1
|
Gueziri HE, Georgiopoulos M, Santaguida C, Collins DL. Ultrasound-based navigated pedicle screw insertion without intraoperative radiation: feasibility study on porcine cadavers. Spine J 2022; 22:1408-1417. [PMID: 35523390 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Navigation systems for spinal fusion surgery rely on intraoperative computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopy imaging. Both expose patient, surgeons and operating room staff to significant amounts of radiation. Alternative methods involving intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging have recently shown promise for image-to-patient registration. Yet, the feasibility and safety of iUS navigation in spinal fusion have not been demonstrated. PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in lumbar and thoracolumbar spinal fusion using a fully automated iUS navigation system. STUDY DESIGN Prospective porcine cadaver study. METHODS Five porcine cadavers were used to instrument the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine using posterior open surgery. During the procedure, iUS images were acquired and used to establish automatic registration between the anatomy and preoperative CT images. Navigation was performed with the preoperative CT using tracked instruments. The accuracy of the system was measured as the distance of manually collected points to the preoperative CT vertebral surface and compared against fiducial-based registration. A postoperative CT was acquired, and screw placements were manually verified. We report breach rates, as well as axial and sagittal screw deviations. RESULTS A total of 56 screws were inserted (5.50 mm diameter n=50, and 6.50 mm diameter n=6). Fifty-two screws were inserted safely without breach. Four screws (7.14%) presented a medial breach with an average deviation of 1.35±0.37 mm (all <2 mm). Two breaches were caused by 6.50 mm diameter screws, and two by 5.50 mm screws. For vertebrae instrumented with 5.50 mm screws, the average axial diameter of the pedicle was 9.29 mm leaving a 1.89 mm margin in the left and right pedicle. For vertebrae instrumented with 6.50 mm screws, the average axial diameter of the pedicle was 8.99 mm leaving a 1.24 mm error margin in the left and right pedicle. The average distance to the vertebral surface was 0.96 mm using iUS registration and 0.97 mm using fiducial-based registration. CONCLUSIONS We successfully implanted all pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine using the ultrasound-based navigation system. All breaches recorded were minor (<2 mm) and the breach rate (7.14%) was comparable to existing literature. More investigation is needed to evaluate consistency, reproducibility, and performance in surgical context. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Intraoperative US-based navigation is feasible and practical for pedicle screw insertion in a porcine model. It might be used as a low-cost and radiation-free alternative to intraoperative CT and fluoroscopy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houssem-Eddine Gueziri
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Miltiadis Georgiopoulos
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D Louis Collins
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gueziri HE, Yan CXB, Collins DL. Open-source software for ultrasound-based guidance in spinal fusion surgery. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:3353-3368. [PMID: 32907772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Spinal instrumentation and surgical manipulations may cause loss of navigation accuracy requiring an efficient re-alignment of the patient anatomy with pre-operative images during surgery. While intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) guidance has shown clear potential to reduce surgery time, compared with clinical computed tomography (CT) guidance, rapid registration aiming to correct for patient misalignment has not been addressed. In this article, we present an open-source platform for pedicle screw navigation using iUS imaging. The alignment method is based on rigid registration of CT to iUS vertebral images and has been designed for fast and fully automatic patient re-alignment in the operating room. Two steps are involved: first, we use the iUS probe's trajectory to achieve an initial coarse registration; then, the registration transform is refined by simultaneously optimizing gradient orientation alignment and mean of iUS intensities passing through the CT-defined posterior surface of the vertebra. We evaluated our approach on a lumbosacral section of a porcine cadaver with seven vertebral levels. We achieved a median target registration error of 1.47 mm (100% success rate, defined by a target registration error <2 mm) when applying the probe's trajectory initial alignment. The approach exhibited high robustness to partial visibility of the vertebra with success rates of 89.86% and 88.57% when missing either the left or right part of the vertebra and robustness to initial misalignments with a success rate of 83.14% for random starts within ±20° rotation and ±20 mm translation. Our graphics processing unit implementation achieves an efficient registration time under 8 s, which makes the approach suitable for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houssem-Eddine Gueziri
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Charles X B Yan
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Louis Collins
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gueziri HE, Santaguida C, Collins DL. The state-of-the-art in ultrasound-guided spine interventions. Med Image Anal 2020; 65:101769. [PMID: 32668375 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
During the last two decades, intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) imaging has been employed for various surgical procedures of the spine, including spinal fusion and needle injections. Accurate and efficient registration of pre-operative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images with iUS images are key elements in the success of iUS-based spine navigation. While widely investigated in research, iUS-based spine navigation has not yet been established in the clinic. This is due to several factors including the lack of a standard methodology for the assessment of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability of the registration method. To address these issues, we present a systematic review of the state-of-the-art techniques for iUS-guided registration in spinal image-guided surgery (IGS). The review follows a new taxonomy based on the four steps involved in the surgical workflow that include pre-processing, registration initialization, estimation of the required patient to image transformation, and a visualization process. We provide a detailed analysis of the measurements in terms of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability that need to be met during the evaluation of a spinal IGS framework. Although this review is focused on spinal navigation, we expect similar evaluation criteria to be relevant for other IGS applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houssem-Eddine Gueziri
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal (QC), Canada; McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada.
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal (QC), Canada
| | - D Louis Collins
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal (QC), Canada; McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tümer N, Kok AC, Vos FM, Streekstra GJ, Askeland C, Tuijthof GJM, Zadpoor AA. Three-Dimensional Registration of Freehand-Tracked Ultrasound to CT Images of the Talocrural Joint. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2018; 18:E2375. [PMID: 30037099 PMCID: PMC6068753 DOI: 10.3390/s18072375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A rigid surface⁻volume registration scheme is presented in this study to register computed tomography (CT) and free-hand tracked ultrasound (US) images of the talocrural joint. Prior to registration, bone surfaces expected to be visible in US are extracted from the CT volume and bone contours in 2D US data are enhanced based on monogenic signal representation of 2D US images. A 3D monogenic signal data is reconstructed from the 2D data using the position of the US probe recorded with an optical tracking system. When registering the surface extracted from the CT scan to the monogenic signal feature volume, six transformation parameters are estimated so as to optimize the sum of monogenic signal features over the transformed surface. The robustness of the registration algorithm was tested on a dataset collected from 12 cadaveric ankles. The proposed method was used in a clinical case study to investigate the potential of US imaging for pre-operative planning of arthroscopic access to talar (osteo)chondral defects (OCDs). The results suggest that registrations with a registration error of 2 mm and less is achievable, and US has the potential to be used in assessment of an OCD' arthroscopic accessibility, given the fact that 51% of the talar surface could be visualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazlı Tümer
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Aimee C Kok
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Frans M Vos
- Department of Imaging Science and Technology, Quantitative Imaging Group, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert J Streekstra
- Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Gabrielle J M Tuijthof
- Orthopaedic Research Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre Smart Devices, Nieuw Eyckholt 300, 6419 DJ Heerlen, The Netherlands.
| | - Amir A Zadpoor
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marinetto E, Uneri A, De Silva T, Reaungamornrat S, Zbijewski W, Sisniega A, Vogt S, Kleinszig G, Pascau J, Siewerdsen JH. Integration of free-hand 3D ultrasound and mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: Feasibility and characterization for real-time guidance of needle insertion. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2017; 58:13-22. [PMID: 28414927 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2016] [Revised: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This work presents development of an integrated ultrasound (US)-cone-beam CT (CBCT) system for image-guided needle interventions, combining a low-cost ultrasound system (Interson VC 7.5MHz, Pleasanton, CA) with a mobile C-arm for fluoroscopy and CBCT via use of a surgical tracker. Imaging performance of the ultrasound system was characterized in terms of depth-dependent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution. US-CBCT system was evaluated in phantom studies simulating three needle-based procedures: drug delivery, tumor ablation, and lumbar puncture. Low-cost ultrasound provided flexibility but exhibited modest CNR and spatial resolution that is likely limited to fairly superficial applications within a ∼10cm depth of view. Needle tip localization demonstrated target registration error 2.1-3.0mm using fiducial-based registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Marinetto
- Departmento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA
| | - A Uneri
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - T De Silva
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA
| | - S Reaungamornrat
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - W Zbijewski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA
| | - A Sisniega
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA
| | - S Vogt
- Siemens Healthcare XP Division, Erlangen, Germany
| | - G Kleinszig
- Siemens Healthcare XP Division, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Pascau
- Departmento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - J H Siewerdsen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA; Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kassab GS, An G, Sander EA, Miga MI, Guccione JM, Ji S, Vodovotz Y. Augmenting Surgery via Multi-scale Modeling and Translational Systems Biology in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 2016; 44:2611-25. [PMID: 27015816 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1596-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In this era of tremendous technological capabilities and increased focus on improving clinical outcomes, decreasing costs, and increasing precision, there is a need for a more quantitative approach to the field of surgery. Multiscale computational modeling has the potential to bridge the gap to the emerging paradigms of Precision Medicine and Translational Systems Biology, in which quantitative metrics and data guide patient care through improved stratification, diagnosis, and therapy. Achievements by multiple groups have demonstrated the potential for (1) multiscale computational modeling, at a biological level, of diseases treated with surgery and the surgical procedure process at the level of the individual and the population; along with (2) patient-specific, computationally-enabled surgical planning, delivery, and guidance and robotically-augmented manipulation. In this perspective article, we discuss these concepts, and cite emerging examples from the fields of trauma, wound healing, and cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghassan S Kassab
- California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Gary An
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Edward A Sander
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Michael I Miga
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Julius M Guccione
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Songbai Ji
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.,Department of Surgery and of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Yoram Vodovotz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, W944 Starzl Biomedical Sciences Tower, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,Center for Inflammation and Regenerative Modeling, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagpal S, Abolmaesumi P, Rasoulian A, Hacihaliloglu I, Ungi T, Osborn J, Lessoway VA, Rudan J, Jaeger M, Rohling RN, Borschneck DP, Mousavi P. A multi-vertebrae CT to US registration of the lumbar spine in clinical data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015; 10:1371-81. [DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1247-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
8
|
Ultrasound-CT registration of vertebrae without reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012; 7:901-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s11548-012-0771-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2012] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
9
|
Gill S, Abolmaesumi P, Fichtinger G, Boisvert J, Pichora D, Borshneck D, Mousavi P. Biomechanically constrained groupwise ultrasound to CT registration of the lumbar spine. Med Image Anal 2012; 16:662-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2009] [Revised: 02/28/2010] [Accepted: 07/11/2010] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
10
|
Lang A, Mousavi P, Gill S, Fichtinger G, Abolmaesumi P. Multi-modal registration of speckle-tracked freehand 3D ultrasound to CT in the lumbar spine. Med Image Anal 2012; 16:675-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2009] [Revised: 05/24/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
11
|
Yan CXB, Goulet B, Chen SJS, Tampieri D, Collins DL. Validation of automated ultrasound-CT registration of vertebrae. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011; 7:601-10. [DOI: 10.1007/s11548-011-0666-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2011] [Accepted: 11/08/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
12
|
Ou Y, Sotiras A, Paragios N, Davatzikos C. DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting. Med Image Anal 2011; 15:622-39. [PMID: 20688559 PMCID: PMC3012150 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2009] [Revised: 06/19/2010] [Accepted: 07/06/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
A general-purpose deformable registration algorithm referred to as "DRAMMS" is presented in this paper. DRAMMS bridges the gap between the traditional voxel-wise methods and landmark/feature-based methods with primarily two contributions. First, DRAMMS renders each voxel relatively distinctively identifiable by a rich set of attributes, therefore largely reducing matching ambiguities. In particular, a set of multi-scale and multi-orientation Gabor attributes are extracted and the optimal components are selected, so that they form a highly distinctive morphological signature reflecting the anatomical and geometric context around each voxel. Moreover, the way in which the optimal Gabor attributes are constructed is independent of the underlying image modalities or contents, which renders DRAMMS generally applicable to diverse registration tasks. A second contribution of DRAMMS is that it modulates the registration by assigning higher weights to those voxels having higher ability to establish unique (hence reliable) correspondences across images, therefore reducing the negative impact of those regions that are less capable of finding correspondences (such as outlier regions). A continuously-valued weighting function named "mutual-saliency" is developed to reflect the matching uniqueness between a pair of voxels implied by the tentative transformation. As a result, voxels do not contribute equally as in most voxel-wise methods, nor in isolation as in landmark/feature-based methods. Instead, they contribute according to the continuously-valued mutual-saliency map, which dynamically evolves during the registration process. Experiments in simulated images, inter-subject images, single-/multi-modality images, from brain, heart, and prostate have demonstrated the general applicability and the accuracy of DRAMMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangming Ou
- Section of Biomedical Image Analysis, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market St., Ste 380, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Towards accurate, robust and practical ultrasound-CT registration of vertebrae for image-guided spine surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010; 6:523-37. [DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0536-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2010] [Accepted: 10/11/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
14
|
Perrin DP, Vasilyev NV, Novotny P, Stoll J, Howe RD, Dupont PE, Salgo IS, del Nido PJ. Image guided surgical interventions. Curr Probl Surg 2009; 46:730-66. [PMID: 19651287 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2009.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas P Perrin
- Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Afthinos JN, Latif MJ, Bhora FY, Connery CP, McGinty JJ, Burra A, Attiyeh M, Todd GJ, Belsley SJ. What technical barriers exist for real-time fluoroscopic and video image overlay in robotic surgery? Int J Med Robot 2008; 4:368-72. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
16
|
Chen TK, Abolmaesumi P, Pichora DR, Ellis RE. A system for ultrasound-guided computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 10:281-92. [PMID: 16410230 DOI: 10.3109/10929080500390017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Current computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems typically use preoperative computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative fluoroscopy as their imaging modalities. Because these imaging tools use X-rays, both patients and surgeons are exposed to ionizing radiation that may cause long-term health damage. To register the patient with the preoperative surgical plan, these techniques require tracking of the targeted anatomy by invasively mounting a tracking device on the patient, which results in extra pain and may prolong recovery time. The mounting procedure also leads to a major difficulty of using these approaches to track small bones or mobile fractures. Furthermore, it is practically impossible to mount a heavy tracking device on a small bone, which thus restricts the use of CAOS techniques. This article presents a novel CAOS method that employs 2D ultrasound (US) as the imaging modality. Medical US is non-ionizing and real-time, and our proposed method does not require any invasive mounting procedures. Experiments have shown that the proposed registration technique has sub-millimetric accuracy in localizing the best match between the intraoperative and preoperative images, demonstrating great potential for orthopedic applications. This method has some significant advantages over previously reported US-guided CAOS techniques: it requires no segmentation and employs only a few US images to accurately and robustly localize the patient. Preliminary laboratory results on both a radius-bone phantom and human subjects are presented.
Collapse
|
17
|
Penney GP, Barratt DC, Chan CSK, Slomczykowski M, Carter TJ, Edwards PJ, Hawkes DJ. Cadaver validation of intensity-based ultrasound to CT registration. Med Image Anal 2006; 10:385-95. [PMID: 16520083 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2006.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2005] [Revised: 11/07/2005] [Accepted: 01/12/2006] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
A method is presented for the rigid registration of tracked B-mode ultrasound images to a CT volume of a femur and pelvis. This registration can allow tracked surgical instruments to be aligned with the CT image or an associated preoperative plan. Our method is fully automatic and requires no manual segmentation of either the ultrasound images or the CT volume. The parameter which is directly related to the speed of sound through tissue has also been included in the registration optimisation process. Experiments have been carried out on six cadaveric femurs and three cadaveric pelves. Registration results were compared with a "gold standard" registration acquired using bone implanted fiducial markers. Results show the registration method to be accurate, on average, to 1.6 mm root-mean-square target registration error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G P Penney
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 2nd Floor Malet Place Engineering Building, Malet Place, Off Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|