Three-dimensional sonohysterography may replace hysteroscopy for women with perimenopausal bleeding

MRI for Diagnosing Intrauterine Adhesions

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) as well as the prognostic value of MRI for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), using hysteroscopy as the reference standard.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical centre.

PATIENT(S)

Ninety-two women with amenorrhea, hypomenorrhea, subfertility, or recurrent pregnancy loss who underwent MRI and in whom Asherman's syndrome was suspected upon TVS.

INTERVENTION(S)

MRI and TVS were conducted approximately 1 week before hysteroscopy.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients suspected of having Asherman's syndrome were examined by MRI and TVS within 7 days of an upcoming hysteroscopy. All hysteroscopy procedures were performed during the early proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. All hysteroscopic diagnoses were performed by an experienced expert. All MRIs were read by 2 experienced, blinded radiologists.

RESULTS

MRI was highly accurate (94.57%), sensitive (98.8%), and specific (42.9%) for diagnosing IUAs with a positive predictive value of 95.5% and a negative predictive value of 75%. The diagnostic values of MRI and TVS were significantly different according to McNemar tests. Junctional zone signal and junctional zone alterations correlated with the stage of IUAs.

CONCLUSION

MRI is markedly superior to TVS in terms of diagnostic accuracy for IUAs, with total agreement with hysteroscopic findings. However, the main advantage of MRI is that, unlike TVS and hysterosalpingography, it can be used to assess the risk of hysteroscopy and to predict postoperative recovery and future pregnancy based on the uterine junctional zone.

Pain Perception and Side Effects During Saline Infusion Sonohysterography With a Balloon Catheter: A Randomized Comparative Study of Cervical Versus Intrauterine Catheter Placement

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate whether the site of the balloon placement into either the uterine cavity or cervical canal can affect the intensity of pain during sonohysterography.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, women who underwent saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) were randomized to intracervical or intrauterine balloon placement between May 2012 and May 2014. The examination was scheduled at the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. The primary outcome measures included the degree of pain after inflation and then after deflation of the balloon catheter. Data were analyzed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle for each woman who underwent SIS.

RESULTS

A total of 300 infertile women were assigned to the treatment groups. There were no significant differences in inflation and deflation pain and the total procedure time between the 2 groups. The total volume of required saline for adequate distention of the cavity was significantly lower in the cervical group than the intrauterine group (p = .015). Nulliparous women had insignificantly more pain after the initial inflation of the balloon compared with multiparous women (p = .069). The pain score was not associated with patients' age, the volume of the saline infused, the presence of intrauterine abnormality, and the procedure time.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracervical catheter placement did not reduce pain during or after SIS. However, intracervical balloon insertion requires a less-significant volume of saline compared with intrauterine placement, leading to a reduced risk of intrauterine infection and the spread of malignant endometrial cells into the peritoneal cavity at the time of the procedure.

Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions

BACKGROUND

Focal abnormalities most commonly acquired within the uterine cavity include endometrial polyps (arising from the endometrium) and submucous fibroids (arising from the myometrium). These benign abnormalities can cause several problems, including abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and subfertility. Two-dimensional saline infusion sonography (2D SIS) is a minimally invasive test that can be used to diagnose these pathologies, but it is less accurate than hysteroscopy, which is a more invasive procedure by which an endoscope allows direct visualisation of the uterine cavity. Three-dimensional (3D) SIS appears to enhance sonographic visualisation within the uterine cavity, thereby offering a potentially more accurate minimally invasive diagnostic test.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3D SIS (index test 1) compared with 2D SIS for the diagnosis of focally growing lesions (presence or not) in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy performed as the reference test. • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D+3D SIS (index test 2) compared with 2D SIS for the diagnosis of focally growing lesions (presence or not) in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy performed as the reference test. In this case, any abnormality on either modality was regarded as a positive result ('OR' approach). Secondary objectives • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3D SIS (index test 1) compared with 2D SIS according to type of abnormality and discrimination between uterine polyps and submucous fibroids in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy and histology used as the reference.• To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D+3D SIS (index test 2) compared with 2D SIS according to type of abnormality and discrimination between uterine polyps and submucous fibroids in women with AUB or subfertility, with hysteroscopy and histology used as the reference.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online (CENTRAL CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Specialised Register and CGFG Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) Specialised Register, clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Screening reference lists of appropriate studies was also performed. We screened for eligibility all studies identified from inception until March 2016. We performed searches with no date or language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The population of interest consisted of premenopausal women with AUB or subfertility and postmenopausal women with AUB. Diagnostic test accuracy studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the accuracy of both 2D SIS and 3D SIS for the diagnosis of acquired intracavitary abnormalities with hysteroscopy used as the reference standard. In light of the lack of data for 3D SIS, we also included studies that evaluated the accuracy of 3D SIS alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors read all potentially eligible references after performing a first screening by title and abstract (LLN and FJRH). They independently extracted data to construct 2×2 tables from eligible studies and assessed studies for methodological quality using the QUADAS-2 tool (revised tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies). To describe and visually present results, we produced in RevMan forest plots showing pairs of sensitivity and specificity together with 95% confidence intervals from each study, as well as raw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots. We displayed paired analyses in an ROC plot by linking sensitivity-specificity pairs from each study by using a dashed line. To compare 3D SIS versus 2D SIS, we restricted analyses to studies that provided 2×2 tables for both tests and used the bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies (1053 women) reported the accuracy of 3D SIS for focal uterine abnormalities; 11 of these (846 women) were suitable for meta-analysis, and eight reported accuracy according to the type of focal abnormality. The design of the included studies seems applicable. The main problem involving the quality of included studies is insufficient reporting of study methods, resulting in unclear risk of bias for several of the quality domains assessed. Therefore, we considered the overall quality of the evidence as low. The summary estimate (11 studies reporting absence or presence of abnormality at 3D SIS) for sensitivity was 94.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.6% to 96.9%) and for specificity 99.4% (95% CI 96.2% to 99.9%). Meta-analysis of the eight studies (N = 716) directly comparing 2D SIS versus 3D SIS showed summary sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI 91.9% to 98.8%) and summary specificity of 99.5% (95% CI 96.1% to 100%) for 3D SIS. For 2D SIS, summary sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 81.2% to 95.8%) and summary specificity was 96.3% (95% CI 86.1% to 99.1%). The difference in accuracy between 2D SIS and 3D SIS was non-significant (P values of 0.07 for sensitivity and 0.10 for specificity).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence suggests that 3D SIS may be very accurate in detecting intracavitary abnormalities. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between 2D SIS and 3D SIS. Summary sensitivity and summary specificity are higher for 3D SIS, but margins of improvement are limited because 2D SIS is already very accurate. When the technology and appropriate expertise are available, 3D SIS offers an alternative to 2D SIS. Both 2D SIS and 3D SIS should be considered alternatives to diagnostic hysteroscopy when intracavitary pathology is suspected in subfertile women and in those with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Endometrial polyps in female allograft recipients with abnormal bleedings

Introduction

Endometrial polyps are a common focal endometrial pathology, with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) as a predominant symptom. Although the great majority of cases are benign, premalignancy or malignancy may develop within the polyp. The need for chronic immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplanted patients is associated with a significantly increased risk of malignant lesions.

Aim of the study

Aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of endometrial polyps in solid organ transplanted women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Material and methods

The retrospective analysis of 125 cases of AUB in allograft recipients and 200 consecutive cases of AUB in patients from the general population was performed. Pathological findings from dilatation and curettage were analyzed and compared between the groups.

Results

Endometrial polyps were the only pathological findings in 12% and 21.5% of cases from the study and the control groups, respectively. In each of the groups, one case of endometrial cancer coexisted with an endometrial polyp. If cases of endometrial polyps coexisting with endometrial hyperplasia were taken into account, the rate of endometrial polyps was similar to that observed in the general population (20% vs. 21.5%, respectively).

Conclusions

Chronic immunosuppression, associated with an increased risk of malignancy, does not increase the risk of endometrial polyps among female graft recipients.