Isolated intrauterine growth restriction: a survey of Central Association of Obstetricians Gynecologists (CAOG) members

Effect of regular third-trimester ultrasound examination on antenatal detection and perinatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants

Objective

To assess the effect of regular third-trimester ultrasound on antenatal detection and perinatal outcomes of small for gestational age (SGA) infants.

Methods

Data from SGA infants delivered at ≥28 weeks’ gestation were retrospectively studied. Each pregnancy had undergone three regular third-trimester ultrasound examinations, and data were grouped according to with or without antenatal ultrasound suspicion of fetal growth restriction (FGR). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of perinatal outcomes were analysed.

Results

A total of 407 infants were included, comprising 268 (65.85%) with antenatal ultrasound suspicion of FGR. Antenatal suspicion of FGR was associated with increased risk of iatrogenic delivery (aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31, 3.14) that included risk of preterm birth (aRR 10.61, 95% CI 1.35, 83.62) and elective caesarean section (aRR 1.306, 95% CI 1.051, 1.623). Differences in fetal death, 1-min Apgar score, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit were not statistically significant. Resuscitation risk was reduced (aRR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06, 0.79).

Conclusions

Regular use of third-trimester ultrasound in one teaching hospital in China showed satisfactory antenatal detection of FGR among SGA infants. Ultrasound suspicion of FGR was associated with higher incidence of iatrogenic deliveries, but not improved neonatal outcomes, except for reduced perinatal resuscitation.

Fetal Growth Diagnosis and Management among Perinatal Medical Professionals: A Survey of Practice and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

This paper aimed to assess the knowledge of healthcare professionals (obstetric and gynecology residents, specialists, and midwives) in the field of perinatal medicine regarding fetal growth diagnosis and management.

METHODS

A questionnaire was created consisting of a set of questions regarding demographic data, methods of growth assessment, and management. It was a handout survey. The results were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis using the program Statistica.

RESULTS

190 medical professionals have participated in the questionnaire. 86.3% of respondents agreed that pregnancy dating should be modified based on first-trimester ultrasound. 90.9% agreed that III trimester ultrasound has a ±15% margin of error. When asked which growth charts are best fit for assessing growth in a studied population, 10.7% marked standard, 37.4% reference, 26.2% customized, and 26.2% did not know the difference between the three choices. 60.3% stated that they use a growth chart to assess growth and qualify fetuses for monitoring. 70.2% used the 10th centile as a cutoff, 20.1% 5th centile, and 9.7% 3rd centile. Only 40.9% would diagnose fetal growth restriction based on fetal weight only. 28.7% using the 10th centile cutoff, 16.1% 5th centile, and 54.0% 3rd centile. Only a quarter of the respondents were able to name the growth chart or tool that they use for assessment. The most common responses were Yudkin, Hadlock, and online calculators of Fetal Medicina Barcelona and the Fetal Medicine Foundation.

DISCUSSION

A lot of confusion is observed primarily in the aspect of cutoff values for identification, subsequent monitoring, and management of fetal growth restriction. There is a need for extensive training and education in this field and uniform national recommendations.

Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has been proposed for the routine surveillance of pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction (FGR), but the predictive performance of this test is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of CPR for predicting adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected FGR.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Lilacs were searched from inception to 31 July 2017 for cohort or cross-sectional studies reporting on the accuracy of CPR for predicting adverse perinatal and/or neurodevelopmental outcomes in singleton pregnancies with FGR suspected antenatally based on sonographic parameters. Summary receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves, pooled sensitivities and specificities, and summary likelihood ratios (LRs) were generated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (including 4301 women) met the inclusion criteria. Summary ROC curves showed that the best predictive accuracy of CPR was for perinatal death and the worst was for neonatal acidosis, with areas under the summary ROC curves of 0.83 and 0.57, respectively. The predictive accuracy of CPR was moderate to high for perinatal death (pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 76%, respectively, and summary positive and negative LRs of 3.9 and 0.09, respectively) and low for composite of adverse perinatal outcomes, Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status, 5-min Apgar score < 7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal acidosis and neonatal morbidity, with summary positive and negative LRs ranging from 1.1 to 2.5 and 0.3 to 0.9, respectively. An abnormal CPR result had moderate accuracy for predicting small-for-gestational age at birth (summary positive LR of 7.4). CPR had a higher predictive accuracy in pregnancies with suspected early-onset FGR. No study provided data for assessing the predictive accuracy of CPR for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome.

CONCLUSION

CPR appears to be useful in predicting perinatal death in pregnancies with suspected FGR. Nevertheless, before incorporating CPR into the routine clinical management of suspected FGR, randomized controlled trials should assess whether the use of CPR reduces perinatal death or other adverse perinatal outcomes. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Variation in the definition of intrauterine growth restriction in routine antenatal care: a physician survey among gynecologists in Northwest Germany

OBJECTIVE

To assess how intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is defined by gynecologists in routine practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed primary care gynecologists in Bremen and Lower Saxony, Northwest Germany, between January and July 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data; consensus was considered as 90% agreement among the respondents. Multiple logistic regression models were performed for the associations between respondents' background characteristics and choice of the small for gestational age (SGA) cutoff values.

RESULTS

Overall, 185 primary care gynecologists participated in the survey. Consensus was only observed in two items: (1) an accurate determination of gestational age (91%) and (2) repeated measurement of the abdominal circumference (91%). Umbilical artery Doppler (76%) and repeated ultrasonography (76%) were the most frequently used methods to confirm suspected IUGR diagnoses, but different responses prevailed. Notably, only 46% of the respondents opted for the 10th percentile of estimated fetal weight as a cutoff for SGA classification, which is the internationally recommended value.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey indicate considerable practice variation regarding detection and management of IUGR pregnancies. There is a need for better agreement in terminology and definition of core aspects of IUGR in antenatal care.

Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate opinions among Irish obstetricians and obstetric trainees regarding the optimal definition, assessment and management of pregnancies affected by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous, structured, web-based survey that comprised 14 questions was sent to 200 obstetricians and obstetric trainees in Ireland.

RESULTS

Of the 113 participants (57% response rate), the majority (50%) were consultants, with over 10 years' clinical experience (46%), who worked in large maternity units (58%) with neonatal units providing care for preterm IUGR fetuses (94%). Eighty-three clinicians (74%) agreed that an estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile constitutes small-for-gestational age (SGA). The majority (n=93; 82%) would deliver the SGA fetus between 37(+0) and 39(+6) weeks gestation. In total, the survey yielded 30 different IUGR definitions; the top three definitions were (i) an EFW below the 5th centile (n=18; 16%), (ii) an EFW below the 10th centile with oligohydramnios and abnormal umbilical artery (UA) Doppler (n=16; 14%), and (iii) an EFW below the 10th centile (n=12; 11%). In the evaluation of the preterm IUGR fetus with abnormal UA Doppler, the assessment of amniotic fluid volume, middle cerebral artery, ductus venosus, cardiotocograph (CTG) and biophysical profiling was performed in 74%, 60%, 60%, 54% and 52% respectively. The majority of clinicians applied three or more assessment modalities and 60% referred to a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) subspecialist. Interestingly, even among MFM subspecialists there was no common consistent management approach. Most doctors (81%) would deliver the IUGR fetus for CTG abnormalities but MFM subspecialists more commonly deliver on the basis of absent end-diastolic flow in the UA alone (37% vs. 10%; p=0.006). Two-thirds of doctors (n=74) would implement customised growth charts if they became available for their population and over 80% thought that a national guideline on IUGR would be beneficial.

CONCLUSION

The results of this survey confirm the inconsistencies surrounding the clinical management of IUGR pregnancies and highlight the need for standardisation of terminology and antenatal surveillance, implementation of fetal weight customisation and national guidance for Ireland.