Myeloid malignancy presenting with a platelet storage pool disorder

[Impact of splenomegaly on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia]

目的

探讨脾肿大对慢性粒-单核细胞白血病（CMML）异基因造血干细胞移植（allo-HSCT）预后的影响。

方法

对2004年至2018年在北京大学血液病研究所接受allo-HSCT后的25例CMML患者进行回顾性分析，根据预处理前2周是否伴有脾脏肿大分为脾肿大组和非脾肿大组，比较两组患者在植入、移植物抗宿主病（GVHD）、复发以及生存方面的差异。

结果

①脾肿大组15例（男8例，女7例），中位年龄45（23~61）岁；非脾肿大组10例（男、女各5例），中位年龄39（12~56）岁。两组患者基线特征差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。②脾肿大组、非脾肿大组粒细胞植入率分别为93.3%（14/15）、100.0%（10/10），中位植入时间分别为17（11~20）d、14（11~18）d（χ²=5.303，P=0.021）；脾肿大组、非脾肿大组血小板植入率分别为80.0%（12/15）、90.0%（9/10）（P=0.212），中位植入时间分别为17（12~33）d、15（12~19）d（χ²=0.470，P=0.493）。③脾肿大组5例发生急性GVHD（Ⅰ/Ⅱ度4例，Ⅲ/Ⅳ度1例），非脾肿大组6例发生急性GVHD（Ⅰ/Ⅱ度5例，Ⅲ/Ⅳ度1例）（χ²=0.204，P=0.652）。脾肿大组、非脾肿大组移植后100 d的急性GVHD累积发生率分别为33.3%（95%CI 14.9%~51.7%）、20.0%（95%CI 2.8%~37.2%）（P=0.635）。脾肿大组5例发生慢性GVHD（广泛型3例），非脾肿大组未发生慢性GVHD（P=0.041）。④脾肿大组、非脾肿大组3年累积复发率分别为（42.7±2.6）%、（11.1±1.2）%（χ²=1.824，P=0.122），3年总生存率分别为（61.5±13.5）%、（68.6±15.1）%（χ²=0.351，P=0.554），3年无白血病生存率分别为（56.3±14.8）%、（80.0±17.9）%（χ²=1.148，P=0.284）。

结论

脾肿大可致CMML患者allo-HSCT后粒细胞植入延迟，对生存及复发无影响。

Splenectomy in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Indications, histopathological findings and clinical outcomes in a single institutional series of thirty-nine patients

In a 28-year period, 39 (7%) patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) (median age 66 years, 64% male) underwent a splenectomy at our institution. Primary indications for splenectomy were refractory thrombocytopenia (36%), progressive spleen related symptoms (33%), emergent splenectomy for splenic rupture (21%), refractory anemia (8%), and prior to allogeneic stem cell transplant (3%). Eleven (28%) patients had anemia at the time of splenectomy, of which 3 (27%) were autoimmune. The median time to splenectomy from CMML diagnosis was 6 months (0-40); perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 13%, while the median postsplenectomy survival was 25 months (11-38). Durable remission in spleen related symptoms, thrombocytopenia, complications from splenic rupture, and anemia were achieved in 85%, 50%, 62%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Perioperative morbidity (n = 30) included infections/sepsis in 6 (20%), intraabdominal bleeding in 4 (13%), venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 3 (10%), and acute lung injury in 2 (7%) patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days (1-25), with 5 deaths occurring secondary to respiratory failure (n = 2), multiorgan dysfunction (n = 2) and hemorrhagic shock (n = 1). There was no difference in overall survival between CMML patients that underwent splenectomy, in comparison to those that did not. Unlike in myelofibrosis, portal hypertension was not an indication for splenectomy and no patients developed post-splenectomy thrombocytosis. In conclusion, apart from being a lifesaving emergent modality in the event of splenic rupture, splenectomy has an important palliative role in patients with CMML, with significant and durable improvements in spleen related symptoms and refractory cytopenias.