Growth factor administration following autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

The role of growth factor administration and T-cell recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of solid tumors: results from a randomized comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation (PBPCT) combined with post-PBPCT administration of myelopoietic growth factors is a valid therapeutic intervention to rapidly restore hematopoiesis after the delivery of intensive, myeloablative cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, the best growth factor regimen to potentiate PBPC-mediated immunohematopoietic recovery has yet to be determined.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a randomized evaluation, the effects produced by post-PBPCT G-CSF and GM-CSF on myeloid/lymphoid recovery and transplant outcome in women with chemosensitive cancer were compared. Thirty-seven ovarian cancer patients and 34 breast cancer patients ranging in age from 24 to 60 years were treated with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) high-dose chemotherapy and then randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) or GM-CSF (5 microg/kg subcutaneously) until Day 13 after PBPCT. Patients were compared in regard to hematopoietic recovery, posttransplant clinical management, and immune recovery. Finally, clinical outcome was estimated as time to progression and overall survival.

RESULTS

Hematopoietic recovery and posttransplant clinical management were comparable in both the G-CSF and GM-CSF series. Conversely, significantly higher T-cell counts were observed in G-CSF-treated patients during the early and late posttransplant follow-up. Patients who received G-CSF showed a significantly longer median time to progression. A parallel analysis revealed that patients in whom a higher CD3+ count was recovered had a significantly longer overall survival and time to progression.

CONCLUSION

The enhancement of post-PBPCT T-cell recovery observed in G-CSF-treated patients encourages the use of G-CSF to ameliorate immune recovery, which seems to play a role in post-PBPCT control of disease in cancer patients. GM-CSF might be administered to prolong immunosuppression after autologous PBPCT for autoimmune diseases or allogeneic PBPCT.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND

The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery.

RESULTS

The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor perturbs lymphocyte mitochondrial function and inhibits cell cycle progression

Sera from healthy subjects receiving recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) to mobilize CD34(+) peripheral blood progenitors (PBPC) have been recently shown to induce unresponsiveness of allogeneic lymphocytes to mitogenic challenge. In the present investigation, the effects of rHuG-CSF on the early stages of lymphocyte activation-induced apoptosis and on lymphocyte cell cycle entry were evaluated. Sera were obtained from HLA-identical donors receiving rHuG-CSF to mobilize CD34(+) PBPC for allogeneic transplantation. Normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were challenged with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in the presence of serum collected before (preG) or after rHuG-CSF administration (postG). Mitochondrial function, that is, incorporation of 3,3'-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide [DiOC(6)(3)] and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as expression of c-Myc and Bcl-2 family members (Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), Bax) were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry. The activation-induced fragmentation of genomic DNA was detected by highly sensitive LM-PCR assay.CD4(+)DiOC(6)(3)(low) and CD8(+)DiOC(6)(3)(low) T lymphocytes increased and reached 32% (range 27%-38%) and 20% (range 15%-23%) of circulating T cells, respectively, on day 4 of rHuG-CSF administration. Hypergeneration of ROS could be demonstrated in 65% (range 58%-82%) of CD4(+) T lymphocytes and in 0.4% (range 0.2%-0. 8%) of circulating CD8(+) T cells. rHuG-CSF determined no alteration of mitochondrial function if added to allogeneic PBMC in vitro, thus suggesting indirect effects mediated by soluble factors; on the contrary, when PBMC were challenged with PHA in the presence of postG serum, both perturbation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Deltapsi(m)) and hypergeneration of ROS were induced, and lymphocytes were predominantly arrested in a G(0) -like phase of the cell cycle and displayed genomic DNA fragmentation. Interestingly, the preincubation of PBMC with a blocking antibody directed against CD95 abrogated the perturbation of lymphocyte Deltapsi(m), suggesting that the CD95 signaling pathway might play a role in the induction of apoptosis after PHA stimulation in the presence of postG serum. Moreover, Bax protein was overexpressed in postG (median fluorescence intensity = 180, range 168-186) compared with preG cultures (median fluorescence intensity = 75, range 68-80; p < 0.01), while no differences in Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), and c-Myc staining intensity were observed. Our findings demonstrate a humoral-mediated rHuG-CSF-induced dissipation of lymphocyte mitochondrial Deltapsi(m); these effects might be mediated by Bax overexpression, with imbalance between apoptosis-promoting and apoptosis-inhibiting Bcl-2 family members and with subsequent induction of mitochondrial permeability transition. Whether immune dysfunction will favorably impact on incidence and severity of acute graft vs host disease after allogeneic PBPC transplantation remains to be determined.

Erythropoietin addition to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor abrogates life-threatening neutropenia and increases peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: results of a randomized comparison

PURPOSE AND METHODS

The ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus erythropoietin (EPO) treatment was compared in a randomized fashion with that of G-CSF treatment alone in promoting hematologic recovery and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent their first course of epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy during a phase II study of intensive outpatient ETP chemotherapy followed by high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan (CEM) late intensification with PBPC support.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of hematologic recovery of 50 randomized patients, after ETP chemotherapy, showed that life-threatening neutropenia occurred in 88% of the patients treated with G-CSF alone, whereas it occurred in only 4% of patients treated with G-CSF + EPO. Significantly different WBC and polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts were observed in the two distinct arms on the day of WBC nadir (P <.0001 and P <.0001, respectively). Moreover, the addition of EPO to G-CSF increased PBPC mobilization and collection as compared with that in G-CSF-treated patients (P =.0009 and P =.0026, respectively), who required a significantly higher number of leukaphereses than G-CSF + EPO-treated patients (P =.0076) to obtain the planned minimum dose of PBPCs. Qualitative analysis by cloning assay of PBPCs collected in both arms revealed that G-CSF- and G-CSF + EPO-mobilized PBPCs have comparable in vitro functional properties.

CONCLUSION

This randomized comparison revealed that EPO significantly increases most of the hematologic effect produced by G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. This biologic property of EPO translated in vivo into a global improvement of patients' hematologic status.