Combination Therapy of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Exerts Pleiotropic Therapeutic Effects in Addition to Blood Pressure Lowering: Amlodipine and Candesartan Trial in Yokohama (ACTY)

Safety and efficacy of candesartan versus valsartan combined with amlodipine on peripheral and central blood pressure

INTRODUCTION

"Amlodipine/valsartan" or "amlodipine/candesartan" combinations represent two effective antihypertensive agents with complementary mechanisms of action. Nevertheless, a study has yet to be done to evaluate the effect of amlodipine/candesartan on central blood pressure and compare it with amlodipine/valsartan combination. To see how "amlodipine plus candesartan combination" reduces peripheral and central blood pressure compared to the most studied combination, "amlodipine plus valsartan".

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients were randomized in an open-label, prospective study by 1:1 ratio to two groups. Group I (n=42) received the amlodipine and valsartan combination, and group II (n=44) received the amlodipine and candesartan combination. Peripheral and central blood pressure (CBP) was measured at baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Both treatment groups reduced peripheral systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure. There was no significant difference between and within both groups. The amlodipine/candesartan combination showed more reduction in peripheral systolic blood pressure (PSBP) after 12 weeks of treatment (p=<0.001). Both groups decreased CBP without significant differences between groups. The amlodipine/candesartan combination showed additional efficacy in decreasing CSBP after 12 weeks (p=<0.001). The two treatment groups did not exert significant efficacy in lowering heart rate (HR) and augmentation index% (AIx%).

CONCLUSION

To conclude, the amlodipine 10mg/candesartan 16mg combination was non-inferior to the amlodipine 10mg/valsartan 160mg combination in terms of reducing peripheral and CBP over time.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to a calcium channel blocker (CCB) following ineffective CCB monotherapy

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis to systematically review and analyze the clinical benefits of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combined with calcium channel blocker (CCB) following ineffective CCB monotherapy.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for articles published until August 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical benefits of ARB combined with CCB following ineffective CCB monotherapy were included. The primary efficacy endpoint of the studies was normal rate of blood pressure, the secondary efficacy endpoints were the response rate and change in blood pressure from baseline. The safety endpoint of the studies was incidence of adverse events. Differences are expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity across studies was tested by using the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included and had sample sizes ranging from 185 to 1,183 subjects (total: 3,909 subjects). The pooled analysis showed that the on-target rate of hypertension treatment was significantly higher in the amlodipine + ARB group than in the amlodipine monotherapy group (RR =1.59; 95% CI, 1.31-1.91; P<0.01). The response rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (RR =1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.58; P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (RR =1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.44; P=0.04) were significantly higher in the amlodipine + ARB group than in the amlodipine monotherapy group. The change in SBP (RR =-3.56; 95% CI, -7.76-0.63; P=0.10) and DBP (RR =-3.03; 95% CI, -6.51-0.45; P=0.09) were higher in hypertensive patients receiving amlodipine + ARB but the difference did not reach statistical significance. ARB + amlodipine treatment carried a lower risk of adverse events relative to amlodipine monotherapy (RR =0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that adding an ARB to CCB after initial ineffective CCB monotherapy, significantly improved blood pressure control and the percentage of on-target hypertension treatment with significantly reduced incidence of adverse events compared with continued CCB monotherapy.

Angiotensin converting enzyme is involved in the cardiac hypertrophy induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats

INTRODUCTION

The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that local angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) was involved in the cardiac hypertrophy induced by sinoaortic denervation (SAD) in rats.

METHODS

Experiment 1: Six weeks after SAD of rats, components of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in left ventricles were assayed by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting analysis. Experiment 2: Rats were divided into five groups treated as follows: (1) sham-operated group; (2) SAD group; (3) SAD group treated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist losartan (10 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1), orally); (4) SAD group treated by ACE inhibitor ramipril (1 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1), orally); (5) SAD group treated by ramipril and the B2-kinin receptor selective antagonist HOE-140 (0.25 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1), subcutaneously).

RESULTS

SAD led to augmentation of the mRNA levels and protein expression of left ventricular ACE and AT1R. Both losartan and ramipril ameliorated SAD-induced left ventricular hypertrophy. Both losartan and ramipril abated oxidative stress, suppressed inflammation, and reduced expression TGFβ-R in left ventricles. In addition, the protective effect of ramipril could be abolished by HOE-140.

CONCLUSION

Local ACE is involved in the left ventricular hypertrophy induced by sinoaortic denervation in rats, via both angiotensin II/AT1R and bradykinin/B2R pathways.

Effects of single pill-based combination therapy of amlodipine and atorvastatin on within-visit blood pressure variability and parameters of renal and vascular function in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease

Both strict blood pressure (BP) control and improvements in BP profile such as BP variability are important for suppression of renal deterioration and cardiovascular complication in hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In the present study, we examined the beneficial effects of the single pill-based combination therapy of amlodipine and atorvastatin on achievement of the target BP and clinic BP profile, as well as markers of vascular and renal damages in twenty hypertensive CKD patients. The combination therapy with amlodipine and atorvastatin for 16 weeks significantly decreased clinic BP, and achievement of target BP control was attained in an average of 45% after the combination therapy in spite of the presence of no achievement at baseline. In addition, the combination therapy significantly decreased the within-visit BP variability. With respect to the effects on renal damage markers, combination therapy with amlodipine and atorvastatin for 16 weeks significantly decreased albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, 1034 ± 1480 versus 733 ± 1218 mg/g-Cr, P < 0.05) without decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Concerning parameters of vascular function, the combination therapy significantly improved both brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and central systolic BP (cSBP) (baPWV, 1903 ± 353 versus 1786 ± 382 cm/s, P < 0.05; cSBP, 148 ± 19 versus 129 ± 23 mmHg, P < 0.01). Collectively, these results suggest that the combination therapy with amlodipine and atorvastatin may exert additional beneficial effects on renal and vascular damages as well as BP profile in addition to BP lowering in hypertension with CKD.

Association between left ventricular hypertrophy and changes in arterial stiffness during hypertensive treatment

Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) has been demonstrated as a parameter of arterial stiffness, which antihypertensive therapy may improve. However, little information is available about the factors affecting changes in arterial stiffness assessed by CAVI during antihypertensive therapy. We performed a study to examine the factors affecting changes in arterial stiffness assessed by CAVI during antihypertensive therapy. Eighty treated hypertensive patients (71 ± 10 years) were divided into two groups: 50 patients showing a decrease in CAVI (Group 1) and 30 patients showing an increase (Group 2) during observation (24 ± 11 months) of antihypertensive therapy. The groups did not differ in the rates of use of angiotensin II receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers. Age (Group 1: 67 ± 11 versus Group 2: 74 ± 8 years), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (Group 1: 103 ± 19 versus Group 2: 120 ± 24 g/m(2)) and systolic blood pressure (Group 1: 133 ± 17 versus Group 2: 144 ± 23 mm Hg) at the start of observation were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p = 0.003, p = 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). The changes in CAVI during observation were correlated only with LVMI (r = 0.289, p = 0.009) at the start of observation for all 80 patients. It may be difficult to improve arterial stiffness assessed by CAVI during antihypertensive therapy in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.