Phenotype of Hodgkin and Sternberg-Reed cells and expression of CD57 (LEU7) antigen

Contribution of Flow Cytometry to the Diagnosis of Malignant and Non Malignant Conditions in Lymph Node Biopsies

In order to assess the contribution of FC to the diagnosis of lymph node disorders we retrospectively compared the pathological and the FC diagnosis made in 118 consecutive lymph node biopsies. Pathological diagnosis included non malignant conditions (n = 43), B-cell Non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (n = 30), T-cell NHL (1 case), carcinoma (n = 18), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (n = 15), melanoma (n = 2), chronic myelocytic leukemia (n = 12), miscellaneous non-lymphoid tissues (n = 6) and undetermined conditions (n = 2). Among the 116 assessable samples, FC was in agreement with histology in 102 cases (87.9%; 95%CI = 81-93) which included 38 benign conditions (90%; 95% CI = 77-97%), 29 NHL (96.7%; 95% CI = 83-100), 18 carcinomas (100%; 95% CI = 81-100), and 12 HL (80.0%; 95% CI = 52-96). Discrepancies (14 cases) included 3 HL undiagnosed by FC and 2 granulomatous adenitis with an erroneous FC diagnosis of HL. Finally, a malignant condition was suspected only by FC in 5 cases (1 carcinoma, 2 B-cell and 2 T-cell NHL) and subsequently demonstrated by additional diagnostic procedures. In conclusion, this study confirms that FC performed on fresh lymph node samples is a powerful diagnostic tool in patients with malignant lymphoma. A few cases left undiagnosed by classical pathological analysis can be recognized by FC. Carcinoma is readily identified by FC analysis, while some benign conditions and Hodgkin lymphoma can be misdiagnosed with the use of FC, although the potential of FC to properly recognize HL is improving compared to previously reported studies. FC is a useful adjunct to pathological analysis of lymph node specimens.

The cancer stem cell: evidence for its origin as an injured autoreactive T cell

This review explores similarities between lymphocytes and cancer cells, and proposes a new model for the genesis of human cancer. We suggest that the development of cancer requires infection(s) during which antigenic determinants from pathogens mimicking self-antigens are co-presented to the immune system, leading to breaking T cell tolerance. Some level of autoimmunity is normal and necessary for effective pathogen eradication. However, autoreactive T cells must be eliminated by apoptosis when the immune response is terminated. Apoptosis can be deficient in the event of a weakened immune system, the causes of which are multifactorial. Some autoreactive T cells suffer genomic damage in this process, but manage to survive. The resulting cancer stem cell still retains some functions of an inflammatory T cell, so it seeks out sites of inflammation inside the body. Due to its defective constitutive production of inflammatory cytokines and other growth factors, a stroma is built at the site of inflammation similar to the temporary stroma built during wound healing. The cancer cells grow inside this stroma, forming a tumor that provides their vascular supply and protects them from cellular immune response.

As cancer stem cells have plasticity comparable to normal stem cells, interactions with surrounding normal tissues cause them to give rise to all the various types of cancers, resembling differentiated tissue types. Metastases form at an advanced stage of the disease, with the proliferation of sites of inflammation inside the body following a similar mechanism. Immunosuppressive cancer therapies inadvertently re-invigorate pathogenic microorganisms and parasitic infections common to cancer, leading to a vicious circle of infection, autoimmunity and malignancy that ultimately dooms cancer patients. Based on this new understanding, we recommend a systemic approach to the development of cancer therapies that supports rather than antagonizes the immune system.