Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the Etymotic Research ER-10C otoacoustic emission probe

Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds

When referred to baseline measures, serial monitoring of pure-tone behavioral thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) can be used to detect the progression of cochlear damage. Semi-logarithmic DPOAE input-output (I/O) functions enable the computation of estimated distortion-product thresholds (EDPTs) by means of linear regression, a metric that provides a quantitative estimate of hearing loss due to cochlear-amplifier degradation. DPOAE wave interference and a suboptimal choice of stimulus levels limit the accuracy of EDPTs. This work identifies the test-retest reliability of EDPTs derived from short-pulse DPOAE level maps (EDPT_LM), a method that circumvents limitations associated with both wave interference and suboptimal choice of stimulus levels. The test-retest reliability was compared to that of EDPTs derived from semi-logarithmic I/O functions (EDPT_I/O) and that of behavioral thresholds acquired with pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and modified Békésy tracking audiometry (TA) to provide a foundation for identifying and interpreting significant threshold shifts. The DPOAE-based auditory thresholds (EDPT_LM and EDPT_I/O) and behavioral thresholds (PTA and TA) were recorded seven times within three months at 14 frequencies with f₂ = 1-14 kHz in 20 ears from ten subjects with normal hearing (4PTA_0.5-4kHz < 20 dB HL). To obtain EDPT_LM, short-pulse DPOAEs were recorded using 21 L₁,L₂ pairs. Reconstruction of DPOAE growth behavior as a function of L₁ and L₂ using nonlinear curve fitting enabled the derivation of EDPT_LM for each frequency. Test-retest reliability was determined using three different approaches: 1) centered thresholds, 2) average threshold differences, and 3) average absolute threshold differences, between each possible test session (N = 21). Test-retest reliability based on centered thresholds and average threshold differences showed no statistically significant difference between EDPT_LM, EDPT_I/O, PTA, and TA for the pooled analysis incorporating all stimulus frequencies. Average absolute threshold differences presented small but significant differences in test-retest reliability with median values of 3.00 dB for PTA, 3.20 dB for TA, 3.34 dB for EDPT_LM, and 3.51 dB for EDPT_I/O. A considerable frequency dependence of test-retest reliability was found; namely, the highest test-retest reliability was for EDPT_LM at f₂ = 11 - 14 kHz. Otherwise, at lower frequencies, the highest test-retest reliability was for TA at f₂ =1 - 2 kHz. Overall, the test-retest reliability of EDPT_LM was better than that of EDPT_I/O and was similar to that for behavioral thresholds. Hence, deriving EDPT_LM from individual level maps is a promising and sensitive method for objectively monitoring the state of the cochlea. Furthermore, the detection of an equidirectional threshold change at a single frequency in both EDPT_LM and TA might allow reducing the threshold shift as indication of a follow-up examination from the clinical standard of 10 dB down to 5 dB. This stricter indicator might be beneficial when monitoring cochlear damage, for example ototoxicity, in the presence of (remnant) cochlear amplification at baseline.