Combining MYC, BCL2 and TP53 gene and protein expression alterations improves risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts poor outcome in high-risk aggressive large B-cell lymphoma

Low lymphocyte-to-monocyte-ratio (LMR) has been associated with unfavorable survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To date, however, the impact of LMR on survival has not been examined in a uniformly treated cohort of patients with high-risk aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. We collected peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and absolute monocyte counts (AMC) prior to treatment and calculated LMR from 112 adult patients, who were less than 65 years of age, had age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 2-3, or site-specific risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) recurrence, and were treated in a Nordic Lymphoma Group LBC-05 trial with dose-dense immunochemotherapy and early systemic CNS prophylaxis (www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01325194). Median pretreatment ALC was 1.40 × 109/l (range, 0.20-4.95), AMC 0.68 × 109/l (range, 0.10-2.62), and LMR 2.08 (range, 0.10-12.00). ALC did not correlate with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, AMC did not correlate with tumor-associated macrophages, and neither ALC nor AMC correlated with survival. However, low LMR (<1.72) translated to unfavourable progression-free survival (PFS) (5-year PFS 70% vs. 92%, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (5-year OS, 77% vs. 92%, p = 0.020). In the patients with low LMR, relative risk of progression was 4.4-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-12.14, p = 0.004), and relative risk of death was 3.3-fold (95% CI 1.18-9.50, p = 0.024) in comparison to the patients with high LMR. We conclude that low LMR is an adverse prognostic factor in uniformly treated young patients with high-risk aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.

[Research of prognostic immunophenotypes in 163 patients of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]

Objective: To screen and analyze the prognostic protein biomarkers of DLBCL, and to explore their value in the prognostic evaluation. Methods: 163 cases of confirmed DLBCLs from January 2011 to December 2016 were collected with their clinical, pathological and follow-up data, which were all from our hospital. The expression of protein markers were tested using immunohistochemical staining (IHC) . The immune phenotypes independent of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) that affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of DLBCL were explored by COX regression model, and the effect of their co-expression on the prognosis were also analyzed. Result: BCL6 negative (PFS: HR=1.652, 95%CI 1.030-2.649, P=0.037) , P53 positive (OS: HR=1.842, 95%CI 1.008-3.367, P=0.047) , and BCL2 strong positive expressions (S+) (OS: HR=2.102, 95%CI 1.249-3.537, P=0.005; PFS: HR=2.126, 95%CI 1.312-3.443, P=0.002) are adverse prognostic factors of DLBCL that are independent of IPI. BCL6(-) (PFS: HR=2.042, 95%CI 1.021-4.081, P=0.043) , P53(+) (OS: HR=3.069, 95%CI 1.244-7.569, P=0.015) and BCL2(S+) (OS: HR=2.433, 95%CI 1.165-5.082, P=0.018; PFS: HR=3.209, 95%CI 1.606-6.410, P=0.001) are adverse prognostic factors in the group of age≤60-year-old; in the group of IPI score 0-2, cases with BCL6(-) (OS: HR=2.467, 95%CI 1.322-4.604, P=0.005; PFS: HR=2.248, 95%CI 1.275-3.965, P=0.005) and BCL2(S+) (PFS: HR=2.045, 95%CI 1.119-3.735, P=0.020) have worse prognosis. The co-expression of BCL6(-) and BCL2(S+) has significant influence on prognosis of DLBCL (P=0.005 and P<0.001) , in which BCL6(+)/non-BCL2(S+) (n=86) has the best prognosis[3-year-OS (71.6±4.9) %, 3-year-PFS (67.0±5.1) %], and BCL6(-)/BCL2(S+) (n=10) has the worst prognosis[3-year-OS (20.0±12.6) %, 3-year-PFS (10.0±9.5) %]; the co-expression of BCL6(-) and P53(+) has no significant influence on prognosis (P=0.061 and P=0.089) , however, those cases with BCL6(+)/P53(-) (n=98) often get better prognosis[3-year-OS (70.6±4.7) %, 3-year-PFS (64.6±4.9) %] than others; the co-expression of P53(+) and BCL2(S+) has significant influence on prognosis of DLBCL (P<0.001 and P<0.001) , and P53(+)/BCL2(S+) (n=5) has the worst prognosis (3-year-OS and 3-year-PFS are both 0) ; BCL2(S+) cases get shorter OS and PFS, regardless of the expression of BCL6 and P53. Conclusion: The expression and co-expression of BCL6 negative, P53 positive and BCL2(S+) have certain value in the prognostic evaluation of DLBCL, especially in the group of age≤60-year-old and IPI score 0-2.

Patients with high-risk DLBCL benefit from dose-dense immunochemotherapy combined with early systemic CNS prophylaxis

Survival of patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is relatively high. We conducted a phase 2 trial in 139 patients aged 18 to 64 years who had primary DLBCL with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 to 3 or site-specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. The goal was to assess whether a dose-dense immunochemotherapy with early systemic CNS prophylaxis improves the outcome and reduces the incidence of CNS events. Treatment consisted of 2 courses of high-dose methotrexate in combination with biweekly rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP-14), followed by 4 courses of R-CHOP-14 with etoposide (R-CHOEP) and 1 course of high-dose cytarabine with R. In addition, liposomal cytarabine was administered intrathecally at courses 1, 3, and 5. Coprimary endpoints were failure-free survival and CNS progression rates. Thirty-six (26%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression occurred in 23 (16%) patients, including three (2.2%) CNS events. At 5 years of median follow-up, failure-free survival, overall survival, and CNS progression rates were 74%, 83%, and 2.3%, respectively. Treatment reduced the risk of progression compared with our previous trial, in which systemic CNS prophylaxis was given after 6 courses of biweekly R-CHOEP (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = .002) and overcame the adverse impact of an aaIPI score of 3 on survival. In addition, outcome of the patients with BCL2/MYC double-hit lymphomas was comparable to the patients without the rearrangements. The results are encouraging, with a low toxic death rate, low number of CNS events, and favorable survival rates. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01325194.

Karonudib has potent anti-tumor effects in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma

Chemo-immunotherapy has improved survival in B-cell lymphoma patients, but refractory/relapsed diseases still represent a major challenge, urging for development of new therapeutics. Karonudib (TH1579) was developed to inhibit MTH1, an enzyme preventing oxidized dNTP-incorporation in DNA. MTH1 is highly upregulated in tumor biopsies from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma, hence confirming a rationale for targeting MTH1. Here, we tested the efficacy of karonudib in vitro and in preclinical B-cell lymphoma models. Using a range of B-cell lymphoma cell lines, karonudib strongly reduced viability at concentrations well tolerated by activated normal B cells. In B-cell lymphoma cells, karonudib increased incorporation of 8-oxo-dGTP into DNA, and prominently induced prometaphase arrest and apoptosis due to failure in spindle assembly. MTH1 knockout cell lines were less sensitive to karonudib-induced apoptosis, but were displaying cell cycle arrest phenotype similar to the wild type cells, indicating a dual inhibitory role of the drug. Karonudib was highly potent as single agent in two different lymphoma xenograft models, including an ABC DLBCL patient derived xenograft, leading to prolonged survival and fully controlled tumor growth. Together, our preclinical findings provide a rationale for further clinical testing of karonudib in B-cell lymphoma.

Cross-talk between Myc and p53 in B-cell lymphomas

Myc and p53 proteins are closely associated with many physiological cellular functions, including immune response and lymphocyte survival, and are expressed in the lymphoid organs, which are sites for the development and activation of B-cell malignancies. Genetic alterations and other mechanisms resulting in constitutive activation, rearrangement, or mutation of MYC and TP53 contribute to the development of lymphomas, progression and therapy resistance by gene dysregulation, activation of downstream anti-apoptotic pathways, and unfavorable microenvironment interactions. The cross-talk between the Myc and p53 proteins contributes to the inferior prognosis in many types of B-cell lymphomas. In this review, we present the physiological roles of Myc and p53 proteins, and recent advances in understanding the pathological roles of Myc, p53, and their cross-talk in lymphoid neoplasms. In addition, we highlight clinical trials of novel agents that directly or indirectly inhibit Myc and/or p53 protein functions and their signaling pathways. Although, to date, these trials have failed to overcome drug resistance, the new results have highlighted the clinical efficiency of targeting diverse mechanisms of action with the goal of optimizing novel therapeutic opportunities to eradicate lymphoma cells.

MYC-driven malignant transformation of mature murine B cells requires inhibition of both intrinsic apoptosis and p53 activity

Increased expression of the oncogene MYC is a common feature of many B-cell malignancies, however MYC overexpression by itself is not sufficient for transformation, and additional genetic events are required, although the exact nature of these remains unknown. In patients and in transgenic mouse models, oncogenic transformation may occur in B cells at various differentiation stages interacting with complex microenvironments. B-cell oncogenesis often occurs after prolonged periods of time, making it difficult to accurately identify the genetic events required for transformation. An in vitro system, where malignant transformation of primary B cells could be analyzed, would facilitate the identification of genetic events required for transformation. Here, we describe such a system and show that primary murine B cells rapidly become transformed upon forced expression of MYC, in conjunction with simultaneous inhibition of the ARF/p53 axis via overexpression of BMI1, as well as through downregulation of p19^ARF or expression of a dominant-negative p53 and suppression of intrinsic apoptosis through overexpression of BCLXL or MCL1. Established tumor cells remained addicted to expression of the lymphoma-inducing genes. In mice, transformed cells rapidly established fatal B-cell lymphomas. Our results suggest that transformation of normal mature B cells into lymphomas can occur as a consequence of three defined events.

Mutation of TP53, translocation analysis and immunohistochemical expression of MYC, BCL-2 and BCL-6 in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive lymphoma with diverse outcomes. Concurrent translocation of MYC and BCL-2 and/or BCL-6, and concurrent immunohistochemical (IHC) high expression of MYC and BCL-2, have been linked to unfavorable treatment responses. TP53-mutated DLBCL has also been linked to worse outcome. Our aim was to evaluate the aforementioned issues in a cohort of 155 patients uniformly treated with R-CHOP-like therapies. We performed direct sequencing of TP53 exons 5, 6, 7 and 8 as well as fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) of MYC, BCL-2 and BCL-6, and IHC of MYC, BCL-2 and BCL-6. In multivariate analysis, TP53 mutations in L3 and loop-sheet helix (LSH) associated with a risk ratio (RR) of disease-specific survival (DSS) of 8.779 (p = 0.022) and a RR of disease-free survival (DFS) of 10.498 (p = 0.011). In IHC analysis BCL-2 overexpression was associated with inferior DFS (p = 0.002) and DSS (p = 0.002). DLBCL with BCL-2 and MYC overexpression conferred inferior survival in all patients (DSS, p = 0.038 and DFS, p = 0.011) and in patients with non-GC phenotype (DSS (p = 0.013) and DFS (p = 0.010). Our results imply that in DLBCL, the location of TP53 mutations and IHC analysis of BCL-2 and MYC might have a role in the assessment of prognosis.

TP53 and OSBPL10 alterations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: prognostic markers identified via exome analysis of cases with extreme prognosis

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype characterized by both biological and clinical heterogeneity. In refractory cases, complete response/complete response unconfirmed rates in salvage therapy remain low. We performed whole-exome sequencing of DLBCL in a discovery cohort comprising 26 good and nine poor prognosis cases. After candidate genes were identified, prognoses were examined in 85 individuals in the DLBCL validation cohort. In the discovery cohort, five patients in the poor prognosis group harbored both a TP53 mutation and 17p deletion. Sixteen mutations were identified in OSBPL10 in nine patients in the good prognosis group, but none in the poor prognosis group. In the validation cohort, TP53 mutations and TP53 deletions were confirmed to be poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.016) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.023) only when both aberrations co-existed. OSBPL10 mutations were validated as prognostic markers for excellent OS (P = 0.037) and PFS (P = 0.041). Significant differences in OS and PFS were observed when patients were stratified into three groups-OSBPL10 mutation (best prognosis), the coexistence of both TP53 mutation and TP53 deletion (poorest prognosis), and others. In this study, the presence of both TP53 mutation and 17p/TP53 deletion, but not the individual variants, was associated with poor prognosis in DLBCL patients after treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) or similar regimens. We also identified OSBPL10 mutation as a marker for patients with excellent prognosis in the R-CHOP era.

Prognostication of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the molecular era: moving beyond the IPI

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with variable outcomes. Despite the majority of patients being cured with combination chemoimmunotherapy, up to 30% eventually succumb to the disease. Until recently, baseline prognostic assessment has centred on the International Prognostic Index (IPI), although this index is yet to impact strongly on treatment choice. Molecular features such as cell of origin, MYC and BCL-2 genetic alterations and protein overexpression were identified over a decade ago, yet their prognostic value is still not fully elucidated. Adding complexity are the plethora of new clinical, biological and molecular prognostic markers described in the recent literature, most of which lack independent validation, likely act as surrogate markers for those already in common use and have yet to substantially impact on therapeutic decision making. This review comprehensively assesses the value of individual prognostic markers in the clinical setting and their potential to predict response to novel agents, and ways to optimise their use in future research.

[Prognostic significance of proteins expression by immunohistochemical method in diffuse large B cell lymphoma]

Objective: To analyze the prognostic significance of TP53, Bcl-2, Bcl-6, Myc proteins expression by immunohistochemical method (IHC) in diffuse large B cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) . Methods: Clinical and pathologic data of 223 patients with DLBCL hospitalized in Zhejiang First Hospital from March 2009 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The 223 cases, a median age of 56 years old with a male predominance, had shown a 39.0% of TP53 positive expression, 38.6% of Myc, 69.1% of Bcl-2, 56.5% of Bcl-6, and 22.7% of Myc/Bcl-2 double expression. According to Hans' classification, 27.4% were GCB and 72.6% were non-GCB. With a median follow-up of 38 (2-97) months, the 3 and 5 years survival rates were 70% and 66% , respectively. By multivariate analysis, TP53 over-expression and Myc/Bcl-2 double expression were independently associated with poor outcomes. 3-year and 5-year overall survival were 59% and 57% for patients with TP53 positive, 77% and 71% for patients with TP53 negative expression. Patients with non-GCB subtype receiving chemotherapy combined with rituximab had a higher OS than those without rituximab. But rituximab did not improve the prognosis of patients with TP53 positive. Conclusion: Myc/Bcl-2 double expression and TP53 over-expression are poor prognosis for DLBCL patients. Patients with Myc/Bcl-2 double expression have shorter OS. Patients with non-GCB subtype who received chemotherapy combined with rituximab have a better OS than those without rituximab. But rituximab does not improve the prognosis of patients with TP53 positive.

P53 expression correlates with poorer survival and augments the negative prognostic effect of MYC rearrangement, expression or concurrent MYC/BCL2 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, MYC rearrangement (MYC-R), MYC expression, or concurrent expression of MYC and BCL2 is associated with a poorer prognosis. P53 expression also has been shown to confer inferior survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, but less is known about the role of P53 expression in those with MYC-R, MYC expression (MYC+), or MYC&BCL2 co-expression (MYC+/BCL2+). We studied P53 expression in 201 patients with untreated de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Sixty-seven (33%) cases were P53 positive, 56 (28%) had MYC-R (including 17 MYC/BCL2 double hit lymphoma), 86 (45%) were MYC+/BCL2+, and 47 (24%) were positive for both MYC and P53. Compared with patients with P53 negative lymphoma, the P53 positive group had a poorer overall survival (P=0.004). In patients with lymphoma harboring MYC-R, MYC expression or MYC+/BCL2+, P53 expression was associated with a significantly worse overall survival (P<0.0001, P=0.01, and P=0.035, respectively). Patients with lymphoma showing concurrent P53 expression and MYC-R had a worse prognosis compared with patients with either P53 expression or MYC-R alone (P<0.0001). Similarly, P53 enhanced the negative prognostic effect of MYC expression in DLBCL patients. In addition, among patients with lymphoma with concurrent MYC and P53 expression, MYC and BCL2 or BCL2 & P53 expression, those patients with tumors with MYC and P53 expression had the worst overall survival (P=0.005), regardless of BCL2 expression status. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that both MYC-R and P53 expression were independent prognostic factors in this patient cohort. In conclusion, our data suggest that P53 expression and MYC -R or MYC expression have an additive negative prognostic effect in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Assessment of P53 expression adds additional prognostic information in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, especially in subgroups with MYC-R, MYC expression and MYC and BCL2 double expression.