Purification and reconstitution of a recombinant human neurokinin-1 receptor

Progress toward heterologous expression of active G-protein-coupled receptors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Linking cellular stress response with translocation and trafficking

High-level expression of mammalian G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a necessary step toward biophysical characterization and high-resolution structure determination. Even though many heterologous expression systems have been used to express mammalian GPCRs at high levels, many receptors are improperly trafficked or are inactive in these systems. En route to engineering a robust microbial host for GPCR expression, we have investigated the expression of 12 GPCRs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where all receptors are expressed at the mg/L scale. However, only the human adenosine A(2)a (hA(2)aR) receptor is active for ligand-binding and located primarily at the plasma membrane, whereas other tested GPCRs are mainly retained within the cell. Selective receptors associate with BiP, an ER-resident chaperone, and activated the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway, which suggests that a pool of receptors may be folded incorrectly. Leader sequence cleavage of the expressed receptors was complete for the hA(2)aR, as expected, and partially cleaved for hA(2)bR, hCCR5R, and hD(2L)R. Ligand-binding assays conducted on the adenosine family (hA(1)R, hA(2)aR, hA(2)bR, and hA(3)R) of receptors show that hA(2)aR and hA(2)bR, the only adenosine receptors that demonstrate leader sequence processing, display activity. Taken together, these studies point to translocation as a critical limiting step in the production of active mammalian GPCRs in S. cerevisiae.

Heterologous GPCR expression: a bottleneck to obtaining crystal structures

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important, medically relevant class of integral membrane proteins. Laboratories throughout all disciplines of science devote time and energy into developing practical methods for the discovery, isolation, and characterization of these proteins. Since the crystal structure of rhodopsin was solved 6 years ago, the race to determine high-resolution structures of more GPCRs has gained momentum. Since certain GPCRs are currently produced at sufficient levels for X-ray crystallography trials, it is speculated that heterologous expression of GPCRs may no longer be a bottleneck in obtaining crystal structures. This Review focuses on the current approaches in heterologous expression of GPCRs and explores the problems associated with obtaining crystal structures from GPCRs expressed in different systems. Although milligram amounts of certain GPCRs are attainable, the majority of GPCRs are still either produced at very low levels or not at all. Developing reliable expression techniques for GPCRs is still a major priority for the structural characterization of GPCRs.

Structural biology of G protein-coupled receptors

More than 60% of the current drugs are based on G protein-coupled receptors. Paradoxically, high-resolution structures are not available to facilitate rational drug design. Difficulties in expression, purification, and crystallization of these transmembrane receptors are the reasons for the low success rate. Recent individual and network-based technology development has significantly improved our knowledge of structural biology and might soon bring a major breakthrough in this area.

Relating surfactant properties to activity and solubilization of the human adenosine a3 receptor

The effects of various surfactants on the activity and stability of the human adenosine A3 receptor (A3) were investigated. The receptor was expressed using stably transfected HEK293 cells at a concentration of 44 pmol functional receptor per milligram membrane protein and purified using over 50 different nonionic surfactants. A strong correlation was observed between a surfactant's ability to remove A3 from the membrane and the ability of the surfactant to remove A3 selectively relative to other membrane proteins. The activity of A3 once purified also correlates well with the selectivity of the surfactant used. The effects of varying the surfactant were much stronger than those achieved by including A3 ligands in the purification scheme. Notably, all surfactants that gave high efficiency, selectivity and activity fall within a narrow range of hydrophile-lipophile balance values. This effect may reflect the ability of the surfactant to pack effectively at the hydrophobic transmembrane interface. These findings emphasize the importance of identifying appropriate surfactants for a particular membrane protein, and offer promise for the development of rapid, efficient, and systematic methods to facilitate membrane protein purification.

Expression and recovery of functional G-protein-coupled receptors using baculovirus expression systems

Baculovirus expression systems have been used for more than ten years as the tool of choice to over-express G-protein-coupled receptors. Although this expression system has also been used to study the signaling mechanisms of the receptors at the cellular level, it was found to be a most useful method to produce large quantities of receptors for biochemical and biophysical studies. Methods that allow easy and selective recovery of properly folded and mature receptors in viral particles open new perspectives for such applications.

Quantitative evaluation of neurotensin receptor purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography

Immobilized metal affinity chromatography has recently been used for purification of histidine-tagged membrane proteins in the presence of detergents with varying success. Strong binding to the metal resin is essential for purification when expression levels are low. We have investigated the influence of tag length and type of detergent on the purification of a neurotensin receptor fusion protein expressed in Escherichia coli at a level of about 0.1% of membrane protein. Receptors with six C-terminal histidine residues did not bind to nickel resin in the presence of the anionic detergent sodium dodecyl sulfate. In contrast, partial purification assessed by densitometry of Coomassie-stained gels was achieved using the nonionic detergents dodecyl maltoside or Triton X-100 (53% pure), or a detergent mixture containing the zwitterionic detergent 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (46% pure). Linking a highly charged epitope tag to the histidine tail did not affect the nickel-binding properties of receptors. The level of purification was substantially improved (72% pure) by extending the histidine tail to 10 residues because this allowed stringent washes at high imidazole concentration to remove nonspecifically bound contaminants. This strategy not only resulted in efficient purification of receptors from crude membranes, but also worked particularly well for single-step purification from total cell lysates, resulting in 340-fold purification of functional neurotensin receptor.