Age at first cannabis use moderates EEG markers of recovery from cannabis

Assessment of Classical and Non-Classical Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measures in Patients with Substance Use Disorders

Background: People diagnosed with substance use disorders (SUDs) are at risk for impairment of brain function and structure. However, physicians still do not have any clinical biomarker of brain impairment that helps diagnose or treat these patients when needed. The most common method to study these patients is the classical electroencephalographic (EEG) analyses of absolute and relative powers, but this has limited individual clinical applicability. Other non-classical measures such as frequency band ratios and entropy show promise in these patients. Therefore, there is a need to expand the use of quantitative (q)EEG beyond classical measures in clinical populations. Our aim is to assess a group of classical and non-classical qEEG measures in a population with SUDs. Methods: We selected 56 non-medicated and drug-free adult patients (30 males) diagnosed with SUDs and admitted to Rehabilitation Clinics. According to qualitative EEG findings, patients were divided into four groups. We estimated the absolute and relative powers and calculated the entropy, and the alpha/(delta + theta) ratio. Results: Our findings showed a significant variability of absolute and relative powers among patients with SUDs. We also observed a decrease in the EEG-based entropy index and alpha/(theta + delta) ratio, mainly in posterior regions, in the patients with abnormal qualitative EEG. Conclusions: Our findings support the view that the power spectrum is not a reliable biomarker on an individual level. Thus, we suggest shifting the approach from the power spectrum toward other potential methods and designs that may offer greater clinical possibilities.

Quantitative signal quality assessment for large-scale continuous scalp electroencephalography from a big data perspective

Objective. Despite electroencephalography (EEG) being a widely used neuroimaging technique with an excellent temporal resolution, in practice, the signals are heavily contaminated by artifacts masking responses of interest in an experiment. It is thus essential to guarantee a prompt and effective detection of artifacts that provides quantitative quality assessment (QA) on raw EEG data. This type of pipeline is crucial for large-scale EEG studies. However, current EEG QA studies are still limited.Approach. In this study, combined from a big data perspective, we therefore describe a quantitative signal quality assessment pipeline, a stable and general threshold-based QA pipeline that automatically integrates artifact detection and new QA measures to assess continuous resting-state raw EEG data. One simulation dataset and two resting-state EEG datasets from 42 healthy subjects and 983 clinical patients were utilized to calibrate the QA pipeline.Main Results. The results demonstrate that (1) the QA indices selected are sensitive: they almost strictly and linearly decrease as the noise level increases; (2) stable, replicable QA thresholds are valid for other experimental and clinical EEG datasets; and (3) use of the QA pipeline on these datasets reveals that high-frequency noises are the most common noises in EEG practice. The QA pipeline is also deployed in the WeBrain cloud platform (https://webrain.uestc.edu.cn/, the Chinese EEG Brain Consortium portal).Significance. These findings suggest that the proposed QA pipeline may be a stable and promising approach for quantitative EEG signal quality assessment in large-scale EEG studies.

Resting-state EEG, Substance use and Abstinence After Chronic use: A Systematic Review

Resting-state EEG reflects intrinsic brain activity and its alteration represents changes in cognition that are related to neuropathology. Thereby, it provides a way of revealing the neurocognitive mechanisms underpinning chronic substance use. In addition, it is documented that some neurocognitive functions can recover following sustained abstinence. We present a systematic review to synthesize how chronic substance use is associated with resting-state EEG alterations and whether these spontaneously recover from abstinence. A literature search in Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus resulted in 4088 articles, of which 57 were included for evaluation. It covered the substance of alcohol (18), tobacco (14), cannabis (8), cocaine (6), opioids (4), methamphetamine (4), and ecstasy (4). EEG analysis methods included spectral power, functional connectivity, and network analyses. It was found that long-term substance use with or without substance use disorder diagnosis was associated with broad intrinsic neural activity alterations, which were usually expressed as neural hyperactivation and decreased neural communication between brain regions. Some studies found the use of alcohol, tobacco, cocaine, cannabis, and methamphetamine was positively correlated with these changes. These alterations can partly recover from abstinence, which differed between drugs and may reflect their neurotoxic degree. Moderating factors that may explain results inconsistency are discussed. In sum, resting-state EEG may act as a potential biomarker of neurotoxic effects of chronic substance use. Recovery effects awaits replication in larger samples with prolonged abstinence. Balanced sex ratio, enlarged sample size, advanced EEG analysis methods, and transparent reporting are recommended for future studies.

Cognitive, physical, and mental health outcomes between long-term cannabis and tobacco users

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis intoxication adversely affects health, yet persistent effects following short-term abstinence in long-term cannabis users are unclear. This matched-subjects, cross-sectional study compared health outcomes of long-term cannabis and long-term tobacco-only users, relative to population norms.

METHODS

Nineteen long-term (mean 32.3years of use, mean age 55.7years), abstinent (mean 15h) cannabis users and 16 long-term tobacco users (mean 37.1years of use, mean age 52.9years), matched for age, educational attainment, and lifetime tobacco consumption, were compared on measures of learning and memory, response inhibition, information-processing, sustained attention, executive control, and mental and physical health.

RESULTS

Cannabis users exhibited poorer overall learning and delayed recall and greater interference and forgetting than tobacco users, and exhibited poorer recall than norms. Inhibition and executive control were similar between groups, but cannabis users had slower reaction times during information processing and sustained attention tasks. Cannabis users had superior health satisfaction and psychological, somatic, and general health than tobacco users and had similar mental and physical health to norms whilst tobacco users had greater stress, role limitations from emotional problems, and poorer health satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term cannabis users may exhibit deficits in some cognitive domains despite short-term abstinence and may therefore benefit from interventions to improve cognitive performance. Tobacco alone may contribute to adverse mental and physical health outcomes, which requires appropriate control in future studies.