Antenatal magnesium sulfate and neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants born to preeclamptic mothers

Antenatal Magnesium Sulfate and adverse gastrointestinal outcomes in Preterm infants-a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of antenatal magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on mortality and morbidity outcomes related to the gastrointestinal system (GI) in preterm infants.

METHODS

Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in November 2022. PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier), and CENTRAL (Ovid) were searched. There were 6695 references. After deduplication, 4332 remained. Ninety-nine full-text articles were assessed and forty four articles were included in the final analysis.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials and observational studies that evaluated at least one of the pre-specified outcomes were included. Preterm infants whose mothers were given antenatal MgSO4 were included and whose mothers did not receive antenatal MgSO4 were the comparators. The main outcomes and measures were: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (stage ≥ 2), surgical NEC, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), feeding intolerance, time to reach full feeds, and GI-associated mortality.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to yield pooled OR and its 95% CI for each outcome due to expected heterogeneity in the studies. The analysis for each predefined outcome was performed separately for adjusted and unadjusted comparisons. All included studies were assessed for methodological quality. The risk of bias was assessed using elements of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS), respectively. The study findings were reported as per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of thirty-eight NRS and six RCTs involving 51,466 preterm infants were included in the final analysis. There were no increased odds of stage ≥2 NEC, (NRS : n = 45,524, OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.84-1.08, I2- 5% & RCT's: n = 5205 OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.89-1.12, I2- 0%), SIP (n = 34,186, OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.94-1.58, I2-30%), feeding intolerance (n = 414, OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.64-1.76, I2-12%) in infants exposed to antenatal MgSO4. On the contrary, the incidence of surgical NEC was significantly lower in MgSO4 exposure infants (n = 29,506 OR:0.74; 95% CI: 0.62-0.90, ARR: 0.47%). Studies assessing the effect on GI-related mortality were limited to make any conceivable conclusion. The certainty of evidence (CoE) for all outcomes was adjudged as 'very low' as per GRADE.

CONCLUSION

Antenatal magnesium sulfate did not increase the incidence of gastrointestinal-related morbidities or mortality in preterm infants. With the current evidence concerns, regarding the adverse effects of MgSO4 administration leading to NEC/SIP or GI-related mortality in preterm infants should not be a hurdle in its routine use in antenatal mothers.

Neuroprotective effect of magnesium supplementation on cerebral ischemic diseases

Ischemic encephalopathy is associated with a high mortality and rate of disability. The most common type of ischemic encephalopathy, ischemic stroke, is the second leading cause of death in the world. At present, the main treatment for ischemic stroke is to reopen blocked blood vessels. However, despite revascularization, many patients are not able to achieve good functional results. At the same time, the strict time window (<4.5 h) of thrombolytic therapy limits clinical application. Therefore, it is important to explore effective neuroprotective drugs for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Magnesium is a natural calcium antagonist, which exerts neuroprotective effects through various mechanisms. However, while most basic studies have shown that magnesium supplementation can help treat cerebral ischemia, intravenous magnesium supplementation in large clinical trials has failed to improve prognosis of ischemic patients. Therefore, we review the basic and clinical studies of magnesium supplementation for cerebral ischemia. According to the route of administration, treatment can be divided into intraperitoneal magnesium supplementation, intravenous magnesium supplementation, arterial magnesium supplementation and intracranial magnesium supplementation. We also summarized the potential influencing factors of magnesium ion intervention in cerebral ischemia injury. Finally, in combination with influencing factors derived from basic research, this article proposes three future research directions, including magnesium supplementation into the circulatory system combined with magnesium supplementation in the lateral ventricle, magnesium supplementation in the lateral ventricle combined with hypothermia therapy, and lateral ventricle magnesium supplementation combined with intracarotid magnesium supplementation combined with selective hypothermia.

The effect of antenatal magnesium sulfate on intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis study was to determine the pooled estimate of the effect of antenatal magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in premature infants.

METHODS

Two review authors independently searched all randomized clinical trials from international databases, including Medline (PubMed), Web of Sciences, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Research Registers of ongoing trials (ClinicalTrials.gov), from January 1989 to August 2017. Two independent review authors were responsible for data collection. After extracting the necessary information from the evaluated articles, metaanalysis of the data was performed using Stata version 14. Also, sources of heterogeneity among studies were determined by Meta regression.

RESULTS

In this study, among 126 articles that were extracted from primary studies, 7 papers that evaluated the effect of MgSO4 on IVH were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that pooled relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.03) for the effect of MgSO4 on IVH.

CONCLUSION

RESULTS

of this study showed that although MgSO4 had a protective effect on IVH in premature infants, this effect was not statistically significant. Further studies are needed to determine the best dosage, timing, and gestational age to achieve the optimum effect of MgSO4 on IVH.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Identifier: CRD42019119610.

Antenatal magnesium sulphate and adverse neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is widespread, increasing use of magnesium sulphate in obstetric practice for pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and preterm fetal neuroprotection; benefit for preventing preterm labour and birth (tocolysis) is unproven. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether antenatal magnesium sulphate is associated with unintended adverse neonatal outcomes.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

CINAHL, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE, Embase, TOXLINE, and Web of Science, were searched (inceptions to 3 September 2019). Randomised, quasi-randomised, and non-randomised trials, cohort and case-control studies, and case reports assessing antenatal magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, fetal neuroprotection, or tocolysis, compared with placebo/no treatment or a different magnesium sulphate regimen, were included. The primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included pre-specified and non-pre-specified adverse neonatal outcomes. Two reviewers screened 5,890 articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias following Cochrane Handbook and RTI Item Bank guidance. For randomised trials, pooled risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis. Non-randomised data were tabulated and narratively summarised. We included 197 studies (40 randomised trials, 138 non-randomised studies, and 19 case reports), of mixed quality. The 40 trials (randomising 19,265 women and their babies) were conducted from 1987 to 2018 across high- (16 trials) and low/middle-income countries (23 trials) (1 mixed). Indications included pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (24 trials), fetal neuroprotection (7 trials), and tocolysis (9 trials); 18 trials compared magnesium sulphate with placebo/no treatment, and 22 compared different regimens. For perinatal death, no clear difference in randomised trials was observed between magnesium sulphate and placebo/no treatment (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10; 8 trials, 13,654 babies), nor between regimens. Eleven of 138 non-randomised studies reported on perinatal death. Only 1 cohort (127 babies; moderate to high risk of bias) observed an increased risk of perinatal death with >48 versus ≤48 grams magnesium sulphate exposure for tocolysis. No clear secondary adverse neonatal outcomes were observed in randomised trials, and a very limited number of possible adverse outcomes warranting further consideration were identified in non-randomised studies. Where non-randomised studies observed possible harms, often no or few confounders were controlled for (moderate to high risk of bias), samples were small (200 babies or fewer), and/or results were from subgroup analyses. Limitations include missing data for important outcomes across most studies, heterogeneity of included studies, and inclusion of published data only.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support clear associations between antenatal magnesium sulphate for beneficial indications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Further large, high-quality studies (prospective cohorts or individual participant data meta-analyses) assessing specific outcomes, or the impact of regimen, pregnancy, or birth characteristics on these outcomes, would further inform safety recommendations. PROSPERO: CRD42013004451.

Fetal neurology: Principles and practice with a life-course perspective

Clinical service, educational, and research components of a fetal/neonatal neurology program are anchored by the disciplines of developmental origins of health and disease and life-course science as programmatic principles. Prenatal participation provides perspectives on maternal, fetal, and placental contributions to health or disease for fetal and subsequent neonatal neurology consultations. This program also provides an early-life diagnostic perspective for neurologic specialties concerned with brain health and disease throughout childhood and adulthood. Animal models and birth cohort studies have demonstrated how the science of epigenetics helps to understand gene-environment interactions to better predict brain health or disease. Fetal neurology consultations provide important diagnostic contributions during critical or sensitive periods of brain development when future neurotherapeutic interventions will maximize adaptive neuroplasticity. Age-specific normative neuroinformatics databases that employ computer-based strategies to integrate clinical/demographic, neuroimaging, neurophysiologic, and genetic datasets will more accurately identify either symptomatic patients or those at risk for brain disorders who would benefit from preventive, rescue, or reparative treatment choices throughout the life span.

Sex Differences in Brain Injury and Repair in Newborn Infants: Clinical Evidence and Biological Mechanisms

Differences in the development of the male and female brain are an evolving area of investigation. We are beginning to understand the underpinnings of male and female advantages due to differences in brain development as well as the consequences following hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the newborn. The two main factors that appear to affect outcomes are gestation age at the time of injury and sex of the subject. This review starts with a summary of differences in the anatomy and physiology of the developing male and female brain. This is followed by a review of the major factors responsible for the observed differences in the face of normal development and hypoxic injury. The last section reviews the response of male and female subjects to various neuroprotective strategies that are currently being used and where there is a need for additional information for more precise therapy based on the sex of the infant.

Neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: an update on disease pathogenesis and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is the most important reason for morbidity and mortality in term-born infants. Understanding pathophysiology of the brain damage is essential for the early detection of patients with high risk for HIE and development of strategies for their treatments. Areas covered: This review discusses pathophysiology of the neonatal HIE and its treatment options, including hypothermia, melatonin, allopurinol, topiramate, erythropoietin, N-acetylcyctein, magnesium sulphate and xenon. Expert commentary: Several clinical studies have been performed in order to decrease the risk of brain injury due to difficulties in the early diagnosis and treatment, and to develop strategies for better long-term outcomes. Although currently standard treatment methods include therapeutic hypothermia for neonates with moderate to severe HIE, new supportive options are needed to enhance neuroprotective effects of the hypothermia, which should aim to reduce production of the free radicals and to have anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic actions.

Magnesium sulfate protects oligodendrocyte lineage cells in a rat cell-culture model of hypoxic-ischemic injury

Hypoxic-ischemic (HI) brain injury in newborns results in serious damage. Magnesium sulfate has been clinically used as a cyto-protective agent against HI brain injury in newborns in some countries, including Japan. However, it is not clear how magnesium exerts this effect and how it acts on the individual types of cells within the newborn brain. In this study, we exposed cultured rat oligodendrocyte precursor cells to magnesium sulfate during the period when they differentiate into oligodendrocytes, and showed that magnesium-exposed oligodendrocytes exhibited more resistance to HI injury. Our data may support the use of magnesium sulfate in the clinical setting.