Indolent mantle cell lymphoma

High Counts of CD68+ and CD163+ Macrophages in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Associated With Inferior Prognosis

Background

Lymphoma-associated macrophages (LAMs) are key components in the lymphoma microenvironment, which may impact disease progression and response to therapy. There are two major subtypes of LAMs, CD68+ M1 and CD163+ M2. M2 LAMs can be transformed from M1 LAMs, particularly in certain diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). While mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is well-known to contain frequent epithelioid macrophages, LAM characterization within MCL has not been fully described. Herein we evaluate the immunophenotypic subclassification, the expression of immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1, and the prognostic impact of LAMs in MCL.

Materials and Methods

A total of 82 MCL cases were collected and a tissue microarray block was constructed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using CD68 and CD163, and the positive cells were recorded manually in four representative 400× fields for each case. Multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence assays were carried out to determine PD-L1 expression on CD68+ M1 LAMs and CD163+ M2 LAMs. In addition, we assessed Ki67 proliferation rate of MCL by an automated method using the QuPath digital imaging analysis. The cut-off points of optimal separation of overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the X-Tile software, the SPSS version 26 was used to construct survival curves, and the log-rank test was performed to calculate the p-values.

Results

MCL had a much higher count of M1 LAMs than M2 LAMs with a CD68:CD163 ratio of 3:1. Both M1 and M2 LAMs were increased in MCL cases with high Ki67 proliferation rates (>30%), in contrast to those with low Ki67 (<30%). Increased number of M1 or M2 LAMs in MCL was associated with an inferior OS. Moreover, high expression of PD-L1 on M1 LAMs had a slightly better OS than the cases with low PD-L1 expression, whereas low expression of PD-L1 on M2 LAMs had a slightly improved OS, although both were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

In contrast to DLBCL, MCL had a significantly lower rate of M1 to M2 polarization, and the high levels of M1 and M2 LAMs were associated with poor OS. Furthermore, differential PD-L1 expressions on LAMs may partially explain the different functions of tumor-suppressing or tumor-promoting of M1 and M2 LAMs, respectively.

Progress in molecular feature of smoldering mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered one of the most aggressive lymphoid tumors. However, it sometimes displays indolent behavior in patients and might not necessitate treatment at diagnosis; this has been described as "smoldering MCL" (SMCL). There are significant differences in the diagnosis, prognosis, molecular mechanisms and treatments of indolent MCL and classical MCL. In this review, we discuss the progress in understanding the molecular mechanism of indolent MCL to provide insights into the genomic nature of this entity. Reported findings of molecular features of indolent MCL include a low Ki-67 index, CD200 positivity, a low frequency of mutations in TP53, a lack of SOX11, normal arrangement and expression of MYC, IGHV mutations, differences from classical MCL by L-MCL16 assays and MCL35 assays, an unmutated P16 status, few defects in ATM, no NOTCH1/2 mutation, Amp 11q gene mutation, no chr9 deletion, microRNA upregulation/downregulation, and low expression of several genes that have been valued in recent years (SPEN, SMARCA4, RANBP2, KMT2C, NSD2, CARD11, FBXW7, BIRC3, KMT2D, CELSR3, TRAF2, MAP3K14, HNRNPH1, Del 9p and/or Del 9q, SP140 and PCDH10). Based on the above molecular characteristics, we may distinguish indolent MCL from classical MCL. If so, indolent MCL will not be overtreated, whereas the treatment of classical MCL will not be delayed.

Intensive induction regimens after deferring initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma are not associated with improved survival

INTRODUCTION

While most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent-behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy.

METHODS

Out of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non-intensive (n = 131).

RESULTS

There was no difference in progression-free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non-intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.

Extremely Rare Primary Spinal Epidural Indolent Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report With Literature Review

Lymphomas are malignant tumors arising from lymphoid tissues and can spread to other organs. Primary extra-nodal locations such as the spinal epidural space are less common. Primary spinal epidural lymphoma (PSEL), which can be either Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s type, is rare. There are different cell types of Non-Hodgkin’s PSEL, among which mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is extremely rare. MCL can have an aggressive or indolent course. Indolent MCL in the epidural space is not yet reported. We report a case of 20-year-old male who presented with radiating low back pain for six weeks followed by a progressive neurological deficit in both lower limbs for nine days. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed spinal epidural tumor extending from L2 to L3. Decompression and subtotal excision biopsy were performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry identified indolent MCL. His neurological status improved to normal postoperatively, and he was referred to an oncologist. He is under observation and planned for radiotherapy. At one-year follow-up, he is asymptomatic and doing his regular job abroad.

An update on options of therapy for aggressive mantle cell lymphoma

With the emerging application of novel targeted agents in the induction, maintenance and salvage strategies, management of aggressive mantle cell lymphoma is being transformed from high-intensity chemo-immunotherapy applicable to only selected patients, to more personalized treatment incorporating novel agents that are effective and accessible for the majority of the patients. This review summarizes risk-stratified management paradigm for aggressive mantle cell lymphoma, providing context for clinical applications of novel agents and cellular therapy including stem cell transplant and CAR-T.

CD5-negative Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Clinicopathologic Correlations and Outcome in 58 Patients

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents 4% to 9% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas and is characterized by CD5 and cyclin D1 expression and t(11;14)(q13;q32). However, about 5% of MCL lack CD5 expression and is poorly characterized. Here, we present 58 patients with CD5 negative (CD5) MCL and compared them with a group of 212 typical CD5 positive (CD5) MCL cases. There were 39 men and 19 women with a median age of 66 years (range, 36 to 88). Compared with CD5 positive (CD5) MCL patients, patients with CD5 MCL showed a lower male-to-female ratio (P=0.006) and a higher frequency of "bone marrow non-nodal" presentation (P=0.01). All other clinicopathologic features, including the frequency of SOX11 expression, were similar between the 2 groups. Treated with similar regimens, patients with CD5 MCL showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.01) and a tendency for longer overall survival (OS; P=0.078) than CD5 positive (CD5) MCL patients. Univariate analysis showed of the well-known poor prognostic factors, only Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index was an inferior prognostic factor and blastoid/pleomorphic morphology and high Ki67 were not associated with prognosis in CD5 MCL patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed CD5 expression was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.031) but not OS in MCL patients. In conclusion, the results suggest that patients with CD5 MCL have a more favorable prognosis than CD5 MCL patients, although the clinicopathologic features of both groups are largely similar. CD5 MCL may represent a distinct variant of MCL and needs to be included in the differential diagnosis of CD5 small B-cell lymphomas.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma With Mantle Zone Growth Pattern

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the clinical and pathologic features of mantle cell lymphoma with mantle zone growth pattern (MCL-MZGP).

METHODS

The clinicopathologic data from 35 cases of MCL-MZGP obtained in 12 centers were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients with MCL-MZGP typically sought treatment at high clinical stages (81%). Intriguingly, 40% (14/35) of cases were incidentally noted. The lymph nodes with MCL-MZGP showed preserved architecture and expanded mantles containing lymphoma cells with classic or small cell cytology. MCL-MZGP was positive for BCL2 (96%, bright), CD5 (82%, moderate), cyclin D1 (100%), and SOX11 (89%). Clinically, our study revealed no significant difference in the overall survival between patients managed with observation alone and those who received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MCL-MZGP was often incidentally identified and resembled reactive mantles. Therefore, recognition of this unusual morphology emphasizes the utility of cyclin D1 immunostain in the cases with suspicious morphology. However, the clinical significance of these findings is still unclear.

CD23 expression in mantle cell lymphoma is associated with CD200 expression, leukemic non-nodal form, and a better prognosis

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is usually CD23 negative, a feature helpful in distinguishing MCL from chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. However, a subset of MCL cases can be CD23+. Limited data are available regarding the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with CD23+ MCL. In this study, we reviewed 798 cases of MCL and identified 103 (13%) that were CD23+ by flow cytometry, all of which were positive for cyclin D1 and/or associated with CCND1/IGH. In all cases of CD23+ MCL, CD23 expression was dim partial or dim, unlike moderate to bright CD23 expression observed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. The clinicopathological features and outcome of patients with CD23+ MCL were compared with 240 patients with typical MCL negative for CD23. Patients with CD23+ MCL more often had an elevated leukocyte count (33% versus 18%, P = .009), bone marrow involvement (89% versus 78%, P = .02), stage 4 disease (87% versus 77%, P = .03), and a leukemic presentation (42% versus 11%, P = .0001). CD23+ MCL was also more often positive for CD200 (17% versus. 4.6%, P = .0005) and less commonly positive for SOX11 (55% versus. 74%, P = .027). All other clinicopathological features were similar. With similar treatment regimens and observation times, patients with CD23+ MCL had a significant better overall survival (P = .02) and progression-free survival (P = .029). In conclusion, CD23 expression was observed in 13% of MCL cases and is associated with a better prognosis in patients with MCL. CD23 is associated with leukocytosis, a leukemic presentation, bone marrow involvement, CD200 expression, and a lower frequency of SOX11 positivity.

Understanding the New WHO Classification of Lymphoid Malignancies: Why It's Important and How It Will Affect Practice

Improved delineation of lymphoid malignancy biology has prompted refinement of the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid tumors with a new framework introduced in 2016. This knowledge has provided valuable insights regarding management. Early clonal proliferations have been set apart given their limited potential for malignant dissemination. Increasing knowledge of molecular drivers of aggressive lymphomas has allowed subclassification and opportunity for clinical investigations to personalize therapy. New insights into T-cell pathophysiology has allowed grouping based on shared molecular and cellular features. This article will summarize the key changes in terms of diagnosis and histopathologic definitions, the impact of these changes on clinical management, and the challenges of future research in this field.

Optimizing therapy for mantle cell lymphoma

Most people with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) present with diffuse adenopathy and benefit from early initiation of rituximab and high-dose cytarabine- or bendamustine-based therapies. Some patients, however, present with primarily nonnodal disease that can follow either an indolent or a rapidly progressive, treatment-resistant clinical course. Rarely, patients present with explosive disease that can be challenging to manage and often involves the central nervous system. New agents with improved therapeutic indices facilitate treatment while maintaining quality of life, but also present new complications at the time of treatment failure. Although uncommon presentations are not new to clinicians who treat MCL, the increasing clarity of underlying biology and prognostic implications may help us develop more specialized treatment strategies.

Long-Term Results of High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Effectiveness of Maintenance Rituximab

High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve outcomes for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) but is associated with a high incidence of relapse. A retrospective study of 191 MCL patients who underwent ASCT at City of Hope was performed to examine prognostic factors for outcomes after ASCT. For all patients the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63% to 77%) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 53% (95% CI, 45% to 60%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) with a continuous pattern of relapse events occurring at a median of 2.1 years (range, .2 to 13.4) after ASCT. In multivariate analysis, post-transplant maintenance rituximab was the factor most significantly associated with both OS (relative risk [RR], .17; 95% CI, .07 to .38) and PFS (RR, .25; 95% CI, .14 to .44). For the subset of patients who had positron emission tomography (PET) data available and were in a PET-negative first complete remission at ASCT (n = 105), maintenance rituximab was significantly associated with superior OS (RR, .17; 95% CI, .05 to .59) and PFS (RR, .20; 95% CI, .09 to .43). These results support a benefit with maintenance rituximab for all MCL patients treated with ASCT.

Understanding the New WHO Classification of Lymphoid Malignancies: Why It's Important and How It Will Affect Practice

Improved delineation of lymphoid malignancy biology has prompted refinement of the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid tumors with a new framework introduced in 2016. This knowledge has provided valuable insights regarding management. Early clonal proliferations have been set apart given their limited potential for malignant dissemination. Increasing knowledge of molecular drivers of aggressive lymphomas has allowed subclassification and opportunity for clinical investigations to personalize therapy. New insights into T-cell pathophysiology has allowed grouping based on shared molecular and cellular features. This article will summarize the key changes in terms of diagnosis and histopathologic definitions, the impact of these changes on clinical management, and the challenges of future research in this field.

Recommendations for Clinical Trial Development in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comprises around 6% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses. In younger patients, age less than 60 to 65 years, aggressive induction often followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant has suggested improved outcomes in this population. Less intensive therapies in older patients often followed by maintenance have been studied or are under active investigation. However, despite recent advances, MCL remains incurable, with a median overall survival of around five years. Patients with high-risk disease have particularly poor outcomes. Treatment varies widely across institutions, and to date no randomized trials comparing intensive vs less intensive approaches have been reported. Although recent data have highlighted the heterogeneity of MCL outcomes, patient assessment for treatment selection has largely been driven by patient age with little regard to fitness, disease biology, or disease risk. One critical advance is the finding that minimal residual disease status (MRD) after induction correlates with long-term outcomes. As such, its use as a potential end point could inform clinical trial design. In order to more rapidly improve the outcomes of MCL patients, clinical trials are needed that prospectively stratify patients on the basis of MCL biology and disease risk, incorporate novel agents, and use MRD to guide the need for additional therapy.

Leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphomas have a distinct phenotype and are associated with deletion of PARP1 and 13q14

Leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma (lMCL) is a particular subtype of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), characterized by leukemic non-nodal disease and slow progression. Recognition of this entity is relevant to avoid overtreatment. Despite indolent clinical behaviour, lMCL might transform to a more aggressive disease. The purpose of this study was to compare lMCL with classical MCL (cMCL) and aggressive MCL (aMCL) using immunohistochemistry, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and array-based comparative genomic hybridization, in order to identify biomarkers for lMCL diagnosis and prognosis. Seven lMCL patients were included. All had bone marrow involvement without lymphadenopathy. An lMCL phenotype was distinct from that of cMCL and aMCL: SOX11-, ATM+, PARP1+/-, and low KI67 (average 2 %). Beyond the t(11;14) translocation, fewer secondary cytogenetic alterations were found in lMCL compared to cMCL and aMCL, including deletion of PARP1 and 13q14. At last follow-up, one patient with lMCL had died of disease and another had progressive disease. These patients were respectively 13q14 deletion- and PARP1-positive. One other case of lMCL harbored a 13q14 deletion associated with PARP1 deletion. This patient had indolent disease. lMCL has a particular phenotype and fewer secondary cytogenetic alterations than cMCL and aMCL. PARP1 protein expression and 13q14 deletion are associated with a progressive clinical course of lMCL and should be included in initial diagnostic studies as predictors of unfavorable outcome. PARP1 deletion is involved in lMCL pathogenesis and might confer advantage.

[Features and Outcomes of Reinstated "Return-to-Work (Re-work)" Program Participants]

Though effects of the return-to-work (re-work) program on reinstatement started being reported, factors related to the outcomes are unclear. As a case series, we discuss the outcomes of reinstatement and the characteristics of large-scale assembly-factory workers (our case) who had attended a medical institution's re-work program. On examining the five successful reinstatement cases and five failed cases, motivation for reinstatement, understanding program requirements, adaptability, and personality traits were found to contribute to these outcomes. We also discussed two failed cases wherein young employees retired after the re-work program. They felt to be disconnected from their work and finally retired.