Prognostic index for relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplant

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Relapse is a significant barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) success. To explore the prognosis of patients who underwent relapse after allo-HSCT, we retrospectively examined 740 consecutive acute leukemia patients in our single center transplanted between January 2013 and December 2018, of which 178 relapsed. The median survival was 204 days (95%CI, 160.7-247.3) from relapse, and the 3-year post-relapse overall survival (prOS) rate was 17.8% (95%CI, 12.5-25.3%). Overall complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was achieved in 32.1% for the acute myeloid leukemia and 45.3% for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients after salvage therapy, respectively. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after transplantation and >20% bone marrow blasts at relapse were associated with worse prOS, while patients with chronic GVHD after transplantation, relapse later than 1 year after transplantation, and solitary extramedullary disease had better prOS. Therefore, we developed a concise risk scoring system for prOS based on the number of risk factors affecting prOS. This scoring system was validated with another cohort of post-transplant relapsed acute leukemia patients who received allo-HSCT between 2019 and 2020. Identifying relapse risk factors and providing personalized care for patients with poor prognoses is crucial for improving survival.

Outcomes of pediatric patients who relapse after first HCT for acute leukemia or MDS

Disease relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) for high-risk acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Comprehensive data on outcomes after post-transplant relapse are lacking, especially in pediatric patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of various transplant-, patient-, and disease-related variables on survival and outcomes in patients who relapse after alloHCT. We describe our institutional experience with 221 pediatric patients who experienced disease relapse after their first alloHCT for acute leukemias or MDS between 1990 and 2018. In a multivariable model, being in first complete remission at first alloHCT, longer duration of remission after alloHCT, experiencing GVHD and receiving a transplant in a more recent time period were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a second alloHCT after post-transplant relapse. Of these variables, only longer interval from alloHCT to relapse, receiving a second alloHCT or DLI, and receiving a transplant in a more recent time period were associated with improved overall survival. Our data support pursuing second alloHCT for patients who have experienced relapse after their first transplant, as that remains the only salvage modality with a reasonable chance of inducing long-term remission.

Prognosis and risk factors for central nervous system relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

We performed a nested case-control study to investigate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and compared the outcomes of patients with CNS relapse following haploidentical donor (HID) HSCT versus identical sibling donor (ISD) HSCT. A total of 37 patients (HID-HSCT, 24; ISD-HSCT, 13) developed CNS relapse after transplantation between January 2009 and January 2019, with an incidence of 1.81%. The median time from transplantation to CNS relapse was 239 days. Pre-HSCT CNS involvement (HR 6.940, 95% CI 3.146-15.306, p < .001) was an independent risk factor for CNS relapse after allo-HSCT for AML. The 3-year overall survival (OS) for patients with CNS relapse was 60.3 ± 8.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the controls (81.5 ± 4.5%, p = .003). The incidence of CNS relapse was 1.64% for patients who received HID-HSCT and 2.55% for those who received ISD-HSCT (p = .193). There was no significant difference in OS between the HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT subgroups among the patients with CNS relapse. In conclusion, CNS relapse is a rare but serious complication after allo-HSCT for AML, and the incidence and outcomes of patients with CNS relapse are comparable following HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT.

Comparable post-relapse outcomes between haploidentical and matched related donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We investigated the impact of donor type on post-relapse survival (PRS) in 85 patients with hematological relapse after their first allogeneic hematological stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for hematological malignancy. The median follow-up was 64 months among survivors. Both 3-year overall survival and 3-year PRS were similar in haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MRD) transplantation (13.0%±4.7% vs 19.4%±7.1%, P=0.913 and 7.7±3.9% vs 9.7±5.3%, P= 0.667). Higher rates of post-relapse grade II-IV and III-IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) were observed in HID transplantation patients. A higher cumulative incidence of post-relapse extensive chronic GvHD was also observed for HID transplantation patients. Multivariate analyses confirmed that treatment including donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), late relapse >1 year, and in first CR at transplantation were associated with superior PRS (P=0.012, hazard ratio (HR)=0.527 (0.320-0.866)); P=0.033, HR=0.534 (0.300-0.952) and P=0.046, HR=0.630 (0.400-0.992). The data suggest that post-relapse outcomes are comparable in HID and MRD transplantation, and that DLI is safe for relapsed patients after haploidentical transplantation.

Prophylaxis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains a major cause of death in patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Several factors may affect the concurrence and outcome of relapse, which include graft-versus-host disease, minimal residual disease or intrinsic factors of the disease, and transplantation characteristics. The mainstay of relapse prevention and treatment is donor leukocyte infusions, targeted therapies, second transplantation, and other novel therapies. In this review, we mainly focus on addressing the impact of graft-versus-host disease on relapse and the prophylaxis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We also make recommendations for critical strategies to prevent relapse after transplantation and challenges that must be addressed to ensure success.

Treatment strategies in patients with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome relapsed after Allo-SCT

Non-relapse mortality after Allo-SCT has significantly decreased over the last years. Nevertheless, relapse remains a major cause for post SCT mortality in patients with AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In this retrospective single-center analysis, we have analyzed the treatment outcomes of 108 patients with AML or MDS, who relapsed after Allo-SCT. Seventy of these patients (65%) were treated with salvage therapies containing chemotherapy alone, allogeneic cell-based treatment or the combination of both. Thirty-eight patients (35%) received palliative treatment. Median OS after diagnosis of relapse was 130 days. Compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone, response to salvage therapy was significantly improved in patients treated with a combination of chemo- and allogeneic cell-based therapy (CR rate 57% vs 13%, P=0.002). Among risk factors concerning pretreatment characteristics, disease status before first Allo-SCT, and details of transplantation, only the time interval from Allo-SCT to relapse was an independent predictor of response to salvage therapy and OS. These data confirmed that time to relapse after transplantation is an important prognostic factor. Up to now, only patients eligible for treatment regimens containing allogeneic cell-based interventions achieved relevant response rates.