A comparison between the two methods of magnesium sulfate administration for duration of 12 versus 24 h after delivery in patients with severe preeclampsia

Early magnesium discontinuation postpartum and eclampsia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal duration of magnesium administration postpartum for prevention of eclampsia has not yet been established. Our objective was to investigate the effect of early discontinuation of postpartum magnesium on the rates of postpartum eclampsia compared to continuation for 24-hours postpartum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Searches were performed using keywords related to "preeclampsia" and "magnesium sulfate" from inception of database until August 2023. Randomized controlled trials of women with preeclampsia were included if they received magnesium prior to delivery and were randomized to early discontinuation versus 24-hours of magnesium postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of postpartum eclampsia.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs with 2183 women were included with five different magnesium administration time frames. In total, seven patients with postpartum eclampsia were reported in three studies. Eclampsia rates were not different between the two groups (5/1088 (0.5 %) after early discontinuation, versus 2/1095 (0.2 %) in the 24-hour group; RR 2.25, 95 % CI 0.5-9.9, I2 = 0 %, 8 studies, 2183 participants). A number needed to treat was calculated; 374 women would need to receive 24-hours of magnesium postpartum to prevent one episode of postpartum eclampsia. The early discontinuation group had a significant decrease in time to ambulation (-9.1 h, 95 % CI -14.7 - (-3.6), I2 = 98 %, 3 studies, 1509 participants) and breastfeeding (-8.4 h, 95 % CI -12.0 - (-4.8), I2 = 98 %, 2 studies, 1397 participants).

CONCLUSIONS

Early magnesium discontinuation postpartum, usually ≤6 h or none at all, did not significantly increase the rate of postpartum eclampsia, however this study is likely underpowered to demonstrate a difference. The number needed to treat is similar to the number needed to treat for antepartum preeclampsia without severe features, for which magnesium is not recommended. The largest proportion of women did not receive magnesium postpartum after receiving at least 8 h of magnesium intrapartum (e.g., loading and maintenance dose). Thus, it is reasonable to consider not using magnesium postpartum, particularly if a woman has received similar adequate dose prior to delivery.

Evaluation of antihypertensives for post partum management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence that directly shows the best antihypertensive treatment options for post partum management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Our objective was to analyze the safest and most effective antihypertensive drugs post partum for patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE were searched to find relevant articles published from inception to Feb 2024. We included randomized control trials, in English, featuring a population of postnatal women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or postpartum women with de novo hypertension with a follow-up of up to 6 months in which any antihypertensive medication was compared with Placebo or a comparison between different doses of antihypertensives was done. The statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that almost all antihypertensives are effective in treating postpartum hypertension. However, some medications had alternating roles in controlling specific outcomes. Using calcium channel blockers resulted in a faster time to sustain BP control than the control (SMD: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.01; P = 0.04). In contrast, using ACE inhibitors or ARBs demanded the use of other antihypertensives in contrast to all other drugs assessed (RR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.07 to 4.07; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Timely management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy postpartum is life-saving. All the traditional antihypertensives we assessed effectively manage hypertension postpartum, thus allowing the physician to tailor the particular drug regimen according to the patient's needs and comorbidities without any hindrance.

Efficacy and safety of 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate in management of patients with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Magnesium sulfate is the most utilized anticonvulsant for treating patients with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 12-h regimen of magnesium sulfate outweighs the 24-h regimen in both efficacy and safety in the management of patients with mild or severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.

METHODS

We searched six electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Google Scholar. This search was conducted to yield any studies that were published until 15 January 2023. We did the statistical analysis plan by Review Manager Software version 5.4.

RESULTS

We included 13 randomized control trials with 2813 patients in this systematic review. Our meta-analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the 12-h regimen of the magnesium sulfate group and the 24-h regimen of the magnesium sulfate group in our outcome of interest: occurrence of seizure (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.00], P = 0.56), diminished deep tendon reflexes (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.80), respiratory depression (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.01], P = 0.57), and pulmonary edema (RD: -0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no statistically significant difference in effectiveness and toxicity risk between the 12-h and 24-h regimens.

Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia

BACKGROUND

Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of women with eclampsia. Regimens for administration of this drug have evolved over the years, but there is no clarity on the comparative benefits or harm of alternative regimens. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if one magnesium sulphate regimen is better than another when used for the care of women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both, to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality for the woman and her baby.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (29 April 2022), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials comparing different regimens for administration of magnesium sulphate used in women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or both. Comparisons included different dose regimens, intramuscular versus intravenous route for maintenance therapy, and different durations of therapy. We excluded studies with quasi-random or cross-over designs. We included abstracts of conference proceedings if compliant with the trustworthiness assessment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two review authors assessed trials for inclusion, performed risk of bias assessment, and extracted data. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update, a total of 16 trials (3020 women) met our inclusion criteria: four trials (409 women) compared regimens for women with eclampsia, and 12 trials (2611 women) compared regimens for women with pre-eclampsia. Most of the included trials had small sample sizes and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Eleven trials reported adequate randomisation and allocation concealment. Blinding of participants and clinicians was not possible in most trials. The included studies were for the most part at low risk of attrition and reporting bias. Treatment of women with eclampsia (four comparisons) One trial compared a loading dose-alone regimen with a loading dose plus maintenance dose regimen (80 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsions or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial compared a lower-dose regimen with standard-dose regimen over 24 hours (72 women). It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on the risk of recurrence of convulsion, severe morbidity, perinatal death, or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (137 women) compared intravenous (IV) versus standard intramuscular (IM) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either route has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, death of the baby before discharge (stillbirth and neonatal death), or maternal death (very low-certainty evidence). One trial (120 women) compared a short maintenance regimen with a standard (24 hours after birth) maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on recurrence of convulsions, severe morbidity, or side effects such as nausea and respiratory failure. A short maintenance regimen may reduce the risk of flushing when compared to a standard 24 hours maintenance regimen (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.93; 1 trial, 120 women; low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials. Prevention of eclampsia for women with pre-eclampsia (five comparisons) Two trials (462 women) compared loading dose alone with loading dose plus maintenance therapy. Low-certainty evidence suggests an uncertain effect with either regimen on the risk of eclampsia (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 6.54; 2 trials, 462 women) or perinatal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.36; 2 trials, 462 women). One small trial (17 women) compared an IV versus IM maintenance regimen for 24 hours. It is uncertain whether IV or IM maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia or stillbirth (very low-certainty evidence). Four trials (1713 women) compared short postpartum maintenance regimens with continuing for 24 hours after birth. Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a wide range of benefit or harm between groups regarding eclampsia (RR 1.99, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.87; 4 trials, 1713 women). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be little or no effect on severe morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.29; 2 trials, 1233 women) or side effects such as respiratory depression (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61; 2 trials, 1424 women). Three trials (185 women) compared a higher-dose maintenance regimen versus a lower-dose maintenance regimen. It is uncertain whether either regimen has an effect on eclampsia (very low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests that a higher-dose maintenance regimen has little or no effect on side effects when compared to a lower-dose regimen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01; 1 trial 62 women). One trial (200 women) compared a maintenance regimen by continuous infusion versus a serial IV bolus regimen. It is uncertain whether the duration of the maintenance regimen has an effect on eclampsia, side effects, perinatal death, maternal death, or other neonatal morbidity (very low-certainty evidence). Many of our prespecified critical outcomes were not reported in the included trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the number of trials evaluating various magnesium sulphate regimens for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment, there is still no compelling evidence that one particular regimen is more effective than another. Well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to answer this question.

Duration of Postpartum Magnesium Sulphate for the Prevention of Eclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the optimal duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate to prevent eclampsia.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception until January 2020 and limited to English-language human randomized controlled trials. Search strategy included the key works "eclampsia," "magnesium sulphate," and "postpartum."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Title, abstract, and full-text review was performed using Covidence data-management software. Of the 3,629 articles screened, 10 studies were included in the final review. Studies were included if they compared two different time points of magnesium sulphate postpartum in women with either preeclampsia or eclampsia.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

Two authors reviewed studies independently. RevMan software was used to calculate risk difference (RD) for categorical outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes. Shorter duration of magnesium sulphate (12 hours or less) was not associated with increased risk of eclampsia compared with 24-hour postpartum regimens (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.01, I2 70%). Studies randomizing women with preeclampsia did not show increased risk of eclampsia with shorter regimens (RD 0, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, I2 0%), nor did trials randomizing those with eclampsia (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.07, I2 87%). Secondary outcomes, including flushing, duration of Foley catheter insertion, time to ambulation, and duration of hospital stay, were all reduced with shorter-duration magnesium sulphate.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that a shorter duration of postpartum magnesium sulphate does not increase the risk for eclamptic seizure; however, data remain underpowered to render firm conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020182432.

A novel 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate regimen in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia in Ghana (MOPEP Study): A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia.

METHODS

This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.

Increased Cardiac Arrhythmia After Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension: A South Korean Nationwide Database Study

Background

Although pregnancy‐induced hypertension (PIH) is associated with an elevated cardiovascular risk, long‐term studies or prepregnancy baseline data are scarce. Therefore, using a large nationwide cohort with prepregnancy periodic health screening data, we investigated whether clinically significant arrhythmia incidence increases after PIH.

Methods and Results

Data were extracted from the Korea National Health Insurance database and combined with the National Health Screening Examination database; women who gave birth between 2007 and 2015 and underwent the national health screening test within a year before pregnancy were followed up until 2016. We excluded women who had a diagnosis of arrhythmia within 1 year before pregnancy. The primary outcome was significant arrhythmia during the year after delivery. Secondary analysis included only specific diagnostic codes of arrhythmia with clinical significance. Additionally, the risk of arrhythmia was stratified by the use of magnesium sulfate. Of 2 035 684 women (PIH; n=37 297 versus normotensive pregnancy; n=1 998 387), the PIH group had a higher prepregnancy risk profile and showed a higher incidence of arrhythmia than women with normotensive pregnancies within 1 year. Women with PIH had a significantly higher risk of atrial flutter/fibrillation and atrioventricular block, but not lethal arrhythmias. Other predictors of arrhythmia development included advanced maternal age and cesarean section. Stratified analysis showed a higher risk of arrhythmia with magnesium sulfate use.

Conclusions

PIH was significantly associated with the development of arrhythmia within 1 year after delivery. Nevertheless, the incidence of lethal arrhythmias was not increased by PIH. Arrhythmia, especially atrial fibrillation, may largely contribute to increasing the future cardiovascular risk in women with a PIH history.

Guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

METHODS

The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia were published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analysed according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.

Duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis in women with preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia are at increased risk of eclampsia. Magnesium sulfate is the standard of care for maternal seizure prophylaxis. Traditional regimens of magnesium sulfate have continued infusions for 24 h postpartum. More recent evidence suggests shortened courses of postpartum magnesium sulfate. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether the duration of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis in women with preeclampsia affects the incidence of seizures postpartum.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed from inception until 1 May 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two hundred and fifty-three studies were reviewed by three individual authors. Inclusion criteria were as follows: published, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia who received a maintenance infusion of magnesium sulfate in the postpartum period. Studies were excluded if either arm did not provide maintenance dosing of magnesium sulfate in the postpartum period. We also excluded ongoing, unpublished, and non-randomized trials.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (n = 1369) were included in the systematic review. Data were abstracted and reviewed by three authors, then entered into Review Manager data software. The primary outcome of eclampsia was reported in all nine studies. An eclamptic event occurred in 2/696 women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium compared to 0/673 events in women who received ≥24 h of postpartum magnesium (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01, 0.01; p=.71). Women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate had a significantly faster time to ambulation postpartum (MD -10.57, 95% CI -17.43, -3.71; p=.003) and shorter durations of indwelling urinary catheter placement (MD -18.97, 95% CI -34.64, -3.29; p=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

As eclampsia is a rare occurrence, this review was not powered to show a difference in the rate of eclampsia. However, the two cases of eclampsia that were reported occurred in the group of women who received <24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate. Therefore, the results of this systematic review support continued use of 24 h of postpartum magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis.

Shortened postpartum magnesium sulfate treatment vs traditional 24h for severe preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the benefits and risks of shortened magnesium sulfate with traditional 24 h for severe postpartum preeclampsia.Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane, Embase, Web of science and Pubmed database from inception till May 15 2019. Studies included type is limited to randomized controlled trial (RCT). Pooled risks difference (RDs), odds risks (ORs), mean difference (MD), standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confifidence intervals (CIs) were used to summarize the effect sizes.Results: Totally studies included are 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Shortened magnesium sulfate treatment has the same risk as eclampsia (RD 0.00, 95%CI-0.01-0.01) and total complications (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15), however, significant difference was observed in both groups pertaining to flushing (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.82), and the need for prolonged treatment (RD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.1), Others factors,namely the benefits of shortened magnesium sulfate treatment,showed differences in both groups.Conclusions: Shortened postpartum magnesium sulfate treatment was as effective as traditional 24 h magnesium sulfate in seizure prevention and total complications. But flushing and needed for prolonged treatment in the shortened groups warrants further research.

Inadequate safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Randomised trials and their syntheses in meta-analyses offer a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and severity of adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic search using bibliographic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE, from inception to August 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials evaluating anticonvulsant or antihypertensive medication for pre-eclampsia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics appraising the adequacy of adverse reaction and toxicity reporting.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 randomised trials. Six trials (10%) were registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, two registry records referred to adverse reactions, stating 'safety and toleration' and 'possible side effects' would be collected. Twenty-six trials (43%) stated the frequency of withdrawals within each study arm, and five trials (8%) adequately reported these withdrawals. Adverse reactions were inconsistently reported across eligible trials: 24 (40%) reported no serious adverse reactions and 36 (60%) reported no mild adverse reactions. The methods of definition or measurement of adverse reactions were infrequently reported within published trial reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-eclampsia trials regularly omit critical information related to safety. Despite the paucity of reporting, randomised trials collect an enormous amount of safety data. Developing and implementing a minimum data set could help to improve safety reporting, permitting a more balanced assessment of interventions by considering the trade-off between the benefits and harms.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (DRF-2014-07-051), UK; Maternity Forum, Royal Society of Medicine, UK.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Developing @coreoutcomes could help to improve safety reporting in #preeclampsia trials. @NIHR_DC.