The COP regimen is not a feasible treatment for advanced, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Emerging therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The presentation, clinical course and prognosis for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is diverse and strategies for therapy reflect this variability. Staging of the disease has assisted in deciding treatment options and more recently the cytogenetic, molecular and surrogate markers of the immunoglobulin heavy chain mutational status, CD38 and ZAP-70, have assisted in further risk stratification. Chemotherapy has been the mainstay of interventional therapy when required and the two most important classes of agents in the treatment of CLL are nucleoside analogues and alkylating agents. Combining these two groups of agents has significantly improved prognosis in this disease. More recently a number of novel agents have been applied to patients with CLL to determine if they represent better therapy. However, allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers perhaps the only realistic chance of a cure in this disease. Clinical trials are still needed to determine the timing and role of this promising treatment modality in the treatment of CLL and, where possible, combined with the emerging awareness of the disease biology, related biological markers and prognostic indicators.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: diagnosis and treatment

Traditionally, the goal of therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been palliative, with first-line therapy using alkylating agents and/or involved field radiotherapy (depending on the stage of disease and sites of involvement) because of the older age of affected patients and the low rate of complete remissions (CRs) with no improvement in overall survival despite treatment. With increasing knowledge about the biology, molecular genetics, and prognostic factors of the disease, the philosophy of care for patients with CLL has evolved from palliation to aiming for a potential cure, especially in younger patients. Furthermore, multiple treatment options have emerged, including purine analogues, monoclonal antibodies, and potentially stem cell transplantation. These have been associated with higher frequencies of CRs and longer durations of responses compared to conventional chemotherapy. In addition, a subset of patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy can achieve durable CRs and molecular remissions. This may translate into improved disease-free survival and potentially a "cure." Because of the heterogeneous nature of CLL, new prognostic markers are currently being incorporated into clinical trials to determine their role in routine clinical practice. This review summarizes current therapeutic regimens that are being evaluated in patients with CLL and management of disease-related complications.

Salvage Therapy for CLL and the Role of Stem Cell Transplantation

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) remains an incurable disease and, notwithstanding the excellent remission rates now achieved with purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies, the vast majority of patients with CLL are destined to relapse after primary treatment. The management of relapsed CLL patients is then dependent upon a number of factors, most importantly age, performance status, previous therapy administered, the response and duration of response to such therapy, and time from last therapy. Although prior therapy and response to such therapy are important factors in determining next therapy, it is often difficult to determine their importance from published studies. Furthermore, the goal of therapy, whether palliative or aggressive, must also be weighed into the decision when deciding on the next line of treatment. With many potential treatments available, the sequence of treatments and the timing of procedures such as stem cell transplantation remain controversial and are the focus of ongoing clinical trials.

Mechanisms and management of toxicities associated with high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy

PURPOSE

The toxicity associated with adjuvant high-dose interferon-alfa-2b therapy (HDI) for high-risk melanoma can lead to premature discontinuation. It is important to understand the expected adverse events and their underlying mechanisms and to anticipate and aggressively manage toxicity during treatment in order to ensure that patients receive the maximum therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

The toxicity profile of HDI was reviewed by examining data from the United States cooperative group trials. Available published data related to the potential mechanisms responsible for the observed adverse events are discussed, and comprehensive recommendations for managing side effects are presented.

RESULTS

The HDI regimen is associated with acute constitutional symptoms, chronic fatigue, myelosuppression, elevated liver enzyme levels, and neurologic symptoms. The majority of patients tolerate 1 year of therapy with an understanding of the anticipated toxicities in conjunction with appropriate dose modifications and supportive care. Ongoing monitoring for liver dysfunction and hematologic toxicity is critical to ensure safety. Many of the toxicities associated with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) seem to be the result of endogenous cytokines and their effects on the neuroendocrine system. Recent data have also demonstrated that IFN-alpha suppresses the activity of specific CYP450 isoenzymes and that this correlates with discrete toxicities. Pharmacologic interventions are under study for fatigue and depression. An increased understanding of the mechanisms of IFN-alpha-associated toxicity will lead to more rational and effective supportive care and improved quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Continued research in this area should lead to improvements in the safety and tolerability of adjuvant therapy for melanoma.

Alkylating agents and nucleoside analogues in the treatment of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of leukemia in the Western world. The natural clinical course is highly variable and chemotherapy is usually not indicated in early and stable disease. Treatment is needed in the progressive form of this leukemia. Chlorambucil, with or without steroids, has been for many years the drug of choice in the treatment of CLL. More recently, treatment approaches have included nucleoside analogues, (NA) fludarabine (FAMP) and cladribine (2-CdA, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), which seem to be the treatment of choice for patients failing standard therapies. Their role as first line therapy is being investigated in randomized trials and the results have recently been published. These studies have shown a higher overall response and complete remission (CR) rate and longer response duration in patients treated initially with NA than with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide-based combination regimens. In contrast, overall survival is similar in patients treated with NA and alkylating agents. However, the randomized trials were designed as crossover studies which may influence survival. Combined use of NA with other cytotoxic drugs, cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and other agents may increase the CR and prolong survival time. However, the results of randomized trials comparing combination treatment with NA alone are not yet available. In conclusion, alkylating agents still have an important place in the routine management of the majority of CLL patients. NA should be routinely used as second line treatment and possibly as first line therapy in younger patients, who are candidates for potentially curative treatment such as stem cell transplantation and/or monoclonal antibodies.