Mortality amongst patients of the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic was high in the 1970s and 80s but has fallen since, why?

Valsartan and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: Blood pressure control and beyond

Patients treated for hypertension are still at significantly elevated risk for cardiovascular complications when compared with normotensive patients, even when on antihypertensive therapy. In all fairness though, a majority of these patients have uncontrolled blood pressure. Blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) prevents or reverses cardiac remodelling and improves prognosis in cardiovascular disease beyond the effects on blood pressure (BP). Valsartan acts by selectively blocking the AT1-receptor and shows similar efficacy and improved tolerability compared with ACE inhibitors. This drug may provide additional benefits in controlling the cardiovascular complications of hypertension. Results of large clinical trials with valsartan, such as VALUE, Val-HEFT, VALIANT and ABCD-2V, are eagerly awaited.

Trends in mortality from all causes and cardiovascular disease among hypertensive and nonhypertensive adults in the United States

BACKGROUND

Little is known about trends in the mortality rate among people with hypertension in the United States. The objective of the present study was to examine the change in the all-cause mortality rate among people with and without hypertension in the United States and whether any such changes differed by sex or race.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 10 852 participants aged 25 to 74 years of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I Epidemiological Follow-Up Study (1971 to 1975) and of 12 420 participants of the NHANES III Linked Mortality Study (1988 to 1994) were used. The mean follow-up times were 17.5 and 14.2 years, respectively. In each cohort, the mortality rate was higher among hypertensive adults than nonhypertensive adults, among hypertensive men than hypertensive women, and among hypertensive blacks than hypertensive whites. Among all hypertensive participants, the age-adjusted mortality rate was 18.8 per 1000 person-years for NHANES I and 14.3 for NHANES III (13.3 and 9.1 per 1000 person-years for nonhypertensive participants, respectively). The reduction among hypertensive men (7.7 per 1000 person-years; 95 confidence interval, 5.2 to 10.2) exceeded that among hypertensive women (1.9 per 1000 person-years; 95 confidence interval, [-0.4 to 4.2]) (P<0.001), and the reduction among hypertensive blacks (5.4 per 1000 person-years; 95 confidence interval, [0.6 to 10.1]) exceeded that among hypertensive whites (4.4 per 1000 person-years; 95 confidence interval, [2.2 to 6.5]) (P=0.707).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate decreased among hypertensive adults, but the mortality gap between adults with and without hypertension remained relatively constant. Efforts are needed to accelerate the decrease in the mortality rate among hypertensive adults.

Impact of new clinical trials on recent guidelines on hypertension management

Guidelines on hypertension diagnosis and treatment have been issued in 2007. Since then, a number of major intervention clinical trials have been designed, carried out, and completed with the aim of investigating unsolved issues related to the impact of the blood pressure-lowering intervention on cardiovascular risk and events. These include, among others, the nephroprotective properties of antihypertensive drugs, the blood pressure targets to be achieved during treatment in uncomplicated and more so in complicated hypertensive patients, the advantages of one drug combination versus another, and the benefits of antihypertensive drugs in the very elderly. All these questions have received a clear-cut answer by the results of recently performed clinical trials, which have been included in the 2009 update document of the European guidelines. This paper will be focused on the 2007 guidelines document and the 2009 update paper, highlighting the new concepts and recommendations provided by the most recent intervention trials.

AII antagonists in hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy: focus on losartan

The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to prevent cardiovascular complications of hypertension, such as heart failure, stroke, end stage renal disease, and death, not just to normalize blood pressure. Recently, several clinical trials investigated the beneficial effects of angiotensin II antagonists (AIIAs) in patients with hypertension, heart failure or diabetic nephropathy utilizing proven clinical outcomes (e.g., all-cause mortality) rather than surrogate outcomes (e.g., blood pressure or proteinuria). The AIIAs may offer therapeutic advantages with respect to particular outcomes in certain types of patients. Evidence is also emerging that losartan may possess beneficial pharmacological properties such as effects on uric acid, platelets, sexual dysfunction, and cognitive function, that may set it apart from other members of the AIIA class. However, further studies are needed to delineate fully these potential pharmacological differences among the AIIAs and their possible clinical relevance. This paper reviews recent AIIA outcomes studies in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or diabetic nephropathy and also examines data suggesting that molecular differences exist within the AIIA class, differences that may assist in explaining the outcomes achieved in these recent trials.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs on vascular remodeling: do they predict outcome in response to antihypertensive therapy?

Remodeling of large and small arteries in hypertension contributes to elevation of blood pressure, and may participate in the complications of hypertension. Large arteries exhibit increased lumen size, thickened media with increased collagen deposition, and decreased compliance, which contributes to raised systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure. In small (resistance) arteries smooth muscle cells are restructured around a smaller lumen, without true hypertrophy, particularly in milder forms of hypertension, whereas in severe forms and in secondary hypertension hypertrophic remodeling has been reported. Endothelial dysfunction occurs in many patients, with prevalence similar to that of left ventricular hypertrophy. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor subtype 1 antagonists and long-acting calcium channel blockers has corrected changes in large and small arteries in hypertensive patients. Treatment with beta-blockers did not modify either structure or function of small arteries. Improved outcomes were reported in clinical trials with drugs that exert vascular protective effects, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor subtype 1 antagonists, as well as with those that do not appear to improve vascular structure or function. Recent trials suggest that these different drugs may provide similar benefits essentially through blood pressure lowering, although some minor differences between drugs have been noted. For example, the alpha-blocker doxasozin has been associated with worse outcomes (heart failure) than have diuretics. That hard end-point clinical trials have not demonstrated any advantages of agents with vasculoprotective properties may relate in part to the relatively short duration of some of these multicenter trials (3-5 years). Another contributing factor may be the low number of events with each drug class in the longer trials. Thus, current evidence does not support the rational expectation that vasculoprotective antihypertensive agents will be associated with better outcomes in hypertensive patients, possibly because of limitations of these trials.

Peripheral vascular disease and hypertension: a forgotten association?

Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is associated with a high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Intermittent claudication is the most common symptomatic manifestation of PVD, but is also an important predictor of cardiovascular death, increasing it by three-fold, and increasing all-cause mortality by two to five-fold. Hypertension is a common and important risk factor for vascular disorders, including PVD. Of hypertensives at presentation, about 2-5% have intermittent claudication, with this prevalence increasing with age. Similarly, 35-55% of patients with PVD at presentation also have hypertension. Patients who suffer from hypertension with PVD have a greatly increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Apart from the epidemiological associations, hypertension contributes to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the basic underlying pathological process underlying PVD. Hypertension, in common with PVD, is associated with abnormalities of haemostasis and lipids, leading to an increased atherothrombotic state. Nevertheless, none of the large antihypertensive treatment trials have adequately addressed whether a reduction in blood pressure causes a decrease in PVD incidence. There is therefore an obvious need for such outcome studies, especially since the two conditions are commonly encountered together.

Small artery remodeling in hypertension: can it be corrected?

Vascular structure, function, and mechanics are altered in hypertension, which contributes to an important degree to complications of elevated blood pressure. Vascular hypertrophy with collagen deposition and increased stiffness is found in large arteries, whereas in small arteries, smooth muscle cells are restructured around a smaller lumen, and there is no net growth of the vascular wall, particularly in milder forms of hypertension. Hypertrophic remodeling and increased small artery stiffness may be found in more severe hypertension. Endothelial dysfunction occurs in large or smaller vessels in a variable percentage of patients, particularly in presence of other risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, and advanced atherosclerosis. In clinical trials, 1-year treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists, and long-acting calcium channel blockers corrected small artery structure and endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients, whereas beta-adrenergic receptor blockers did not. Improved outcomes in hypertensive patients demonstrated in recent trials with some but not others of these agents could be a consequence, at least in part, of vascular protection offered by some antihypertensive agents.

Should an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor be standard therapy for patients with atherosclerotic disease?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors appear to possess unique cardioprotective benefits, even when used in patients without high blood pressure or left ventricular dysfunction (the traditional indications for ACE inhibitor therapy). The ACE inhibitors improve endothelial function and regress both left ventricular hypertrophy and arterial mass better than other antihypertensive agents that lower blood pressure equally as well. These agents promote collateral vessel development and improve prognosis in patients who have had a coronary revascularization procedure (i.e., percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Insulin resistance, present not only in type 2 diabetes but also commonly in patients with hypertension or coronary artery disease, or both, sensitizes the vasculature to the trophic effects of angiotensin II and aldosterone. This may partly explain the improvement in prognosis noted when patients who have atherosclerosis or diabetes are treated with an ACE inhibitor. Therapy with ACE inhibitors has also been shown, in two large, randomized trials, to reduce the incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes through largely unknown mechanisms. The ACE inhibitors are safe, well tolerated and affordable medications. The data suggest that most people with atherosclerosis should be considered candidates for ACE inhibitor therapy, unless they are intolerant to the medication, or have systolic blood pressures consistently <100 mm Hg. Patients who show evidence of insulin resistance (with or without overt type 2 diabetes) should also be considered as candidates for prophylactic ACE inhibitor therapy. Although angiotensin receptor blockers should not be considered equivalent to ACE inhibitors for this indication, they may be a reasonable alternative for patients intolerant of ACE inhibitors.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on hypertensive vascular disease

Hypertension is associated with alterations in the structure, function, and mechanical properties of large and small arteries. Changes in the endothelium, smooth muscle cell, extracellular matrix, and possibly the adventitia, contribute to complications of hypertension. In large arteries, vascular hypertrophy is found, often with increased stiffness of media components. In small arteries, particularly in mild hypertension, rearrangement of smooth muscle cells around a smaller lumen without changes in media volume (eutrophic remodeling) occurs; in more severe hypertension, hypertrophic remodeling with increased vascular stiffness can be found. Vascular remodeling is accompanied by an increase in the extracellular matrix, particularly collagen deposition. Recent studies have demonstrated that vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction of small and large vessels may be normalized by treatment with some antihypertensive agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonists, and long-acting calcium channel blockers). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have now been shown to improve outcomes in hypertensive patients, an effect that may in part be related to the vascular protective effects reviewed here.