Inhibitors of the Ras signal transduction pathway as potential antitumour agents

Peptides with anticancer use or potential

This review is an attempt to illustrate the diversity of peptides reported for a potential or an established use in cancer therapy. With 612 references, this work aims at covering the patents and publications up to year 2000 with many inroads in years 2001-2002. The peptides are classed according to four categories of effective (or plausible) biological mechanisms of action: receptor-interacting compounds; inhibitors of protein-protein interaction; enzymes inhibitors; nucleic acid-interacting compounds. The fifth group is made of the peptides for which no mechanism of action has been found yet. Incidentally this work provides an overview of many of the modern targets of anticancer research.

Tomorrow's anticancer agents: inhibitors of Ras farnesylation

The purpose of this chapter is to concentrate on what can be considered as definite milestones on the way from examples of inhibitors of farnesyl-protein transferase (FPTase) to candidate drugs actually being considered for or already being evaluated in clinical trials. Emphasis will be placed on results obtained using experimental tumour models in vivo, with a detailed discussion of these results and of the questions which remain to be studied or are still unanswered. The data discussed here are almost exclusively based on published reports, with only brief reference, in the chapter "use of the FPTase inhibitors in the clinic", to some of the newer compounds reported on during recent meetings, details of which have not yet appeared in the peer-reviewed literature. For those requiring a more extensive review of the catalogue of FPTase inhibitors now discovered, some excellent reviews have been committed to this purpose [1-3].

Ras-induced cellular events (review)

Ras is a crucial regulator of cell growth in eukaryotic cells. Activated Ras can stimulate signal transduction cascades, leading to cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis. It is also one of the most commonly mutated genes in both solid tumours and haematologic neoplasias. In leukaemia and tumours, aberrant Ras signalling can be induced directly by Ras mutation or indirectly by altering genes that associate with Ras or its signalling pathways. A requisite for Ras function is localization to the plasma membrane, which is induced by the post-translational modification farnesylation. Molecules that interfere with this Ras modification have been used as antitumour agents. Ras is emerging as a dual regulator of cell functions, playing either positive or negative roles in the control of proliferation or apoptosis. The diversity of Ras-mediated effects may be related in part to the differential involvement of Ras homologues in distinct cellular processes or to the expanding array of Ras effectors.

Inhibition of RAS-targeted prenylation: protein farnesyl transferase inhibitors revisited

The ras oncogene and its 21 kD protein product, Ras, has emerged during the last decade as a potentially exploitable target for anticancer drug development. The knowledge that Ras was readily prenylated by protein farnesyl transferase (PFTase) and that inhibition of this prenylation had functional consequences for the transformed phenotype that expressed oncogenic Ras provided the rational for the development of PFTase inhibitors. The initial enthusiasm for this approach seemed justified by the early identification of PFTase inhibitors that were able potently and specifically to block Ras processing, signalling and transformation in transformed and tumour cell lines in vitro and in certain selected animal models. More recently the recognition that geranylgeranyl transferase (GGTase) I might also be a therapeutic target is being actively researched. The last couple of years though have proved remarkable with the disclosure of a series of structurally-diverse molecules, whose major in vivo preclinical activites have been well documented against experimental animal tumours, and culminating this year in preliminary reporting of their Phase I clinical evaluations. Nevertheless, during the research and development phases of PFTase inhibitors as pharmaceutical agents for clinical use, there have been several unexpected findings which have raised intriguing and potentially crucial questions about their activities. This review aims to highlight and offer new insights into many of these issues and to bring into perspective concerns arising from basic research, as well as from clinical studies. There seems little doubt that these inhibitors of RAS-targeted prenylation represent a new generation of anticancer drugs for the preclinical researcher, whether they can be successfully exploited in clinical practice should be resolved early in the next millenium.

Investigation of S-farnesyl transferase substrate specificity with combinatorial tetrapeptide libraries

Using biased tetrapeptide libraries made up of proteinogenic amino acids of the general formula Cys-O2-X3-X4, we searched for new substrates of partly purified rat brain S-farnesyl transferase (FTase). To achieve this task, an assay was developed in which the consumption of the co-substrate (farnesyl pyrophosphate) was measured. After three steps of deconvolution including each synthesis and enzymatic assay, the most efficient substrates found under these particular conditions were Cys-Lys-Gln-Gln (peptide I) and Cys-Lys-Gln-Met (peptide II). As a control, we used another tetrapeptide library (Cys-Val-O3-X4) in which the valine position was arbitrarily fixed, corresponding to Cys-Val-Ile-Met in the CAAX box of K-RasB, although this sublibrary was only marginally active compared with Cys-Lys-X3-X4 in the first round of deconvolution. The best substrate sublibrary was Cys-Val-Thr-X4, threonine being more favourable than the aliphatic amino acids (Val, Ile, Leu, Ala) in this position. Deconvolution finally led to Cys-Val-Thr-Gln, -Met, -Thr and -Ser as the most efficient substrates of FTase. Those tetrapeptides were not substrates of a partly purified geranylgeranyl transferase 1 (GGTase1). We also investigated the influence of the -1 position (at the N-terminus of cysteine) on the specificity of the enzyme, by using a series of pentapeptides constructed on the basis of the best tetrapeptide core (peptide 1). Among this family of analogues, only His-Cys-Lys-Gln-Gln did not behave as a substrate, whereas all the other pentapeptides were measurable substrates, with Gly-, Asn- and Thr-Cys-Lys-Gln-Gln displaying kinetic constants similar to that of Cys-Lys-Gln-Gln. The present work provides strong evidence that the best tetrapeptide substrates of FTase do not necessarily belong to the classical CAAX box, in which A's are lipophilic residues, but rather contain hydrophilic amino acids in the middle of their sequences. Among them, peptides I and II are potent FTase in vitro substrates that are not recognised by GGTase1 and might be new starting points for the design of FTase inhibitors.

Chromatographic assay and peptide substrate characterization of partially purified farnesyl- and geranylgeranyltransferases from rat brain cytosol

A simple method for partially purifying both farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase from rat brain cytosol is presented. Each of the final protein preparations contains one single transferase activity. A common method of measurement of both activities is described. The assay, which follows substrate prenylation, is also convenient for the measurement of the concomitant decrease in cosubstrates during the two transfer reactions. The quantitative HPLC detection of the prenylated substrates and of the cosubstrate consumption is used here to follow the purification processes. The same method is also used for substrate-specificity studies of the two enzymes performed on 18 synthetic hexapeptides derived from the C-terminus of proteins known to be prenylated in vivo. These studies partially confirm the reported differences in the substrate specificities of the two prenyltransferases. However, the observed recognition of overlapping sequences by the two enzymes might have important consequences for the inhibition of either of the enzymes in vivo and for the design of specific inhibitors.