Uterine rupture and risk factors for caesarean delivery following induced labour in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section

Evaluating Facility-Based Decision-Making in Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery and Association with Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes

Objective To describe facility-based decision-making for women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) in a resource-limited setting and to characterize maternal and perinatal outcomes in these groups. Methods One year retrospective study of women with one prior CD delivering at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana. Women were categorized into three groups based on initial plan of management on admission [trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), emergency repeat CD (EMCD) or non-emergent repeat CD (RCD)]. Characteristics and outcomes across these groups were then compared. Results During the study period, 1247 women with one prior CD delivered at KBTH, of which 377 (30.2%) were triaged to RCD, 439 (35.2%) to EMCD and 431 (34.6%) to TOLAC. Twelve uterine ruptures and no maternal deaths occurred. Perinatal mortality was 4.2% (n = 52). Compared to the RCD group, the TOLAC group had a lower risk for maternal adverse events (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0; p = 0.04) and non-significant higher risk of perinatal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.3; p = 0.25). Compared to women triaged to RCD, the EMCD group had a non-significant increase in risk of maternal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.5; p = 0.2) and a significantly higher rate of perinatal adverse events (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9; p = 0.01). Conclusions for Practice Women triaged to EMCD at admission are different when compared to women allowed a TOLAC or offered a non-emergent RCD. These women bear increased rates of adverse outcomes and should be considered as a separate group for analysis in future studies conducted in similar settings.

Induction of labor in women that had a previous cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate factors that predict the likelihood of the success of induction of labor (IOL) in women that had a previous cesarean section (pCS).

METHODS

Pregnant women with one pCS performed more than 18 months prior were included in this retrospective observational study. Of the 242 eligible women, 234 were enrolled; 120 (51.3%) of these women delivered vaginally (VD), with the remainder receiving a repeat CS.

RESULTS

The main reasons for IOL were premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (37.1%) and post-date pregnancy (26.5%). Babies with a birth weight≥4000 g were more prevalent in women undergoing CS (21/114; 18.4%, p<0.02) and were associated with the failure of IOL. Uterine rupture during labor (1.3%) occurred in three cases. Having had a previous vaginal delivery (VD) (p=0.01), not being African (p=0.022), and receiving IOL for PROM (p=0.04) with a cervical Bishop score≥5 (p=0.015) significantly predicted the occurrence of a VD, with an 15% variance (p<0.001). An age>35 years appears to not affect the success of induction.

CONCLUSIONS

A successful IOL should be expected in Caucasian women induced for PROM with a favorable Bishop score.

Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey

Objective: To determine the predisposing factors, modes of clinical presentation, management modalities and fetomaternal outcomes of uterine rupture cases at a tertiary care center in Turkey.

Methodology: A 14-year retrospective analysis of 61 gravid (>20 weeks of gestation) uterine rupture cases between January 1998 to March 2012 was carried out.

Results: The incidence of ruptured uteri was calculated to be 0.116%. Persistence for vaginal delivery after cesarean was the most common cause of uterine rupture (31.1%). Ablatio placenta was the most common co-existent obstetric pathology (4.9%). Bleeding was the main symptom at presentation (44.3%) and complete type of uterine rupture (93.4%) was more likely to occur. Isthmus was the most vulnerable part of uterus (39.3%) for rupture. The longer the interval between rupture and surgical intervention, the longer the duration of hospitalization was. Older patients with increased number of previous pregnancies were likely to have longer hospitalization periods.

Conclusion: Rupture of gravid uterus brings about potentially hazardous risks. Regular antenatal care, hospital deliveries and vigilance during labor with quick referral to a well-equipped center may reduce the incidence of this condition.