown with the orally available medications dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. Fingolimod is mainly associated with cardiac side effects, dimethyl fumarate with bowel symptoms. Several reports about progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy as a result of dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod therapy raised the awareness of fatal opportunistic infections. Alemtuzumab, a CD52-depleting antibody, is highly effective in reducing relapses but leads to secondary immunity with mainly thyroid disorders in about 30% of patients. Development of secondary B-cell-mediated disease might also be a risk of this antibody. The follow-up drug of the B-cell-depleting antibody rituximab, ocrelizumab, is mainly associated with infusion-related reactions; long-term data are scarce. The medication daclizumab high yield process, acting via the activation of CD56^bright natural killer cells, can induce the elevation of liver function enzymes, but also fulminant liver failure has been reported. Therefore, daclizumab has been retracted from the market. Long-term data on the purine nucleoside cladribine in MS therapy, recently authorized in the European Union, have been acquired during the long-term follow-up of the cladribine studies. The small molecule laquinimod is currently under development. We review data of clinical trials and their extensions regarding long-term efficacy and side effects, which might be associated with long-term treatment.

T cell deficiencies as a common risk factor for drug associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a disease of the central nervous system caused by neuropathogenic prototypes of ubiquitous community-acquired JC virus (JCV). The disease became of particular concern following its association with certain therapies that modulate immune system function without heavy immunosuppression. Due to lack of prophylactic/treatment options and poor outcomes, which often include severe disability or death, PML is a considerable concern for development of new drugs that interfere with immune system functions. In this review of clinical and research findings, we discuss the evidence that deficiencies in CD4⁺ T helper cells, cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells, and interferon gamma are of crucial importance for development of PML under a variety of circumstances, including those associated with use of various drugs, regardless of differences in their mechanisms of action. These deficiencies apparently enable transformation of the harmless JCV archetype into neuropathogenic prototypes, but the site(s), and the mechanisms, of this transformation are yet to be elucidated. Here we discuss the evidence for brain as one of the sites of this transformation, and propose a model of PML pathogenesis that emphasizes the central role of T cell deficiencies in the two life cycles of the JCV, one non-pathogenic and one neuropathogenic. Finally, we conclude that the development of clinical grade T cell functional tests and more consistent use of already available laboratory tests for T cell subset analysis would greatly aid the effort to more accurately predict and assess the magnitude of PML risk for concerned therapeutic interventions.

Drug-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a clinical, radiological, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis of 326 cases

The implementation of a variety of immunosuppressive therapies has made drug-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) an increasingly prevalent clinical entity. The purpose of this study was to investigate its diagnostic characteristics and to determine whether differences herein exist between the multiple sclerosis (MS), neoplasm, post-transplantation, and autoimmune disease subgroups. Reports of possible, probable, and definite PML according to the current diagnostic criteria were obtained by a systematic search of PubMed and the Dutch pharmacovigilance database. Demographic, epidemiologic, clinical, radiological, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and histopathological features were extracted from each report and differences were compared between the disease categories. In the 326 identified reports, PML onset occurred on average 29.5 months after drug introduction, varying from 14.2 to 37.8 months in the neoplasm and MS subgroups, respectively. The most common overall symptoms were motor weakness (48.6 %), cognitive deficits (43.2 %), dysarthria (26.3 %), and ataxia (24.1 %). The former two also constituted the most prevalent manifestations in each subgroup. Lesions were more often localized supratentorially (87.7 %) than infratentorially (27.4 %), especially in the frontal (64.1 %) and parietal lobes (46.6 %), and revealed enhancement in 27.6 % of cases, particularly in the MS (42.9 %) subgroup. Positive JC virus results in the first CSF sample were obtained in 63.5 %, while conversion after one or more negative outcomes occurred in 13.7 % of cases. 52.2 % of patients died, ranging from 12.0 to 83.3 % in the MS and neoplasm subgroups, respectively. In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous nature of the underlying diseases, motor weakness and cognitive changes were the two most common manifestations of drug-associated PML in all subgroups. The frontal and parietal lobes invariably constituted the predilection sites of drug-related PML lesions.