Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study

Reattachable fiducial skin marker for automatic multimodality registration

Purpose

Fusing image information has become increasingly important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of the patient. Despite intensive research towards markerless registration approaches, fiducial marker-based methods remain the default choice for a wide range of applications in clinical practice. However, as especially non-invasive markers cannot be positioned reproducibly in the same pose on the patient, pre-interventional imaging has to be performed immediately before the intervention for fiducial marker-based registrations.

Methods

We propose a new non-invasive, reattachable fiducial skin marker concept for multi-modal registration approaches including the use of electromagnetic or optical tracking technologies. We furthermore describe a robust, automatic fiducial marker localization algorithm for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Localization of the new fiducial marker has been assessed for different marker configurations using both CT and MRI. Furthermore, we applied the marker in an abdominal phantom study. For this, we attached the marker at three poses to the phantom, registered ten segmented targets of the phantom’s CT image to live ultrasound images and determined the target registration error (TRE) for each target and each marker pose.

Results

Reattachment of the marker was possible with a mean precision of 0.02 mm ± 0.01 mm. Our algorithm successfully localized the marker automatically in all ($$n=201$$ n = 201 ) evaluated CT/MRI images. Depending on the marker pose, the mean ($$n=10$$ n = 10 ) TRE of the abdominal phantom study ranged from 1.51 ± 0.75 mm to 4.65 ± 1.22 mm.

Conclusions

The non-invasive, reattachable skin marker concept allows reproducible positioning of the marker and automatic localization in different imaging modalities. The low TREs indicate the potential applicability of the marker concept for clinical interventions, such as the puncture of abdominal lesions, where current image-based registration approaches still lack robustness and existing marker-based methods are often impractical.

Virtual and Augmented Reality Systems for Renal Interventions: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Many virtual and augmented reality systems have been proposed to support renal interventions. This paper reviews such systems employed in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and renal stones.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria were virtual and augmented reality systems for radical or partial nephrectomy and renal stone treatment, excluding systems solely developed or evaluated for training purposes.

RESULTS

In total, 52 research papers were identified and analyzed. Most of the identified literature (87%) deals with systems for renal cell carcinoma treatment. About 44% of the systems have already been employed in clinical practice, but only 20% in studies with ten or more patients. Main challenges remaining for future research include the consideration of organ movement and deformation, human factor issues, and the conduction of large clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

Augmented and virtual reality systems have the potential to improve safety and outcomes of renal interventions. In the last ten years, many technical advances have led to more sophisticated systems, which are already applied in clinical practice. Further research is required to cope with current limitations of virtual and augmented reality assistance in clinical environments.