Non-invasive cryolipolysis to reduce subcutaneous fat in the arms

Non-invasive Body Contouring Technologies: An Updated Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, a lot of body contouring devices and methods are introduced all over the world. The object of the present narrative review was to update and classify existing evidence on these methods and devices.

METHODS

We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for 11 essential keywords, including cryolipolysis, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), shock wave, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), radiofrequency (RF), capacitive resistive electrical transfer (TECAR), high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM), electromyostimulation (EMS), carboxytherapy, mesotherapy, and acupuncture and their abbreviations, in addition to obesity, overweight, cellulite, subcutaneous fat, and body contouring.

RESULTS

Totally 193 references were used in 11 main topics.

CONCLUSION

In order to help physicians with finding the best evidence in different methods, the data were summarised in 11 topics. Furthermore, FDA-approved devices, side effects and common protocols were described in each section.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors 39 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 40 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 41 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 42 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

From Esthetic Medicine to Optimizing Reconstructive Outcome: A Feasibility Trial on Secondary Refinement of Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flaps with Cryolipolysis

BACKGROUND

 Free adipocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps have evolved as workhorse flaps to reconstruct complex, multicompound defects. While coverage is safely achieved, flaps may remain bulky. As a standard of care, flaps are refined with liposuction, partial excision, or combination of both. Cryolipolysis is widely used for fat reduction in esthetic medicine. This pilot comparative study analyses whether cryolipolysis may serve as a safe alternative method to effectively reduce volume in fasciocutaneous flaps. Moreover, patients' satisfaction with the procedure is evaluated.

METHODS

 In this single-center, retrospective, interventional comparative cohort study, 10 patients with free subfascial ALT flaps for distal extremity reconstruction underwent cryolipolysis (60 minutes, -9°C). Circumference of the extremities and subcutaneous fat thickness were determined before (T1) and 12 weeks (T2) after cryolipolysis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with a questionnaire of Likert's scale questions. Duration of hospital stay, intervention time, costs, and possible complications were analyzed and compared with surgical flap contouring (n = 12).

RESULTS

 All patients undergoing cryolipolysis were male, with a median age of 52 years without arterial disease-like state or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At T2, a significant reduction of circumference of 1.8 ± 0.9 cm (p < 0.001) and subcutaneous fat layer of 7.7 ± 3.0 mm (p < 0.0001) was recorded. Overall, 90% of the patients were satisfied with the result. Cryolipolysis was well tolerated. One patient developed a second-degree frostbite which healed without further intervention. Cryolipolysis proofed to be as safe as surgical flap contouring. Hospital stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) and personal resources were spared when flap contouring was performed with cryolipolysis.

CONCLUSION

 This is a novel application of evolving body-contouring cryolipolysis from esthetic medicine into optimizing outcomes in reconstructive surgery. Cryolipolysis has been shown to be relatively safe and effective to reduce ALT's volume with high patients' satisfaction. This successful pilot study encourages further investigation with a prospective randomized control trial.

Structural design optimization and lipolytic effect prediction of vacuum suction cryolipolysis applicator: Simulation study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cryolipolysis is a popular noninvasive lipolytic method that uses low temperature to induce apoptosis or necrosis of adipocytes to reduce local fat in the human body. Vacuum suction applicator is a commonly used cryolipolysis equipment, which suction human skin and fat into a chamber for cooling. The structure of vacuum suction applicator is usually irregular, its cooling characteristic is also complex, and unreasonable suction structure will cause human discomfort. Biological experiments and clinical studies are often used to study the structural design of applicators, whereas these methods are impossible to obtain the three-dimensional cooling characteristic of applicator comprehensively and require a lot of costs. This study aims to optimize the structure of applicator for lowering discomfort, evaluate the cooling characteristic and lipolytic effect of applicators, which could provide guidance for clinical application of applicators and reduce costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cryolipolysis applicators models with four vacuum suction angles were established, and COMSOL was used to compare the cooling performance parameters, cooling kinetics, and lipolytic effects of the applicators. Specific evaluation indicators also include: cooling capacity analysis, temperature field analysis, lipolytic percentage, lipolytic volume, lipolytic weight, lipolytic thickness, lipolytic waistline, and lipolysis temperature threshold analysis.

RESULTS

The applicator with a small suction angle has a greater cooling capacity to cool deeper level of fat. When the cooling temperature is -10°C, the temperature of skin layer is about -10°C at 60 minutes, the temperature of fat layer is -7.36 to 3.01°C at 10 mm, -3.67 to 5.91°C at 20 mm and 2.01-10.81°C at 30 mm. The percentage of lipolytic declined with the increase of suction angle, the final lipolytic percentage (35.81%) of the 90° applicator is the highest, the percentage (28.72%) of 150° applicator (28.72%) is the lowest. The lipolytic volume, weight, and average thickness of applicator constantly increased with the increase of the suction angle, the final lipolytic volume range of the four suction angle applicators is 171.88-310.18 cm³ , the lipolytic weight range is 160.11-288.93 g, and the lipolytic average thickness range is 1.21-1.36 cm. Lower lipolysis temperature threshold will reduce the lipolysis effect, but it may also lead to another lipolysis mechanism-cell necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Different suction angles significantly affect the cooling characteristics and lipolytic effects of cryolipolysis applicator. A reasonable suction angle is one of the critical factors to improve the efficiency and comfort of cryolipolysis.

Collagen Stimulators in Body Applications: A Review Focused on Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA)

The number of aesthetic procedures performed worldwide continues to grow together with an increase in the population seeking the restoration or preservation of a youthful appearance. Requests for non-surgical body rejuvenation are increasing. Patients are looking for safe and effective minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. Soft-tissue dermal fillers can meet these expectations. Based on the beneficial outcomes of these treatments in many facial areas, a new trend is developing to target body areas. Different dermal fillers are available and include collagen stimulators initially developed to restore facial volume. Furthermore, they are associated with long-lasting efficiency, a high level of patient satisfaction and a good safety profile, with mainly minor adverse events reported. In appropriate conditions of use, they are now used for body rejuvenation in clinical practice. Their use is expanding and allows addressing various issues including volume loss, skin laxity, cellulite, striae distensae and wrinkles. This review focuses on poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), used in the first collagen stimulator and one of the most investigated in facial and in off-facial body applications. The available published data, although still limited, are presented by body area, neck and chest, buttocks, abdomen, upper arms, thighs, knees, and hands. Key features of the concerned zones and the main clinical signs affecting the body part as well as the injection modalities are provided along with the aesthetic results. This represents the state of the art on which to base further developments necessary for optimal and safe outcomes of treatment with the PLLA-based collagen stimulators and others in this class for body rejuvenation.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Body, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Body Firming Moisturizer for Upper Arm Rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Aging of upper arm skin, induced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, often results in a loss of contour, elasticity, and firmness, and an increase in laxity, crepiness, roughness, and photodamage. A topical body firming moisturizer (TBFM) was developed to target all aspects of skin aging.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the TBFM for upper arm firming and rejuvenation.

METHODS

Forty female subjects, 40 to 60 years old, Fitzpatrick skin type II to V, with mild to moderate laxity, crepiness, and photodamage on the upper arms, were recruited into the study, 10 of whom were selected for biopsy analysis. Subjects were randomly allocated to apply the TBFM and placebo moisturizer on the assigned arms twice daily for 12 weeks. At each visit, efficacy and tolerability evaluation, self-assessment, and standardized clinical photography were performed. Ultrasound measurements were performed at baseline, week 8 and week 12.

RESULTS

Efficacy evaluation by a clinical grader and bioinstrumentation analysis showed the TBFM improved all skin parameters of the aged upper arm while outperforming the placebo moisturizer after 12 weeks. Clinical photography showed the test product toned and firmed the skin. The TBFM was well tolerated and well perceived by the subjects. Ultrasound images indicated an improvement in skin density and skin structure at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial indicates that the TBFM was well tolerated and was effective in improving crepey, lax, and photodamaged skin of the upper arms after 12 weeks of treatment twice daily.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

BACKGROUND

In addition to reducing subcutaneous fat for body contouring, some patients are interested in toning the underlying muscle layer.

OBJECTIVE

This feasibility study evaluated the safety and efficacy of electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) alone, cryolipolysis alone, and cryolipolysis with EMMS for noninvasive contouring of abdomen.

METHODS

Abdomens of 50 subjects were treated in a study with 3 cohorts: EMMS alone, Cryolipolysis alone, and Cryolipolysis + EMMS in combination. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation treatments were delivered in 4 sessions over 2 weeks. Cryolipolysis treatments were delivered in one session. Combination treatments consisted of one cryolipolysis and 4 EMMS visits. Efficacy was assessed by independent physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), circumferential measurement, Subject GAIS (SGAIS), and Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ).

RESULTS

Safety was demonstrated for all study cohorts with no device- or procedure-related adverse events. Independent photo review showed greatest mean GAIS score for the Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, then EMMS only cohort. BSQ showed greatest average score increase for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only cohort, then EMMS only cohort. Mean circumferential reduction measurements were greatest for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, and then EMMS only cohort. The mean SGAIS improvement score was equal for the Cryolipolysis only and Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohorts, followed by the EMMS only cohort.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach using cryolipolysis and EMMS was safe and demonstrated enhanced body contouring efficacy for this feasibility study.

Cryolipolysis (CLL) for Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat: Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, cryolipolysis (CLL), a noninvasive approach based upon the inherent sensitivity of adipocytes to cold injury, has emerged. However, it is not clear whether available evidence to date about its efficacy justifies aggressive marketing and extensive widespread application by many practitioners without well-defined indications or objectives of treatment. The current review is intended to evaluate available evidence regarding CLL mechanisms of action and its efficacy not only in fat reducing but also in its ability to result in an aesthetically optimal outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus computerized medical bibliographic database was conducted with the search terms "cryolipolysis," "lipocryolysis," and "cool sculpting." Selection criteria included all matched reports with the search terms in their titles.

RESULTS

Thirty-two reports matched the inclusion criteria of this review. Five experimental studies were identified and included to further supplement the discussion.

CONCLUSION

Most reports about CLL included in this review lacked rigorous scientific methodology in study design or in outcome measurement. Serious concerns about integrity of many of these reports, particularly with respect to validity of photographic outcome documentation in addition to objectivity, conflict of interest issues, and commercial bias, have been expressed. Further research should be encouraged to prove with methodological rigor positive effects of this treatment modality and to determine categories of patients in whom most favorable outcomes might be expected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Adverse Events Associated With Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis is a popular procedure for people seeking noninvasive body contouring. As with any novel therapy, it is critical for providers to familiarize themselves with related adverse events (AEs), to provide appropriate information to patients before treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To describe reported complications and AEs associated with cryolipolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was completed using the PubMed database and following search terms: "cryolipolysis" or "lipocryolysis" or "CoolSculpting." Only randomized clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports describing AEs related to cryolipolysis as well as studies written in English were included for review.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles were included in this review. The most common AEs associated with cryolipolysis were treatment site erythema, numbness/paresthesia, bruising, and edema. More serious complications of cryolipolysis include severe/persistent pain, dysesthesia, skin hyperpigmentation, motor neuropathy, and paradoxical adipose hyperplasia.

CONCLUSION

Cryolipolysis is a safe option for patients seeking noninvasive body contouring. Most reported AEs are minimal and resolve quickly. It is important that physicians are aware of serious, irreversible AEs and are prepared to counsel patients appropriately before treatment.

Cryolipolysis for local fat reduction in adults from Brazil: A single-arm intervention study

BACKGROUND

Localized fat is a matter of great concern among individuals from today's society. Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive technique that have shown great results in reducing localized fat.

AIMS

To analyze the efficacy of cryoplipolysis on visible local fat reduction in submental region, arms, or male breast (pseudogynecomastia) in Brazilian subjects, and to assess possible factors associated with treatment success.

METHODS

Single-arm, nonrandomized trial, with volunteers from both genders with visible excess fat in the arms or submental region or men presenting pseudogynecomastia. Eligible subjects were submitted to physical, photographic, and ultrasound analysis before and three months after intervention. A single cryolipolysis session was performed using specific methods for each region, followed by a local massage for two minutes. Data were described as measures of central tendency and dispersion and measures of frequency. Reduction in measurements and factors associated with treatment success was analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects underwent one session of cryolipolysis in each area (22 subjects treated the arms, 20 the submental region and 9 the breast). In general, a mean reduction of 19.1% was observed. Significant differences were observed for almost all body parts analyzed. Body mass index was the only variable showing a significant relationship with intervention results.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryolipolysis is a useful noninvasive tool in reduction of visible localized fat in arms and submental region and of pseudogynecomastia. Obese subjects are not benefited by the treatment.

A 3-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Volume Loss Following Submental Cryolipolysis

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis is a proven and effective means of fat reduction; however, there are no standardized means of measuring volume reduction.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to assess the volume loss using a 3-dimensional (3D) analysis following submental cryolipolysis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study between April 2016 and August 2018 was performed. Thirty-five patients underwent a single 45-minute cycle of cryolipolysis to the submental region using the CoolSculpting System. A 3-fold analysis was performed employing an independent observer assessment of 2-dimensional photographs and 3D volumetric analysis utilizing the Vectra XT system, and patient satisfaction was measured with the FACE-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

Our results suggested the mean (standard deviation) pretreatment volume (n = 35) was 104.12 cm3 (28.78). The 6-week mean posttreatment volume (n = 26) was 81.55 cm3 (21.29). The mean volume reduction found at 6 weeks posttreatment showed a reduction of 22.46 cm3 (19.10) (95% CI 14.74 to 30.17, P < 0.0001). The 12-week mean posttreatment volume (n = 24) was 82.24 cm3 (23.97). The 12-week posttreatment demonstrated a reduction of 22.30 cm3 (14.04) (95% CI 16.37 to 28.23, P < 0.0001). The mean percentage correct for each reviewer correctly identifying the pretreatment and posttreatment photograph was 76.33% (7.14). Patient satisfaction showed a mean FACE-Q score of 54.10 (20.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The study further affirms that submental cryolipolysis is an efficacious and safe, noninvasive method for reducing submental adiposity resulting in notable patient satisfaction rates. Furthermore, results suggest that patients can have a volume loss of about 20% on average, allowing them to be more confident and comfortable with their appearance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Cryolipolysis for Noninvasive Contouring of the Periumbilical Abdomen With a Nonvacuum Conformable-Surface Applicator

BACKGROUND

Although most cryolipolysis treatments are performed with vacuum applicators, some patients may have areas of fibrous, nonpinchable fat or find vacuum suction to be uncomfortable.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates a nonvacuum conformable-surface applicator for cryolipolysis of the periumbilical abdomen.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Twenty subjects with periumbilical subcutaneous fat were treated with a nonvacuum cryolipolysis applicator in this prospective, single-center, open-label clinical trial. Each subject underwent a single treatment cycle with an optional second treatment 10 weeks later. Efficacy was evaluated by blinded review of digital photographs. Subject satisfaction was assessed at 10-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects completed one treatment, of which 6 underwent the optional retreatment. Independent review demonstrated 77% correct identification of baseline photographs after one treatment, which improved to 100% after a second treatment. Patient questionnaires after one treatment revealed 50% satisfaction, with 60% willing to recommend the procedure and 60% reporting visible fat reduction. After second treatment, however, 100% were satisfied, 83% were willing to recommend, and 100% reported visible fat reduction.

CONCLUSION

Cryolipolysis with a nonvacuum conformable-surface applicator is safe, effective, and well tolerated for noninvasive reduction of fibrous periumbilical abdominal fat. Efficacy and subject satisfaction is significantly greater with 2 treatments than with a single session.

A customized approach for arm fat reduction using cryolipolysis

OBJECTIVES

Cryolipolysis of the arms has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for non-invasive reduction of subcutaneous fat. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the concurrent use of a new commercially-available small applicator in conjunction with an existing medium sized applicator for the customized treatment of arm fat.

METHODS

Bilateral arms of 15 eligible subjects were simultaneously treated using one or two vacuum applicators with flat contours. Either a medium or small cryolipolysis applicator with an oblong cup-shaped cooling surface was selected to treat upper arm fat. The shape of the fat bulge in each subject's arm was assessed and up to two treatment cycles (-11°C for 35 minutes each) were delivered to each arm in one session, based upon investigator discretion. Throughout the procedure and at the completion of each treatment cycle, investigators assessed the subject's level of comfort, as well as sensory and motor nerve effects. Post-treatment manual massage was performed, and clinical assessments of each treatment site were recorded. Adverse events were recorded to monitor procedural safety. Baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment photographs and ultrasound measurements were taken to assess efficacy. Subject questionnaires were administered to evaluate satisfaction.

RESULTS

Fifteen female subjects (mean age of 51.1, mean BMI of 26.8) completed the study. Ultrasound imaging revealed statistically significant fat layer reduction of 2.5 mm (SD ± 2.4 mm, 95%CI 1.6-3.3). Subject surveys administered 12 weeks post-treatment demonstrated 87% satisfaction with the arm cryolipolysis procedure. A panel of blinded, independent physicians correctly identified 83% of the before and after photos. Clinical assessments found adverse events were mild and included erythema and mild swelling that resolved without intervention. Mild treatment area numbness was reported by 73% of subjects at the 4-week interim visit and fully resolved at the 12-week visit.

CONCLUSION

This study documents the first reported customized approach for assessment and treatment of arm fat using a small or medium cup applicator with varied applicator placement. By incorporating one or two treatment cycles per arm in a single session, the issue of variable fat distribution in people's arms can be addressed. This approach was shown to be a safe and effective way to reduce unwanted arm fat with high patient satisfaction. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cryolipolysis for the treatment of submental fat: Review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Submental fat accumulation is a common cosmetic concern. Cryolipolysis utilizes noninvasive cooling to lyse adipocytes. A cryolipolysis device was recently approved for treatment of submental fat.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript provides a review of the preclinical work and clinical trials related to cryolipolysis for the treatment of submental fat. Settings, efficacy, and side effects are also discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed through Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL, using the search terms "cryolipolysis," "submental," and "paradoxical adipose hyperplasia". Additional sources from the original source bibliographies were used to further supplement this review.

RESULTS

There are 4 clinical trials and one case series (total 101 patients) that evaluated the use of cryolipolysis for treatment of submental fat. In these studies, there was a statistically significant reduction in submental fat and patients expressed high satisfaction with the treatment. Adverse effects were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive cooling technique that is safe and effective for treatment of submental fat. To date, there are no reports of marginal mandibular nerve injury or paradoxical adipose hyperplasia following treatment with this device.

Noninvasive Body Contouring: A Male Perspective

Noninvasive body contouring is an attractive therapeutic modality to enhance the ideal male physique. Men place higher value on enhancing a well-defined, strong, masculine jawline and developing a V-shaped taper through the upper body. An understanding of the body contour men strive for allows the treating physician to focus on areas that are of most concern to men, thus enhancing patient experience and satisfaction. This article discusses noninvasive body contouring techniques, taking into account the unique aesthetic concerns of the male patient by combining an analysis of the existing literature with our own clinical experience.

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening

Importance

Cryolipolysis is a popular, well-tolerated nonsurgical procedure that uses controlled cooling to selectively destroy fat cells. Central submental cryolipolysis has been reported to be safe and effective, but many patients would benefit from extending this treatment over the entire submental region.

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for reduction of lateral and central submental fat.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The study population consisted of 14 participants who were treated from January 22 to June 30, 2016, in the lateral and central submental area to reduce unwanted subcutaneous fat. A small-volume cup applicator was used to administer 2 cryolipolysis treatments, delivered in 45-minute treatment cycles in 2 sessions. For the first treatment session, all participants received bilateral treatments with approximately 20% overlap of the treatment area. At the 6-week follow-up visit, participants were reassessed to determine whether they would benefit from a second treatment and to determine the number of cycles needed to achieve the optimal aesthetic result, and then they were treated a second time.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Participant surveys assessed tolerability and treatment satisfaction at 12 weeks following the second treatment. Clinicians monitored adverse events to assess safety. Caliper measurements were recorded to assess fat thickness reduction. Treatment efficacy was objectively evaluated using 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional imaging.

Results

Among the 14 participants (12 women and 2 men; mean [SD] age, 50.5 [10.4] years), the adverse effects of the procedure were typically mild and included numbness and tingling, which resolved without intervention by the final 12-week follow-up visit. An independent review of digital photographs revealed an 81.0% (95% CI, 65.9%-91.4%; P = .02) correct identification rate (34 of 42 images) of the pretreatment and posttreatment images. Caliper measurements demonstrated a mean (SD) fat layer reduction of 2.3 (0.8) mm (range, 0.7-3.5 mm). Three-dimensional imaging revealed a mean (SD) reduction in fat volume of 4.82 (11.42) cm3 (from a reduction of 32.69 cm3 to an increase of 13.85 cm3), in skin surface area of 1.29 (1.42) cm2 (from a reduction of 3.18 cm2 to an increase of 0.99 cm2), and in fat thickness of 3.77 (3.59) mm (from of reduction of 13.10 mm to an increase of 0.47 mm). Results of participant surveys indicated that 13 participants (93%) were satisfied with the cryolipolysis treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although safe and efficacious central submental cryolipolysis has been reported, this is the first clinical study of cryolipolysis for treatment of the entire submental area using overlapping bilateral treatments and a shorter treatment duration. The study demonstrates that bilateral submental cryolipolysis is well tolerated and produces visible and significant fat layer reduction.

Level of Evidence

4.

Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Arm Fat: Safety and Efficacy of a Prototype CoolCup Applicator With Flat Contour

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis of the arms has been shown to be an effective but somewhat time-consuming process.

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated safety and efficacy of a contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for reduction of arm fat. The prototype was designed to maximize tissue contact with the cooling surface to improve comfort, while reducing treatment time by 25 minutes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both arms were treated using a prototype device that delivered treatment in 35 minutes at −11°C. Photographic and ultrasound documentation was captured at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Efficacy was assessed by photo review and measurement of fat reduction in ultrasound images. Immediately after 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment, clinical assessments were performed to evaluate treatment areas and sensory alterations.

RESULTS

Thirty women were enrolled and completed treatments to both arms. Ultrasound measurements found mean fat layer reduction of 3.2 mm with an SD of 2.7 mm. Blinded independent photo review found 85.2% correct identification of baseline photographs by at least 2/3 of reviewers. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects. Four study subjects experienced numbness in the treatment area beyond the 12-week visit that subsequently resolved without intervention.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the CoolCup prototype applicator provides rapid, safe, and effective arm treatment.

Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference

Background and Objectives

Cryolipolysis is a safe, effective non‐surgical procedure to reduce fat. For most cryolipolysis treatments, tissue is pulled between parallel cooling plates with a treatment duration of 60 minutes. A novel contoured cup, medium‐sized applicator was developed to increase tissue contact with reduced skin tension and reduced treatment time. This prototype contoured cup was investigated with a standard cryolipolysis applicator to evaluate safety, efficacy, and patient preference.

Study Design/Material and Methods

A prototype CoolCup medium‐sized vacuum applicator (CoolSculpting System, ZELTIQ Aesthetics) was used to treat n = 19 subjects in the flanks. Randomly assigned, one flank received standard treatment with the CoolCore applicator (−10°C for 60 minutes). The contralateral flank received treatment from the CoolCup (−11°C for 35 minutes). The clinical study primary efficacy endpoint was 70% correct identification of baseline photographs by independent physician review. Incidence of adverse device effects was monitored. Fat layer reduction was measured by ultrasound and subject surveys were administered 12 weeks post‐treatment.

Results

Equivalent efficacy was demonstrated between the CoolCore standard treatment and the prototype CoolCup. Independent review from three blinded physicians found 81% correct identification of baseline photographs for the standard treatment and 79% for the CoolCup. Ultrasound measurements indicated mean fat layer reduction of 4.38 mm for the standard treatment and 4.40 mm for the CoolCup; no statistically significant difference was found when comparing treatment efficacy of the two applicators (P = 0.96). Patient questionnaires revealed 85% preferred CoolCup because of shorter treatment duration and greater comfort. Procedural assessments revealed 45% lower pain scores for CoolCup. Immediate post‐treatment clinical assessments revealed 82% less bruising. Typical side effects, such as numbness and erythema, were similar. There were no adverse events.

Conclusion

This clinical study of a prototype medium‐sized vacuum applicator with a cooled contoured surface indicates that the CoolCup produces equivalent safety and efficacy to the standard CoolCore cryolipolysis applicator. With a 42% reduction in treatment time, the procedure was found to be more comfortable because of lower vacuum skin tension and shorter treatment duration. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:63–68, 2017. © 2016 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.