Report on the 5th International Workshop on Positron Emission Tomography in Lymphoma held in Menton, France, 19–20 September 2014

End-of-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: ΔSUV outperforms Deauville score

In DLBCL, the Deauville scoring system (DS) is the standard for PET/CT response assessment. An alternative system, based on the semi-quantitative change in standardized uptake values, namely ΔSUVmax, has been reported to be more objective than the DS. We aimed to compare ΔSUVmax and DS for risk stratification of DLBCL patients on end-of-treatment (EoT) PET. 108 consecutive patients were included. 2-year EFS Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models were performed. 2-year EFS was significantly different between favorable ΔSUVmax (favΔ < -86.5%) and unfavorable ΔSUVmax (unfavΔ ≥ -86.5%) patients: 100.0% ± 0.0 versus 58.3% ± 14.2 (p = 0.001). On Cox multivariable regression, ΔSUVmax status was the only independent predictor of 2-year EFS, outperforming DS. Therefore, ΔSUVmax should be computed for non-responder patients, especially DS4, as the 2-year EFS is not different between responders and non-responders in the case of favΔ. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this hypothesis.

Current and future best practice in imaging, staging, and response assessment for Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: the Specialist Integrated Haematological Malignancy Imaging Reporting (SIHMIR) paradigm shift

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) encompasses over 40 different haematological malignancies, including low and high-grade neoplasms, such as follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) respectively. A key clinical issue in the context of NHL is delayed and inaccurate diagnosis, which contributes adversely to patient morbidity and mortality. This article will address relevant imaging aspects, with particular reference to advancements in NHL imaging, including computed tomography (CT), integrated positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We provide multiparametric (anato-functional) imaging display items, including histological correlation. We will also introduce our original concept of "Specialist Integrated Haematological Malignancy Imaging Reporting" (SIHMIR), a paradigm shift in lymphoma radiology.

Predictive approaches for post-therapy PET/CT in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic capacity of three methods of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/CT analysis carried out after therapy in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). The three methods of PET/CT analysis included the International Harmonization Project (IHP) criteria, the Deauville five-point scale (5-PS), and standardized uptake value (SUV)-based assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients diagnosed with ENKTL were enrolled. Each patient underwent three F-FDG PET/CT scans: (i) baseline, (ii) after two to four cycles of chemotherapy (early response assessment), and (iii) at the end of treatment (evaluation of the final response). Post-therapy F-FDG PET/CT results were determined on the basis of IHP criteria, 5-PS, and change in the maximum F-FDG uptake (ΔSUVmax). IHP criteria, 5-PS, and ΔSUVmax were then examined for their ability to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 25 months, 5-PS and ΔSUVmax were significant predictors of PFS and OS. After multivariate analysis, 5-PS could predict PFS (P=0.008) and OS (P=0.002) independently. ΔSUVmax was found to be an independent predictor of PFS (P=0.019), but not OS, and had a lower accuracy and positive predictive value than 5-PS.

CONCLUSION

Post-therapy PET/CT analysis using the 5-PS is more able to predict survival than analysis with IHP or [INCREMENT]SUVmax in ENKTL patients.

Assessment of alteration in liver 18F-FDG uptake due to steatosis in lymphoma patients and its impact on the Deauville score

AIM

Our aim was (1) to evaluate the prevalence of steatosis in lymphoma patients and its evolution during treatment; (2) to evaluate the impact of hepatic steatosis on ¹⁸F-FDG liver uptake; and (3) to study how hepatic steatosis affects the Deauville score (DS) for discriminating between responders and non-responders.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, 358 PET scans from 227 patients [122 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 57 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 48 Follicular lymphoma (FL)] referred for baseline (n = 143), interim (n = 79) and end-of-treatment (EoT, n = 136) PET scans were reviewed. Steatosis was diagnosed on the unenhanced CT part of PET/CT examinations using a cut-off value of 42 Hounsfield units (HU). EARL-compliant SUL_max were recorded on the liver and the tumour target lesion. DS were then computed.

RESULTS

Prevalence of steatosis at baseline, interim and EoT PET was 15/143 (10.5%), 6/79 (7.6%) and 16/136 (11.8%), respectively (p = 0.62).Ten out of 27 steatotic patients (37.0%) displayed a steatotic liver on all examinations. Six patients (22.2%) had a disappearance of hepatic steatosis during their time-course of treatment. Only one patient developed steatosis during his course of treatment. Liver SUL_max values were significantly lower in the steatosis versus non-steatotic groups of patients for interim (1.66 ± 0.36 versus 2.15 ± 0.27) and EoT (1.67 ± 0.29 versus 2.17 ± 0.30) PET. CT density was found to be an independent factor that correlated with liver SUL_max, while BMI, blood glucose level and the type of chemotherapy regimen were not. Using a method based on this correlation to correct liver SUL_max, all DS4 steatotic patients on interim (n = 1) and EoT (n = 2) PET moved to DS3.

CONCLUSIONS

Steatosis is actually a theoretical but not practical issue in most patients but should be recognised and corrected in appropriate cases, namely, for those patients scored DS4 with a percentage difference between the target lesion and the liver background lower than 30%.

Does PET Reconstruction Method Affect Deauville Score in Lymphoma Patients?

When evaluating ¹⁸F-FDG PET images with the Deauville score (DS), the quantification of tumor and reference organs limits the problem of optical misinterpretation. Compared with conventional reconstruction algorithms, point-spread function (PSF) modeling increases SUVs significantly in tumors but only moderately in the liver, which could affect the DS. We investigated whether the choice of the reconstruction algorithm affects the DS and whether discordance affects the capability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET to stratify lymphoma patients. Methods: Overall, 126 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were included (56 female and 70 male; median age, 65 y; range, 20-88 y). PET data were reconstructed with the unfiltered PSF method. Additionally, a 6-mm filter was applied to PSF images to meet the requirements of the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) harmonization program from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) (PSF_EARL). One hundred interim PET (i-PET) and 95 end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) studies were analyzed. SUV_max in the liver and aorta was determined using automatic volumes of interest and compared with SUV_max in the residual mass with the highest ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Results: For i-PET, using PSF and PSF_EARL, we classified patients as responders and nonresponders in 60 and 40 cases versus 63 and 37 cases, respectively. Five cases of major discordance (5.0%) occurred (i.e., changes from responder to nonresponder). For Eot-PET, patients were classified using PSF and PSF_EARL as responders and nonresponders in 69 and 26 cases versus 72 and 23 cases, respectively. Three cases of major discordance (3.2%) occurred. Concordance (Cohen unweighted κ) between the PSF and the PSF_EARL DS was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.91) for i-PET and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.96) for EoT-PET. The median follow-up periods were 28.4 and 27.4 mo for i-PET and EoT-PET, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed statistically significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival among responders and nonresponders no matter which reconstruction was used for i-PET and EoT-PET. Conclusion: Neither DS nor risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients is affected by the choice of PET reconstruction. Specifically, the use of PSF is not an issue in routine clinical processes or in multicenter trials. These findings have to be confirmed in escalation and deescalation procedures based on early i-PET.

Positron Emission Tomography-Based Assessment of Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Survival after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hodgkin Lymphoma

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is curative for 60% of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL). A more precise assessment of the depth of remission before AHCT may help to identify patients likely to benefit from AHCT. We aimed to determine whether positron emission tomography (PET)-based quantitative parameters of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and maximal standardized uptake volume (SUV_max) measured before AHCT predict progression-free survival (PFS) after transplant. Pretransplant PET/computed tomography images of 96 consecutive patients with R/R HL were analyzed. Median TMTV, TLG, and SUV_max were 7.97 cm³ (range, 1.3 to 102.1), 23.7 (range, 4.0 to 813.1), and 5.23 (range, 2.7 to 23.2). Two-year PFS in patients with high TMTV (TMTVhigh; more than median; n = 17) was only 12% (95% CI, 1% to 38%) compared with 53% (95% CI, 28% to 73%; P = .05) in patients with TMTVlow (lower or equal to median; n = 17) and 63% (95% CI, 50% to 74%) in 61 patients with no metabolically active tumor (TMTV0; P > .01). In concordance, high TLG (>19) and SUV_max (>4.9) predicted inferior 2-year PFS. In multivariate analysis patients with TMTVhigh had a 3.5-fold higher risk of treatment failure compared with TMTV0/TMTVlow (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.75 to 6.93; P < .01). Deauville (D)-scores of 4 to 5 before AHCT predicted worse PFS compared with D-scores of 1 to 3 (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.92 to 7.28; P < .01). Yet, TMTV and D-scores were disconcordant in 12 subjects; 9 patients in the D4 group with TMTVlow had 2-year PFS of 44% (95% CI, 14% to 72%), which was 2-fold higher than predicted by D4 score. In conclusion, in patients with R/R HL and PET-positive residual disease, TMTVhigh can identify very poor AHCT responders. Patients with TMTVlow, TLG, and SUV_max before AHCT have similar outcomes to those without metabolically active disease.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) (with and without diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT), with regard to the assessment of nodal and extranodal involvement, in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, without restriction to FDG-avid subytpes.

Materials and Methods

Patients with histologically proven lymphoma were enrolled in this prospective, institutional review board–approved study. After a single ¹⁸F-FDG injection, patients consecutively underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET⁄CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR on the same day for staging or restaging. Three sets of images were analyzed separately: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR without DWI, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR with DWI. Region-based agreement and examination-based sensitivity and specificity were calculated for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR without DWI, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR DWI. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV_max, SUV_mean) on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR were compared and correlated with minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC_min, ADC_mean).

Results

Thirty-four patients with a total of 40 examinations were included. Examination-based sensitivities for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR DWI were 82.1%, 85.7%, and 100%, respectively; specificities were 100% for all 3 techniques; and accuracies were 87.5%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was false negative in 5 of 40 examinations (all with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma), and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR (without DWI) was false negative in 4 of 40 examinations. Region-based percentages of agreement were 99% (κ, 0.95) between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR DWI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, 99.2% (κ, 0.96) between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, and 99.4% (κ, 0.97) between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR DWI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR. There was a strong correlation between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR for SUV_max (r = 0.83) and SUV_mean (r = 0.81) but no significant correlation between ADC_min and SUV_max (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: r = 0.46, P = 0.65; ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR: r = 0.64, P = 0.53) or between ADC_mean and SUV_mean (respectively, r = −0.14, P = 0.17 for the correlation with PET/CT and r = −0.14, P = 0.14 for the correlation with PET/MR).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT show a similar diagnostic performance in lymphoma patients. However, if DWI is included in the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR protocol, results surpass those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT because of the higher sensitivity of DWI for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas.

ESMO consensus conference on malignant lymphoma: general perspectives and recommendations for prognostic tools in mature B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on mature B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) was held on 20 June 2015 in Lugano, Switzerland, and included a multidisciplinary panel of 25 leading experts. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on critical subjects difficult to consider in detail in the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. The following areas were identified: (i) the elderly patient, (ii) prognostic factors suitable for clinical use and (iii) the 'ultra-high-risk' group. Before the conference, the expert panel was divided into three working groups; each group focused on one of these areas in order to address four clinically relevant questions relating to that topic. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, each working group developed recommendations to address each of the four questions assigned to their group. These recommendations were then presented to the entire panel and a consensus was reached. This manuscript presents recommendations dedicated to the second area of interest, i.e. prognostic factors suitable for clinical use. The four topics [i.e. interim positron emission tomography (PET), TP53 mutations, cell of origin (COO) and minimal residual disease (MRD)] were primarily chosen because of the bulk of available data together with the lack of clear guidance regarding their use in clinical practice and within clinical trials. Results, including a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this manuscript. The panel acknowledged that detection of TP53 inactivation by deletion or mutation in CLL should be implemented in clinical practice (level of evidence I, strength of recommendation A). Due to their potentially high prognostic value, at least in some lymphoma entities, implementation of interim PET, COO and MRD was highly recommended in the context of clinical trials. All expert panel members approved this final article.

Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: Experience at a Single National Reference Center in Mexico

Background. Although chemotherapy added to rituximab is a standard of care for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment of patients ≥65 years of age remains controversial due to comorbidities. Methods. This is a retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized study of patients ≥65 years of age, who were diagnosed with DLBCL but not previously treated. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were analyzed. Three rituximab-containing treatment regimens (standard RCHOP, anthracycline dose-reduced RChOP, and RCOP) were compared. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared with the log-rank test. Results. In total, 141 patients with a median age of 73.9 years were studied. The three treatment groups had comparable demographic characteristics. The overall response was 77%, 72.5%, and 59% in groups treated with RCHOP, RChOP, and RCOP, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the factors influencing the overall survival were the presence of B symptoms, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3), and febrile neutropenia. Factors influencing disease-free survival were febrile neutropenia, high-intermediate and high-risk IPI scores, and treatment without anthracycline. Conclusion. A higher ORR (overall response rate) was achieved with standard RCHOP, which influenced DFS and OS, although it was not statistically significant compared with the other groups. Interventional phase 3 trials testing new molecules in patients aged 70 to 80 years and older are required to improve the prognosis within this growing population.