Is the Head Position during Preoperative Image Data Acquisition Essential for the Accuracy of Navigated Brain Tumor Surgery?

Characterization of Pyramidal Tract Shift in High-Grade Glioma Resection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize pyramidal tract shift in different regions of the brain during glioma resection and its association with head position and tumor location.

METHODS

From 2008-2013, 14 patients presenting at the National Neuroscience Institute with high-grade glioma (World Health Organization III or IV) underwent preoperative and intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging. A novel method of placing landmarks along the preoperative and intraoperative tracts, with anterior commissure as the origin, was used to determine pyramidal tract shift. Shift was evaluated in x (lateromedial), y (anteroposterior), and z (craniocaudal) directions for 3 brain regions: brainstem, around third and lateral ventricles, and above ventricles. Shift radius is calculated as the distance between preoperative and postoperative landmarks.

RESULTS

Mean shift radius was 2.72 ± 0.55, 2.98 ± 0.53, and 4.04 ± 0.58 mm at the brainstem, third and lateral ventricles, and above the ventricles, respectively (P < 0.001). Only shift in the y direction (P < 0.03) and shift radius (P < 0.03) were significantly different among regions. Head position during surgery strongly influenced shift radius above the ventricles (P < 0.005), but tumor location had no significant effect. The z-direction shift did not differ significantly among regions.

CONCLUSION

Direction of pyramidal tract shift in 3 dimensions is unpredictable; hence shift radius is a more clinical useful concept. Shift radius was largest above the ventricles and was strongly influenced by head position, with a trend for temporal lobe tumors to exhibit larger shifts.

Preoperative mapping of cortical motor function: prospective comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging and [15O]-H2O-positron emission tomography in the same co-ordinate system

BACKGROUND

Two of the most widely accepted approaches to map eloquent cortical areas preoperatively are positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As yet, no study has compared these two modalities within the same frame of reference in tumour patients.

AIM

We employed [15O]-H2O-PET and fMRI in patients undergoing presurgical evaluation and compared the results with those obtained by direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with tumours of different aetiology near the central region were investigated. fMRI and PET were processed using the same methods, i.e. statistical parametric mapping (SPM) without anatomical normalization, and transformed into the same frame of reference.

RESULTS

fMRI activity was found in more cranial and lateral sections, i.e. closer to the brain surface, in comparison with PET, which demonstrated parenchymal activation. The mean localization difference between fMRI and PET was 8.1 +/- 4.6 mm (range, 2-18 mm). fMRI and [15O]-H2O-PET could reliably identify the central sulcus, as demonstrated by DECS.

CONCLUSIONS

fMRI and [15O]-H2O-PET demonstrate comparable results and are sensitive and reliable tools to map the central region, especially in cases of infiltrating brain tumours. However, fMRI is more prone to artefacts, such as the visualization of draining veins, which may explain the more cranial and lateral activation visualized by fMRI, whereas PET depicts capillary perfusion changes and therefore shows activation closer to the parenchyma.