Research and rural; EGPRN and EURIPA—finding common ground. October 2013, Malta

Thinking rural health in Santal community in West Bengal: An interprofessional bottom-up approach to rural health

Background

An interprofessional and cross-cultural pedagogical project in community health for students in nursing, social work, anthropology and medicine at the end of the bachelor's degree begun in 2014. After a rural context fieldwork in several Santal villages of West Bengal (India), students had to conduct a research project, based on a community-health topic.

Aims

This paper describes how such a pedagogical project, introducing students to ethnographic research, can initiate new ways of thinking for possible future health interventions in rural communities.

Methods

An inductive approach based on ethnography was used during the fieldwork, including observations, interviews, focus groups and local documentation.

Results

Our observations led to the finding that actions in rural health cannot be initiated without: promoting an interprofessional/interdisciplinary perspective and a culture of complexity and reflectivity; considering local populations in transition and not in a fixed homogenous situation; understanding more than imposing; taking into account local disease classification and local pragmatic solutions; considering the dialogue between bio-medicine and therapeutic pluralism; considering local perceptions and practices; considering care itineraries/pathways; and finally being conscious of our apostolic function.

Conclusion

Our interprofessional pedagogical project promotes a bottom-up approach in dialogue with a global health vision.

van der Ploeg M, Floriani C, Kurpas D, Vinker S, Kreitmayer Pestic S, Petrazzuoli F, Hoffmann K, Viegas RPA, Mallen C, Tatsioni A, Maisonneuve H, Collins C, Lingner H, Tsopra R, Mueller Y, Poortvliet RKE, Gussekloo J, Streit S. Managing hypertension in frail oldest-old-The role of guideline use by general practitioners from 29 countries

Background

The best management of hypertension in frail oldest-old (≥80 years of age) remains unclear and we still lack guidelines that provide specific recommendations. Our study aims to investigate guideline use in general practitioners (GPs) and to examine if guideline use relates to different decisions when managing hypertension in frail oldest-old.

Design/Setting

Cross-sectional study among currently active GPs from 29 countries using a case-vignettes survey.

Methods

GPs participated in a survey with case-vignettes of frail oldest-olds varying in systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD). GPs from 26 European countries and from Brazil, Israel and New Zealand were invited. We compared the percentage of GPs reporting using guidelines per country and further stratified on the most frequently mentioned guidelines. To adjust for patient characteristics (SBP, CVD and GPs’ sex, years of experience, prevalence of oldest-old and location of their practice), we used a mixed-effects regression model accounting for clustering within countries.

Results

Overall, 2,543 GPs from 29 countries were included. 59.4% of them reported to use guidelines. Higher guideline use was found in female (p = 0.031) and less-experienced GPs (p<0.001). Across countries, we found a large variation in self-reported guideline use, ranging from 25% to 90% of the GPs, but there was no difference in hypertension treatment decisions in frail oldest-old patients between GPs that did not use and GPs that used guidelines, irrespective of the guidelines they used.

Conclusion

Many GPs reported using guidelines to manage hypertension in frail oldest-old patients, however guideline users did not decide differently from non-users concerning hypertension treatment decisions. Instead of focusing on the fact if GPs use guidelines or not, we as a scientific community should put an emphasis on what guidelines suggest in frail and oldest-old patients.