Ultrasound-Based Stereotactic Guidance in Prostate Cancer—Quantification of Organ Motion and Set-Up Errors in External Beam Radiation Therapy

Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer

We reviewed the literature on the use of margins in radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer, focusing on different options for image guidance (IG) and technical issues. The search in PubMed database was limited to include studies that involved external beam radiotherapy of the intact prostate. Post-prostatectomy studies, brachytherapy and particle therapy were excluded. Each article was characterized according to the IG strategy used: positioning on external marks using room lasers, bone anatomy and soft tissue match, usage of fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking and adapted delivery. A lack of uniformity in margin selection among institutions was evident from the review. In general, introduction of pre- and in-treatment IG was associated with smaller planning target volume (PTV) margins, but there was a lack of definitive experimental/clinical studies providing robust information on selection of exact PTV values. In addition, there is a lack of comparative research regarding the cost-benefit ratio of the different strategies: insertion of fiducial markers or electromagnetic transponders facilitates prostate gland localization but at a price of invasive procedure; frequent pre-treatment imaging increases patient in-room time, dose and labour; online plan adaptation should improve radiation delivery accuracy but requires fast and precise computation. Finally, optimal protocols for quality assurance procedures need to be established.

Post-radiotherapy prostate biopsies reveal heightened apex positivity relative to other prostate regions sampled

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prostate biopsy positivity after radiotherapy (RT) is a significant determinant of eventual biochemical failure. We mapped pre- and post-treatment tumor locations to determine if residual disease is location-dependent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 303 patients treated on a randomized hypofractionation trial. Of these, 125 underwent prostate biopsy 2-years post-RT. Biopsy cores were mapped to a sextant template, and 86 patients with both pre-/post-treatment systematic sextant biopsies were analyzed.

RESULTS

The pretreatment distribution of positive biopsy cores was not significantly related to prostate region (base, mid, apex; p=0.723). Whereas all regions post-RT had reduced positive biopsies, the base was reduced to the greatest degree and the apex the least (p=0.045). In 38 patients who had a positive post-treatment biopsy, there was change in the rate of apical positivity before and after treatment (76 vs. 71%; p=0.774), while significant reductions were seen in the mid and base.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, persistence of prostate tumor cells after RT increases going from the base to apex. MRI was used in planning and image guidance was performed daily during treatment, so geographic miss of the apex is unlikely. Nonetheless, the pattern observed suggests that attention to apex dosimetry is a priority.

Stereotactic ultrasound for target volume definition in a patient with prostate cancer and bilateral total hip replacement

PURPOSE

Target-volume definition for prostate cancer in patients with bilateral metal total hip replacements (THRs) is a challenge because of metal artifacts in the planning computed tomography (CT) scans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for matching and prostate delineation; however, at a spatial and temporal distance from the planning CT, identical rectal and vesical filling is difficult to achieve. In addition, MRI may also be impaired by metal artifacts, even resulting in spatial image distortion. Here, we present a method to define prostate target volumes based on ultrasound images acquired during CT simulation and online-matched to the CT data set directly at the planning CT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 78-year-old patient with cT2cNxM0 prostate cancer with bilateral metal THRs was referred to external beam radiation therapy. T2-weighted MRI was performed on the day of the planning CT with preparation according to a protocol for reproducible bladder and rectal filling. The planning CT was obtained with the immediate acquisition of a 3-dimensional ultrasound data set with a dedicated stereotactic ultrasound system for online intermodality image matching referenced to the isocenter by ceiling-mounted infrared cameras. MRI (offline) and ultrasound images (online) were thus both matched to the CT images for planning. Daily image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was performed with transabdominal ultrasound and compared with cone beam CT.

RESULTS

Because of variations in bladder and rectal filling and metal-induced image distortion in MRI, soft-tissue-based matching of the MRI to CT was not sufficient for unequivocal prostate target definition. Ultrasound-based images could be matched, and prostate, seminal vesicles, and target volumes were reliably defined. Daily IGRT could be successfully completed with transabdominal ultrasound with good accordance between cone beam CT and ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

For prostate cancer patients with bilateral THRs causing artifacts in planning CTs, ultrasound referenced to the isocenter of the CT simulator and acquired with intermodal online coregistration directly at the planning CT is a fast and easy method to reliably delineate the prostate and target volumes and for daily IGRT.

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging

This review is about the development of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonic medical imaging, how it works, and where its future lies. It assumes knowledge of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound, which is covered elsewhere in this issue. The three main ways in which 3D ultrasound may be acquired are described: the mechanically swept 3D probe, the 2D transducer array that can acquire intrinsically 3D data, and the freehand 3D ultrasound. This provides an appreciation of the constraints implicit in each of these approaches together with their strengths and weaknesses. Then some of the techniques that are used for processing the 3D data and the way this can lead to information of clinical value are discussed. A table is provided to show the range of clinical applications reported in the literature. Finally, the discussion relating to the technology and its clinical applications to explain why 3D ultrasound has been relatively slow to be adopted in routine clinics is drawn together and the issues that will govern its development in the future explored.

Influence of volumes of prostate, rectum, and bladder on treatment planning CT on interfraction prostate shifts during ultrasound image-guided IMRT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between prostate, bladder, and rectum volumes on treatment planning CT day and prostate shifts in the XYZ directions on treatment days.

METHODS

Prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum were contoured on CT images obtained in supine position. Intensity modulated radiation therapy plans was prepared. Contours were exported to BAT-ultrasound imaging system. Patients were positioned on the couch using skin marks. An ultrasound probe was used to obtain ultrasound images of prostate, bladder, and rectum, which were aligned with CT images. Couch shifts in the XYZ directions as recommended by BAT system were made and recorded. 4698 couch shifts for 42 patients were analyzed to study the correlations between interfraction prostate shifts vs bladder, rectum, and prostate volumes on planning CT.

RESULTS

Mean and range of volumes (cc): Bladder: 179 (42-582), rectum: 108 (28-223), and prostate: 55 (21-154). Mean systematic prostate shifts were (cm, +/-SD) right and left lateral: -0.047 +/- 0.16 (-0.361-0.251), anterior and posterior: 0.14 0.3 (-0.466-0.669), and superior and inferior: 0.19 +/- 0.26 (-0.342-0.633). Bladder volume was not correlated with lateral, anterior/posterior, and superior/inferior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). Rectal volume was correlated with anterior/posterior (P < 0.001) but not with lateral and superior/inferior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). The smaller the rectal volume or cross sectional area, the larger was the prostate shift anteriorly and vice versa (P < 0.001). Prostate volume was correlated with superior/inferior (P < 0.05) but not with lateral and anterior/posterior prostate shifts (P > 0.2). The smaller the prostate volume, the larger was prostate shift superiorly and vice versa (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate and rectal volumes, but not bladder volumes, on treatment planning CT influenced prostate position on treatment fractions. Daily image-guided adoptive radiotherapy would be required for patients with distended or empty rectum on planning CT to reduce rectal toxicity in the case of empty rectum and to minimize geometric miss of prostate.

Assessing prostate, bladder and rectal doses during image guided radiation therapy--need for plan adaptation?

The primary application of Image‐Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer has been to assist precise dose delivery to the tumor. With the ability to use in‐room Computed Tomography (CT) imaging modalities, the prostate, bladder and rectum can be imaged before each treatment and the actual doses delivered to these organs can be tracked using anatomy of the day. This study evaluates the dosimetric uncertainties caused by interfraction organ variation during IGRT for 10 patients using kilovoltage cone beam CT (kvCBCT) on the Elekta Synergy system and megavoltage CT (MVCT) on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art System. The actual delivered doses to the prostate, bladder and rectum were based on dose recomputation using CT anatomy of the day. The feasibility of dose calculation accuracy in kvCBCT images from the Elekta Synergy system was investigated using the ComTom phantom. Additionally, low contrast resolution, image uniformity, and spatial resolution between the three imaging modalities of kilovoltage CT (kvCT), kvCBCT and MVCT images, were quantitatively evaluated using the Catphan 600 phantom. The Planned Adaptive software was used on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art system to construct a cumulative Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), incorporating anatomical information provided by the daily MVCT scans. The cumulative DVH was examined to identify large deviation (10% or greater) between the planned and delivered mean doses. The study proposes a framework that applies the cumulative DVH to evaluate and adapt plans that are based on actual delivered doses. Due to the large deviation in CT number (›300 HU) between the kvCBCT images and the kvCT, a direct dose recomputation on the kvCBCT images from the Elekta Synergy system was found to be inaccurate. The maximum deviation to the prostate was only 2.7% in our kvCBCT study, when compared to the daily prescribed dose. However, there was a large daily variation in rectum and bladder doses based on the anatomy of the day. The maximum variation in rectum and bladder volumes receiving the percentage of prescribed dose was 12% and 40%, respectively. We have shown that by using Planned Adaptive software on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art system, plans can be adapted based on the image feedback from daily MVCT scans to allow the actual delivered doses to closely track the original planned doses.

PACS number: 87.53.Tf

Effect of body mass index on shifts in ultrasound-based image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy for abdominal malignancies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated whether corrective shifts determined by daily ultrasound-based image-guidance correlate with body mass index (BMI) of patients treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for abdominal malignancies. The utility of daily image-guidance, particularly for patients with BMI>25.0, is examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 3162 ultrasound-directed shifts were performed in 86 patients. Direction and magnitude of shifts were correlated with pretreatment BMI. Bivariate statistical analysis and analysis of set-up correction data were performed using systematic and random error calculations.

RESULTS

Total 2040 daily alignments were performed. Average 3D vector of set-up correction for all patients was 12.1mm/fraction. Directional and absolute shifts and 3D vector length were significantly different between BMI cohorts. 3D displacement averaged 4.9 mm/fraction and 6.8mm/fraction for BMI < or = 25.0 and BMI>25.0, respectively. Systematic error in all axes and 3D vector was significantly greater for BMI>25.0. Differences in random error were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Set-up corrections derived from daily ultrasound-based IG-IMRT of abdominal tumors correlated with BMI. Daily image-guidance may improve precision of IMRT delivery with benefits assessed for the entire population, particularly patients with increased habitus. Requisite PTV margins suggested in the absence of daily image-guidance are significantly greater in patients with BMI>25.0.

Comparing computed tomography localization with daily ultrasound during image-guided radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation

In the present paper, we describe the results of a prospective trial that compared isocenter shifts produced by BAT Ultrasound (Nomos, Sewicky, PA) to those produced by a computed tomography (CT) unit in the treatment room to aid in positioning during image-guided radiation therapy. The trial included 15 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent CT and MR simulation immobilized supine in an Alpha Cradle and were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. BAT Ultrasound was used daily to correct for interfraction motion by obtaining shift in the x, y, and z directions. Two days per week during therapy, CT scans blinded to the ultrasound shifts were obtained and recorded. We analyzed 218 alignments from the 15 patients and observed a high level of correlation between the CT and ultrasound isocenter shifts (correlation coefficients: 0.877 anterior-posterior, 0.842 lateral, and 0.831 superior-inferior). The systematic differences were less than 1 mm, and the random differences were approximately 2 mm. The average absolute differences, including both systemic and random differences, were less than 2 mm in all directions. The isocenter shifts generated by using a CT unit in the treatment room correlate highly with shifts produced by the BAT Ultrasound system.

Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and evaluate biochemical control rates for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with either high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or conventional-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy 3D-CRT.

METHODS

Four hundred sixteen patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years (median, 5 years) were included. Two hundred seventy-one patients received 3D-CRT with a median dose of 68.4 Gy (range, 66-71 Gy). The next 145 patients received IMRT with a median dose of 75.6 Gy (range, 70.2-77.4 Gy). Biochemical control rates were calculated according to both American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definitions. Prognostic factors were identified using both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 5-year biochemical control rate was 60.4% for 3D-CRT and 74.1% for IMRT (p < 0.0001, first ASTRO Consensus definition). Using the ASTRO Phoenix definition, the 5-year biochemical control rate was 74.4% and 84.6% with 3D-RT and IMRT, respectively (p = 0.0326). Univariate analyses determined that PSA level, T stage, Gleason score, perineural invasion, and radiation dose were predictive of biochemical control. On multivariate analysis, dose, Gleason score, and perineural invasion remained significant.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of both ASTRO definitions, dose, Gleason score, and perineural invasion were predictive of biochemical control. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy allowed delivery of higher doses of radiation with very low toxicity, resulting in improved biochemical control.

Daily electronic portal imaging of implanted gold seed fiducials in patients undergoing radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to measure interfraction prostate bed motion, setup error, and total positioning error in 10 consecutive patients undergoing postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Daily image-guided target localization and alignment using electronic portal imaging of gold seed fiducials implanted into the prostate bed under transrectal ultrasound guidance was used in 10 patients undergoing adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy. Prostate bed motion, setup error, and total positioning error were measured by analysis of gold seed fiducial location on the daily electronic portal images compared with the digitally reconstructed radiographs from the treatment-planning CT.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- standard deviation) prostate bed motion was 0.3 +/- 0.9 mm, 0.4 +/- 2.4 mm, and -1.1 +/- 2.1 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) axes, respectively. Mean set-up error was 0.1 +/- 4.5 mm, 1.1 +/- 3.9 mm, and -0.2 +/- 5.1 mm in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. Mean total positioning error was 0.2 +/- 4.5 mm, 1.2 +/- 5.1 mm, and -0.3 +/- 4.5 mm in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. Total positioning errors >5 mm occurred in 14.1%, 38.7%, and 28.2% of all fractions in the LR, SI, and AP axes, respectively. There was no significant migration of the gold marker seeds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the use of daily image-guided target localization and alignment using electronic portal imaging of implanted gold seed fiducials as a valuable method to correct for interfraction target motion and to improve precision in the delivery of postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning

PURPOSE

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are currently used for positioning verification. However, it is yet unknown whether CBCT could be used in dose calculation for replanning in adaptive radiation therapy. This study investigates the dosimetric feasibility of CBCT-based treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Hounsfield unit (HU) values and profiles of Catphan, homogeneous/inhomogeneous phantoms, and various tissue regions of patients in CBCT images were compared to those in CT. The dosimetric consequence of the HU variation was investigated by comparing CBCT-based treatment plans to conventional CT-based plans for both phantoms and patients.

RESULTS

The maximum HU difference between CBCT and CT of Catphan was 34 HU in the Teflon. The differences in other materials were less than 10 HU. The profiles for the homogeneous phantoms in CBCT displayed reduced HU values up to 150 HU in the peripheral regions compared to those in CT. The scatter and artifacts in CBCT became severe surrounding inhomogeneous tissues with reduced HU values up to 200 HU. The MU/cGy differences were less than 1% for most phantom cases. The isodose distributions between CBCT-based and CT-based plans agreed very well. However, the discrepancy was larger when CBCT was scanned without a bowtie filter than with bowtie filter. Also, up to 3% dosimetric error was observed in the plans for the inhomogeneous phantom. In the patient studies, the discrepancies of isodose lines between CT-based and CBCT-based plans, both 3D and IMRT, were less than 2 mm. Again, larger discrepancy occurred for the lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of CBCT-based treatment planning. CBCT-based treatment plans were dosimetrically comparable to CT-based treatment plans. Dosimetric data in the inhomogeneous tissue regions should be carefully validated.

Motion and shape change when using an endorectal balloon during prostate radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate motion and shape change when using an endorectal balloon (ERB) in patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

In nine patients treated for prostate cancer using an ERB, the anterior wall of the ERB was contoured on right lateral images taken immediately before irradiation, and on left lateral images taken immediately after irradiation. Changes in the contours were used to calculate inter-fraction shape change and inter-imaging motion and shape change. Inter-imaging motion describes changes that occur after the right lateral image is taken that are seen in the left lateral image.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of all inter-imaging shifts of the anterior wall of the ERB were in the posterior direction (mean: 1.8 mm, 1 SD: 1.8 mm, maximum posterior shift: 2.8-7.2 mm). The inter-fraction shape change (1 SD) of the anterior wall was equivalent to a change in the angle of the balloon of 2.5-5.7 degrees, with a range of 8-20 degrees, depending on the patient. Inter-imaging shape changes were similar in size.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-imaging motion and shape changes may be explained by the patient relaxing some time after insertion of the ERB, indicating that it could be reduced by a waiting period after insertion before irradiation. Development of image-guided localization strategies should consider intra-fraction motion and also inter- and intra-fraction shape change.

Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to study the variations in delivered doses to the prostate, rectum, and bladder during a full course of image-guided external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with helical tomotherapy to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction in 39 fractions. Daily target localization was performed using intraprostatic fiducials and daily megavoltage pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans, resulting in a total of 390 CT scans. The prostate, rectum, and bladder were manually contoured on each CT by a single physician. Daily dosimetric analysis was performed with dose recalculation. The study endpoints were D95 (dose to 95% of the prostate), rV2 (absolute rectal volume receiving 2 Gy), and bV2 (absolute bladder volume receiving 2 Gy).

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the average D95 (+/-SD) was 2.02 +/- 0.04 Gy (range, 1.79-2.20 Gy). The average rV2 (+/-SD) was 7.0 +/- 8.1 cc (range, 0.1-67.3 cc). The average bV2 (+/-SD) was 8.7 +/- 6.8 cc (range, 0.3-36.8 cc). Unlike doses for the prostate, there was significant daily variation in rectal and bladder doses, mostly because of variations in volume and shape of these organs.

CONCLUSION

Large variations in delivered doses to the rectum and bladder can be documented with daily megavoltage CT scans. Image guidance for the targeting of the prostate, even with intraprostatic fiducials, does not take into account the variation in actual rectal and bladder doses. The clinical impact of techniques that take into account such dosimetric parameters in daily patient set-ups should be investigated.

Dosimetric comparison of four target alignment methods for prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the dosimetric consequences of 4 treatment delivery techniques for prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During an 8-week course of radiotherapy, 10 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans 3 times per week (243 total) before daily treatment with a CT-linear accelerator. Treatment delivery was simulated by realigning a fixed-margin treatment plan on each CT scan and calculating doses. The alignment methods were those based on the following: skin marks, bony registration, ultrasonography (US), and in-room CT. For the last two methods, prostate was the alignment target. The dosimetric effects of these alignment methods on the prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder were compared. The average daily minimum dose to 0.1 cm3 was used as the metric for target coverage.

RESULTS

Skin and bone alignments provided acceptable prostate coverage for only 70% of patients, US alignment for 90%, and CT alignment for 100%. CT-based alignment of the prostate provided seminal vesicle (SV) coverage of > or = 69 Gy for all patients; US and bone alignments provided SV coverage of > or = 60 Gy. This SV coverage may be acceptable for early-stage cancer (equivalent SV dose = 55.8 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction), but unacceptable for late-stage cancer (SV dose = 75.6 Gy). At 75.6 Gy, the acceptable rate for SV coverage was 40% for skin and bone alignments, 70% for US, and 80% for CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct target alignment methods (US and CT) provided better target coverage. CT-guided alignment provided the best and most consistent dosimetric coverage. A larger planning target volume margin is needed for SV coverage when the alignment target is the prostate.

Ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of cross-modality and intramodality methods for daily localization during external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare two different ultrasound-based verification systems for prostate alignment during daily external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate displacements were measured prospectively in 40 patients undergoing daily EBRT. Comparison was made between a system based on the cross-modality verification method (CMVM), which uses two different imaging modalities to assess organ motion, and a system based on the intramodality verification method (IMVM), which uses only one imaging modality for such assessment. A total of 217 CMVM and 217 IMVM displacements were collected within a minute of each other. In 10 patients, IMVM displacements were also compared with those measured by sequential CT scans.

RESULTS

Analysis in the paired CMVM and IMVM displacements shows a significant mean difference of 0.9 +/- 3.3 mm in the lateral and 6.0 +/- 5.1 mm in the superoinferior directions (p < 0.0001), whereas no significant difference was detected in the anteroposterior direction between the two methods. Comparison of the computed tomography scan and IMVM measured displacements shows no significant difference between the two methods, with mean values of 0.2 +/- 1.7 mm in the lateral, -0.3 +/- 1.6 mm in the anteroposterior, and 0.1 +/- 1.4 mm in the superoinferior directions.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant systematic difference exists between cross-modality and intramodality methods when assessing prostate alignment during daily EBRT. Because displacements assessed by IMVM are consistent with those assessed by computed tomography scan, a more accurate prostate alignment appears to be obtained when the IMVM method is used.

A comparison of CT- and ultrasound-based imaging to localize the prostate for external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study assesses the accuracy of NOMOS B-mode acquisition and targeting system (BAT) compared with computed tomography (CT) in localizing the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-six patients were CT scanned, and the prostate was localized by 3 observers using the BAT system. The BAT couch shift measurements were compared with the CT localization. Six of the patients had gold markers present in the prostate, and the prostate movement determined by BAT was compared with the movement determined by the gold markers.

RESULTS

Using the BAT system, the 3 observers determined the prostate position to be a mean of 1-5 mm over all directions with respect to the CT. The proportion of readings with a difference >3 mm between the observers was in the range of 25% to 44%. The prostate movement based on gold markers was an average of 3-5 mm different from that measured by BAT. The literature assessing the accuracy and reproducibility on BAT is summarized and compared with our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found that there are systematic differences between the BAT-defined prostate position compared with that estimated on CT using gold grain marker seeds.

Guidelines for primary radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES

The appropriate application of 3-D conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy or image guided radiotherapy for patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer requires a standardisation of target delineation as well as clinical quality assurance procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pathological and imaging studies provide valuable information on tumour extension. In addition, clinical investigations on patient positioning and immobilisation as well as treatment verification data offer an abundance of information.

RESULTS

Target volume definitions for different risk groups of prostate cancer patients based on pathological and imaging studies are provided. Available imaging modalities, patient positioning and treatment preparation studies as well as verification procedures are collected from literature studies. These studies are summarised and recommendations are given where appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

On behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Radiation Oncology Group this article presents a common set of recommendations for external beam radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer.

Target localization for post-prostatectomy patients using CT and ultrasound image guidance

We conducted a study comparing B‐mode acquisition and targeting (BAT) ultrasound alignments based on CT data in the postoperative setting. CT scans were obtained with a Primatom CT‐on‐rails on nine patients. Two CT scans were obtained each week, while setup error was minimized by BAT ultrasounds. For the first three patients, a direct comparison was performed. For the next six patients, a template based on the shifts from the week 1 CT during treatment was used for subsequent setup. Comparison of isocenter shifts between the BAT ultrasound and CT was made by the difference, absolute difference, and improvement (using CT alignments as the reference technique). A total of 90 image comparisons were made. The average interfraction motion was 3.2 mm in the lateral, 3.0 mm in the longitudinal, and 5.1 mm in the AP direction. The results suggest that the CT‐based ultrasound templates can improve the localization of the prostate bed when the initial displacements are greater than 4 mm. For initial displacements smaller than 4 mm, the technique neither improved nor worsened target localization. However, ultrasound alignments performed without the use of a template deteriorated patient positioning for two out of three patients, demonstrating that the use of a CT template was beneficial even at small initial displacements.

PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Kn, 87.53.Xd

Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: Monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability

PURPOSE

The use of intraprostatic fiducials as surrogates for prostate gland position assumes that the markers are rigidly positioned within the prostate. To test this assumption, the intermarker distances (IMD) of implanted markers was monitored during the full course of radiation therapy to determine marker stability within the prostate gland.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis is performed on 56 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. A total of 168 markers (3 markers per patient) were implanted. Two high-resolution X-rays were acquired before treatment delivery to visualize the position of the implanted markers. A total of 2,037 daily alignments were performed on the 56 cases (average: 36 alignments per patient). Each pair of X-ray images allows the computation of the 3 IMDs. A total of 6,111 IMDs were available for analysis. To study variations in marker position, daily IMDs were compared with the IMD that was observed during the first alignment. We defined the variation in the IMD as the important measure of intrinsic marker position variation. The standard deviation (SD) of IMD variations was studied as a measure of the extent of marker position variation. Particular attention was given to cases in which significant intermarker variations were observed.

RESULTS

The average directional variation of all IMDs (+/- SD) was -0.31 (+/-1.41) mm. The average absolute variation of all IMDs (+/- SD) was 1.01 (+/-1.03) mm. The largest observed variation in IMD was 10.2 mm. Among the individual 56 patients, the SDs of the IMD variations were computed and found to range from 0.4 to 4.2 mm. In 54 of the 56 patients (96%), the variations of all 3 IMDs had SD of 4.0 mm or less, which indicates little variation in the relative position of the markers. Only in 2 patients did any of the IMDs vary, with SD that exceeded 4.0 mm, which indicated noticeable and consistent marker-position variation. The maximum observed SD in the IMD variation was 4.2 mm. In each of the 2 cases, 2 IMDs were found to fluctuate, while the third IMD remained fairly constant. This finding means that 1 of 3 markers varied frequently in its relative position throughout the treatment. Therefore, only 2 of the 168 markers (1%) showed frequent changes in their relative positions. A review of these 2 cases revealed that the observed marker mobility was likely not caused by migration of the marker itself but caused by prostate deformation, secondary to rectal filling. To investigate the frequency of extreme situations, the maximum observed IMD variation was determined for each patient. In 47 of the 56 patients (84%), the maximum difference in IMDs was at least 2 mm. The corresponding numbers for 3, 4, and 5 mm were 23 (41%), 10 (18%), and 5 (9%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study is the largest reported series of localized prostate cancer patients with implanted intraprostatic markers used for daily target localization in which individual marker positions were registered and IMDs were computed to test for marker position variation. Only 2 of 168 implanted markers showed a relatively significant and consistent change in their relative position throughout a course of treatment. However, these variations in position were most likely not caused by marker migration but caused by prostate deformation. Typically, the IMDs varied minimally, which indicated relatively little deformation of the gland as well as the absence of significant marker migration. However, during a typical course of treatment, the IMD is likely to vary by several millimeters in some instances, which indicates infrequent but significant deformation. In these instances, an alignment based on the 3 markers' center of mass will still provide a meaningful alignment of the prostate within the radiation field. Intraprostatic implanted fiducials in the prostate allow a reliable and simple localization of the prostate gland, even in the presence of organ deformation.

Ultrasound probe pressure as a source of error in prostate localization for external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

A pelvic phantom was constructed to evaluate the effect of ultrasound probe pressure during performance of bipolar acquisition technique (BAT) for prostate localization for radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A pelvic phantom of a gelatin mold with a water-filled balloon representing the bladder and rectum and a central encapsulated clay sphere representing the prostate was constructed. This phantom was then scanned using planning computed tomography (CT). The geometric information of the phantom was outlined in two planes. The phantom was then scanned using the BAT system with mild and moderate ultrasound probe pressure. Differences in prostate depth between the CT and BAT systems were displayed.

RESULTS

A difference of 1 cm between the phantom surface and the prostate could be produced with moderate ultrasound probe pressure. The differences were similar between the CT- and BAT-generated contours and were dependent on the ultrasound probe pressure.

CONCLUSION

Care must be taken not to cause any alteration in prostate localization with increasing ultrasound probe pressure when using BAT localization. Increased probe pressure may introduce errors in prostate localization and under dose the target.

Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate

PURPOSE

The prostate volume delineated on MRI is smaller than on CT. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of MRI- vs. CT-based prostate delineation using multiple observers on the dose to the target and organs at risk during external beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT and MRI scans of the pelvic region were made of 18 patients and matched three-dimensionally on the bony anatomy. Three observers delineated the prostate using both modalities. A fourth observer delineated the rectal wall and the bulb of the penis. The planning treatment volume (PTV) was generated from the delineated prostates with a margin of 10 mm in three-dimensions. A three-field treatment plan with a prescribed dose of 78 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point was automatically generated from each PTV. Dose-volume histograms were calculated of all PTVs, rectal walls, and penile bulbs. The equivalent uniform dose was calculated for the rectal wall using a volume exponent (n = 0.12).

RESULTS

The equivalent uniform dose of the CT rectal wall in plans based on the CT-delineated prostate was, on average, 5.1 Gy (SEM 0.5) greater than in the plans based on the MRI-delineated prostate. For the MRI rectal wall, this difference was 3.6 Gy (SEM 0.4). Allowing for the same equivalent uniform dose to the CT rectal wall, the prescribed dose to the PTV could be raised from 78 to 85 Gy when using the MRI-delineated prostate for treatment planning. The mean dose to the bulb of the penis was 11.6 Gy (SEM 1.8) lower for plans based on the MRI-delineated prostate. The mean coverage (volume of the PTV receiving > or =95% of the prescribed dose) was 99.9% for both modalities. The interobserver coverage (coverage of the PTV by a treatment plan designed for the PTV delineated by another observer in the same modality) was 97% for both modalities. The MRI rectum was significantly more ventrally localized than the CT rectum, probably because of the rounded tabletop and no knee support on the MRI scanner.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose delivered to the rectal wall and bulb of the penis is significantly reduced with treatment plans based on the MRI-delineated prostate compared with the CT-delineated prostate, allowing a dose escalation of 2.0-7.0 Gy for the same rectal wall dose. The interobserver coverage was the same for CT and MRI delineation of the prostate. A statistically significant difference in position between the CT- and MRI-delineated rectum was observed, probably owing to a different tabletop and use of knee support.

Use of portal images and BAT ultrasonography to measure setup error and organ motion for prostate IMRT: implications for treatment margins

PURPOSE

Traditionally, portal images have been used for verification of patient setup. More recently, direct prostate localization using ultrasound imaging has become available. The aim of this study was to use both modalities to measure daily setup error and prostate organ motion and their respective contributions to the overall uncertainty of prostate target localization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-five patients treated for prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) between February 6 and July 2, 2001 underwent daily B-mode acquisition and targeting (BAT) ultrasound localization and weekly orthogonal portal imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 243 pairs of orthogonal portal films and the corresponding daily BAT images were reviewed. The mean shift +/- standard deviation in the right-left (RL), AP, and superinferior (SI) directions was 0.035 +/- 2.8 mm, -0.23 +/- 3.0 mm, and -0.013 +/- 2.0 mm, respectively, for portal films and -0.82 +/- 3.2 mm, -1.4 +/- 6.4 mm and -1.7 +/- 6.4 mm, respectively, for BAT images taken on the same day as the portal films. The mean prostate organ motion measurements were -0.89 +/- 3.3 mm (RL), -1.3 +/- 5.7 mm (AP), and -1.6 +/- 6.4 mm (SI). Without BAT localization, organ motion would have caused the clinical target volume to move outside the planning target volume margin in 23.3-41.8% of the treatments. Margins necessary to achieve complete coverage of the clinical target volume > 95% of the time without BAT would have been 5.3, 10.4 and 10.4 mm in the RL, AP, and SI dimensions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate organ motion appears to predominate over setup error as the major component of variation in target localization. Without the use of BAT ultrasound prostate imaging, misses of the prostate can occur in a high percentage of treatments, despite patient setup verification with portal images. Relatively large planning target volume margins in the AP and SI dimensions may be necessary to overcome this.

Evaluation of mechanical precision and alignment uncertainties for an integrated CT/LINAC system

A new integrated CT/LINAC combination, in which the CT scanner is inside the radiation therapy treatment room and the same patient couch is used for CT scanning and treatment (after a 180-degree couch rotation), should allow for accurate correction of interfractional setup errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sources of uncertainties, and to measure the overall precision of this system. The following sources of uncertainty were identified: (1) the patient couch position on the LINAC side after a rotation, (2) the patient couch position on the CT side after a rotation, (3) the patient couch position as indicated by its digital readout, (4) the difference in couch sag between the CT and LINAC positions, (5) the precision of the CT coordinates, (6) the identification of fiducial markers from CT images, (7) the alignment of contours with structures in the CT images, and (8) the alignment with setup lasers. The largest single uncertainties (one standard deviation or 1 SD) were found in couch position on the CT side after a rotation (0.5 mm in the RL direction) and the alignment of contours with the CT images (0.4 mm in the SI direction). All other sources of uncertainty are less than 0.3 mm (1 SD). The overall precision of two setup protocols was investigated in a controlled phantom study. A protocol that relies heavily on the mechanical integrity of the system, and assumes a fixed relationship between the LINAC isocenter and the CT images, gave a predicted precision (1 SD) of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.6 mm in the SI, RL and AP directions, respectively. The second protocol reduces reliance on the mechanical precision of the total system, particularly the patient couch, by using radio-opaque fiducial markers to transfer the isocenter information from the LINAC side to the CT images. This protocol gave a slightly improved predicted precision of 0.5, 0.4, and 0.4 mm in the SI, RL and AP directions, respectively. The distribution of phantom position after CT-based correction confirmed these results. Knowledge of the individual sources of uncertainty will allow alternative setup protocols to be evaluated in the future without the need for significant additional measurements.

Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization

PURPOSE

The NOMOS (Sewickley, PA) B-mode Acquisition and Targeting System (BAT) ultrasound system provides a rapid means of correcting for interfraction prostate positional variation. In this investigation, we report our experience on the clinical issues relevant to the daily use of the BAT system and the analysis of combined setup error and organ motion for 3509 BAT alignment procedures in 147 consecutive patients treated with IMRT for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After setup to external skin marks, therapists performed the BAT ultrasound alignment procedure before each IMRT treatment. In this study, a single physician (A.C.) reviewed all BAT images and classified image quality and accuracy of image alignment by the therapist. On a scale of 1-3, near-perfect image quality or alignment was given a 1, fair image quality or misalignment > or = 5 mm (likely within the PTV) was given a 2, and unacceptable image quality or misalignment >5 mm (potential to violate the PTV) was given a value of 3. The distribution of shifts made was analyzed in each dimension and for all patients. The time required to perform the BAT alignment was also assessed in 17 patients.

RESULTS

Among the 3509 attempted BAT procedures, the image quality was judged to be poor or unacceptable in 5.1% (181). Of the remaining 3328 BAT images, with quality scores of 1-2, alignments were unacceptable (>5 mm misalignment as judged by the reviewing physician) in 3% (100). The mean shift in each direction, averaged over all patients, was 0.5-0.7 mm. Interfraction standard deviation (1 SD) of prostate position based on combined setup error and internal organ motion is 4.9 mm, 4.4 mm, and 2.8 mm in the anteroposterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and lateral (RL) dimensions, respectively. The distribution of the shifts was a near-random Gaussian-type in all three major axes, with greater variations in AP and SI directions. The percent of BAT procedures in which the shift was >5 mm was 28.6% in AP, 23% in SI, and 9% in RL directions. The average BAT procedure took extra 5 min out of a 20-min time slot in a typical eight-field IMRT treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the daily ultrasound images was deemed acceptable in 95%. Major alignment errors by therapists were only 3%. The BAT system is clinically effective and feasible in a matter of 5 min. Although the accuracy of the BAT was not addressed in this investigation, we found a significant percentage of large shifts being made from the initial alignment position.

Interfractional and intrafractional accuracy during radiotherapy of gynecologic carcinomas: a comprehensive evaluation using the ExacTrac system

PURPOSE

To evaluate positioning uncertainties with an infrared body marker-based positioning system (ExacTrac) compared with conventional laser positioning in patients treated for gynecologic carcinomas, and to investigate patient movement during therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients were positioned both with a conventional laser system and with the ExacTrac system. Positioning accuracy was evaluated using repeated electronic portal images. Average displacements and overall, systematic, and random errors were calculated and compared for the two positioning methods. Further, inter- and intrafractional patient movement including time trends in positioning displacements, respiratory amplitudes, and breathing frequencies were analyzed by online documentation of body marker movement with the ExacTrac system.

RESULTS

Average displacements ranged between -3.6 and 6.7 mm for the three coordinates. Mean systematic and random errors ranged from 1.6 to 3.7 mm and 2.2 to 3.7 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between conventional and ExacTrac positioning (p > 0.07). The main breathing direction was from dorsocaudal to anterocranial in 9 of 10 patients. The mean 3D breathing amplitude in the pelvis was 2.4 mm (0.49-6.96 mm). Significant interfractional and intrafractional time trends were observed concerning breathing amplitudes and positioning displacements.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed displacements did not vary significantly between the two evaluated positioning systems. The analysis of registered body marker positions revealed a wide variation in respiratory frequencies, breathing amplitudes, and patient displacements with interfractional and intrafractional time trends. Systems that allow the measurement of each patient's motion characteristics are a necessary requirement for all efforts at individually tailored radiation therapy.

Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques

PURPOSE

Conformal radiotherapy requires accurate patient positioning with reference to the initial three-dimensional (3D) CT image. Patient setup is controlled by comparison with portal images acquired immediately before patient treatment. Several automatic methods have been proposed, generally based on segmentation procedures. However, portal images are of very low contrast, leading to segmentation inaccuracies. In this study, we propose an intensity-based (with no segmentation), fully automatic, 3D method, associating two portal images and a 3D CT scan to estimate patient setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of an anthropomorphic phantom were used. A CT scan of the pelvic area was first acquired, then the phantom was installed in seven positions. The process is a 3D optimization of a similarity measure in the space of rigid transformations. To avoid time-consuming digitally reconstructed radiograph generation at each iteration, we used two-dimensional transformations and two sets of specific and pregenerated digitally reconstructed radiographs. We also propose a technique for computing intensity-based similarity measures between several couples of images. A correlation coefficient, chi-square, mutual information, and correlation ratio were used.

RESULTS

The best results were obtained with the correlation ratio. The median root mean square error was 2.0 mm for the seven positions tested and was, respectively, 3.6, 4.4, and 5.1 for correlation coefficient, chi-square, and mutual information.

CONCLUSIONS

Full 3D analysis of setup errors is feasible without any segmentation step. It is fast and accurate and could therefore be used before each treatment session. The method presents three main advantages for clinical implementation-it is fully automatic, applicable to all tumor sites, and requires no additional device.

Measurement of intrafractional prostate motion using magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To quantify the three-dimensional intrafractional prostate motion over typical treatment time intervals with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine MRI) studies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two patients with prostate cancer were scanned supine in an alpha cradle cast using cine MRI. Twenty sequential slices were acquired in the sagittal and axial planes through the center of the prostate. Each scan took approximately 9 min. The posterior, lateral, and superior edges of the prostate were tracked on each frame relative to the initial prostate position, and the size and duration of each displacement was recorded.

RESULTS

The prostate displacements were (mean +/- SD): 0.2 +/- 2.9 mm, 0.0 +/- 3.4 mm, and 0.0 +/- 1.5 mm in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and medial-lateral dimensions respectively. The prostate motion appeared to have been driven by peristalsis in the rectum. Large displacements of the prostate (up to 1.2 cm) moved the prostate both anteriorly and superiorly and in some cases compressed the organ. For such motions, the prostate did not stay displaced, but moved back to its original position. To account for the dosimetric consequences of the motion, we also calculated the time-averaged displacement to be approximately 1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cine MRI can be used to measure intrafractional prostate motion. Although intrafractional prostate motions occur, their effects are negligible compared to interfractional motion and setup error. No adjustment in margin is necessary for three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

MRI simulation: effect of gradient distortions on three-dimensional prostate cancer plans

PURPOSE

To quantify the dosimetric consequences of external patient contour distortions produced on low-field and high-field MRIs for external beam radiation of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A linearity phantom consisting of a grid filled with contrast material was scanned on a spiral CT, a 0.23 T open MRI, and a 1.5 T closed bore system. Subsequently, 12 patients with prostate cancer were scanned on CT and the open MRI. A gradient distortion correction (GDC) program was used to postprocess the MRI images. Eight of the patients were also scanned on the 1.5 T MRI with integrated GDC correction. All data sets were fused according to their bony landmarks using a chamfer-matching algorithm. The prostate volume was contoured on an MRI image, irrespective of the apparent prostate location in those sets. Thus, the same target volume was planned and used for calculating the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral separations. The number of monitor units required for treatment using a four-field conformal technique was compared. Because there are also setup variations in patient outer contours, two different CT scans from 20 different patients were fused, and the differences in AP and lateral separations were measured to obtain an estimate of the mean interfractional separation variation.

RESULTS

All AP separations measured on MRI were statistically indistinguishable from those on CT within the interfractional separation variations. The mean differences between CT and low-field MRI and CT and high-field MRI lateral separations were 1.6 cm and 0.7 cm, respectively, and were statistically significantly different from zero. However, after the GDC was applied to the low-field images, the difference became 0.4 +/- 0.4 mm (mean +/- standard deviation), which was statistically insignificant from the CT-to-CT variations. The mean variations in the lateral separations from the low-field images with GDC would result in a dosimetric difference of <1%, assuming an equally weighted four-field 18-MV technique for patient separations up to approximately 40 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with lateral separations <40 cm, a homogeneous calculation simulated using a 1.5 T MRI or a 0.23 T MRI with a gradient distortion correction will yield a monitor unit calculation indistinguishable from that generated using CT simulation.

Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction

PURPOSE

Here we study the magnitude of prostate motion during the delivery of a radiotherapy fraction. These motions have clinical consequences for on-line position verification and the choice of margins around the target volume.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We studied the motion of the prostate for 10 patients during 251 radiotherapy treatment fractions by assessing the position of implanted gold markers. Gold markers of 1 mm diameter and 5 mm length were implanted in the prostate before the start of the radiotherapy. We obtained movies during each fraction using an a-Si flat-panel imager. The markers could be detected in separate frames using a marker extraction kernel.

RESULTS

Marker displacements as large as 9.5 mm were detected in one fraction. The motion of the prostate is greatest in the caudal-cranial and the anterior-posterior directions. Within a time window of 2 to 3 min, deviations from the initial marker position, averaged over all patients, are 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm and -0.4 +/- 0.7 mm in the anterior-posterior and caudal-cranial directions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It appeared that on average, the intrafraction prostate motions did not result in margins larger than 1 mm, provided that the position verification is performed at time intervals of 2 to 3 min. Only for some patients performing more frequent position verification or adding extra margins of 2 to 3 mm is required to account for intrafraction prostate motions.

A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment

PURPOSE

A practical method to achieve prostate immobilization and daily target localization for external beam radiation treatment is described.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy using permanent radioactive source placement were selected for study. To quantify prostate motion both with and without the presence of a specially designed inflatable intrarectal balloon, the computerized tomography-based coordinates of all intraprostatic radioactive sources were compared over 3 consecutive measurements at 1-min intervals.

RESULTS

The placement and inflation of the intrarectal balloon were well tolerated by all patients. The mean (range) displacement of the prostate gland when the intrarectal balloon was present vs. absent was 1.3 (0-2.2) mm vs. 1.8 (0-9.1) mm (p = 0.03) at 2 min respectively. The maximum displacement in any direction (anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, or right-left) when the intrarectal balloon was inflated vs. absent was reduced to < or =1 mm from 4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Both prostate gland immobilization and target verification are possible using a specially designed inflatable intrarectal balloon. Using this device, the posterior margin necessary on the lateral fields to ensure dosimetric coverage of the entire prostate gland could be safely reduced to 5 mm and treatment could be set up and verified using a lateral portal image.

Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment errors from set-up and inter-fraction prostatic motion with port films and implanted prostate fiducial markers during conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Errors from isocentre positioning and inter-fraction prostate motion were investigated in 13 men treated with escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. To limit the effect of inter-fraction prostate motion, patients were planned and treated with an empty rectum and a comfortably full bladder, and were instructed regarding dietary management, fluid intake and laxative use. Field placement was determined and corrected with daily on-line portal imaging. A lateral portal film was taken three times weekly over the course of therapy. From these films, random and systematic placement errors were measured by matching corresponding bony landmarks to the simulator film. Superior-inferior and anterior-posterior prostate motion was measured from the displacement of three gold pins implanted into the prostate before planning. A planning target volume (PTV) was derived to account for the measured prostate motion and field placement errors.

RESULTS

From 272 port films the random and systematic isocentre positioning error was 2.2 mm (range 0.2-7.3 mm) and 1.4 mm (range 0.2-3.3 mm), respectively. Prostate motion was largest at the base compared to the apex. Base: anterior, standard deviation (SD) 2.9 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. Apex: anterior, SD 2.1 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. The margin of PTV required to give a 99% probability of the gland remaining within the 95% isodose line during the course of therapy is superior 5.8 mm, and inferior 5.6 mm. In the anterior and posterior direction, this margin is 7.2 mm at the base, 6.5 mm at the mid-gland and 6.0 mm at the apex.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic set-up errors were small using real-time isocentre placement corrections. Patient instruction to help control variation in bladder and rectal distension during therapy may explain the observed small SD for prostate motion in this group of patients. Inter-fraction prostate motion remained the largest source of treatment error, and observed motion was greatest at the gland base. In the absence of real-time pre-treatment imaging of prostate position, sequential portal films of implanted prostatic markers should improve quality assurance by confirming organ position within the treatment field over the course of therapy.