Optimization of radotinib doses for the treatment of Asian patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia based on dose-response relationship analyses

Appropriate Starting Dose of Dasatinib Based on Analyses of Dose-Limiting Toxicities and Molecular Responses in Asian Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Dasatinib is administered at a fixed starting dosage of 100 mg once daily regardless of patient-specific factors. However, such fixed dosing may not be optimal for the treatment of Asian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CP-CML).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and molecular responses (MRs) of dasatinib therapy were evaluated using clinical data obtained from 102 patients newly diagnosed with CP-CML at 17 hospitals in South Korea.

RESULTS

By 36 months after the initiation of a fixed dose regimen of dasatinib 100 mg once daily as the first-line therapy, 55.9% of patients experienced at least one type of DLT. The 3 most frequent DLTs were thrombocytopenia (45.5%), pericardial or pleural effusion (30.9%), and anemia (7.3%). Patients with higher dasatinib dose adjusted for body weight (Dose/BW) had a greater rate of DLT occurrence (logit [P] = 1.58 × [Dose/BW] - 2.27, P = .03). As median Dose/BW increased from 1.23 to 2.00 mg/kg, the rate of DLT occurrence increased from 43.5% to 66.7% (P = .03). However, Dose/BW did not affect the achievement rate of major MR (60.9% to 69.6%, P = .92).

CONCLUSION

The starting dosage of dasatinib may need to be reduced (eg, 80 mg once daily or lower) for Asian patients with CP-CML, especially with lighter BW, to alleviate the risk of DLT occurrence without compromising the achievement of MR.

Development of a dried blood spot sampling method towards therapeutic monitoring of radotinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a minimally invasive method of blood sampling that enables monitoring of drug concentrations to be more convenient. This study aimed at developing a DBS sampling method for an accurate and precise prediction of radotinib plasma concentrations (C_p ) in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML).

METHODS

Dried blood spot and venous blood samples were simultaneously collected from fifty CML patients who had been receiving radotinib for at least a week. Radotinib concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Unmeasured C_p was predicted directly based on a Deming regression between DBS concentrations (C_DBS ) and C_p . Unmeasured C_p was also predicted from C_DBS corrected by each patient's haematocrit (Hct). Both prediction methods were evaluated for their accuracy and precision using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Deming regression equation between C_DBS and C_p was obtained as follows: C_p  = 1.34∙C_DBS  + 4.26 (r²  = .97). C_p was directly predictable using C_p,pred1  = 1.34∙C_DBS  + 4.26. With Hct correction, C_p was alternatively predictable using C_p,pred2  = C_DBS / (1-Hct + Hct² ). The slopes of Deming regression line between predicted and measured C_p were 0.99 and 1.02 for the direct and Hct-corrected method, respectively. The mean biases (accuracy) were -0.44% and 1.6% with the 95% limits of agreement (precision) of -22.4% to 21.5% and -20.5% to 23.7%, respectively. More than 93% of predicted and measured C_p pairs had their differences within 20% of the mean of each pair in both methods.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Radotinib C_DBS are highly correlated with radotinib C_p. Radotinib C_p can be accurately and precisely predicted from C_DBS using direct or Hct-corrected prediction methods. Both appear to be appropriate for the therapeutic monitoring of radotinib in patients with CML.

Pharmacology of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia; a clinician's perspective

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we have summarized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adverse effects of imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib and radotinib with focus on pharmacogenomic studies with clinical end points. We have discussed the key phase 3 trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) comparing with each other, treatment free remission (TFR) and selection of TKI. Upcoming concepts and related trials in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) along with future directions have been touched upon.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Embase, Google, Cochrane library and Medline were searched to identify relevant literature for the review. Clinicaltrial.gov was searched for upcoming data and trials.

RESULTS

There are lot of gap in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TKI. Imatinib appears to be the safest TKI. Newer TKI's achieve better achievement of therapeutic milestones, deeper molecular response and less chances of progression of CML compared to imatinib. Newer TKI appears to be better choice for achieving TFR. When the objective is survival, imatinib is still the TKI of choice. Primary prophylaxis with antiplatelet drugs for TKI having cardiovascular and thromboembolic side effects should be considered.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacogenetic data of TKI is still immature to guide in therapeutic decision making in clinical practice. There is need for further research in pharmacology and pharmacogenomics of newer TKI's. Randomized controlled trials are required to decide the optimum TKI for TFR. Safe and effective TKI for targeting T315I mutation, CML accelerated phase and blast crisis are an active area of research.

Determination of a radotinib dosage regimen based on dose-response relationships for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CP-CML). Here, using the data from a Phase 3 study conducted in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML, the dose-efficacy as well as dose-safety relationship analyses were performed to determine a safe and effective initial dosage regimen of radotinib. A significant positive association was detected between the starting dose of radotinib adjusted for body weight (Dose/BW) and the probability of dose-limiting toxicity (≥grade 3 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity) (P = 0.003). In contrast, a significant inverse association was discovered between Dose/BW and the probability of major molecular response (BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ≤ 0.1%) when controlled for sex (P = 0.033). Moreover, frequent dose interruptions and reductions secondary to radotinib toxicities occurred in the Phase 3 study, resulting in nearly half (44%) of patients receiving a reduced dose at a 12-month follow-up. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the need for initial radotinib dose attenuation to improve the long-term efficacy and safety of radotinib. Hence, the authors suggest a new upfront radotinib dose of 400 mg once daily be tested in patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Phase III Clinical Trial (RERISE study) Results of Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Purpose: Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in Korea for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in patients newly diagnosed or with insufficient response to other TKIs. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radotinib as first-line therapy for CML-CP.Experimental Design: This multinational, open-label study assigned patients (1:1:1) to one of two twice-daily radotinib doses, or imatinib daily. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months.Results: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized to receive radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg twice-daily (n = 81), or imatinib 400 mg daily (n = 81). MMR rates by 12 months were higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg (52%) or radotinib 400 mg twice-daily (46%) versus imatinib (30%; P = 0.0044 and P = 0.0342, respectively). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 12 months were higher for radotinib 300 mg (91%) versus imatinib (77%; P = 0.0120). Early molecular response at 3 months occurred in 86% and 87% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg and radotinib 400 mg, respectively, and 71% of those receiving imatinib. By 12 months, no patients had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Most adverse events were manageable with dose reduction.Conclusions: Radotinib demonstrated superiority over imatinib in CCyR and MMR in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01511289 Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7180-8. ©2017 AACR.

Induction of K562 Cell Apoptosis by As4S4 via Down-Regulating miR181

Background

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has unsatisfactory treatment efficacy at present. As the major component of red orpiment, tetra-arsenic tetra-sulfide (As₄S₄) has been recently used in treating leukemia, but with unclear mechanism targeting CML. MicroRNA (miR) is a group of endogenous non-coding RNAs regulating pathogenesis. MiR181 has been shown to exert important roles in tumor progression. The relationship between miR181 and As₄S₄ in inducing K562 cell apoptosis, however, is still unclear.

Material/Methods

CML cell line K562 was cultured in vitro in a control group and in groups receiving various dosages (20 μM and 40 μM) of As₄S₄. MTT assay was employed to detect the effect on K562 cell survival. MiR181 expression was quantified by real-time PCR. MTT assay and assay kit were used to determine K562 cell survival and caspase 3 expression. Cell apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry. Bcl-2 expression was determined by real-time PCR and Western blotting.

Results

As₄S₄ significantly suppressed proliferation of K562 cells (p<0.05) and decreased miR181 expression, and increased caspase3 activity compared to the control group. It can induce K562 cell apoptosis via remarkably down-regulating mRNA and protein expressions of Bcl-2 (p<0.05).

Conclusions

As₄S₄ can facilitate K562 cell apoptosis via down-regulating miR181, inhibiting Bcl02 expression, and enhancing apoptotic protein caspase3 activity.