Asynchronous bilateral retinoblastoma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience

Treatment of Retinoblastoma: The Role of External Beam Radiotherapy

The risk of radiotherapy-related secondary cancers in children with constitutional retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) mutations has led to reduced use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for RB. Presently, tumor reduction with chemotherapy with or without focal surgery (chemosurgery) is most commonly undertaken; EBRT is avoided as much as possible and is considered only as the last treatment option prior to enucleation. Nevertheless, approximately 80% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage, and only 20-25% of early stage RB patients can be cured with a chemosurgery strategy. As a whole, chemotherapy fails in more than two-thirds of eyes with advanced stage disease, requiring EBRT or enucleation. Radiotherapy is still considered necessary for patients with large tumor(s) who are not candidates for chemosurgery but who have visual potential. When radiation therapy is indicated, the lowest possible radiation dose combined with systemic or local chemotherapy and focal surgery may yield the best clinical outcomes in terms of local control and treatment-related toxicity. Proton beam therapy is one EBRT method that can be used for treatment of RB and reduces the radiation dose delivered to the adjacent orbital bone while maintaining an adequate dose to the tumor. To maximize the therapeutic success of treatment of advanced RB, the possibility of integrating radiotherapy at early stages of treatment may need to be discussed by a multidisciplinary team, rather than considering EBRT as only a last treatment option.

Long-term retinoblastoma follow-up with or without general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Children with treated retinoblastoma undergo frequent examinations to monitor for recurrent or new tumours. Examinations under anaesthesia allow a more complete examination in younger children, however they are stressful for the family, subject the child to medical risk and consume resources. The risk of recurrent or new tumours declines with age and it is common practice to examine older children without general anaesthesia. There are no studies on the safety and cost effectiveness of this practice, or guidelines on when examination without anaesthesia (EWA) can be safely commenced.

PROCEDURE

Retrospective case note review of 128 sequential patients treated for retinoblastoma in a national referral centre over 10 years.

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 113 eyes of 84 children were analysed. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 months (range birth to 71 months). There were 55 unilateral and 29 bilateral cases. The mean follow-up was 77.7 months (range 12-178 months). EWA was commenced at a mean age of 53 months (range 12-98 months). The age of conversion to EWA was largely dependent on child cooperation and disease activity. Tumour activity was detected on EWA in one child at the age of 86 months, 9 months after the last active treatment and treated successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination without general anaesthesia does not appear to expose children to an increased risk of undetected tumour growth. This study highlights the important factors to be considered when deciding a safe time to commence EWA.

Retinoblastoma

Retinoblastoma is a rare eye tumor of childhood that arises in the retina. It is the most common intraocular malignancy of infancy and childhood; with an incidence of 1/15,000–20,000 live births. The two most frequent symptoms revealing retinoblastoma are leukocoria and strabismus. Iris rubeosis, hypopyon, hyphema, buphthalmia, orbital cellulites and exophthalmia may also be observed. Sixty per cent of retinoblastomas are unilateral and most of these forms are not hereditary (median age at diagnosis two years). Retinoblastoma is bilateral in 40% of cases (median age at diagnosis one year). All bilateral and multifocal unilateral forms are hereditary. Hereditary retinoblastoma constitutes a cancer predisposition syndrome: a subject constitutionally carrying an RB1 gene mutation has a greater than 90% risk of developing retinoblastoma but is also at increased risk of developing other types of cancers. Diagnosis is made by fundoscopy. Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans may contribute to diagnosis. Management of patients with retinoblastoma must take into account the various aspects of the disease: the visual risk, the possibly hereditary nature of the disease, the life-threatening risk. Enucleation is still often necessary in unilateral disease; the decision for adjuvant treatment is taken according to the histological risk factors. Conservative treatment for at least one eye is possible in most of the bilateral cases. It includes laser alone or combined with chemotherapy, cryotherapy and brachytherapy. The indication for external beam radiotherapy should be restricted to large ocular tumors and diffuse vitreous seeding because of the risk of late effects, including secondary sarcoma. Vital prognosis, related to retinoblastoma alone, is now excellent in patients with unilateral or bilateral forms of retinoblastoma. Long term follow-up and early counseling regarding the risk of second primary tumors and transmission should be offered to retinoblastoma patients.

Metachronous tumor development in unilateral retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

A series of 205 retinoblastoma (RB) patients referred to the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Siena (Italy) was evaluated in order to assess the proportion of unilateral cases later developing tumors in the companion eye ("metachronous" bilateral retinobastoma) (MBRB).

METHODS

The total number of unilaterally affected patients developing tumors in the fellow eye was recorded and the risk factors assessed for the development of asynchronous bilateral retinoblastoma, i.e., family history, tumor multifocality and early age at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Only two out of 133 (1.5%) unilateral retinoblastoma patients in our series could be considered affected by MBRB.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of MBRB in our series was negligible (1.5% of all unilateral cases) compared to other reports. None of the reported risk factors for the development of tumors in the fellow eye was relevant in the present series. Although close follow-up of some unilateral cases is still recommended, thorough examination of the fellow eye, to search for lesions in the peripheral retina, is essential in all cases of unilateral RB. MBRB may be a distinctive clinical entity with specific clinical, genetic and prognostic features. However, all these aspects need to be better investigated in larger series.