Improving the ultrasound detection of isolated fetal limb abnormalities

Evaluation of medical malpractice claims in obstetric ultrasonography: Opinion of The Council of Forensic Medicine in Turkey

AIM

The Council of Forensic Medicine is an institution affiliated with the Ministry of Justice in the Republic of Turkey which acts in an official oversight capacity in cases of alleged medical malpractice in forensic medical science. Sonographers may face judicial sanctions as a result of ultrasonography examinations that they do not perform according to current guidelines. In this study we focused our attention to claims of medical malpractice related to obstetric ultrasonography that had been referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine. Our aim was to investigate the causes of malpractice claims related to obstetric ultrasonography and to present the expert opinions of our council about these claims in the light of literature. We have also planned to discuss what can be done with current guideline information to prevent situations that cause malpractice claims.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study herein was performed on 73 claims of medical malpractice in obstetric ultrasonography findings, all of which were referred by forensic authorities to the Second Specialization Board of Council Forensic Medicine from 2014 to 2018. A retrospective review of the reports generated from information contained within case files illuminates the reasoning behind medical error claims. Among the reasons examined are features of the ultrasonographic evaluation (number, week of examination, health institution), the traits of the evaluating physicians (institutions, branches, academic titles), congenital anomalies detected after birth, and maternal age.

RESULTS

Analysis of the data shows that 79.5% of ultrasonographic examinations leading to claims of medical malpractice were performed in private health institutions. All cases of medical malpractice claims were associated with undiagnosed congenital anomalies, and that the form for informed consent was obtained for only 19.1% of cases that underwent second level ultrasonographic examination. Further, 53.3% of cases with congenital anomalies subject to litigation were anomalies of the extremities, and all four cases of alleged malpractice within obstetric ultrasonography were associated with extremity anomalies. The variety of academic titles of physicians performing the ultrasonographic examinations was not statistically significant. It was concluded that two ultrasonography examinations performed by two nuclear medicine specialists were not in accordance with medical norms.

CONCLUSION

Although organizations such as AIUM, ACR, and ACOG try to set standards for ultrasound examination through practice guidelines, it is difficult to establish optimal standards for ultrasonographic examination. In light of the guidelines created by the above organizations, each country should set its own standard based on their own socioeconomic and health data. We conclude that it is not appropriate for obstetric ultrasonographic examinations to be performed by specialists in fields such as nuclear medicine, where ultrasonographic examinations are not a part of the core training curriculum. Obtaining a signed informed consent form from the patient prior to the second level ultrasonography examination will be useful for medicolegal defense purposes should a subsequent claim of malpractice be filed.

Swedish parents' experiences of their role in treatment for children with congenital limb reduction deficiency: Decision-making and treatment support

BACKGROUND

Parents of children with congenital limb reduction deficiency have an essential role in making treatment decisions during their child's first years of life. Treatment options usually concern surgical and/or prosthetic treatment. To tailor treatment options to fit different family values and priorities, the family-centred approach indicates the importance of understanding the parental role in partnership with health care professionals. The aim of this study was to describe parents' experiences of their role in decision-making and treatment for children with congenital limb reduction deficiency.

METHODS

A descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 parents (12 mothers and 5 fathers) of children with upper and/or lower limb deficiency (mean age 5.9 years). The interview data were analysed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

RESULTS

Two major themes emerged from the data. The first theme, being a decision maker for someone else, was described as an ambivalent parental role, including collaboration within the family and with health care professionals. The second theme, becoming and being a treatment supporter in the child's everyday life, was made up of four categories: being a supporter of the child in everyday activities, mentoring the child to handle encounters with others, becoming a coordinator of information and being an 'extended arm' of the health care provision for the child.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhances our understanding of the parental role in decision-making and treatment for children with congenital limb reduction deficiency. The results may contribute to the continued development of the family-centred service approach by providing guidelines for treatment programmes, with the goal of improving decision support and broadening the support for parents during treatment for these children.

Two case reports: Early detection of amniotic band syndrome by adhesion between hand and umbilical cord at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation

RATIONALE

The significant ultrasonic characteristics of amniotic band syndrome (ABS) are the malformations of fetal affected parts and the band-like echoes in amniotic cavity. This article first suggests that the fetal hand adhered to umbilical cord with restricted movement provides some values in the diagnosis of ABS in early gestational weeks especially when the fetal malformation is not obvious and amniotic band is thin and fine.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Two pregnant women had no discomfort and underwent routine ultrasound examination at 11 to 14 gestational weeks.

DIAGNOSIS

Only the fetal hand adhered to umbilical cord with restricted movement was detected during the first ultrasound examination at 11∼14 gestational weeks, and the floating band-like echos were detected in the amniotic cavity with follow-up examinations 2 to 3 weeks later. Both of the 2 fetus were diagnosed as ABS by ultrasound INTERVENTIONS:: The two pregnant women underwent the prenatal counseling and were recommended closely follow-up and further examination.

OUTCOMES

Two fetuses died in utero between 17 and 19 weeks. After induction of labor, it was found that the hands and umbilical cord of the fetuses were wrapped by amniotic bands, which was proved pathologically as ABS.

LESSONS

The adhesion of the fetal hand and umbilical cord is an important ultrasonic sign suggesting ABS with poor prognosis in early pregnancy. We hope that this study can provide some guidance for the early diagnosis of ABS during 11 to 14 week's ultrasound examination.