Immunosuppressive toxicity of CAMPATH1H monoclonal antibody in the treatment of patients with recurrent low grade lymphoma

Invasive Fungal Infections and Targeted Therapies in Hematological Malignancies

The use of targeted biologic therapies for hematological malignancies has greatly expanded in recent years. These agents act upon specific molecular pathways in order to target malignant cells but frequently have broader effects involving both innate and adaptive immunity. Patients with hematological malignancies have unique risk factors for infection, including immune dysregulation related to their underlying disease and sequelae of prior treatment regimens. Determining the individual risk of infection related to any novel agent is challenging in this setting. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent one of the most morbid infectious complications observed in hematological malignancy. In recent years, growing evidence suggests that certain small molecule inhibitors, such as BTK inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, may cause an increased risk of IFI in certain patients. It is imperative to better understand the impact that novel targeted therapies might have on the development of IFIs in this high-risk patient population.

Targeted Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

Background:

The introduction of monoclonal antibodies, either as native molecules or conjugated to radioisotopes or other toxins, has led to new therapeutic options for patients with hematologic malignancies. In addition, the use of small molecules against specific cell surface receptors, enzymes, and proteins has become an important strategy in the treatment of such disorders.

Methods:

The author reviewed the published clinical trials of monoclonal antibody and other targeted therapies in hematologic malignancies.

Results:

Results from several trials demonstrate a therapeutic benefit for the use of monoclonal antibodies (either native or conjugated) and other targeted therapies, used alone or in combination with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Conclusions:

Targeted therapy of hematologic malignancies seems to be an effective and less toxic approach to the treatment of such disorders. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to determine where and when such management fits into a therapeutic regimen for any given disorder, whether upfront or as salvage therapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy (concurrent or sequential).

Effect of alemtuzumab on intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes and intestinal barrier function in cynomolgus model

Background:

Alemtuzumab has been used in organ transplantation and a variety of hematologic malignancies (especially for the treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia). However, serious infectious complications frequently occur after treatment. The reason for increased infections postalemtuzumab treatment is unknown at this stage. We explore the effect of alemtuzumab on intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and intestinal barrier function in cynomolgus model to explain the reason of infection following alemtuzumab treatment.

Methods:

Twelve male cynomolguses were randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group. The treatment group received alemtuzumab (3 mg/kg, intravenous injection) while the control group received the same volume of physiological saline. Intestinal IELs were isolated from the control group and the treatment group (on day 9, 35, and 70 after treatment) for counting and flow cytometric analysis. Moreover, intestinal permeability was monitored by enzymatic spectrophotometric technique and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results:

The numbers of IELs were decreased significantly on day 9 after treatment compared with the control group (0.35 ± 0.07 × 10⁸ and 1.35 ± 0.09 × 10⁸, respectively; P < 0.05) and were not fully restored until day 70 after treatment. There were significant differences among four groups considering IELs subtypes. In addition, the proportion of apoptotic IELs after alemtuzumab treatment was significantly higher than in the control group (22.01 ± 3.67 and 6.01 ± 1.42, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the concentration of D-lactate and endotoxin was also increased significantly on day 9 after treatment.

Conclusions:

Alemtuzumab treatment depletes lymphocytes in the peripheral blood and intestine of cynomolgus model. The induction of apoptosis is an important mechanism of lymphocyte depletion after alemtuzumab treatment. Notably, intestinal barrier function may be disrupted after alemtuzumab treatment.

A CD52 antibody impairs mouse-transplanted intestinal tight junctions

BACKGROUND

Induction immunosuppression strategies using a CD52 monoclonal antibody (mAb) have been introduced for small bowel transplantation, resulting in improved outcomes. However, little information is known about the effects of the antibody on the microstructure of the intestinal barrier, which functions to prevent bacterial translocation. In this study, we used a murine orthotopic small bowel transplantation model to investigate the impact of a CD52 mAb on tight junctions (TJs), which are considered a central part of the intestinal barrier, of the transplanted intestine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C57BL/6 mice were used as recipients. The grafts were harvested from BALB/c mice in allogeneic groups and C57BL/6 mice in syngeneic groups. The anti-mouse CD52 mAb was applied as a surrogate antibody. Transmission electron microscopy was used to evaluate the TJ ultrastructure. The expression of the TJ proteins occludin and ZO-1 was analyzed by Western blot. The distribution of TJ proteins was observed by immunofluorescence, and the permeability of the transplanted intestine was assessed in vivo using FITC-dextran.

RESULTS

After CD52 mAb application, a compromised TJ ultrastructure was observed. In addition, TJ protein expression (occludin and ZO-1) decreased and the intestinal permeability increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-mouse CD52 mAb impaired the transplanted intestinal TJ and barrier.

Immunotherapy targets in pediatric cancer

Immunotherapy for cancer has shown increasing success and there is ample evidence to expect that progress gleaned in immune targeting of adult cancers can be translated to pediatric oncology. This manuscript reviews principles that guide selection of targets for immunotherapy of cancer, emphasizing the similarities and distinctions between oncogene-inhibition targets and immune targets. It follows with a detailed review of molecules expressed by pediatric tumors that are already under study as immune targets or are good candidates for future studies of immune targeting. Distinctions are made between cell surface antigens that can be targeted in an MHC independent manner using antibodies, antibody derivatives, or chimeric antigen receptors versus intracellular antigens which must be targeted with MHC restricted T cell therapies. Among the most advanced immune targets for childhood cancer are CD19 and CD22 on hematologic malignancies, GD2 on solid tumors, and NY-ESO-1 expressed by a majority of synovial sarcomas, but several other molecules reviewed here also have properties which suggest that they too could serve as effective targets for immunotherapy of childhood cancer.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.

Campath 1-H treatment in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

Campath 1-H (Alemtuzumab) is a humanised monoclonal antibody which targets the CD52 antigen, a low molecular weight glycoprotein present on the surface of most lymphocyte lineages, causing complement mediated lysis and rapid and prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Following encouraging initial data from other centres we report our open label experience of using Campath 1-H as a treatment in aggressive relapsing multiple sclerosis in a consecutive series of 39 highly selected patients treated across three regional centres and followed for a mean of 1.89 years. The mean annualised relapse rate fell from 2.48 pre treatment to 0.19 post treatment with 29% of documented relapses observed in the 12 weeks following initial infusion. Mean change in EDSS was -0.36 overall and -0.15 in those patients completing > or =1 year of follow- up. Eighty-three per cent of patients had stable or improved disability following treatment. Infusion related side effects were common including rash, headache and pyrexia but were usually mild and self limiting. Transient worsening of pre-existing neurological deficits during infusion was observed in 3 patients. 12 patients developed biochemical evidence of autoimmune dysfunction, 2 patients developed thyroid disease and 1 patient autoimmune skin disease. We conclude that relapse rates fall following Campath 1-H. Whilst side effects were common these were normally self limiting or easily managed, suggesting Campath 1-H may be of use in the treatment of very active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Infectious complications associated with alemtuzumab use for lymphoproliferative disorders

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is an emerging therapy for refractory lymphoproliferative disorders. The associated long-term risks of infection remain poorly defined.

METHODS

From July 2001 through December 2003, all patients who received alemtuzumab for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders at 1 institution underwent a retrospective evaluation to document infectious complications until death or end of follow-up in October 2004. Alemtuzumab recipients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were compared with a concurrent cohort who also underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but did not receive alemtuzumab.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were identified (21 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 6 with plasma cell disorders). The overall mortality was 37%, with 7 of 10 deaths being related to infection. Significant opportunistic infections occurred in 9 patients (43%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, including cytomegalovirus, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, adenovirus, toxoplasmosis, and acanthamaebiasis. Thirty nonopportunistic infections in 22 patients (82%) were also identified. The 3 deaths related to nonopportunistic infections all involved Enterococcus species bacteremia. When compared with a concurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia cohort that underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, alemtuzumab recipients had an incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation of 66.7% (6 of 9 patients), compared with 37% in the non-alemtuzumab group (10 of 27 patients; P = .15), and an incidence of post-transplant opportunistic infections (excluding herpesviruses) of 44.4% (compared with 29.6% in the non-alemtuzumab group; P = .41).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of herpesvirus and Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis, serious infectious complications occur in patients receiving alemtuzumab for lymphoproliferative disorders. Infectious complications are more varied and diverse in patients receiving alemtuzumab than has been reported in trials to date.

Update on management of infections in cancer and stem cell transplant patients

Infections are the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with aggressive malignancies and those undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The introduction of new therapeutic approaches including the use of nucleoside analogs and of monoclonal antibodies to CD20 and CD52 and the increased use of matched unrelated stem cell donors has resulted in new challenges with regard to systemic viral and fungal infections. In patients with bacterial infections, emergence of resistance to formerly widely used antibiotics as well as a shift of causative pathogens towards a predominance of multi-resistant gram-positive cocci has to be taken into consideration. In high-risk neutropenic patients with fever of unknown origin, prompt empiric monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, or a carbapenem is mandatory. In patients with lung infiltrates, early preemptive intervention with an antifungal active against aspergilli is recommended, whereas in patients with catheter-related, skin or soft tissue infections, preemptive addition of a glycopeptide shows a high response rate. The prompt preemptive use of ganciclovir or foscarnet in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients can reliably be guided by serial monitoring of cytomegalovirus antigen and polymerase chain reaction monitoring.

The Emerging Role of Alemtuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Targeted therapy for malignant hematologic disorders has become a realistic goal with the identification of novel antibodies that are designed to act against highly expressed antigens on malignant clones. CD52 is abundantly expressed on malignant lymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD52 and induces cell death by several mechanisms that are still under investigation. The initial positive results of many clinical studies that explored the activity of alemtuzumab in relapsed and/or refractory CLL have provoked many oncologists to incorporate this agent into the treatment paradigm of this disease. Prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of therapy or until patients are no longer immunocompromised are recommended. This review summarizes the clinical experience with alemtuzumab that eventually led to its approval. Recent novel prognostic factors and trends in CLL therapy are also reviewed.

Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Alemtuzumab is a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody (MAb) that recognizes the CD52 antigen, expressed on normal and neoplastic lymphocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells. In 2001, alemtuzumab was approved in the US and Europe to treat B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that had been treated previously with alkylating agents and was refractory to fludarabine. In heavily pretreated patients this MAb is able to produce response rates of about 40%, and in symptomatic, previously untreated patients response rates of more than 80% can be achieved. Alemtuzumab can also be used in patients with CLL as a preparative regimen for stem cell transplantation (SCT) and to prevent graft versus host disease. Moreover its in vivo use before or after SCT may also potentially result in depletion of residual leukemia cells, especially in the autologous setting. Adverse events associated with alemtuzumab include acute first-dose reaction, hematologic toxicity, and infectious complications. Usually they are predictable, manageable, and acceptable in the context of CLL. However, in a significant percentage of patients, cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs during alemtuzumab therapy, and routine weekly monitoring with the polymerase chain reaction methodology is indicated. Moreover, antiviral and antibacterial prophylaxis is mandatory.

Antibody therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a promising new modality

Therapeutic options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been limited, with low complete response rates (CR) and no treatments demonstrating a survival advantage. The recent introduction of the monoclonal antibodies rituximab and alemtuzumab into clinical trials for patients with CLL has generated promising results. Rituximab targets the CD20 antigen and demonstrates varied single-agent activity that is highly dependent upon the dosing schedule and treatment status of the patient. More importantly, when rituximab is combined with fludarabine or fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, a high frequency of CR and prolonged progression-free survival are observed without an appreciable increase in significant toxicity. Alemtuzumab targets the more ubiquitously expressed CD52 antigen and is therefore associated with a higher frequency of toxicity, particularly immunosuppression, but has appreciable activity in fludarabine refractory CLL. Additionally, alemtuzumab is effective against CLL clones that have p53 mutations or deletions. Future efforts in developing combination strategies with rituximab, alemtuzumab, and potentially other new antibodies offer great promise for the future treatment of CLL.

Homing and mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic cancer cells are mirror image processes, utilizing similar signaling pathways and occurring concurrently: circulating cancer cells constitute an ideal target for concurrent treatment with chemotherapy and antilineage-specific antibodies

Adhesion molecules and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 signaling play key role in homing and mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor (HPC) and hematopoietic cancer clonogenic cells (HCC). High expression of VLA-4 is required for homing of HPC and HCC, whereas downregulation of these molecules is required for successful mobilization of HPC and HCC. Upregulation and activation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling is required for homing of HPC and HCC, whereas disruption of the SDF-1 signaling is required for mobilization of HPC and HCC. Hence, mobilizations of HPC and HCC occur concurrently. It is proposed that drug resistance evolves as a result of repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Following each cycle of chemotherapy, HCC lose adhesion molecules and SDF-1 signaling. Surviving cells, released from tumor sites, circulate until re-expression of adhesion molecules and CXCR4 occurs, then homing to stroma of distal tissues occurs. Cytokines secreted by cells in the new microenvironment induce proliferation and drug resistance of HCC. This process is amplified in each cycle of chemotherapy resulting in disease progression. A novel model for treatment is proposed in which circulating HCC are the target for clinical intervention, and concurrent treatment with chemotherapy and antilineage-specific antibodies will result in abrogation of the 'vicious cycle' of conventional anticancer therapy.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most commonly diagnosed leukemias managed by practicing hematologists. For many years patients with CLL have been viewed as similar, with a long natural history and only marginally effective therapies that rarely yielded complete responses. Recently, several important observations related to the biologic significance of V(H) mutational status and associated ZAP-70 overexpression, disrupted p53 function, and chromosomal aberrations have led to the ability to identify patients at high risk for early disease progression and inferior survival. Concurrent with these investigations, several treatments including the nucleoside analogues, monoclonal antibodies rituximab and alemtuzumab have been introduced. Combination of these therapies in clinical trials has led to high complete and overall response rates when applied as initial therapy for symptomatic CLL. Thus, the complexity of initial risk stratification of CLL and treatment has increased significantly. Furthermore, when these initial therapies do not work, approach of the CLL patient with fludarabine-refractory disease can be quite challenging. This session will describe the natural history of a CLL patient with emphasis on important decision junctures at different time points in the disease. In Section I, Dr. Stephan Stilgenbauer focuses on the discussion that occurs with CLL patients at their initial evaluation. This includes a review of the diagnostic criteria for CLL and prognostic factors utilized to predict the natural history of the disease. The later discussion of risk stratification focuses on molecular and genomic aberrations that predict rapid progression, poor response to therapy, and inferior survival. Ongoing and future efforts examining early intervention strategies in high risk CLL are reviewed. In Section II, Drs. Ian Flinn and Jesus G. Berdeja focus on the discussion of CLL patients when symptomatic disease has developed. This includes an updated review of monotherapy trials with nucleoside analogs and recent trials that have combined these with monoclonal antibodies and/or alternative chemotherapy agents. Appropriate application of more aggressive therapies such as autologous and allogeneic immunotherapy and less aggressive treatments for appropriate CLL patient candidates are discussed. In Section III, Dr. John Byrd focuses on the discussion that occurs with CLL patients whose disease is refractory to fludarabine. The application of genetic risk stratification in choosing therapy for this subset of patients is reviewed. Available data with conventional combination based therapies and monoclonal antibodies are discussed. Finally, alternative promising investigational therapies including new antibodies, kinase inhibitors (CDK, PDK1/AKT, PKC) and alternative targeted therapies (DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, etc.) are reviewed with an emphasis on the most promising agents for this patient population.

Alemtuzumab therapy in B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H, Ilex Pharmaceuticals, San Antonio, TX) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that recognizes the CD52 antigen expressed on malignant and normal B lymphocytes. It has come to be used therapeutically in B-cell malignancies. Responses are seen in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and alemtuzumab can induce molecular remissions in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), even when refractory to purine analogues. Most studies reveal the responses to be superior in the absence of bulky disease. Infusion-related side effects such as rigors, hypotension, and nausea are reduced by using the subcutaneous route of administration. Infectious complications are the most important toxicity seen and are related to the depletion of normal lymphocytes. The clinical efficacy in combination with both fludarabine and rituximab is under investigation.

Pharmacokinetics of alemtuzumab used for in vivo and in vitro T-cell depletion in allogeneic transplantations: relevance for early adoptive immunotherapy and infectious complications

Persistence of alemtuzumab at lympholytic concentrations after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantations (RITs) could impair immune reconstitution and reduce donor T-cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma (GVL) effects, derived from the graft or subsequent adoptive immunotherapy. We have studied the pharmacokinetics of alemtuzumab in 2 different groups: RIT (100 mg alemtuzumab in vivo over 5 days) and myeloablative allografts (20 mg alemtuzumab added in vitro to the stem cells prior to return). Alemtuzumab concentrations in RIT patients were in excess of that required to kill infused donor CD52+ cells at the time of transplantation and remained at potentially lympholytic levels (> 0.1 microg/mL) for approximately 56 days after transplantation, 26 days longer than for the myeloablative group. Total lymphocyte counts were significantly lower in the RIT group persisting beyond 6 months after transplantation (P =.005), and median absolute CD4 counts higher than 200 x 106/L were delayed until 9 months after transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus viremia during Campath-1H therapy for relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and prolymphocytic leukemia

Campath-1H is effective therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL), but it is associated with profound lymphopenia and deficiencies in cell-mediated immunity. We report the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in 34 patients treated with Campath-1H for relapsed or refractory CLL and PLL. All patients received infection prophylaxis during therapy and continuing for at least 2 months following Campath-1H. Five patients (15%) developed CMV viremia at a median of 28 days (range, 20-30 days) after the first dose of Campath-1H. The median CMV viral load was 860/mL (range, 420-2100/mL), as determined by quantitative plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All 5 patients had a temperature > 38.5 degrees C, normal chest radiographs, normal liver function tests, and negative bacterial blood cultures with no clinical evidence of CMV disease at the time of presentation with CMV viremia. The median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 740/ microL (range, 340-1600/ microL), and the median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was 16/microL (range, 11-169/ microL) for the 5 patients at the time of CMV viremia. All 5 patients received ganciclovir therapy followed by prompt fever resolution and clearance of CMV viremia by plasma PCR. By univariate regression analysis, the following were not risk factors for CMV viremia: age, number of prior regimens, prior rituximab therapy, prior splenectomy, modified Rai stage at Campath-1H therapy (low/intermediate vs. high), ANC, and ALC; although, there was a trend towards significance for prior rituximab therapy (P = 0.07). Cytomegalovirus viremia may be a significant infectious complication during Campath-1H therapy and should be investigated further in future studies.

Using unconjugated antibodies as an immunotherapeutic approach to treatment of B-cell neoplasms

B-cell neoplasms have the sixth highest mortality incidence and one of the largest rates of increase of all malignancies. Frequent relapse and the development of refractory disease in this patient group have stimulated research to find alternative treatments. The use of unconjugated antibodies offers a new approach to the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This article will explore the pharmacology, dosage, and administration guidelines as well as side effect management of the available drugs in this classification. Expectations for future approaches to the treatment of B-cell neoplasms will be discussed.

Campath-1H (anti-CD52) monoclonal antibody therapy in lymphoproliferative disorders

Campath-1H is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted against the CDw52 membrane antigen of lymphocytes, which causes complement and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Campath-1H has been used in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL), and low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LGNHL). Campath-1H is administered intravenously thrice weekly for up to 12 wk, at an initial dose of 3 mg, escalated to 10 and 30 mg. The responses (complete [CR] and partial [PR]) obtained in untreated B-CLL patients are of the order of 90%. In previously treated B-CLL patients, responses are of the order of approximately 40%, with 2-4% CRs. Responses are more prominent in the blood and bone marrow compared to the lymph nodes. The median duration of response is 9-12 mo. Because of the antibody's higher activity on circulating lymphocytes, it has been used for in vivo purging of residual disease in B-CLL, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. In heavily pretreated advanced stage LGNHL, response is achieved only in 14% of cases with B-phenotype; a 50% response rate is noted in mycosis fungoides. In T-PLL, the CR rate is approximately 60%. Promising results have been reported in a small number of patients with refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenia of lymphoproliferative disorders. The main complications of Campath-1H treatment are caused by tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6 release, usually during the first intravenous infusion, and include fever, rigor, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension responsive to steroids. These side effects are usually less severe with subsequent infusions and can be prevented by paracetamol and antihistamines. Immunosupression resulting from normal B- and T-lymphocyte depletion is frequent, resulting in an increased risk for opportunistic infections. More clinical trials in a larger number of patients are necessary to determine the exact role and indications of Campath-1H in lymphoproliferative disorders.

Conceptual aspects of combining rituximab and Campath-1H in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Monoclonal antibody-based therapy has emerged as a novel approach in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. The safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies make these compounds attractive and easy to administer, even in elderly, heavily pretreated patients. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is an incurable disease with few therapeutic options once patients fail purine analogue-based therapy. Two monoclonal antibodies have shown activity in this disease. The first is rituximab (Rituxan; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, and IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA), a chimeric human-mouse anti-CD20 antibody. The second is Campath-1H, a humanized form of a rat antibody active against CD52. We hypothesize that combining both antibodies in patients who have failed conventional therapies and express both CD20 and CD52 might have enhanced efficacy and therapeutic benefit. This concept is being explored at our institution in the context of a phase I/II clinical trial. The outcome and feasibility of this combination opens the way for future combination therapies using novel biologic agents. Semin Oncol 29 (suppl 2):75-80. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Antibody-targeted immunotherapy for treatment of malignancy

Despite testing since the mid-1900s, only in the past three years have some monoclonal antibodies provided sufficient efficacy and safety data to support regulatory approval as cancer therapy. Adjuvant-edrecolomab monoclonal antibody was approved in Germany after demonstration of a statistically significant 32% improvement over observation alone in the seven-year mortality rate for patients with colorectal cancer. Similarly, trastuzumab monoclonal antibody combined with chemotherapy prolonged the median time to the progression of breast cancer compared to chemotherapy alone. Unconjugated monoclonal antibodies investigated for the treatment of hematologic malignancies include anti-idiotype, CAMPATH-1, and rituximab. Rituximab was the first such therapy approved in the United States for relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after demonstration of an overall response rate of 48% and a duration of response of 11.7 months. The radioisotope-conjugated monoclonal antibodies tested as therapy include anti-B1, LYM-1, LL2, anti-CD33, and ibritumomab tiuxetan. Clearly, the full potential of immunotherapy still lies ahead.

A phase II multicenter study of CAMPATH-1H antibody in previously treated patients with nonbulky non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

CAMPATH-1H is a humanized antilymphocyte monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the CD52 antigen expressed on normal and malignant lymphocytes. We report the results of a multicenter phase II trial using intravenous CAMPATH-1H in previously treated patients with nonbulky non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or minimal residual NHL. Sixteen previously treated patients with nonbulky NHL and two patients with minimal residual NHL, were treated with CAMPATH-1H. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometric techniques in eleven patients. The 18 patients enrolled in the studies received CAMPATH-1H for a median duration of 6 weeks (range, 3 to 14 weeks), and a median cumulative dose of 470 mg (range, 180 to 1185 mg). Two of the sixteen patients with nonbulky NHL achieved a complete response (CR) and one patient achieved a partial response (PR). One of the two patients with minimal residual NHL achieved a molecular CR. Infusional complications were seen with the majority of patients but were more common with initial infusions. Significant hematologic toxicity was also observed with grade (3/4) thrombocytopenia (n=10), grade (3/4) neutropenia (n=4) and grade 3 anemia (n=3). Due to excessive infectious complications observed with the patients enrolled, the trials were terminated early. Anti-tumor activity was demonstrated in a small subset of previously treated low-grade lymphoma patients with nonbulky or minimal residual disease. Future studies evaluating the effect of different drug schedules, modes of mAb administration, and concurrent use of prophylactic antibiotics/antiviral/antifungal agents to optimize anti-tumor activity and limit infectious toxicities are planned.

Campath-1H monoclonal antibody therapy

Monoclonal antibodies are receiving ever-increasing utilization in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Campath-1 antibodies are directed against the surface antigen CD52 that is expressed on virtually all lymphocytes and monocytes. Murine forms, Campath-1G and Campath-1M, have been utilized extensively in allogeneic bone marrow transplants in order to purge the allograft of lymphocytes. The humanized form, Campath-1H, is currently the focus of many clinical trials in hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases. The genetically engineered Campath-1H has been utilized in the treatment of lymphomas and lymphoid leukemias with impressive results. T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphomas appear to be particularly good targets for this agent. Campath-1H may be administered intravenously or subcutaneously. Infectious complications are the most significant side effect associated with its usage, with fevers, chills, nausea, and vomiting most common. Antibiotic prophylaxis has made the infectious morbidity associated with Campath-1H more manageable. The efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials and manageable toxicities make Campath-1H an appealing agent in the treatment of hematologic malignancies.

Rituximab anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody induces marked but transient reductions of peripheral blood lymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients

Rituximab has been recently proposed as an effective non-chemotherapeutic option for patients with follicle centre lymphoma (FCL). However, less is known on its role in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We thus decided to assess its effectiveness on a panel of 7 patients with refractory or relapsed CLL. Mild (5 patients) or severe (1 patient) adverse reactions were observed during the first hours of Rituximab infusion, almost exclusively at the first course. Symptoms rapidly subsided with temporary drug withdrawal and low dose steroids. All patients could receive the whole scheduled treatment. A striking reduction of peripheral blood (PB) lymphocyte counts was observed in all patients (median 93%; range 57-99%). However, Rituximab was poorly effective towards nodal and splenic disease. Patients required additional treatment after a median time of 70 d (range: 20-180 d). Our data show that Rituximab delivery in CLL patients is feasible and has an acceptable toxicity, although it probably does not represent an ideal treatment option when delivered using schedules originally designed for FCL patients. However, responses observed at PB level suggest that Rituximab has an activity which is not negligible and deserves further investigation in CLL. Future approaches will be directed to the development of alternative schedules which may include dose intensification, combination of Rituximab and chemotherapy, and in vivo purging of peripheral blood progenitor cell harvests for autografting procedures.

Association of serum Rituximab (IDEC-C2B8) concentration and anti-tumor response in the treatment of recurrent low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies are being utilized for treatment of patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma as well as other cancers. Results from phase I and II clinical studies has shown that the chimeric monoclonal antibody Rituximab has minimal toxicity and significant therapeutic activity in low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We have recently reported on a multicentre pivotal phase III clinical trial involving 166 patients with recurrent low-grade lymphoma who were treated with four infusions of Rituximab. Eighty patients (48%) achieved objective responses including 10 patients (6%) with complete responses. Overall, 126 patients (76%) had a > or = 20% reduction in overall tumor size. The median response duration and time to progression are 11.6 and 13.2 months, respectively. The infusional and long term toxicities were limited.

RESULTS

In this report we describe the pharmacokinetic data obtained on these patients. Measurable concentrations of Rituximab were detected in all patients after the first infusion and increased throughout the treatment course. The half-life of the monoclonal antibody increased from 76.3 hours after the first infusion to 205.8 hours after the fourth infusion and was concomitant with a four-fold decrease in the antibody clearance. At three months and six months post-treatment, the median Rituximab serum levels were 20.3 micrograms/ml (range 0.0 to 96.8 micrograms/ml in 104 patients) and 1.3 micrograms/ml (range 0.0-28.7 micrograms/ml in 13 patients), respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between the median antibody concentration and response for multiple time points during the treatment and followup. The mean serum antibody concentration was also inversely correlated with measurements of tumor bulk and with the number of circulating B cells at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that Rituximab is therapeutically effective against B-cell lymphoma. Pharmacokinetic data suggests that certain subsets of patients may possibly benefit from increased dosing and studies to address this are currently underway.

Cytomegalovirus retinitis and low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: case report and review of the literature

Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma may develop retinal or choroidal lesions during the course of their disease. New immunosuppressive therapies currently used in reticuloendothelial malignancies have increased the incidence of opportunistic infections in this patient population. The differentiation of lymphomatous infiltration from opportunistic infection as a cause of chorioretinal infiltrates is critical, as the treatments are fundamentally different. We report a case of a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who developed a chorioretinal infiltrate that was initially thought to represent progressive disease. The patient received radiation treatment appropriate for intraocular lymphoma. The lesion progressed further and after reevaluation a diagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis was made and therapy initiated. Review of the literature for intraocular lymphoma and cytomegalovirus retinitis is provided and diagnostic strategies are described. We recommend analysis of intraocular fluid when there is difficulty in clinically differentiating intraocular lymphoma from opportunistic infection.