Antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine in hypertensive Japanese treated with renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors - a multicenter, open, randomized trial using 24-hour urine collection

N-/T-Type vs. L-Type Calcium Channel Blocker in Treating Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCB) are often used together in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order to explore better subtypes of CCB for the treatment of CKD. This meta-analysis of 12 RCTs with 967 CKD patients who were treated with RAS inhibitors demonstrated that, when compared with L-type CCB, N-/T-type CCB was superior in reducing urine albumin/protein excretion (SMD, −0.41; 95% CI, −0.64 to −0.18; p < 0.001) and aldosterone, without influencing serum creatinine (WMD, −3.64; 95% CI, −11.63 to 4.35; p = 0.37), glomerular filtration rate (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, −0.13 to 0.25; p = 0.53), and adverse effects (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35 to 2.58; p = 0.93). In addition, N-/T-type CCB did not decrease the systolic blood pressure (BP) (WMD, 0.17; 95% CI, −1.05 to 1.39; p = 0.79) or diastolic BP (WMD, 0.64; 95% CI, −0.55 to 1.83; p = 0.29) when compared with L-type CCB. In CKD patients treated with RAS inhibitors, N-/T-type CCB is more effective than L-type CCB in reducing urine albumin/protein excretion without increased serum creatinine, decreased glomerular filtration rate, and increased adverse effects. The additional benefit is independent of BP and may be associated with decreased aldosterone (PROSPERO, CRD42020197560).

Renal Function in Hypertensive Patients Receiving Cilnidipine and L-Type Calcium Channel Blockers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled and Retrospective Studies

Nearly 65%-95% of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have hypertension. Calcium-channel blockers are the first-line drugs for the treatment of hypertension, including hypertension with diabetes. This study aims to estimate the effect of an L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), cilnidipine, on the renal function of hypertensive patients. Randomized control trials were selected from PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Science Direct, Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO), Springer, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Medline, VIP, and Wanfang databases (from the date of databases' establishment till January 2022). Data were independently evaluated following the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The changes in serum creatinine (SCr), urinary protein excretion (UPE), urinary protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after treatment, in percentages, were extracted for the meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) and a CI of 95% were determined using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 11 studies were analyzed. The standardized mean difference (SMD) between cilnidipine and L-type CCBs was -0.022, suggesting a reduced SCr with cilnidipine. For UPCR, the SMD value is 1.28. Although cilnidipine reduced UPCR in all four studies, the L-type CCBs reported a slight increase in UPCR. For eGFR, the SMD value was found to be 0.693. Cilnidipine had a more favorable effect on eGFR when compared to the L-type CCBs. While cilnidipine had similar effects on SCr to that of L-type CCBs, cilnidipine showed greater improvement in UPCR, UPE, and eGFR values.

N-type calcium channel and renal injury

Accumulating evidences indicated that voltage-gated calcium channels (VDCC), including L-, T-, N-, and P/Q-type, are present in kidney and contribute to renal injury during various chronic diseases trough different mechanisms. As a voltage-gated calcium channel, N-type calcium channel was firstly been founded predominately distributed on nerve endings which control neurotransmitter releases. Since sympathetic nerve is distributed along renal afferent and efferent arterioles, N-type calcium channel blockade on sympathetic nerve terminals would bring renal dynamic improvement by dilating both arterioles and reducing glomerular pressure. In addition, large body of scientific research indicated that neurotransmitters, such as norepinephrine, releases by activating N-type calcium channel can trigger inflammatory and fibrotic signaling pathways in kidney. Interestingly, we recently demonstrated that N-type calcium channel is also expressed on podocytes and may directly contribute to podocyte injury in denervated animal models. In this paper, we will summarize our current knowledge regarding renal N-type calcium channels, and discuss how they might contribute to the river that terminates in renal injury.

Efficacy of Cilnidipine (L/N-type Calcium Channel Blocker) in Treatment of Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

 Hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases, and the prevalence of hypertension continues to rise across the globe. National and international guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), diuretics, and beta-blockers for the management of hypertension. CCBs are among the most used antihypertensive medications and Cilnidipine is a newer dihydropyridine CCB shown to have a prolonged antihypertensive property.

OBJECTIVE

 This meta-analysis of comparative randomized and non-randomized clinical trials evaluated the effect of Cilnidipine monotherapy or combination therapy on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse rate (PR) over 48 weeks of therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

 PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google scholar databases were searched to identify studies designed to evaluate the effects of Cilnidipine in the treatment of hypertensive patients. The study criteria for inclusion into the meta-analysis were all prospective, randomized, and non-randomized clinical studies published till March 2021, studies published in a peer-reviewed journal, the inclusion of patients with hypertension, assessment of blood pressure and heart rate, and a follow-up of four weeks or longer. The initial search identified 82 potential articles; of these, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Studies with <4 weeks treatment period and those not having a CCB were excluded.

OUTCOMES

 Change in SBP, DBP, and PR from baseline at the end of therapy compared between the Cilnidipine and other CCB's.

RESULTS

Cilnidipine caused a significant reduction (p<0.05) in SBP, DBP, and PR at end of therapy, whereas the reduction in SBP, DBP, and PR with Cilnidipine was similar to other CCB's (p>0.05). The results of this meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the efficacy in the treatment of hypertensive patients with Cilnidipine and the other therapies.

CONCLUSION

 Cilnidipine has similar anti-hypertensive effects compared with other first-line antihypertensive drugs commonly used in practice. We recommend Cilnidipine as a novel first-line CCB for the management of hypertension either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy.

On the top of ARB N/L type Ca channel blocker leads to less elevation of aldosterone

The activation of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is one of the unfavourable characteristics of calcium channel blocker (CCB). N type calcium channel is thought to be involved in renin gene transcription and adrenal aldosterone release. Accordingly, N/L type CCB has a possibility of less elevation of plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) among CCBs. In a monotherapy study, we had already demonstrated that N/L type CCB leads to less activation of the RAS compared with L type CCB. The objective of this study is to substantiate the hypothesis that at the condition of additive administration on the top of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), still N/L type CCB leads to less elevation of PAC compared with L type one. Subjects were 60 hypertensives administered with valsartan. As an open label study, amlodipine (L type) or cilnidipine (N/L type) were administered on the top of valsartan (ARB) in a cross-over manner. Results were as follows (valsartan+amlodipine compared with valsartan+cilnidipine): systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg): 132±10/76±10 compared with 131±10/77±9, P=0.95/0.48, plasma renin activity (PRA) (ng/ml·h): 2.41±2.67 compared with 2.00±1.50 P=0.20, PAC (pg/ml): 77.3±31.0 compared with 67.4±24.8, P<0.05, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (mg/gCr): 105.9±216.1 compared with 73.9±122.2, P<0.05. Thus, PAC at cilnidipine was significantly lower than those at amlodipine in spite of the comparable BP reductions. Besides, UAE was significantly lower at cilnidipine. In conclusion, on the top of the ARB, it is suggested that cilnidipine administration might lead to less elevation of PAC and reduction in UAE compared with amlodipine.

Effect of N- and T-type calcium channel blocker on proteinuria, blood pressure and kidney function in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis

The combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and a blocker of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is recommended in clinical practice guidelines. L/N- and L/T-type CCBs might provide an additional effect on lowering proteinuria. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of L/N- and L/T-type CCBs in hypertensive patients with proteinuria. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for single-arm studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of L/N- and L/T-type CCBs as add-on therapy compared with standard antihypertensive regimen for proteinuria on hemodynamic and kidney-related parameters in hypertensive patients with proteinuria. Random-effect model meta-analyses were used to compute changes in the outcomes of interest. We identified 17 RCTs, representing 1905 patients. By meta-analysis, L/N- and L/T-type CCB add-on therapy did not yield significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with standard treatment, but there was a significant lowering of the pulse rate. However, L/N- and L/T-type CCBs resulted in a significant standardized net decrease in albuminuria and proteinuria (-1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.78 to -0.23; P=0.01), and a standardized net improvement in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine (0.23; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.35, P<0.001; and -0.25; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.03; P=0.02, respectively). Despite no additional lowering effect on blood pressure, L/N- and L/T-type CCBs combined with a blocker of the RAAS provided a decrease in proteinuria and improvement in kidney function. Further studies are required to establish the long-term kidney benefits of this combination therapy.

Excellent tolerance to cilnidipine in hypertensives with amlodipine - induced edema

Background:

Ankle edema is a common adverse effect of amlodipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB). Cilnidipine is a newer L/N-type CCB, approved for treatment of essential hypertension.

Aim:

This study was designed to determine whether cilnidipine can produce resolution of amlodipine-induced edema while maintaining adequate control of hypertension.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective study was performed on 27 patients with essential hypertension with amlodipine-induced edema. Concomitant nephropathy, cardiac failure, hepatic cirrhosis, or other causes of edema, and secondary hypertension were excluded by appropriate tests. Amlodipine therapy was substituted in all the cases with an efficacy-equivalent dose of cilnidipine. Clinical assessment of ankle edema and measurement of bilateral ankle circumference, body weight, blood pressure, and pulse rate were performed at onset of the study and after 4 weeks of cilnidipine therapy.

Results:

At completion of the study, edema had resolved in all the patients. There was a significant decrease in bilateral ankle circumference and body weight (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in mean arterial blood pressure and pulse rate.

Conclusions:

Therapy with cilnidipine resulted in complete resolution of amlodipine-induced edema in all the cases without significant worsening of hypertension or tachycardia. Cilnidipine is an acceptable alternative antihypertensive for patients with amlodipine-induced edema.

Comparison of the antialbuminuric effects of L-/N-type and L-type calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria: the study of assessment for kidney function by urinary microalbumin in randomized (SAKURA) trial

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether the L-/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB) cilnidipine is more renoprotective than the L-type CCB amlodipine in patients with early-stage diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial, the antialbuminuric effects of cilnidipine and amlodipine were examined in renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor-treated patients with hypertension (blood pressure [BP]: 130-180/80-110 mmHg), type 2 diabetes, and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin to creatinine [Cr] ratio [UACR]: 30-300 mg/g).

RESULTS

Patients received cilnidipine (n = 179, final dose: 10.27 ± 4.13 mg/day) or amlodipine (n = 186, 4.87 ± 2.08 mg/day) for 12 months. Cilnidipine and amlodipine equally decreased BP. The UACR values for the cilnidipine and amlodipine groups were 111.50 ± 138.97 and 88.29 ± 63.45 mg/g, respectively, before treatment and 107.93 ± 130.23 and 89.07 ± 97.55 mg/g, respectively, after treatment. The groups showed similar changes for the natural logarithm of the UACR, serum Cr, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilnidipine did not offer greater renoprotection than amlodipine in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.

L/N-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine reduces plasma aldosterone, albuminuria, and urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with chronic kidney disease

Cilnidipine inhibits both L- and N-type calcium channels and has been shown to dilate efferent arterioles as effectively as afferent arterioles. We conducted an open-label, randomized trial to compare the effects of cilnidipine against those of amlodipine on blood pressure (BP), albuminuria, and plasma aldosterone concentration in hypertensive patients with mild- to moderate-stage chronic kidney disease. Patients with BP ≥130/80 mmHg, an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90-30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and albuminuria ≥30 mg/g, despite treatment with the maximum recommended dose of angiotensin II receptor blockers, were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients received either 10 mg/day cilnidipine (increased to 20 mg/day; n = 35) or 2.5 mg/day amlodipine (increased to 5 mg/day; n = 35). After 48 weeks of treatment, a significant and comparable reduction in systolic and diastolic BP was observed in both groups. The percent reduction in the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) in the cilnidipine group was significantly greater than in the amlodipine group. Although plasma renin activity did not differ between the two groups, the plasma aldosterone level was significantly decreased in the cilnidipine group. Cilnidipine therefore appears to reduce albuminuria, urinary L-FABP, and plasma aldosterone levels more than amlodipine, and these effects are independent of BP reduction.

Metabolic syndrome and renal injury

Both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are major global health issues. Current clinical markers used to reflect renal injury include albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Given the same eGFR level, urine albumin might be a better risk marker to predict progression of CKD and future development of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Serum Cystatin C is emerging as a new biomarker for early detection of renal injury associated with MetS and cardiovascular risk. In addition to each component, MetS per se influences the incidence and prognosis of renal injury and the odds ratios increased with the increase in the number of metabolic abnormalities. Hyperinsulinemia, activation of rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, increase of oxidative stress, and inflammatory cytokines are proposed to be the plausible biological link between MetS and CKD. Weight control, stick control of blood pressure, glucose, and lipids disorders may lead to lessening renal injury and even the subsequent CVD.