Telematics and telemanipulation in surgery

Robotics and telesurgery – an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Laparoscopy is handicapped by the reduction of the range of motion from six to only four degrees of freedom. In complicated cases (i.e. radical prostatectomy), there is often a crossing of the hands of surgeon and assistant. Finally, standard laparoscopes allow only 2D-vision. This has a major impact on technically difficult reconstructive procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Solutions include the understanding of the geometry of laparoscopy, but also newly developed surgical robots. During the last five years, there has been an increasing development and experience with robotics in urology. This article reviews the actual results focussing on the benefits and problems of robotics in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Own experiences with robot-assisted surgery include more than 1200 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using a voice-controlled camera-arm (AESOP) as well as six telesurgical interventions with the da Vinci-system. Substantial experimental studies have been performed focussing on the geometry of laparoscopy and new training concepts such as perfused pelvitrainers and models for simulation of urethrovesical anastomosis. The recent literature on robotics in urology has been reviewed based on a MEDLINE/PUBMED research. The geometry of laparoscopy includes the angles between the instruments which have to be in a range of 25 degrees to 45 degrees ; the angles between the instrument and the working plane that should not exceed 55 degrees ; and the bi-planar angle between the shaft of the needle holder and the needle which has to be adapted according to the anatomical situation in range of 90 degrees to 110 degrees . 3-D-systems have not yet proved to be effective due to handling problems such as shutter glasses, video helmets or reduced brightness. At the moment, there are only two robotic surgical systems (AESOP, da Vinci) in clinical use, of which only the da Vinci provides stereovision and all six degrees of freedom (DOF). To date, more than 3000 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies have been performed worldwide at 92 centres with this system. The main advantage of the system represents the translation of open surgical skills to laparoscopy. Despite recent development of basic tools (e.g. bipolar forceps) for the da Vinci robot, investment and maintenance costs still represent the major problem of the device. Additionally, the device does not provide any haptic sense (i.e. tactile feedback). Robotic surgery represents a turning point of surgical research. However, broad use of robotic systems is limited mainly because of the high investment and running costs. Interestingly, more than in the field of cardiac surgery, there seems to be a need for telemanipulators in urology, mainly to reduce the learning curve of standard laparoscopy. However, new training concepts used in combination with mono-tasking computerized robots (AESOP) have proved their efficacy associated with a significant cost reduction.

Robotic Surgery: Urologic Implications

Current medical robots have nothing in common with the anthropomorphic robots in science fiction classics. They are in fact, manipulators, working on a master-slave principle. Robots can be defined as "automatically controlled multitask manipulators, which are freely programmable in three or more spaces." The success of robots in surgery is based on their precision, lack of fatigue, and speed of action. This review describes the theory, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical utilization of mechanical and robotic arm systems to replace the second assistant and provide camera direction and stability during laparoscopic surgery. The Robotrac system (Aesculap, Burlingame, CA), the First Assistant (Leonard Medical Inc, Huntingdon Valley, PA), AESOP (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA), ZEUS (Computer Motion), and the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA) system are reviewed, as are simple mechanical-assist systems such as Omnitract (Minnesota Scientific, St. Paul, MN), Iron Intern (Automated Medical Products Corp., New York, NY), the Bookwalter retraction system (Codman , Somerville, NJ), the Surgassistant trade mark (Solos Endoscopy, Irvine, CA), the Trocar Sleeve Stabilizer (Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp., Rosemont, IL), and the Endoholder (Codman, Somerville, NJ).

Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future?

In urology, at the end of the last millennium, there was an increasing use of computerized technology, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, microwave therapy and high-energy focused ultrasound. However, experience with manipulating robots in urological surgery is still very limited. Laparoscopic surgery is handicapped by a reduction of the range of motion because of the fixed trocar position. The da Vinci system is the first surgical system to address all these problems adequately. The system consists of two main components: the surgeon's viewing and control console with three-dimensional imaging and the surgical arm unit that positions and manoeuvres detachable surgical instruments. The surgeon performs the procedure seated at the console holding specially designed instruments. Telerobotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy provides advantages such as stereovision, dexterity and tremor filtering, but there is a learning curve with the device, mainly because of the magnification, the three-dimensional image and the lack of tactile feedback. However, after only a short period of time, the experienced surgeon is able to become familiar with the device. The impact of robotics in urological surgery is therefore very promising, and we are convinced that it will totally change the future of urological surgery.

Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids

Within a Dutch research program on minimally invasive surgery, a large literature survey has been carried out. This article describes the state of the art in research on observation in laparoscopy. It gives an overview of factors impeding the surgeon and technical developments designed to overcome these problems. A large number of journals, proceedings, patents, and books starting from the year 1991 have been consulted. The survey was completed with a thorough MEDLINE search. The survey showed that many authors have an incomplete background in the fundamentals of visual perception. This leads to a lack of understanding and to the design of supporting aids that often are not very useful. The new aspect of this study is that it gives a complete and structured overview of laparoscopic observation problems and current solutions. The observation problems are structured according to visual perception theory. The solutions are critically considered, and their benefits and drawbacks are identified. The study shows that the benefits of stereo-endoscopes and motorized endoscope positioners are questionable. The addition of shadows and movement parallax is still a very important research topic.

Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids

Within a Dutch research program on minimally invasive surgery, a large literature survey has been carried out. This article describes the state of the art in research on manipulation in laparoscopy. It gives an overview of factors impeding the surgeon and technical developments designed to overcome these problems. Starting from the year 1991, a large number of journals, proceedings, patents, and books have been consulted. The survey was completed with a thorough MEDLINE search. The impeding effects have been subdivided into two groups: transformation of spatial and grasping movements of the hand. The article gives an overview of these effects and of supporting aids that have been developed. The studies show that many aids are based on a technology-driven rather than a clinically-driven approach. The development of simple instruments that can be used for a large range of tasks instead of only one is still a very important topic of research.