Evaluation of obstetrical patients with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy - tertiary center experience

Risk Assessment of Critical Obstetric Bleeding With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

BACKGROUND

Use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the peripartum period is considered to be a higher risk of critical obstetric bleeding compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). However, the evidence for the safety of using LMWH during the peripartum period is currently lacking.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated a nationwide medical database to clarify the safety of using LMWH during childbirth. The Japanese Nationwide Diagnosis Procedure Combination database was retrospectively reviewed, and data from women with childbirth between 2018 and 2022 were collected.

RESULTS

Among the overall 354,299 women with childbirth, 3,099 were with obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 484 were with critical obstetric bleeding requiring massive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion ≥4,000 cc, and 38 were with maternal death. Among the overall women, each of the anticoagulants other than LMWH was associated with critical obstetrical bleeding with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) greater than 1.0, while LMWH was not associated with critical obstetrical bleeding (aOR, 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.11-2.71)). This finding did not change in subgroup analyses among those with Cesarean section. Furthermore, UFH was associated with critical bleeding among the 3,099 women with obstetrical DIC (aOR, 3.91 (2.83-5.46)), while LMWH was not (aOR, 0.26 (0.03-1.37)).

CONCLUSION

The use of UFH was significantly associated with an increased critical obstetric hemorrhage requiring massive RBC transfusion or total hysterectomy. Meanwhile, the use of LMWH was not associated with increased critical obstetric bleeding. LMWH would be safer than UFH to be used for women during childbirth.

The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria in intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) has been assessed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) 2001 and the ISTH 2018-modified version. More investigations are needed to assess usability and visibility of those DIC scoring systems in the intensive care units (ICU).

AIMS

This study investigated the predictive performance of the ISTH-Overt DIC versions of 28-day mortality in ICUs compared to SOFA as a gold standard assessment tool of sepsis.

METHODS

A retrospective design (2015-2017) included 220 adult patients enrolled from medical and surgical ICUs in two major hospitals in Jordan. We calculated ISTH-Overt DIC scores and SOFA score on time of DIC diagnosis. Overt DIC was categorized based on a score of ≥ five for ISTH DIC 2001; and ≥ 4 for ISTH DIC 2018. Provided, a score > 12 was categorized as Multiple-Organ- Dysfunction-Syndrome (MODS) for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Then, 28-day mortality follow-up was performed.

RESULTS

More than half of sample died before 28-days of follow-up. The analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) showed that higher scores of ISTH DIC 2001(≥ 5), ISTH DIC 2018 (≥ 4), and SOFA score (>12) were highly associated with 28-day mortality. The ISTH DIC 2001 and SOFA score were superior on the modified ISTH 2018 in predicting 28-day mortality, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of (0.724 vs. 0.822 vs. 0.507, respectively). Yet, the accuracy of the SOFA score was better than the ISTH DIC 2001.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ISTH DIC 2001 score is helpful when applied on medical and surgical ICU Jordanian populations. It showed better results compared to the Modified ISTH DIC 2018 in mortality prediction, regardless of the underlying diseases.