Bone marrow transplantation in low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The Importance of HLA Assessment in "Off-the-Shelf" Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Based-Therapies

The need for more effective therapies of chronic and acute diseases has led to the attempts of developing more adequate and less invasive treatment methods. Regenerative medicine relies mainly on the therapeutic potential of stem cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), due to their immunosuppressive properties and tissue repair abilities, seem to be an ideal tool for cell-based therapies. Taking into account all available sources of MSCs, perinatal tissues become an attractive source of allogeneic MSCs. The allogeneic MSCs provide "off-the-shelf" cellular therapy, however, their allogenicity may be viewed as a limitation for their use. Moreover, some evidence suggests that MSCs are not as immune-privileged as it was previously reported. Therefore, understanding their interactions with the recipient's immune system is crucial for their successful clinical application. In this review, we discuss both autologous and allogeneic application of MSCs, focusing on current approaches to allogeneic MSCs therapies, with a particular interest in the role of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and HLA-matching in allogeneic MSCs transplantation. Importantly, the evidence from the currently completed and ongoing clinical trials demonstrates that allogeneic MSCs transplantation is safe and seems to cause no major side-effects to the patient. These findings strongly support the case for MSCs efficacy in treatment of a variety of diseases and their use as an "off-the-shelf" medical product.

Clinical Trials With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Update

In the last year, the promising features of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including their regenerative properties and ability to differentiate into diverse cell lineages, have generated great interest among researchers whose work has offered intriguing perspectives on cell-based therapies for various diseases. Currently the most commonly used adult stem cells in regenerative medicine, MSCs, can be isolated from several tissues, exhibit a strong capacity for replication in vitro, and can differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. However, heterogeneous procedures for isolating and cultivating MSCs among laboratories have prompted the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) to issue criteria for identifying unique populations of these cells. Consequently, the isolation of MSCs according to ISCT criteria has produced heterogeneous, nonclonal cultures of stromal cells containing stem cells with different multipotent properties, committed progenitors, and differentiated cells. Though the nature and functions of MSCs remain unclear, nonclonal stromal cultures obtained from bone marrow and other tissues currently serve as sources of putative MSCs for therapeutic purposes, and several findings underscore their effectiveness in treating different diseases. To date, 493 MSC-based clinical trials, either complete or ongoing, appear in the database of the US National Institutes of Health. In the present article, we provide a comprehensive review of MSC-based clinical trials conducted worldwide that scrutinizes biological properties of MSCs, elucidates recent clinical findings and clinical trial phases of investigation, highlights therapeutic effects of MSCs, and identifies principal criticisms of the use of these cells. In particular, we analyze clinical trials using MSCs for representative diseases, including hematological disease, graft-versus-host disease, organ transplantation, diabetes, inflammatory diseases, and diseases in the liver, kidney, and lung, as well as cardiovascular, bone and cartilage, neurological, and autoimmune diseases.

Intravenous human mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in NOD/SCID mice preserve liver integrity of irradiation damage

This work was initiated in an effort to evaluate the potential therapeutic contribution of the infusion of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the correction of liver injuries. We subjected NOD-SCID mice to a 10.5-Gy abdominal irradiation and we tested the biological and histological markers of liver injury in the absence and after infusion of expanded human MSC. Irradiation alone induced a significant elevation of the ALT and AST. Apoptosis in the endothelial layer of vessels was observed. When MSC were infused in mice, a significant decrease of transaminases was measured, and a total disappearance of apoptotic cells. MSC were not found in liver. To explain the protection of liver without MSC engraftment, we hypothesize an indirect action of MSC on the liver via the intestinal tract. Pelvic or total body irradiation induces intestinal absorption defects leading to an alteration of the enterohepatic recirculation of bile acids. This alteration induces an increase in Deoxy Cholic Acid (DCA) which is hepatoxic. In this study, we confirm these results. DCA concentration increased approximately twofold after irradiation but stayed to the baseline level after MSC injection. We propose from our observations that, following irradiation, MSC infusion indirectly corrected liver dysfunction by preventing gut damage. This explanation would be consistent with the absence of MSC engraftment in liver. These results evidenced that MSC treatment of a target organ may have an effect on distant tissues. This observation comes in support to the interest for the use of MSC for cellular therapy in multiple pathologies proposed in the recent years.

Stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects

This article provides an overview of the current knowledge relating to the potential use of transplanted stem cells in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Two types of stem cells, CNS-derived neural stem/precursor cells (NPCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered to provide reproducible and robust therapeutic effects when intravenously or intrathecally injected into both rodents and primates with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Furthermore, preliminary safety data concerning the use of intrathecally injected autologous MSCs in patients with progressive MS are available. We discuss how the data gathered to date challenge the narrow view that the therapeutic effects of NPCs and MSCs observed in the treatment of MS are accomplished solely by cell replacement. Both types of stem cell, when transplanted systemically, might instead influence disease outcome by releasing a plethora of factors that are immunomodulatory or neuroprotective, thereby directly or indirectly influencing the regenerative properties of intrinsic CNS stem/precursor cells.

The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation as a treatment for multiple sclerosis: consensus report of the International MSCT Study Group

Current therapies for multiple sclerosis effectively reduce inflammation, but do little in terms of repair to the damaged central nervous system. Cell-based therapies may provide a new strategy for bolstering regeneration and repair through neuro-axonal protection or remyelination. Mesenchymal stem cells modulate pathological responses in experimental autoimmune encephalitis, alleviating disease, but also stimulate repair of the central nervous system through the release of soluble factors. Autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells have been safely administered to individuals with hemato-oncological diseases and in a limited number of patients with multiple sclerosis. It is therefore reasonable to move mesenchymal stem cells transplantation into properly controlled human studies to explore their potential as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. Since it is likely that the first such studies will probably involve only small numbers of patients in a few centers, we formed an international panel comprising multiple sclerosis neurology and stem cell experts, as well as immunologists. The aims were to derive a consensus on the utilization of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, along with protocols for the culture of the cells and the treatment of patients. This article reviews the consensus derived from our group on the rationale for mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, the methodology for generating mesenchymal stem cells and the first treatment protocol for multiple sclerosis patients.

Use of stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

The reported evidence of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) may explain the lack of efficacy of the currently used immunomodulating modalities and the irreversible axonal damage, which results in accumulating disability. To date, efforts for neuroprotective treatments have not been successful in clinical studies in other CNS diseases. Therefore, for MS, the use of stem cells may provide a logical solution, since these cells can migrate locally into the areas of white-matter lesions (plaques) and have the potential to support local neurogenesis and rebuilding of the affected myelin. This is achieved both by support of the resident CNS stem cell repertoire and by differentiation of the transplanted cells into neurons and myelin-producing cells (oligodendrocytes). Stem cells were also shown to possess immunomodulating properties, inducing systemic and local suppression of the myelin-targeting autoimmune lymphocytes. Several types of stem cells (embryonic and adult) have been described and extensively studied in animal models of CNS diseases and the various models of MS (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [EAE]). In this review, we summarize the experience with the use of different types of stem cells in CNS disease models, focusing on the models of EAE and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each stem cell type for future clinical applications in MS.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in lymphoid malignancies

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is an effective therapeutic option for a wide range of hematological malignancies. The toxicity of the conditioning regimen and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurring after the infusion of the graft remain the most important factors leading to high morbidity and mortality. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have recently been developed in an effort to reduce the toxicity associated with conventional allo-SCT while preserving the curative potential of the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. Most patients with lymphoproliferative disorders are not ideal candidates for allo-SCT due to higher age at diagnosis, which together with the advanced stage of disease at the time of transplantation can lead to a high transplant-related mortality (TRM). Preliminary experience indicates that reduced-intensity allo-SCT is feasible in such patients. The immediate TRM is low in comparison with conventional procedures and overall results seem promising, thus indicating the existence of a GVT effect. Nevertheless, all series are still low in numbers and follow-up is too short to draw definitive conclusions. Acute and chronic GVHD remain a significant problem with incidences comparable to the conventional setting in some series. Thus, therapeutic strategies must be sought to decrease GVHD without abrogating the GVT effect.

Clinical relevance of MGMT in the treatment of cancer

Anumber of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents attack the O(6) position on guanine, forming the most potent cytotoxic DNA adducts known. The DNA repair enzyme O(6)-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), encoded by the gene MGMT, repairs alkylation at this site and is responsible for protecting both tumor and normal cells from these agents. Cells and tissues vary greatly in AGT expression, not only between tissues but also between individuals. AGT activity correlates inversely with sensitivity to agents that form O(6)-alkylguanine DNA adducts, such as carmustine (BCNU), temozolomide, streptozotocin, and dacarbazine. The one exception is those tumors lacking mismatch repair, which renders them resistant to methylating agents. A recent study in patients with gliomas confirmed the correlation between low-level expression of the MGMT gene and response and survival after BCNU. An inhibitor to AGT, O(6)-benzylguanine (BG), depletes AGT in human tumors without associated toxicity and is now in phase II clinical trials. Finally, mutations within the active site region of the MGMT gene render the AGT protein resistant to BG inactivation. As a result, mutant MGMT gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells has been shown to selectively protect the marrow from the combination of an alkylating agent and BG, while at the same time sensitizing tumor cells. MGMT remains a paradigm for development of new agents that modulate known mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer cells and raise the spectra of combinatorial therapies that encompass known drug resistance mechanisms.

Overview of autologous stem cell transplantation

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants over the last decade. Faster recovery of cell counts, lesser transplant morbidity, shorter hospital stay and reduced cost compared with marrow autografts have been the main advantages of autologous peripheral blood cell over marrow transplants. In this paper we attempt to review the advances in the biology and mobilization of stem cells, and focus on clinical results of autologous peripheral stem cell and marrow transplants for disease specific sites such as breast cancer, myeloma, autoimmune diseases, germ cell tumors, the acute and chronic leukemias, the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease. We also discuss transplant related complications, gene therapy and the different methods of purging. This review was intended for autologous peripheral stem cell transplants, however, unavoidably, it also discusses autologous marrow transplantation and aspects common to both procedures.

Salvage treatment after failure or relapse following initial chemotherapy for follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

In an attempt to further define prognostic factors in patients with follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, two subgroups of patients receiving 2nd line therapy; (a) those who had failed to achieve CR with initial therapy and (b) those who had relapsed after achieving initial CR, were examined. Patients who failed to achieve initial remission were not totally refractory to retreatment. Seven of 34 (21%) who had failed to respond to initial treatment achieved CR following treatment with various 'salvage chemotherapy' approaches. There were, however, no significant pretreatment prognostic factors that were predictive for response. Among patients who relapsed after initial CR, 22 of 54 (41%) achieved a second CR following retreatment with conventional chemotherapy approaches. The only factors which were significant in predicting for second CR were sex (female) and age (< 60 years). In both subgroups, patients who achieved CR following 'salvage' therapy survived significantly longer than those who responded less favourably. These findings emphasise the fact that response to treatment is the major predictor of survival among patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.