When is the optimal time to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers?

Value of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor test in third trimester of pregnancy for predicting preeclampsia in asymptomatic women

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the value of screening maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio in asymptomatic women during 3rd trimester to predict preeclampsia (PE) development.

METHODS

The investigated group comprised of 178 pregnant women. During this gestation, 24 cases had developed PE and 12 isolated gestational hypertension (GH); whereas 142 remained normotensive. Blood samples were collected between 180 and 259 gestational days (g.d.) when the participants were asymptomatic. Serums were analyzed using the BRAHMS sFlt-1 Kryptor/BRAHMS PlGF plus Kryptor PE ratio test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Henningdorf, Germany). High-risk pregnancies for the PE development were defined as sFlt-1/PlGF>38.

RESULTS

The detection rate (DR) for manifestation of PE≤30 days after sampling was 83.3% and overall DR during pregnancy 58.3%. Ten of 15 women having false positive prediction of PE suffered from GH, preterm birth and/or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age-newborn. False positive rate was significantly higher at 239-253 g.d. compared to sampling at 210-224 g.d. and 225-238 g.d. (21.9% vs. 7.8% and 5.3%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The sFlt-1/PlGF test during 180-259 g.d. detected approximately half of subsequent PE cases. An optimal time to use the test for screening purposes was estimated 225-238 g.d. (DR 66.7%). False positive test results were more common to cases with other adverse pregnancy outcomes and samples drawn at higher gestational age.

Timing of antenatal corticosteroids for optimal neonatal outcomes: A Markov decision analysis model

OBJECTIVE

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs) are administered to pregnant individuals at high risk of preterm delivery to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. ACSs have a limited timeframe of effectiveness, and timing of administration can be difficult because of uncertainty surrounding the likelihood of preterm delivery. The objective of the current study was to design a decision analysis model to optimize the timing of ACS administration and identify important model variables that impact administration timing preference.

METHODS

We created a Markov decision analysis model with a base case of a patient at 24⁰ weeks gestation with antepartum hemorrhage. Decision strategies included immediate, delayed, and no ACS administration. Outcomes were based on the neonatal perspective and consisted of lifetime quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Data for model inputs were derived from current literature and clinical recommendations.

RESULTS

Our base case analysis revealed a preferred strategy of delaying ACSs for 2 weeks, which maximized QALYs (39.18 lifetime discounted), driven by reduced neonatal morbidity at the expense of 0.1% more neonatal deaths, when compared with immediate ACS administration. Sensitivity analyses identified that, if the probability of delivery within the next week was >6.19%, then immediate steroids were preferred. Other important variables included gestational age, ACS effectiveness, and ACS adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

ACS timing involves a trade-off between morbidity and mortality, and optimal timing depends on probability of delivery, gestational age, and risks and benefits of ACSs. Clinicians should carefully consider these factors prior to ACS administration.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Growth Disturbances-Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction, or an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile, is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Optimizing management for obtaining the most favorable outcome for mother and fetus is largely based on detailed ultrasound findings. Identifying and performing those ultrasound procedures that are most associated with adverse outcome is necessary for proper patient management. Transabdominal ultrasound is the mainstay of initial management and assessment of fetal growth. For those fetuses that are identified as small for gestational age, assessment of fetal well-being with biophysical profile and Doppler velocimetry provide vital information for differentiating those fetuses that may be compromised and may require delivery and those that are well compensated. Delivery of the pregnancy is primarily based upon the gestational age of the pregnancy and the ultrasound findings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The growth-restricted fetus: risk of mortality by each additional week of expectant management

OBJECTIVE

To compare fetal/infant mortality risk associated with each additional week of expectant management with the infant mortality risk of immediate delivery in growth-restricted pregnancies.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies from the 2005-2008 California Birth Registry comparing pregnancies affected and unaffected by growth restriction, defined using birth weights as a proxy for fetal growth restriction (FGR). Birth weights were subdivided as greater than the 90th percentile, between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile, and less than the 10th percentile. Cases greater than the 90th percentile were excluded from analysis. Cases less than the 10th percentile were considered to have FGR and were further subcategorized into <10th percentile, <5th percentile, and <3rd percentile. We compared the risk of infant death at each gestational age week against a composite risk representing the mortality risk of one additional week of expectant management.

RESULTS

We identified 1,641,000 births, of which 110,748 (6.7%) were less than 10th percentile. The risk of stillbirth increased with gestational age with the risk of stillbirth at each week of gestation inversely proportional to growth percentile. The risks of fetal and infant mortality with expectant management outweighed the risk of infant death for all FGR categories analyzed beginning at 38 weeks. However, the absolute risks differed by growth percentiles, with the highest risks of infant death and stillbirth in the <3rd percentile cohort. At 39 weeks, absolute risks were low, although the number needed to deliver to prevent 1 death ranged from 413 for <3rd percentile to 2667 in unaffected pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

At 38 weeks, the mortality risk of expectant management for one additional week exceeds the risk of delivery across all growth-restricted cohorts, despite variation in absolute risk by degree of growth restriction.

Late preterm and early term: when to induce a growth restricted fetus? A population-based study

PURPOSE

(1) Compare fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with induction of labor (IOL) versus expectant management (EM) in women with isolated fetal growth restriction (FGR) between 34^0/7 and 38^6/7 weeks; (2) Determine optimal gestational age for delivery of such fetuses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective population based cohort study of 2232 parturients with isolated FGR, including two groups: (1) IOL (n = 1428); 2) EM (n = 804).

RESULTS

IOL group had a lower stillbirth and neonatal death rates (p = .042, p < .001), higher 1 and 5 min Apgar scores and a higher vaginal delivery rate compared to the EM group. In the late preterm period, EM was associated with increased rate of low 1 and 5 min Apgar scores, nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing (NRFHR), stillbirth and neonatal death rate (p = .001, p = .039). In the early term cohort, EM was associated with a higher rate of NRFHR and low 1 min Apgar scores (p = .003, p = .002). IOL at 37 weeks protected from stillbirth but not from adverse composite neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

IOL of FGR fetuses at 37 weeks had a protective effect against stillbirth. In addition, at late preterm, it is associated with lower rates of stillbirth, neonatal death, and NRFHR.

Polymorphisms of Platelet Glycoprotein Receptors and Cell Adhesion Molecules in Fetuses with Fetal Growth Restriction and Their Mothers As Detected with Pyrosequencing

BACKGROUND

Vascular thrombotic tendency may lead to fetal growth restriction (FGR). Altered platelet function and genetic heterogeneity may play a role in this procedure. We investigated whether maternal or fetal genotypic frequencies of genes polymorphisms for certain platelet receptor and cell adhesion molecules are altered in FGR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the maternal and fetal genotypic frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in four genes coding for platelet receptors and cell adhesion molecules [integrin alpha subunit 2 (ITGA2)C807T, integrin subunit beta 3(ITGB3) T1565C, platelet cell adhesion protein 1 (PECAM1) CTG-GTG and selectin P(SELP)A/C]. A total of 32 fetuses with fetal growth restriction and their mothers were matched with 18 normal controls. Using maternal venous blood and umbilical cord blood samples, nucleotide sequences were determined from pyrograms. Genotypic frequencies were calculated and analyzed using appropriate tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the proportion of heterozygotes or homozygotes for any of the genotypic frequencies between FGR and control groups in mothers or fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated no association of maternal or fetal ITGA2 C807T SNP, ITGB3 T1565C SNP, PECAM1 CTG - GTG and SELP A/C polymorphisms with FGR.