Measurement of aromatisation by a urine technique suitable for the evaluation of aromatase inhibitors in vivo

miR-452 Reverses Abnormal Glycosylation Modification of ERα and Estrogen Resistance in TNBC (Triple-Negative Breast Cancer) Through Targeting UGT1A1

Background: The breast epithelial cells in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) actually have specific estrogen receptor (ER) expression, and the abnormal glycosylation of UGT1A1 in TNBC cells resulted in abnormal expression and function of ERα through regulating the modification of ERα. Therefore, our study targets the role of UGT1A1 expression, then glycosylation modification of ERα (estrogen receptor α) and estrogen resistance in development of TNBC.

Methods: The differential expression of mRNA and miRNA in TNBC tissues was tested. Luciferase activity was analyzed in TNBC cells treated with miR-452. Moreover, the human mammary gland and TNBC cell lines were dealt with estrogen and miR-452 or its inhibitors, then proliferation ability was further determined. Moreover, the role of interaction between UGT1A1 and ERα in the glycosylation modification of ERα and UGT activity, and metabolism of estrogen were assessed. The effects of miR-452 on TNBC by improving abnormal glycosylation modification of ERα by targeting UGT1A1 and estrogen resistance were studied in vitro and in vivo.

Results: The expression level of UGT1A1 in TNBC tumor tissues was higher than its matched para-tumorous tissues, but the miR-452 expression was opposite. The glycosylation modification site of ERα expressed in TNBC cells was different from that of normal mammary epithelial cells. The estrogen 17β-estradiol (E2) significantly promoted mitotic entry of TNBC cells. The interaction between UGT1A1 and ERα affected the expression level of each other, as well as the UGT enzyme activity and proliferation of TNBC cells. UGT1A1 induced production of intracellular estrogens and TNBC proliferation, but it could be reversed by overexpression of ERα. Upregulation of ERα caused the downregulation of UGT1A1 and marked decrease of intracellular estrogen products, and then suppressed TNBC proliferation. Moreover, UGT1A1 was the target gene of miR-452; miR-452 antagomir restrained TNBC xenograft.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that estrogen was a positive factor in the proliferation of TNBC cells at onset of mitosis through accentuating the expression and enzyme activity of UGT1A1. However, miR-452 targeted to UGT1A1, then regulated glycosylation modification of ERα, estrogen metabolism, and TNBC development associated with estrogen resistance.

Aromatase inhibition 2013: clinical state of the art and questions that remain to be solved

Following their successful implementation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the 'third-generation' aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. These drugs are characterized by potent aromatase inhibition, causing >98% inhibition of estrogen synthesis in vivo. A recent meta-analysis found no difference in anti-tumor efficacy between these three compounds. As of today, aromatase inhibitor monotherapy and sequential treatment using tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor for a total of 5 years are considered equipotent treatment options. However, current trials are addressing the potential benefit of extending treatment duration beyond 5 years. Regarding side effects, aromatase inhibitors are not found associated with enhanced risk of cardiovascular disease, and enhanced bone loss is prevented by adding bisphosphonates in concert for those at danger of developing osteoporosis. However, arthralgia and carpal tunnel syndrome preclude drug administration among a few patients. While recent findings have questioned the use of aromatase inhibitors among overweight and, in particular, obese patients, this problem seems to focus on premenopausal patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor and an LH-RH analog in concert, questioning the efficacy of LH-RH analogs rather than aromatase inhibitors among overweight patients. Finally, recent findings revealing a benefit from adding the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to endocrine treatment indicate targeted therapy against defined growth factor pathways to be a way forward, by reversing acquired resistance to endocrine therapy.

The potency and clinical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors across the breast cancer continuum

The strategy of using estrogen suppression to treat breast cancer led to the development of aromatase inhibitors, including the third-generation nonsteroidal compounds anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal compound exemestane. Aromatase inhibitors potently inhibit aromatase activity and also suppress estrogen levels in plasma and tissue. In clinical studies in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, third-generation aromatase inhibitors were shown superior to tamoxifen for the treatment of metastatic disease. Studies of adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors include (i) head-to-head studies of 5 years of the aromatase inhibitor versus 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy; (ii) sequential therapy of 2-3 years of tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (or the opposite sequence) versus 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy; (iii) extended therapy with an aromatase inhibitor after 5 years of tamoxifen; and (iv) sequential therapy with an aromatase inhibitor versus aromatase inhibitor monotherapy. Recent results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination and Breast International Group 1-98 trials advocate using an aromatase inhibitor upfront. This article examines the clinical data with aromatase inhibitors, following a brief summary of their pharmacology.

Strength and weakness of phase I to IV trials, with an emphasis on translational aspects

Although phase I to III trials represent the standard for introducing new drugs to clinical therapy, there has been increasing demand for translational research in oncology over the past decade. Thus, for most novel therapies such as 'targeted agents', a critical aspect for drug development in oncology has been to select the right patients for therapy. Translational research plays a pivotal role, not only in phase II trials but also in phase I and III and even in phase IV trials. The importance of distinguishing between our translational 'aims' in phase II and phase III trials is emphasized. Although translational research in phase III trials aims to identify optimal markers for clinical use, phase II studies may represent an optimal setting to explore tumour biology and the mechanisms of drug resistance in depth.

Lack of complete cross-resistance between different aromatase inhibitors; a real finding in search for an explanation?

While third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) are successfully implemented as adjuvant and first-line therapy for hormone-sensitive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, important questions remain to be addressed. An issue of particular interest is the question about lack of complete cross-resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal compounds. Although the studies reporting this phenomenon in general contain a small number of patients, the findings across the different reports seem consistent. While several potential mechanisms have been suggested, so far we lack scientific proof what mechanisms may be responsible for this finding. Finally, we do not know whether lack of cross-resistance actually signals an improved efficacy for certain compounds or may be due to alternative mechanisms of action. Neither do we know whether some tumours are more sensitive to particular drugs. This paper summarizes clinical findings up to now with respect to lack of cross-resistance and discuss potential mechanisms involved.

Aromatase inhibitors: assessment of biochemical efficacy measured by total body aromatase inhibition and tissue estrogen suppression

The implementation of aromatase inhibitors for treatment of early and metastatic breast cancer has been one of the major improvements in endocrine therapy of breast cancer. Measurement of endocrine effects of aromatase inhibition in vivo has been a major tool in the process of evaluating novel compounds. Biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in vivo may be determined from their effects on "total body aromatization" as well changes in plasma and tissue estrogen levels. Due to high sensitivity, tracer methods allowing calculation of whole body aromatase inhibition are still considered the gold standard. The method developed by our group in collaboration with the Royal Marsden Hospital and the results of this joint program are summarized and discussed. These studies allowed classification of the different aromatase inhibitors and their optimal dosage, selecting the best compounds for clinical evaluation. In vivo total body aromatase assessment is a work-consuming method, allowing such studies to be conducted in a limited number of patients only. In contrast, plasma estrogen measurement is a cruder but simpler method, allowing screening of larger groups of patients. As plasma estrogens arise through passive diffusion of estrogens synthesized in different body compartments, plasma estrogens, as well as total body aromatase assessment, present a rough estimate of total body tissue estrogen production, and changes associated with treatment with aromatase inhibitors reflect the effects on tissue estrogen production in general. However, plasma estrogen levels do not correlate to breast cancer tissue estrogen levels. This is due to the endocrine autonomy of breast cancer tissue with significant local estrogen production in some tumors. Thus, direct measurement of intratumor estrogens is demanded to evaluate the effects of aromatase inhibitors in malignant target tissues. Our group has developed a highly sensitive HPLC-RIA for the simultaneous measurement of estrone, estradiol, and estrone sulfate in malignant breast tissue samples, and we are currently using this method to assess alterations in intratumor estrogen levels during treatment with different aromatase inhibitors.

Total body aromatization in postmenopausal breast cancer patients is strongly correlated to plasma leptin levels

The adipocytokine leptin has recently been shown to enhance the expression of aromatase via promoter II and I.3 using an AP-1 motif. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between plasma leptin concentrations and total body aromatization (TBA) as well as plasma levels of estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)) and estrone sulfate (E(1)S) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Twenty-two postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, participating in tracer studies for the measurement of total body aromatization (TBA) in vivo, were available. In addition, blood samples for plasma estrogens and leptin measurements were available from another 22 breast cancer patients and 114 healthy postmenopausal women participating in the mammography-screening program. Values for TBA varied from 1.46 to 4.72% while plasma leptin levels ranged from 1.83 to 95.51 ng/ml in the same group of patients. All plasma estrogen levels were in the normal range expected for postmenopausal women. We found a significant correlation between pretreatment leptin levels and TBA (r(s) 0.452, P=0.01). In contrast, basal levels of TBA did not correlate to body mass index (BMI) in the same group of patients. Plasma leptin levels correlated to plasma levels of estradiol (r(s) 0.659, P=0.007), and estrone sulfate (r(s) 0.562, P=0.01) in the group of breast cancer patients (n=44) as well as in the group of healthy postmenopausal women (estradiol, r(s) 0.363, P< or =0.001, estrone sulfate r(s) 0.353, P< or =0.001). In conclusion, we found plasma leptin levels to correlate to TBA in breast cancer patients and to plasma levels of estradiol and estrone sulfate in breast cancer patients as well as in healthy postmenopausal females. These findings suggest that leptin may influence on aromatase activity in vivo, providing a possible link between body weight and plasma estrogen levels as well as breast cancer risk.

Multilocus analysis of SNP and metabolic data within a given pathway

BACKGROUND

Complex traits, which are under the influence of multiple and possibly interacting genes, have become a subject of new statistical methodological research. One of the greatest challenges facing human geneticists is the identification and characterization of susceptibility genes for common multifactorial diseases and their association to different quantitative phenotypic traits.

RESULTS

Two types of data from the same metabolic pathway were used in the analysis: categorical measurements of 18 SNPs; and quantitative measurements of plasma levels of several steroids and their precursors. Using the combinatorial partitioning method we tested various thresholds for each metabolic trait and each individual SNP locus. One SNP in CYP19, 3UTR, two SNPs in CYP1B1 (R48G and A119S) and one in CYP1A1 (T461N) were significantly differently distributed between the high and low level metabolic groups. The leave one out cross validation method showed that 6 SNPs in concert make 65% correct prediction of phenotype. Further we used pattern recognition, computing the p-value by Monte Carlo simulation to identify sets of SNPs and physiological characteristics such as age and weight that contribute to a given metabolic level. Since the SNPs detected by both methods reside either in the same gene (CYP1B1) or in 3 different genes in immediate vicinity on chromosome 15 (CYP19, CYP11 and CYP1A1) we investigated the possibility that they form intragenic and intergenic haplotypes, which may jointly account for a higher activity in the pathway. We identified such haplotypes associated with metabolic levels.

CONCLUSION

The methods reported here may enable to study multiple low-penetrance genetic factors that together determine various quantitative phenotypic traits. Our preliminary data suggest that several genes coding for proteins involved in a common pathway, that happen to be located on common chromosomal areas and may form intragenic haplotypes, together account for a higher activity of the whole pathway.

Treatment with high-dose estrogen (diethylstilbestrol) significantly decreases plasma estrogen and androgen levels but does not influence in vivo aromatization in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

While growth factors and hormones are known to influence aromatase expression in experimental systems, little is know about potential factors influencing peripheral aromatization in postmenopausal women. The fact that peripheral aromatase activity is higher in old compared to young women and the finding of relatively high tissue estradiol (E2) concentrations after the menopause suggests peripheral aromatization could be influenced by estrogen concentration. To test this hypothesis, we determined plasma hormone levels (n=9) and in vivo aromatization (n=3) in postmenopausal women suffering from advanced breast cancer before and during treatment (4 weeks) with diethylstilbestrol (DES) 5mg three times daily. Plasma levels of cortisol (C), corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were significantly increased in all patients (P<0.05 for all). While we found no change in total body aromatization and plasma estrone (E(1)) levels, estradiol (E(2)) and estrone sulfate (E(1)S) were suppressed by a mean of 48.8 and 68.2%, respectively (P=0.043 and 0.008). Surprisingly, plasma levels of androstenedione (A), testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate (DHEAS) were also suppressed by a mean in the range of 32.1 to 52.6% (P<0.05 for all androgens). In contrast, no change in plasma progesterone or 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone was found. Thus, one possible explanation to our findings could be that DES administered in high doses reduces 17,20-lyase activity in the adrenal gland.

Aromatase inhibition: translation into a successful therapeutic approach

The development of the novel third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators for breast cancer treatment is one of the most successful contemporary achievements in cancer therapy. Parallel to studies evaluating toxicity and clinical efficacy in metastatic disease, the endocrine effects of multiple compounds were evaluated, leading to the identification of the highly potent third-generation aromatase inhibitors based on estrogen deprivation and aromatase inhibition in vivo. Thus, translational studies have been of vital importance identifying the unique characteristics of these compounds. Whereas first- and second-generation aromatase inhibitors inhibit estrogen synthesis in vivo by up to 90%, the third-generation compounds anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole were found to cause > or =98% aromatase inhibition. This article summarizes and discusses the "translational research" that provided the background for the implementation of the third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators into large clinical trials. The need for future translational research exploiting the mechanisms of resistance to these compounds for future improvement of endocrine therapy is emphasized.

Endocrine effects of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo: review of data and method limitations

The so-called "third-generation" aromatase inhibitors/inactivators have become standard first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women in the metastatic setting. In addition, these compounds, administered as monotherapy or in sequence with tamoxifen, are likely to become standard adjuvant therapy in most countries in the near future. In contrast to the SERMs, aromatase inhibitors may be assessed for their biochemical efficacy in vivo either by measuring their ability to suppress plasma and tissue estrogen levels or, alternatively, by measuring their ability to inhibit the conversion of tracer-labelled androstenedione into estrone. While contemporary methods for estrogen measurement (with the exception of estrone sulphate) lack the sensitivity to measure plasma estrogen levels during treatment with the most potent compounds, in vivo aromatase inhibition can be determined with a much better sensitivity. Thus, in a joint program conducted by the Royal Marsden Hospital, London and our team in Bergen, we were able to reveal profound differences between first- and second-generation aromatase inhibitors, causing 50-90% aromatase inhibition, and the three third-generation compounds, causing >98% inhibition of total body aromatization.

Comparison between aromatase inhibitors and sequential use

The biochemical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and inactivators in vivo may be determined by two types of methods; by measuring plasma or tissue estrogen levels, or assessment of the conversion of the androgen substrate (in practice, androstenedione) into estrogens (estrone) by the use of tracer methods. While methods to determine plasma and tissue estrogens are limited through lack of sensitivity required to measure the very low concentrations recorded in postmenopausal women on treatment with these compounds, measurement of in vivo aromatization is an extensive procedure, applicable to a limited number of patients only. While we may correlate the mean level of aromatase inhibition achieved with different compounds to clinical efficacy, data correlating individual estrogen suppression to clinical outcome among patients treated with a specific compound is limited. The now well-characterized phenomenon of lack of cross-resistance between non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and steroidal aromatase inactivators are likely due to biochemical effects not related to differences in total body aromatase inhibition.

Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators for breast cancer therapy

Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators are increasingly important to the therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. These compounds are also currently being evaluated in the adjuvant setting and may have potential in breast cancer prevention. In addition to the recent clinical results, experimental research with development of aromatase 'knockout' mice as well as certain clinical observations in individuals lacking this enzyme have deepened our understanding of estrogens outside of the field of reproduction. Such information should help us to further develop this type of therapy in breast cancer and, in particular, extend our understanding of the lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators. Clinically, third-generation aromatase inhibitors and inactivators have shown superiority compared with conventional treatment in advanced postmenopausal breast cancer with respect to second-line (tamoxifen failures) as well as first-line therapy. The fact that tamoxifen is noncurative in metastatic disease but improves long-term survival in the adjuvant setting suggests that even modest improvements in therapy of advanced disease may be translated into survival benefits in patients with early disease. In addition, these novel compounds with lack of complete cross-resistance extend the scope of using sequential treatment options to maximise the duration of optimal endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer disease.

Influence of letrozole and anastrozole on total body aromatization and plasma estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients evaluated in a randomized, cross-over study

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of the two novel, potent, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole on total-body aromatization and plasma estrogen levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, metastatic breast cancer were treated with anastrozole 1 mg orally (PO) and letrozole 2.5 mg PO once daily, each given for a time interval of 6 weeks in a randomized sequence. Total-body aromatization was determined before treatment and at the end of each treatment period using a dual-label isotopic technique involving isolation of the metabolites with high-performance liquid chromatography. Plasma levels of estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)), and estrone sulfate (E(1)S) were determined in samples obtained before each injection using highly sensitive radioimmunoassays.

RESULTS

Pretreatment aromatase levels ranged from 1.68% to 4.27%. On-treatment levels of aromatase were detectable in 11 of 12 patients during treatment with anastrozole (mean percentage inhibition in the whole group, 97.3%) but in none of the 12 patients during treatment with letrozole (> 99.1% suppression in all patients; Wilcoxon, P =.0022, comparing the two drug regimens). Treatment with anastrozole suppressed plasma levels of E(1), E(2), and E(1)S by a mean of 81.0%, 84.9%, and 93.5%, respectively, whereas treatment with letrozole caused a corresponding decrease of 84.3%, 87.8% and 98.0%, respectively. The suppression of E(1) and E(1)S was found to be significantly better during treatment with letrozole compared with anastrozole (P =.019 and.0037, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed letrozole (2.5 mg once daily) to be a more potent suppressor of total-body aromatization and plasma estrogen levels compared with anastrozole (1 mg once daily) in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

Stepwise estrogen suppression manipulating the estrostat

Estrogen suppression is an effective endocrine treatment option in pre- as well as postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The fact that it produces clinical benefits not only in these two groups of patients that differ significantly with respect to plasma estrogen levels but also among patients with very low plasma estrogen levels due to previous hypophysectomy, adrenalectomy or treatment with first/second generation aromatase inhibitors, suggests estrogen deprivation to work independent of pretreatment plasma estrogen levels. Interestingly, in vitro studies have revealed MCF-7 cells to respond to estrogen deprivation by sensitization, causing maximum estradiol stimulation at a concentration 10(-5) to 10(-4) the concentration needed in wild-type cells. While results from recent phase III studies comparing novel aromatase inhibitors and inactivators to conventional therapy have suggested that a more effective hormone ablation may be translated into an improved clinical efficacy, the biochemical rationale for lack of complete cross-resistance between aromatase inhibitors and inactivators or aromatase inhibitors and megestrol acetate remains to be explained. Interestingly, patients becoming resistant to estrogen deprivation may still respond to estrogens administered in pharmacological doses. Future studies are warranted to explore alterations in gene expression and signaling mechanisms in response to different therapies in tumor tissue in vivo.

A novel HPLC-RIA method for the simultaneous detection of estrone, estradiol and estrone sulphate levels in breast cancer tissue

Estrogen deprivation is an effective approach for treatment of hormone sensitive breast cancer. While much is known about plasma estrogen levels with respect to castration in premenopausal women and use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women, currently there is increasing interest in intra-tumour estrogen production. However, knowledge about alterations in intra-tumour estrogen levels is limited, mainly due to methodological problems with measurements of estrogen fractions in tissue samples. Here we describe a new method for simultaneous measurement of the three main estrogen fractions, estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)) and estrone sulphate (E(1)S) in breast tumour tissue. Following incubation with -labelled estrogen standards, crude fractions were separated by ether extraction. The E(1)S fraction was hydrolysed with sulphatase followed by eluation on a Sephadex column. High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to purify the individual estrogen fractions prior to RIA analysis. Estrone and E(1)S were converted into E(2), and all three estrogen fractions were finally measured by the same highly sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay using estradiol-6-(O-carboxymethyl)-oximino-2-(2--iodo-histamine) as a ligand. Although several purification steps were used, the internal recovery values for tritiated estrogens were found to be 25-50% for E(1) and E(2) and 15-30% for E(1)S. The detection limit of this method was 4.3 fmol/g tissue for E(2), 19.8 fmol/g tissue for E(1) and 11.9 fmol/g E(1)S, respectively. Using tissue from locally advanced breast cancers (n = 14), we found median levels of E(1), E(2) and E(1)S to be 283.8 fmol/g tissue (range 19.8-547.5), 554.1 fmol/g (9.5-3024.2) and 209.4 fmol/g (11.9-753.4), respectively. The method described here is a promising tool to study intra-tumour estrogen fractions in breast tissue biopsies.

Pharmacological and clinical profile of anastrozole

Anastrozole (Arimidex, 2,-2[5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-phenylene]bis(2-met hyl)propiononitrile) is a novel, potent aromatase inhibitor belonging to the triazole class. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have revealed the drug to be a potent inhibitor of the aromatase enzyme with no inhibitory activity versus other enzymes involved in steroid synthesis. The drug is a potent suppressor of plasma estrogens in healthy male and postmenopausal female volunteers as well as postmenopausal breast cancer patients, and anastrozole administered as 1 mg or 10 mg daily has been shown to inhibit in vivo aromatization by 96.7 and 98.1%, respectively. Two large, randomized studies revealed anastrozole to cause objective response rates and stable disease comparable to what was achieved with megestrol acetate but with a lower incidence of side effects. While follow-up results have not revealed any significant difference in time to relapse between the drug regimens, they have revealed an improved survival among patients treated with anastrozole 1 mg compared to megestrol acetate 160 mg daily. Further follow-up is required to finally decide whether there may be a survival benefit also among patients treated with anastrozole 10 mg daily and to evaluate whether the improvement in survival is associated with an improved disease-free survival as would be anticipated.

Influence of anastrozole (Arimidex), a selective, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, on in vivo aromatisation and plasma oestrogen levels in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The effect of anastrozole ('Arimidex', ZD1033), a new, selective, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor on in vivo aromatisation and plasma oestrogen levels was evaluated in post-menopausal women with breast cancer. Twelve patients progressing after treatment with tamoxifen were randomised to receive anastrozole 1 mg or 10 mg once daily for a 28 day period in a double-blinded crossover design. In vivo aromatisation and plasma oestrogen levels were determined before commencing treatment and at the end of each 4-week period. Treatment with anastrozole 1 and 10 mg reduced the percentage aromatisation from 2.25% to 0.074% and 0.043% (mean suppression of 96.7% and 98.1% from baseline) and suppressed plasma levels of oestrone, oestradiol and oestrone sulphate by > or = 86.5%, > or = 83.5% and > or = 93.5% respectively, irrespective of dose. Notably, several patients had their oestrone and oestradiol values suppressed beneath the sensitivity limit of the assays. In conclusion, anastrozole was found to be highly effective in inhibiting in vivo aromatisation with no difference in efficacy between the two drug doses. Contrary to previous studies on other aromatase inhibitors, this study revealed an internal consistency between the percentage aromatase inhibition and suppression of plasma oestrone sulphate.

Aromatase inhibition for breast cancer treatment

While the first generation aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide and second- and third generation inhibitors like formestane and fadrozole all have been found to inhibit in vivo aromatization by 85-93%, the novel aromatase inhibitors letrozole and arimidex inhibit in vivo aromatization by 97-99%. However, we do not know whether these drugs cause a higher response rate or a longer duration of remission compared with less potent aromatase inhibitors. Lack of cross-resistance to steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors suggests that these drugs may have partially different mechanisms of action, probably by influencing the intratumour aromatase enzyme. Recent studies have shown that breast cancer cells may adapt to alterations in oestrogen concentration in vitro by increasing their sensitivity. The observation that patients suffering relapse following castration, hypophysectomy or adrenalectomy may respond to treatment with aromatase inhibitors suggests that similar mechanisms could be responsible for acquired resistance to oestrogen deprivation.

The effects of oral 4-hydroxyandrostenedione on peripheral aromatisation in post-menopausal breast cancer patients

This study investigated the influence of the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4OHA, formestane), given orally, on peripheral aromatase activity and plasma oestradiol (E2) levels in post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The aim was to establish whether an optimal dose could be identified that had a pharmacological effectiveness comparable with that of parenteral 4OHA. A total of 13 post-menopausal women were studied before treatment and after a minimum of 4 weeks on treatment with one or more of the following doses: 125 mg once daily (od), 125 mg b.i.d. (bd) and 250 mg od. In all, seven aromatase studied were performed at 125 mg od; four, at 125 mg bd; and ten, at 250 mg od. Three patients were studied at all doses. E2 was measured concurrently and was available at all dose increments for seven patients. Given at doses of 125 mg od, 125 mg bd and 250 mg od, treatment with formestane inhibited in vivo aromatisation by 62.3% +/- 9.5%, 70.0% +/- 5.1% and 57.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively (mean +/- SEM). Corresponding values for plasma E2 suppression were 30.7% +/- 6.5%, 43.4% +/- 4.5% and 42.9% +/- 6.7%, respectively. Thus, apart from a somewhat better suppression of plasma E2 levels by the two higher doses as compared with 125 mg od, no significant difference in the degree of aromatase inhibition or plasma E2 suppression was observed. The suppression of E2 by oral 4OHA at 125 mg bd or 250 mg od approaches that achieved by the recommended parenteral schedule of 250 mg fortnightly, but inhibition of aromatase at this dose was substantially inferior. The findings are consistent with a hypothesis that 4OHA given orally may cause substantial plasma oestrogen suppression during part of the day, but neither the od nor the bd regimens investigated in the present study were capable of producing optimal aromatase inhibition.

Combined treatment with 4-hydroxyandrostenedione and aminoglutethimide: effects on aromatase inhibition and oestrogen suppression

The effects of a combination of aminoglutethimide (AG) 1,000 mg daily and 4-hydroxy-androstenedione (4OHA) 500 mg i.m. weekly on peripheral aromatase activity as measured by in vivo radioisotopic tracer methodology and serum oestrogen suppression were investigated in ten post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Patients were treated for a minimum of 4 weeks with 4OHA before addition of AG for a minimum of 6 weeks. Aromatase inhibition was found to be nearly identical in the two treatment situations (92.5 +/- 4.7% and 93.8 +/- 3.8% respectively). There was no further significant suppression of plasma oestradiol or plasma oestrone levels when AG was added to 4OHA treatment (mean decrease of 7.6 +/- 12.1% and 2.8 +/- 12.0% respectively). In contrast, adding AG caused a further suppression of plasma oestrone sulphate (Oe1S) compared with 4OHA monotherapy (mean suppression of 35.2 +/- 9.1%, P < 0.025). This effect on Oe1S may be due to an influence of AG on oestrogen metabolism.

Plasma and urinary oestrogens in breast cancer patients on treatment with 4-hydroxyandrostenedione

Plasma and urinary oestrogens were measured in nine breast cancer patients (eight postmenopausal women and one man) before and during treatment with the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione. Urinary oestrogens were measured by using a highly specific GC-MS method. Plasma levels of oestrone, oestradiol and oestrone sulphate were suppressed by 66.6% (+/- 3.6%), 57.7% (+/- 5.1%) and 51.8% (+/- 6.4%) respectively (P < 0.005 for all). Twenty-four hour urinary excretion of total oestrogens, oestradiol, oestriol, 2-hydroxyoestrone, 16 alpha-hydroxyoestrone and the minor metabolites 16 beta- and 15 alpha-hydroxyoestrone were all suppressed by mean values ranging from 60% to 82%, (oestradiol: P < 0.025, otherwise P < 0.005). There were no significant changes in the ratios between the different plasma oestrogens. The finding of sustained plasma and urinary oestrogens at 20-40% compared to their control levels indirectly support a hypothesis of alternative oestrogen sources in postmenopausal breast cancer patients on treatment with 4-hydroxyandrostenedione.

The influence of aminoglutethimide and its analogue rogletimide on peripheral aromatisation in breast cancer

The influence of the prototype aromatase inhibitor Aminoglutethimide (AG) and its analogue Rogletimide (RG) on peripheral aromatisation were investigated in 13 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Seven patients received AG 1,000 mg daily plus Hydrocortisone (HC) cover and six received RG as dose escalation of 200 mg bd, 400 mg bd and 800 mg bd. In vivo aromatase inhibition was investigated using the double bolus injection technique with [4-14C] oestrone ([4-14C]E1) and [6,7-3H] androstenedione ([6,7-3H]4A) followed by a 96 h urine collection. The labelled urinary oestrogens were separated and purified by chromatography and HPLC. Plasma oestradiol (E2) was also measured. AG mean aromatase inhibition was 90.6% +/- 1.8 s.e.m. and E2 suppression 75.7% +/- 7.3 s.e.m. RG mean aromatase inhibition was 50.6% +/- 9.8 s.e.m. at 200 mg bd, 63.5% +/- 5.7 s.e.m. at 400 mg bd and 73.8% +/- 5.8 s.e.m. at 800 mg bd. E2 suppression was 30.7% +/- 9.5 s.e.m., 40.2% +/- 10.3 s.e.m. and 57.6% +/- 9.2 s.e.m. respectively. These results confirm the efficacy of AG as an aromatase inhibitor. RG produced dose dependent E2 suppression and aromatase inhibition, but even at the maximum tolerated dose of 800 mg bd had sub-optimal aromatase inhibition and oestradiol suppression compared with AG.

Aromatase activity, serum oestradiol and their correlation with demographic indices

Peripheral aromatase activity was measured in 24 postmenopausal women suffering from advanced breast cancer. The % conversion of androstenedione to oestrone was then assessed for a significant correlation with age, weight, height, Quetelets index (weight/height2, Q.I.) and length of menopause. Serum oestradiol (E2) levels were measured in 22 of the subjects and compared with the same indices. There was no correlation between E2 or aromatase activity with the length of menopause (P = 0.3 and P = 0.5, respectively). In our data aromatase activity did not correlate with age (P greater than 0.5, n = 22). Serum E2 levels (P = 0.07, n = 20) expressed a negative correlation (i.e. decreased) with age. There was also a poor correlation between aromatase activity and weight of Quetelets index (P = 0.3, n = 20 for both). Serum E2 levels showed a statistically significant correlation with weight (P = 0.01, n = 21), but the relationship with Quetelets index just failed to attain statistical significance (P = 0.07, n = 20). In both cases the regression line was positive. When aromatase activity was correlated with serum E2 levels the regression line was positive but not statistically significant (P = 0.4, n = 22). The data indicate that aromatase activity is only one factor determining the differences in serum E2 levels between postmenopausal women.

The influence of intramuscular 4-hydroxyandrostenedione on peripheral aromatisation in breast cancer patients

The influence of the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4OHA) given intramuscularly on the peripheral aromatisation of androstenedione into oestrone was investigated in postmenopausal women with breast cancer and compared with the suppression of plasma oestradiol (E2). 7 patients were investigated before and during treatment on day 7, i.e. midway between two weekly injections. After an intravenous injection of [3H] androstenedione and [14C] oestrone, urine was collected for 96 h and the isotope ratio determined in the urinary oestrogen metabolites after isolation with high performance liquid chromatography. At 250 mg, 4OHA inhibited aromatisation to [mean (S.D.)] 15.2 (5)% of baseline (P < 0.002). There was significantly greater inhibition to 8.1 (2.7)% at 4OHA 500 mg (P < 0.01). Plasma E2 was reduced to 41.2 (14.1)% of baseline at 4OHA 250 mg with a further reduction to 32.7 (19.8)% at 500 mg (P < 0.05). These results confirm the dose-response relation previously established with plasma oestrogen measurements alone.

The influence of CGS 16949A on peripheral aromatisation in breast cancer patients

The influence of a new aromatase inhibitor, CGS 16949A on peripheral aromatisation of androstenedione into oestrone was investigated in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. A mixture of 3H androstenedione and 14C oestrone was injected, and all urine was collected for the following 96 h. The isotope ratio was determined in the urinary oestrogen metabolites after isolation by HPLC. Eight patients were investigated before and during treatment with CGS 16949A. At a dose of 1 mg b.d. (eight patients) CGS 16949A inhibited aromatisation by a mean value of 82.4% (range 71.3 to 93.7%). When the drug dose was escalated to 2 mg b.d. (three patients) aromatisation was inhibited by a mean of 92.6% (range 90.6 to 95.8%), these results suggest that CGS 16949A at a dose of 1 mg b.d. causes submaximal aromatase inhibition in many patients, while a dose of 2 mg b.d. seems to result in greater than 90% aromatase inhibition. These data are consistent with previous observations that the higher dose is more effective in suppression of plasma oestradiol levels.