Anesthetic considerations in pregnant women at advanced maternal age

Retrospective study to assess the effect of epidural analgesia on labor progress and women's pelvic floor muscle from the perspective of electromyography

OBJECTIVE

Epidural analgesia has been widely used as a form of pain relief during labor and its safety has been gradually recognized. However, few studies of the effect of epidural analgesia on the pelvic floor are known. Thus, we aim to analyze the effect of epidural analgesia on labor progress and women's pelvic floor muscle from the perspective of electromyography systematically. In addition, obstetric risk factors for dysfunction of pelvic floor muscle after vaginal delivery were also evaluated.

METHODS

Childbirth data of 124 primiparas who gave first birth vaginally in our hospital and their pelvic floor function assessment results at postpartum 7 weeks were retrospectively collected. Pelvic floor muscle electromyogram screenings were performed by a biofeedback electro-stimulant therapy instrument.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the percentage of episiotomy, forceps, artificial rupturing membrane, and the application of oxytocin, except perineal laceration. Woman who implemented epidural analgesia experienced a longer stage of labor. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the total score and pelvic floor muscle strength. The risk factors for the value of the pre-rest phase include the age of pregnant women, the fetal weight, and the length of the second stage while the value of the post-rest phase was only associated with the fetal weight and the length of the second stage. In addition, the value of type I muscles was associated with the gravida and fetal weight while the value of type II muscles was only associated with forceps. The sustained contraction was correlated with the gravida and the total scores had a significant correlation with forceps.

CONCLUSION

Epidural analgesia during labor is approved to be a safe and effective procedure to relieve pain with very low side effects on the mode of labor and pelvic floor muscle. The assessment of pelvic floor muscle before pregnancy is beneficial in guiding the better protection of pelvic floor muscle function. According to the evaluation results, the doctors can control the associated risk factors as much as possible to reduce the injury of pregnancy and parturition to the pelvic floor.

Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal morbidity: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pregnancies in women over 35 years of age are becoming more frequent. The majority of studies point to an age of 35 as a provider of obstetric and neonatal complications. But several confounding factors are not taken into account and this results in contradictory results.

METHODS

The objective was to quantify the strength of the association between maternal age and obstetric and neonatal morbidity. This observational study was based on systematic records of 9 years of pregnancies managed in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France. In all, 24,674 pregnancies were managed at Antoine Béclère Hospital between April 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015, including 23,291 singleton pregnancies. Maternal age was the age at the beginning of pregnancy, taken as a quantitative variable. The main outcome measure was a composite "unfavourable" pregnancy outcome that included miscarriage, induced abortion, in utero foetal death, stillborn or newborn infant weighing under 500 g or delivered before 24 weeks of gestational age. Obstetric and neonatal morbidity comprised hospitalisation during pregnancy for more than 1 day, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes requiring hospitalisation, caesarean delivery, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and newborn transfer to the paediatric unit or neonatal intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted among singleton pregnancies (n = 23,291) and were adjusted for obesity, assisted reproductive technology and geographical origin of the mother. Unfavourable pregnancy outcome rate tripled with age, from 5% among women aged 25 to 34 to 16% among those over 45. Women over 40 were twice as likely to be hospitalised as those aged 25 to 34. The caesarean section rate reached more than 40% among women over 40 and more than 60% in women over 45. The rate of newborn transfer to paediatric intensive care or a neonatal intensive care unit was doubled in women over 40 and small-for-gestational age was more frequent with age, reaching 34% in women over 45.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of maternal-foetal complications increases steadily with age and is particularly high after 35 years and closer monitoring appears to be necessary. These results provide additional evidence and information for public health decision-makers.

Pregnancy and Lactation in a 67-Year-Old Elderly Gravida following Donor Oocyte In Vitro Fertilization

There is limited data on the anticipated perinatal course among gravidae in their sixth and seventh decades. Our objective was to describe the relatively uncomplicated prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum course of a 67-year-old essential primigravida. Briefly, our patient conceived a singleton pregnancy via IVF with donor oocytes, then presented at 13 6/7 weeks of gestation to initiate prenatal care. Her medical history was significant for chronic hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity. Her cardiac function was monitored throughout pregnancy, and she delivered at 36 1/7 weeks by cesarean for a decline in left ventricular function with mitral regurgitation. Her intrapartum and postpartum course was uncomplicated, and she was able to successfully breastfeed for six months and resume prepregnancy activity. For comparison, we analyzed deliveries among gravidae > 45 years of age from our institutional obstetrical database (2011-2018). This case represents the eldest gravidae identified in the literature and illustrates the potential for a relatively uncomplicated perinatal course with successful lactation. This case may enable other providers to counsel elderly patients on anticipated outcomes inclusive of ability to breastfeed.

Does epidural analgesia influence labor progress in women aged 35 or more?

Background: During the last decades, the age of pregnant women significantly increased. The incidence of maternal and labor complications is higher among older women, but conclusive data have not been delivered whether labor epidural analgesia (EA) may affect the duration of labor and delivery outcomes in this population of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of EA among women aged over 35 years.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all, singleton, at term deliveries, laboring with EA, between December 2011 and October 2017. Women aged ≥35 years (study group) were compared with women aged <35 years (control group) to evaluate EA effects on the duration of labor and neonatal outcome.Results: The study enrolled 459 women with EA: 122 women were included in the study group and 337 in the control group. The multiple regression analysis showed that parity was an independent variable for a shorter dilation period (p = .002), second stage length (p = .0001) and for the total labor duration (p = .0001); neonatal weight was significant for a shorter dilation period (p = .005) and for the total labor duration (p = .002); maternal age and cervical dilatation at the beginning of EA did not influence neither the period of the labor stages nor the total labor duration (p > .05).Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that women aged ≥35 with EA may have labor duration and neonatal short-term outcomes similar to younger women with EA.

No longer rare diseases and obstetric anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With new medical technologies and changing life styles, maternal demographics has changes and consequently older and sicker women are becoming pregnant.In this review, we present these different high-risk parturient populations, which were once considered rare for the practicing obstetric anesthesiologist.

RECENT FINDINGS

With lifestyle and medical advances, older and sicker women are getting pregnant. Older women are more prone to pregnancy complications. Cancer survivors are becoming pregnant and more pregnant women are being diagnosed with cancer. Previous neurological and cardiac conditions considered not compatible with pregnancy are now seen more frequently. As the rate of obesity increases so does the rate of obstructive sleep apnea, which is known to be associated with many adverse maternal and neonatal sequalae. Finally, increased use of both opioids and marijuana has led to increased number of pregnant women using these illicit substances.

SUMMARY

Future research and implementation of international guidelines for management of these high-risk parturient population is necessary in order to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity.

The Effect of Very Advanced Maternal Age on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize information on the maternal and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with a maternal age greater or equal to 45 years old compared with women with a maternal age of less than 45.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search of online databases from January 1946 through June 2015 was completed. The maternal outcomes were: fetal loss, preterm birth, full-term birth, complications of pregnancy, the type of delivery, and periconception hemorrhage. The fetal outcomes were: intrauterine growth restriction/LGA, fetal anomalies, APGAR score, and neonatal death.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included in the systematic review and 15 included in the meta-analysis. There was a 2.60 greater likelihood of fetal loss (I² = 99%). Newborns of women of a very advanced maternal age were 2.49 more likely to have a concerning 5-minute APGAR score. Very advanced maternal age women had a 3.32 greater likelihood of pregnancy complications (I² = 91%). There was a 1.96 greater likelihood of preterm birth at very advanced maternal age (I² = 91%) and a 4 times greater likelihood of having to deliver through Caesarean section (I² = 97%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The large amount of heterogeneity among most outcomes that were investigated suggest results must be interpreted with caution.

Anesthesia management of complete versus incomplete placenta previa: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Placenta previa (PP) is a major cause of obstetric hemorrhage. Clinical diagnosis of complete versus incomplete PP has a significant impact on the peripartum outcome. Our study objective is to examine whether distinction between PP classifications effect anesthetic management.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multi-center, retrospective, cohort study was performed in two tertiary university-affiliated medical centers between the years 2005 and 2013. Electronic delivery databases were reviewed for demographic, anesthetic, obstetric hemorrhage, and postoperative outcomes for all cases.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period 452 cases of PP were documented. We found 134 women (29.6%) had a complete PP and 318 (70.4%) had incomplete PP. Our main findings were that women with complete PP intraoperatively had higher incidence of general anesthesia (p = .017), higher mean estimated blood loss (p < .001), increased blood components transfusions (p < .001), and significant increase in cesarean hysterectomy rate (p < .001) than women with incomplete PP. Additionally, complete PP was associated with more postoperative complications: higher incidence of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p < .001), more mechanical ventilation (p = .02), a longer median postoperative care unit (PACU) (p = .02), ICU (p = .002), and overall length of stay in the hospital (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete PP is associated with increased risk of hemorrhage compared with incomplete PP. Therefore distinction between classifications should be factored into anesthetic management protocols.