The outburst age: how TEM ignited the MIS revolution

Uptake of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in North America: Initial Assessment of a Structured Training Program and the Experience of Delegate Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision is a new approach to curative-intent rectal cancer surgery. Training and surgeon experience with this approach has not been assessed previously in America.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize a structured training program and to determine the experience of delegate surgeons.

DESIGN

Data were assimilated from an anonymous, online survey delivered to attendees on course completion. Data on surgeon performance during hands-on cadaveric dissection were collected prospectively.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single tertiary colorectal surgery referral center, and cadaveric hands-on training was conducted at a specialized surgeon education center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measurement was the use of the course and surgeon experience posttraining.

RESULTS

During a 12-month period, eight 2-day transanal total mesorectal excision courses were conducted. Eighty-one colorectal surgeons successfully completed the course. During cadaveric dissection, 71% achieved a complete (Quirke 3) specimen; 26% were near complete (Quirke 2), and 3% were incomplete (Quirke 1). A total of 9.1% demonstrated dissection in the incorrect plane, whereas 4.5% created major injury to the rectum or surrounding structures, excluding the prostate. Thirty eight (46.9%) of 81 surgeon delegates responded to an online survey. Of survey respondents, 94.6% believed training should be required before performing transanal total mesorectal excision. Posttraining, 94.3% of surgeon delegates planned to use transanal total mesorectal excision for distal-third rectal cancers, 74.3% for middle-third cancers, and 8.6% for proximal-third cancers. The most significant complication reported was urethral injury; 5 were reported by the subset of survey respondents who had performed this operation postcourse.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by inherent reporting bias, including observer and recall biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this structured training program for transanal total mesorectal excision was found to be useful by the majority of respondents, the risk of iatrogenic injury after training remains high, suggesting that this training pedagogy alone is insufficient. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A335.

Technologies, technical steps, and early postoperative results of transanal TME

INTRODUCTION

First described in 1982, TME overcomes most of the concerns regarding adequate local control after anterior rectal resection. TME requires close sharp dissection along the so-called Heald's plane down to the levators, with distal dissection often cumbersome. In recent years, Transanal TME was introduced with the aim to improve distal rectal dissection and quality of mesorectal excision.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized study, started in 2013, is currently ongoing in two Italian Centers. Study objectives were assessing the safety of TaTME and TME quality. TaTME technique and technologies as performed in these centers and cumulative results at ≤30 postoperative days of the first 102 patients are reported.

RESULTS

Early postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 33.3% (34 pts, 16 Clavien-Dindo I + II and 18 Clavien-Dindo III + IV + V), and 1.96% (two deaths), respectively. The quality of mesorectal excision according to Quirke was: complete in 97.1% and nearly complete in 2.9% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the effectiveness of TaTME, especially regarding the quality of the mesorectal dissection. Open questions regarding standardization, anatomical landmarks, indications, morbidity (with special regard to local infection and sepsis), learning curve and oncological outcomes require further answers from larger studies and RCTs before definitive validation of this procedure.  .

Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME

Stereotactic navigation allows for real-time, image-guided surgery, thus providing an augmented working environment for the operator. This technique can be applied to complex minimally invasive surgery for fixed anatomic targets. Transanal minimally invasive surgery represents a new approach to rectal cancer surgery that is technically demanding and introduces the potential for procedure-specific morbidity. Feasibility of stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME has been demonstrated, and this could theoretically translate into improved resection quality by improving the surgeon's spatial awareness. The future of minimally invasive surgery as it relates to augmented reality and image-guided surgery is discussed.

Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Robotic transanal surgery represents a natural evolution of transanal minimally invasive surgery. This new approach to rectal surgery provides the ability to perform local excision of rectal neoplasia with precision. Robotic transanal surgery can also be used to perform more advanced procedures including repair of complex fistulae and transanal total mesorectal excision.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent transanal robotic surgery over a 33-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent three types of procedures using this approach: (a) local excision of rectal neoplasia, (b) transanal total mesorectal excision, and (c) closure of complex fistulae, such as rectourethral fistulae.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent robotic transanal surgery during the 33-month study period. Of these, nine patients underwent local excision of rectal neoplasia; four patients underwent transanal total mesorectal excision; four patients underwent repair of rectourethral fistulae; and one patient underwent repair of an anastomotic fistula. Of the patients undergoing robotic transanal surgery for local excision, 6/9 were resections of benign neoplasia, while 3/9 were resections for invasive adenocarcinoma. There was no fragmentation (0/9) noted on any of the locally excised specimens, while one patient (1/9) had a positive lateral margin. During the mean follow-up of 11.4 months, no recurrence was detected. Four patients underwent robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for curative intent resection of rectal cancer confined to the distal rectum. Mesorectal quality was graded as complete or near complete, and an R0 resection was performed in all four cases. Other transanal robotic procedures performed were the repair of rectourethral fistulae (n = 3) and anastomotic fistula (n = 1). This approach was met with limited success, and only half of the rectourethral fistulae were closed.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic transanal surgery for local excision, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of fistulae is feasible, although these new approaches represent a work-in-progress. Improvement in platform design will likely facilitate the ability to perform more complex procedures. Further research with robotic transanal approaches is necessary to determine whether or not this approach can provide patients with significant benefit.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for surgical repair of rectovesical fistula following radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Rectovesical fistula is a rare complication following prostatectomy, associated with significant symptoms such as urinary drainage from anus or faecaluria. While several surgical procedures have been described to treat this condition, none of them has been accepted as the universal standard. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established endoluminal procedure for local excision of rectal tumors. But its application to the repair of rectovesical fistula has been almost unknown.

METHODS

We performed TEM as a surgical repair for refractory rectovesical fistula developing after radical prostatectomy in 10 patients. Under the magnified three-dimensional view, through the stereoscope, the fistula and the surrounding rectal mucosa were precisely resected. The defect and the muscle layer of the rectum were closed by hand-sew technique in four layers.

RESULTS

Fistula was completely closed in 7 patients, who eventually underwent enterostomy closure, while in the other 3 patients the fistula recurred. In the three recurrent cases, the fistula was associated with wide, tough scar tissue due to previous irradiation, HIFU, or repeated surgical repair attempts.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectovesical fistulas associated with wide, tough scar tissue due to multi-time attempt of surgical repair or any type of energy ablation should not be indicated for repair by TEM. However, for simple fistulas without tough, fibrotic surroundings, TEM can be indicated as a minimally invasive surgical option with very low morbidity, without any incision in healthy tissue for approach.

Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The introduction of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) in 2009 allowed colorectal surgeons to approach transanal access with a different perspective. This has lead to the development of TAMIS for total mesorectal excision (TME). We have previously described robotic transanal TME and here report our initial experience with the first three human cases performed at a single institution.

METHODS

Three patients with distal rectal cancer were selective to undergo robotic transanal TME. All resections were carried out with intent to cure; they were performed by a single attending colorectal surgeon over an 11-month period.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent robotic transanal TME. The average age was 45 years (range 26-59) with mean BMI of 32 kg/m(2) (range 21-38.5). The average tumor size was 2.5 cm. All lesions were located in the distal 5 cm of the rectum. In each case, the distal and circumferential resection margins were free of tumor. The resection quality of the mesorectal envelope was Grade I and Grade II. There was no major morbidity or mortality on short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic transanal TME is a new modality for en bloc rectal cancer surgery, and the technique is feasible. Further study is necessary to assess the benefit of this novel approach.

A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was introduced as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery in 2010. Over the past 4 years, considerable international experience has been gained with this approach. Most published reports focus on TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasia, but there are other important applications such as transanal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. This comprehensive review details the progress with TAMIS since its inception. Robotic transanal surgery is a natural evolution of TAMIS still in its early infancy, which is also reviewed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge was performed. Since the inception of TAMIS in 2009, 33 retrospective studies and case reports, and 3 abstracts have been published on TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms, which represents a combined n = 390 TAMIS procedures performed worldwide using eight different types of TAMIS platforms. A total of 152 lesions were excised for benign disease including adenomas and high-grade dysplasias (39 %), 209 for malignancy for carcinomas in situ and adenocarcinomas (53.5 %). Twenty-nine (7.5 %) of TAMIS resections were for other pathology, of which the majority (23/29) were neuroendocrine lesions. The remaining resections were for mucocele, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, melanoma, and fibrosis. Robotic-TAMIS has also been reported, however, data are extremely limited as there are only 7 case reports (combined n = 11) in the published literature. Success with Robotic-TAMIS has been demonstrated with various patient positions and by use of a special glove port. Transanal total mesorectal excision using the TAMIS platform has also been demonstrated is several small series, and the feasibility of performing pure transanal total mesorectal excision has also been reported. Combined, n = 78 cases of transanal total mesorectal excision have been performed using TAMIS. The advantages of TAMIS-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision are discussed.

A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was introduced as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery in 2010. Over the past 4 years, considerable international experience has been gained with this approach. Most published reports focus on TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasia, but there are other important applications such as transanal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. This comprehensive review details the progress with TAMIS since its inception. Robotic transanal surgery is a natural evolution of TAMIS still in its early infancy, which is also reviewed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge was performed. Since the inception of TAMIS in 2009, 33 retrospective studies and case reports, and 3 abstracts have been published on TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms, which represents a combined n = 390 TAMIS procedures performed worldwide using eight different types of TAMIS platforms. A total of 152 lesions were excised for benign disease including adenomas and high-grade dysplasias (39 %), 209 for malignancy for carcinomas in situ and adenocarcinomas (53.5 %). Twenty-nine (7.5 %) of TAMIS resections were for other pathology, of which the majority (23/29) were neuroendocrine lesions. The remaining resections were for mucocele, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, melanoma, and fibrosis. Robotic-TAMIS has also been reported, however, data are extremely limited as there are only 7 case reports (combined n = 11) in the published literature. Success with Robotic-TAMIS has been demonstrated with various patient positions and by use of a special glove port. Transanal total mesorectal excision using the TAMIS platform has also been demonstrated is several small series, and the feasibility of performing pure transanal total mesorectal excision has also been reported. Combined, n = 78 cases of transanal total mesorectal excision have been performed using TAMIS. The advantages of TAMIS-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision are discussed.