What is the best treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia?

Genotypic and phenotypic classification of cancer: How should the impact of the two diagnostic approaches best be balanced?

Neoplastic tumors are traditionally named based on their differentiation (i.e., which normal cells and tissues they resemble) and bodily site. In recent years, knowledge about the genetic basis of tumorigenesis has grown rapidly, and the new information has in several instances been incorporated into the very definition of cancerous entities. The proper contribution of the diseases' phenotype and genotype to what they are called and how they are delineated from one another has rarely been subjected to explicit reasoning, however, nor is it often made clear whether existing naming practices are founded on ontological or utilitarian grounds. We look at several examples of how the new cytogenetic and molecular genetic understanding of tumorigenesis has impacted oncological nomenclature in a significant manner, but also at counterexamples where no similar change has taken place. In all likelihood, more and more neoplastic diseases will in the future be defined and named based on their pathogenesis rather than their phenotype, not least because effective and specific drug therapies directed against the molecular change at the very heart of oncogenesis will increasingly become available. The fact that this shift in emphasis is primarily guided by utilitarian considerations rather than any perception of acquired genetic changes as somehow being more ontologically "profound" or "important" in tumorigenesis, is as it should be; both the phenotype and the genotype of tumors are key parameters across most of oncology and are likely to be retained as the basis of coexisting disease classifications for as long as we can foresee.

The emerging role of retinoids and retinoic acid metabolism blocking agents in the treatment of cancer

BACKGROUND

Although significant advances have been made in the treatment of some malignancies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic tumors remains poor. Differentiating agents redirect cells toward their normal phenotype and therefore may reverse or suppress evolving malignant lesions or prevent cancer invasion. In addition, they offer a potential alternative to the classic cytostatic drugs.

METHODS

The purpose of this review was to examine the current and potential future roles of differentiating agents in the treatment of cancer.

RESULTS

Initial studies with differentiating agents focused on retinoid therapy. Although retinoids have shown some clinical success, their widespread use has been limited by resistance and, in the chemopreventive setting, toxicity. This has led to the synthesis of a number of new retinoids that currently are undergoing clinical investigation. A further approach to overcoming the drawbacks associated with exogenous retinoids has been to increase the levels of endogenous retinoic acid (RA) by inhibiting the cytochrome P450-mediated catabolism of RA using a novel class of agents known as retinoic acid metabolism blocking agents (RAMBAs). Liarozole, the first RAMBA to undergo clinical investigation, preferentially increases intratumor levels of endogenous RA resulting in antitumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although studies using exogenous retinoids in this setting have not yet fulfilled their initial promise, studies with a growing set of synthetic retinoids are ongoing. Furthermore, modulation of endogenous retinoids may offer a significant new potential treatment for cancer.

Tretinoin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use in the management of acute promyelocytic leukaemia

Tretinoin (all-trans retinoic acid), a vitamin A derivative, induces cellular differentiation in several haematological precursor cell lines and cells from patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Drug treatment with tretinoin is associated with morphological and functional maturation of leukaemic promyelocytes and a progressive reduction in the occurrence of the characteristic t(15;17) chromosomal translocation. Recent therapeutic trials indicate that tretinoin induces remission in 64 to 100% of patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. In newly diagnosed patients, remission induction treatment with tretinoin followed by intensive chemotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in relapse rate and prolongation of event-free and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in 1 comparative trial. Tretinoin alone does not totally eradicate the leukaemic clone and consolidation chemotherapy is recommended as follow-up. The use of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) provides a sensitive and specific technique to assist in prediction and monitoring of a patient's response to treatment and to help detect the presence of residual or recurrent disease. The use of tretinoin is potentially limited by the rapid and almost universal development of drug resistance and occurrence of the often severe retinoic acid syndrome. Useful strategies have been described to manage these effects but current and future efforts must be directed at elucidating the mechanisms involved and determining the optimum therapeutic management. In summary, results to date indicate that the combination of tretinoin and intensive chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone and appears to improve the prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Further information on the relative efficacy of various induction and post-remission strategies in subsets of patients will help determine optimum use of this promising agent in the management of acute promyelocytic leukaemia.

Leukemia cell lines: in vitro models for the study of acute promyelocytic leukemia

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) serves as a paradigm in clinical and biological leukemia research. Firstly, APL represents a model for the new therapeutic approach of differentiation therapy, taking advantage of the ability of APL cells to respond to retinoic acid treatment by terminal differentiation. Secondly, the 15;17 chromosomal translocation specific for APL leads at the molecular genetic level to a chimeric gene fusing the PML and RAR alpha genes and appears to be an instrumental, if not actually the causative event, in the neoplastic process. These unique characteristics of an otherwise rather rare disease have recently attracted intense research interest. As in other types of leukemia where continuous cell lines are powerful research tools, studies using APL-derived cell lines have contributed a large body of relevant data in efforts to unravel the pathobiology and leukemogenesis of APL. Three cell lines have been reported to be derived from patients with APL: HL-60, NB-4 and PL-21. Both HL-60 and PL-21 lack t(15;17) while NB-4 carries this cytogenetic hallmark pathognomonic for APL. Morphological and immunophenotypical examinations of the cell lines do not permit a clear assignment to any stage of myelomonocytic differentiation. Some additional data, such as expression of myeloperoxidase, monocyte-specific esterase and annexin VIII, together with the cytogenetic and molecular biological information, suggest that NB-4 is the only genuine promyelocytic leukemia cell line, whereas HL-60 may represent a discrete stage of differentiation between the late myeloblasts and the promyelocyte; PL-21 has distinct features associated with monocytic cells. These cell lines provide unique in vitro model systems for studying the cellular and molecular events involved in the proliferation and differentiation of normal and leukemic myelomonocytic cells.

PML-RAR alpha PCR positivity in the bone marrow of patients with APL precedes haematological relapse by 2-3 months

We report the results of serial tests in three patients with hyperleucocytotic AML M3 by haematological methods, coagulation assays and PCR analyses following treatment with ATRA and chemotherapy. All three patients became PCR negative in bone marrow and peripheral blood (sensitivity level 1 in 10(5) cells) after one cycle of ATRA + chemotherapy. However, they relapsed haematologically 6-9 months after achieving complete haematological remission. The haematological relapse was preceded by PCR positivity in the bone marrow by 3 months. Platelet counts decreased already during CHR, but dropped below normal levels only at the time of relapse. Coagulation parameters were not helpful for early prediction of relapse. Our results demonstrate that PCR analysis in the bone marrow is the best way to monitor patients with APL. However, in hyperleucocytotic patients, PCR negativity does not seem to indicate long-term remission.