Collection of more hematopoietic progenitor cells with large volume leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma

Presence of Promyelocytes in Peripheral Blood as a Novel Predictor of Optimal Timing for Single-Step Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection

BACKGROUND

Because peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection places a burden on the patient and should ideally be completed in a single procedure, a convenient clinical predictive factor is needed.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 72 patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection. A median volume of 3.9 × 10⁶ CD34-positive cells/kg (range: 0.3-47.4 × 10⁶ cells/kg) was collected on the first day. We defined failure as inability to collect 2.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg on the first day. PBSC collection was classified as failed (n = 25, 34.7%) and successful (n = 47, 65.3%), and patient clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

The success group had significantly more cases in which a differential white blood cell count in peripheral blood on the day of PBSC collection detected promyelocytes (n = 34 [72.3%] vs. n = 11 [44.0%] in the failure group; P = 0.008). Sixty-two patients underwent autologous PBSC transplantation (median number of transplanted cells, 5.6 × 10⁶/μL; range: 1.60-47.4 × 10⁶ cells/μL). Among transplanted patients, the success and failure groups did not significantly differ in relation to the interval until neutrophil, platelet, or red blood cell engraftment.

CONCLUSION

The presence of promyelocytes in peripheral blood may be a useful indicator of the optimal timing for single-step PBSC collection.

How do we mobilize and collect autologous peripheral blood stem cells?

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) has become a widely applied therapeutic approach for many hematologic and nonhematologic diseases. Adequate PBSC mobilization is critical to the success of ASCT. However, many factors can contribute to poor mobilization. Plerixafor is an effective yet costly adjunct agent that has been increasingly used to improve mobilization in a variety of diagnoses and clinical settings. However, to achieve both optimal cell collection yields and cost-effectiveness, the role of plerixafor in PBSC mobilization needs to be well defined in terms of triggers for initiating its use and criteria for monitoring response. As one of the largest hematopoietic transplant centers in the country, we have developed an approach to PBSC mobilization and collection that incorporates patient laboratory assessments, monitoring of the collection yields, and judicious use of plerixafor as well as various patient support and education programs. These measures have resulted in an increase in our collection success rate and a decrease in the mean number of collection days. In this article we describe our approach to autologous PBSC mobilization and collection. Pertinent reports in the literature are also reviewed and discussed.

How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly

Transplantation with 2-5 × 106 mobilized CD34+cells/kg body weight lowers transplantation costs and mortality. Mobilization is most commonly performed with recombinant human G-CSF with or without chemotherapy, but a proportion of patients/donors fail to mobilize sufficient cells. BM disease, prior treatment, and age are factors influencing mobilization, but genetics also contributes. Mobilization may fail because of the changes affecting the HSC/progenitor cell/BM niche integrity and chemotaxis. Poor mobilization affects patient outcome and increases resource use. Until recently increasing G-CSF dose and adding SCF have been used in poor mobilizers with limited success. However, plerixafor through its rapid direct blockage of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemotaxis pathway and synergy with G-CSF and chemotherapy has become a new and important agent for mobilization. Its efficacy in upfront and failed mobilizers is well established. To maximize HSC harvest in poor mobilizers the clinician needs to optimize current mobilization protocols and to integrate novel agents such as plerixafor. These include when to mobilize in relation to chemotherapy, how to schedule and perform apheresis, how to identify poor mobilizers, and what are the criteria for preemptive and immediate salvage use of plerixafor.

Safety and efficacy assessment of plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma proven or predicted to be poor mobilizers, including assessment of tumor cell mobilization

This was an open-label, single-center, phase II study of 20 patients with multiple myeloma who were either proven poor mobilizers (n=10; group A) or predicted poor mobilizers (n=10; group B) and were planned for autologous hematopoietic SCT. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of plerixafor for stem cell mobilization and tumor cell contamination. The peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count was generally very low pre- plerixafor and increased significantly post-plerixafor administration. Cumulative apheresis yields of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were observed in 7 of 10 patients (group A) and 8 of 10 patients (group B). Among the proven poor mobilizers, there was no evidence of tumor cell mobilization in the PB after G-CSF plus plerixafor treatment. Seventeen of 20 (85%) patients underwent transplantation. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of 13 days for all patients. Platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 16 days and 19 days for all proven and predicted poor mobilizers, respectively. At 12 months, 12 of 17 patients had documented durable grafts, 3 of 17 patients died and 2 of 17 patients were lost to follow-up; but they had documented graft durability at the previous 3- and 6-month visit. The safety profile of plerixafor in all patients was consistent with previous reports.

Multiple myeloma patients receiving large volume leukapheresis efficiently yield enough CD34+ cells to allow double transplants

Current protocols for myeloma patients require more than one autologous transplant. We performed a retrospective study to determine the cost-effectiveness of large volume leukapheresis (LVL) compared with standard volume leukapheresis (SVL) collection when two transplants are required. We evaluated 87 patients who underwent a cumulative total of 260 LVL and SVL collections. The median product volume per collection was 356 ml for LVL, and this was significantly higher than the median product volume per collection for SVL (median 149.5 ml, P < 0.001). The median total CD34+ cell yield/kg was 6.4 x 10(6) for LVL and 5.2 x 10(6) for SVL. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.005). Because the target CD34+ cell dose for a single transplant was 3 x 10(6)/kg at our institution, overall the LVL yields enough CD34+ cells that could allow for two transplants. Therefore, more patients in the LVL group were able to undergo a potential second transplant. Because of the reserved cells for a second transplant, LVL patients received significantly less CD34+ cell/kg per transplant than the patients in SVL group (P = <0.001). As a result, LVL group had statistically significant but clinically insignificant delay in neutrophil (P = <0.001) and platelet (P = 0.02) engraftments. Additionally, using LVL instead of SVL to collect >or=6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells may potentially save $7,497 per patient. We therefore conclude that LVL is the method of choice for collection of multiple myeloma patients when two transplants are anticipated.

Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Given the potential to limit cost, we conducted a pilot study evaluating delayed, low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following chemotherapy for the procurement of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autologous transplantation and reviewed the relevant literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with various malignancies received cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m(2) and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF 300 microg/d or 480 microg/d starting day +5 until two to four daily large volume leukapheresis yielded > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells. We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and EMBASE databases from 1990 to the present to identify papers on PBPC procurement using delayed G-CSF (starting day +4 or later) following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

G-CSF was administered for a median of 9 days at an average cost of 1260 USD per 70-kg patient. Collection was initiated at a median of 12 days after chemotherapy. A median 2.5 (range 2-4) apheresis were performed yielding an average daily CD34+ collection of 6.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.35-56.7). After one apheresis, 82% and 57% of patients collected > or =2.5 x 10(6)/kg and > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Ultimately, 89% collected > or =5.0 x 10(6)/kg. Febrile neutropenia and catheter-related infection developed in five and two patients, respectively. All patients proceeded to transplantation and engrafted successfully with a median of 14.9 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.05-113) cells infused. Eleven published reports were identified involving 590 patients of whom 498 received G-CSF at a dose range of 250 microg/d to 10 microg/kg/d starting day +4 to 15 for a period of 4 to 9 days for PBPC procurement. Among these reports, 62 to 100% and 33 to 96% of patients collected > or =2 to 2.5 x 10(6) and > or =5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of delayed, low-dose G-CSF plus chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization was feasible and provides further evidence supporting this potentially cost-effective strategy. A review of the literature supports our findings and emphasizes the need for larger studies to address this issue.

Large-volume leukapheresis yields more viable CD34+ cells and colony-forming units than normal-volume leukapheresis, especially in patients who mobilize low numbers of CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND

Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) differs from normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) by increased blood flow and altered anticoagulation regimen. LVL is now regarded as a safe procedure for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), but it is not known whether the procedure will alter CD34+ cell quality or will be useful for patients who mobilize few CD34+ cells into peripheral blood.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The results from 82 LVL and 125 NVL (4.0-5.3 and 2.7-3.5 times the patients' blood volumes processed, respectively) were retrospectively analyzed in altogether 112 consecutive patients with malignant diseases.

RESULTS

The LVL yielded significantly more CD34+ cells (4.2 x 10(6) vs. 3.1 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.006, all patients; and 1.8 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.004, bad mobilizers) and significantly higher colony-forming units (77 x 10(4) vs. 33 x 10(4)/kg; all patients and 33 x 10(4) vs. 20 x 10(4)/kg, p < 0.001, both groups). Significantly fewer leukapheresis procedures were required to obtain 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (one vs. two, p = 0.001, all patients; and two vs. three, p = 0.009, bad mobilizers). No significant differences in CD34+ cell viability and time to hematologic recovery were observed between the patients who received PBPCs harvested by NVL and LVL.

CONCLUSION

Although a median platelet loss of 36 percent can be expected, LVL can be recommended as the standard apheresis method for PBPC collections in patients with malignant diseases. LVL is particularly useful in patients who mobilize a low number of CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood.

Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients: Do we need an age-adjusted regimen for the elderly?

The upper age limit for autologous progenitor cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients is increasing continuously. We examined whether this shift in the age of pretreated myeloma patients requires modification of mobilization regimen. We compared retrospectively 21 consecutive progenitor cell mobilizations in 15 pts < 60 years (median age 56, range 37-59) with 33 consecutive mobilizations in 23 pts > 60 years (median age 65, range 60-73) of age. The number of CD34 positive circulating cells before scheduled leukapheresis was a mean of 67,935 cells/mL (SEM +/- 17,614) in the younger population and a mean of 19,069 (SEM +/- 5,396) for older pts (P = 0.0027). In patients >60 years, 13/33 mobilizations (including 2 patients with 2 failing attempts) were not successful (39%), compared to 6/21 mobilizations (29%, including 1 patient with 3 failing attempts) in the younger population. The increased number of progenitor cells in the grafts of younger patients led to a more rapid regeneration of leukocytes and platelets after stem cell infusion. Our data show that stem cell mobilization in older multiple myeloma patients is inferior compared to a younger patient population. There is a trend towards more leukapheresis until the target stem cell dose has been collected, and the decreased number of progenitor cells in the actual graft delays engraftment of leukocytes and platelets. The overall number of unsuccessful mobilization attempts, however, did not differ significantly between both age groups. A special "age-adjusted" increase in the dose of growth factors seems unjustified. Improvements in timing of leukapheresis, growth factor application, and mobilizing chemotherapy regimen as well as the use of alternative cytokines should be investigated for both age groups.

Effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a retrospective review of 67 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma at Mayo Clinic and treated with a single regimen prior to stem cell transplantation between January of 2000 and September of 2001. Stem cells were collected from 24 patients who received thalidomide, 200 mg/day, with dexamethasone as initial therapy before stem cell collection. These patients were compared with 43 control patients seen during the same period who had received only one previous regimen before stem cell collection and transplantation. The cumulative thalidomide dose before stem cell collection was 17 000 mg over a median of four cycles (range, 2-7 cycles). The thalidomide and control groups were not significantly different in their baseline characteristics, number of stem cells collected, time to collection, or time to engraftment of neutrophils or platelet count of 50 000/microl. Time to platelet count of 20 000/microl was delayed by a median of 4 days (P=0.008), but platelet transfusion requirements did not differ (P=0.95). We concluded that thalidomide does not substantially affect peripheral cell mobilization or engraftment.

Kinetics of standardized large volume leukapheresis (LVL) in patients do not show a recruitment phenomenon of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC)

Although several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of large volume leukapheresis (LVL) to yield high numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC), the mechanisms of stem cell release into circulation and the postulated phenomenon of PBPC recruitment during apheresis have not been investigated in detail. Therefore, we analyzed the kinetics of stem cell enrichment in a total of 34 standardized LVL for patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphoma, multiple myeloma) and solid tumors (breast cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma). LVL was started 2 h after administration of G-CSF processing six times the patient's blood volume. Cells were sequentially collected into six bags and the numbers of leukocytes, mononuclear cells (MNC), CD34+ cells and colony-forming cells (CFU-GM) in each collection bag were analyzed. The numbers of PBPC collected demonstrated a continuous decrease starting after an early maximum during the second processed blood volume (P = 0.001). Interestingly, these kinetics of decreasing stem cell yields during LVL were similar for both entities of patients with hematologic malignancies as well as for both groups of patients with solid tumors. In summary, a recruitment phenomenon, defined as a time-dependent and LVL-induced increase of PBPC, could not be demonstrated in any of the diseases investigated.

Peripheral blood stem cell collection: the interaction of technology, procedure, and biological factors

Centrifugal technology, continuous flow and discontinuous flow, has served as the technology platform for extracting cell concentrates of interest from peripheral blood (PB) for patient therapy for the past 35-40 yr. Models for procedure outcome exist for collection of normal donor (ND) platelet and granulocyte concentrates that integrate: (1) biological variables (pre-procedure PB cell concentration, the total circulating quantity of cells, donor/patient blood volume (BV)), (2) device efficiency, and (3) procedure parameters such as total blood processed (TBP), and in the case of cytoreductions - the volume collected. (cf. Hester J, Kellogg R, Mulzet A, et al., Blood (54) (1979) 254; Hester J, Ventura G, J Clin Apheresis (4) (1988) 188.) To date, no predictive CD34+ yield algorithm integrating these three variables has been formulated that could be applied prospectively for individual ND or patients (PT). There are economic, toxicity and statistical comparison benefits to be derived from generating such an algorithm.A small pilot study is presented with a brief review of current publications that suggest the circulating quantity of CD34+ cells available to be collected and the quantity mobilized during leukapheresis are the major contributing factors to CD34+ yield, somewhat obscuring the role of the total blood processed (TBP). Intraprocedure CD34+ cell mobilization, incompletely characterized to date, appears to be a dynamic nonlinear process, as the harvested yield does not rise proportionally as the fraction of BV processed increases. And, like the pre-procedure PB CD34+ concentration and total circulating quantity, CD34+ mobilization during leukapheresis probably relates to prior treatment and the priming regimen. Studies that provide: (1) separate analyses of PT populations divided according to chemotherapy toxicity factors; (2) design and implementation of optimal priming regimens with respect to dose 'intensity' of both growth factors and chemotherapy; and (3) standardization of laboratory assays of CD34+ enumeration seem essential to generating a predictive algorithm.

Stem Cell Collection using the Dideco Excel Continuous Flow Blood Cell Separator: Parameters for Optimal Stem Cell Collection Timing

This study evaluates stem cell collection procedures performed with the Dideco Excel blood cell separator, with particular attention given to yields and separator collection efficiencies. Patients’ blood precounts and yield parameters related to the harvest capacity of the collection system were investigated. Fifty-five collection procedures were analyzed in 32 patients suffering from hematological malignancies and solid tumors and mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The median blood volume processed in each procedure was 15.8 liters (12–19.750), with a blood flow rate of 70 ml/min. Patients had the following median blood precount value: NC 7.81×109/L, CD34+ cells 49.08×103/ml. Leukapheresis procedures gave the following yields: NC 14.95×109, MNC 10.83×109, CD34+ cells 4.37×106; yields/kg, NC 0.21×109kg, MNC 0.15×109/kg CD34+ cells 4.26×106/kg. Procedures show the following collection efficiencies: NC 10.79%, MNC 29.06%, CD34+ 42.33%, PLT 26.5%. The RBC (red blood cell) contamination of the product was (median value) 20.9 ml for each procedure, and for platelets 1.76×1011 per procedure. The CD34+ cell precounts strongly correlated with the CD34+ yields/kg (r=0.82. p=0.000). Furthermore the NC and MNC precounts correlated with the CD34+ yields/kg but only the MNC precount correlation is notable (r=0.57, p=0.000). The logistic regression analysis shows that CD34+ (p=0.008) but not NC (po=0.14), MNC (p=0.09), or PLT (p=0.53) precounts significantly influenced the collection of a sufficient dose of CD34+ cells for transplantation (≥ 2.5×106/kg). Eleven of the thirty-two patients have been transplanted till now, and all had a prompt and lasting trilineage engraftment NC >1×109/L on day 12 (10–17). Our data show that the collection system analyzed in this report is able to collect large amounts of progenitor cells, harvesting ≥2.5×106/kg CD34+ cells with a single procedure in 68.8% of patients and assuring complete recovery after stem cell transplantation.

Repeated peripheral stem cell mobilization in healthy donors: time-dependent changes in mobilization efficiency

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells was analysed in 10 consecutive healthy donors undergoing repeated stem cell mobilization for allogeneic transplantation. Donors received recombinant G-CSF at a dose of 10 microg/kg/d for both mobilizations. Collection of stem cells was started on day 5 of G-CSF administration. To compare the efficiency of first and second mobilization, we determined the leucocyte and CD34+ cell counts in peripheral blood, and the yield of nucleated cells and CD34+ cell counts in the apheresis product. CD34+ cell numbers in peripheral blood were (median) 81.2 x 10(6)/l during the first and 50.4 x 10(6)/l during the second mobilization (P = 0.007). Likewise, CD34+ cells in the apheresis product decreased from 319.8 x 10(6) to 275.7 x 10(6) (P = 0.02). Decrease in CD34+ cell counts in peripheral blood and in the apheresis product was associated with the time interval between first and second mobilization. In a regression analysis there was a correlation between the ratios of CD34+ cell counts of first and second mobilization and the inverse of time interval between procedures (r2 = 0.51 peripheral blood; r2 = 0.74 apheresis product). Thus, stem cell yield is reduced when healthy donors receive repeated mobilization within a short time. Nevertheless, an adequate number of stem cells may repeatedly be mobilized within 2 months.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) counts during steady-state haemopoiesis enable the estimation of the yield of mobilized PBPC after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported cytotoxic chemotherapy: an update on 100 patients

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) can be mobilized using chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We and others previously reported a correlation of steady-state PBPC counts and the PBPC yield during mobilization in a small group of patients. Here we present data on 100 patients (patients: 25 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), five Hodgkin's disease, 35 multiple myeloma (MM), 35 solid tumour) which enabled a detailed analysis of determinants of steady-state PBPC levels and of mobilization efficiency in patient subgroups. Previous irradiation (P = 0.0034) or previous chemotherapy in patients with haematological malignancies (P = 0.0062) led to a depletion of steady-state PB CD34+ cells. A correlation analysis showed steady-state PB CD34+ cells (all patients: r = 0.52, P < 0.0001; NHL patients, r = 0.69, P = 0.0003; MM patients: r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) and PB colony-forming cells can reliably assess the CD34+ cell yield in mobilized PB. In patients with solid tumour a similar trend was observed in mobilization after the first chemotherapy cycle (r = 0.51, P = 0.05) but not if mobilization occurred after the second or further cycle of a sequential dose-intensified G-CSF-supported chemotherapy regimen, when premobilization CD34+ counts were 18-fold elevated (P = 0.004). When the patients with MM (r = 0.63, P = 0.0008) or with NHL (r = 0.65, P = 0.006) were analysed separately, a highly significant correlation of the steady-state PB CD34+ cell count to the mean leukapheresis CD34+ cell yield was found, whereas no correlation was observed for patients with a solid tumour. For patients with haematological malignancies estimates could be calculated which, at a specific steady-state PB CD34+ cell count, could predict with a 95% probability a defined minimum progenitor cell yield. These results enable recognition of patients who mobilize PBPC poorly and may assist selection of patients for novel mobilization regimens.

Bone marrow transplantation in multiple myeloma

Experience from around the world now suggests that high response rates can be achieved in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, patients are destined to relapse and few, if any, are cured. Major obstacles to cure are the excessive toxicity noted after allografting in multiple myeloma, contaminating tumor cells in multiple myeloma autografts, and most importantly, the persistence of minimal residual disease after high-dose therapy and either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. In this context, strategies are being developed to decrease the toxicity of allografting and to enhance allogeneic anti-multiple myeloma immunity after transplantation to improve outcome. To improve autografting, better ablative regimens, more efficacious purging of tumor cells from autografts, and enhancement of autologous anti-multiple myeloma immunity post-transplantation are modalities being tested to enhance overall and event-free survival.