Modifying the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: looking beyond the FEV1

COPD: Providing the right treatment for the right patient at the right time

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality that is both preventable and treatable. However, a major challenge in recognizing, preventing, and treating COPD is understanding its complexity. While COPD has historically been characterized as a disease defined by airflow limitation, we now understand it as a multi-component disease with many clinical phenotypes, systemic manifestations, and associated co-morbidities. Evidence is rapidly emerging in our understanding of the many factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD and the identification of "early" or "pre-COPD" which should provide exciting opportunities for early treatment and disease modification. In addition to breakthroughs in our understanding of the origins of COPD, we are optimizing treatment strategies and delivery of care that are showing impressive benefits in patient-centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. This special issue of Respiratory Medicine, "COPD: Providing the Right Treatment for the Right Patient at the Right Time" is a summary of the proceedings of a conference held in Stresa, Italy in April 2022 that brought together international experts to discuss emerging evidence in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in honor of a distinguished friend and colleague, Claudio Ferdinando Donor (1948-2021). Claudio was a true pioneer in the field of pulmonary rehabilitation and the comprehensive care of individuals with COPD. He held numerous leadership roles in in the field, provide editorial stewardship of several respiratory journals, authored numerous papers, statement and guidelines in COPD and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and provided mentorship to many in our field. Claudio's most impressive talent was his ability to organize spectacular conferences and symposia that highlighted cutting edge science and clinical medicine. It is in this spirit that this conference was conceived and planned. These proceedings are divided into 4 sections which highlight crucial areas in the field of COPD: (1) New concepts in COPD pathogenesis; (2) Enhancing outcomes in COPD; (3) Non-pharmacologic management of COPD; and (4) Optimizing delivery of care for COPD. These presentations summarize the newest evidence in the field and capture lively discussion on the exciting future of treating this prevalent and impactful disease. We thank each of the authors for their participation and applaud their efforts toward pushing the envelope in our understanding of COPD and optimizing care for these patients. We believe that this edition is a most fitting tribute to a dear colleague and friend and will prove useful to students, clinicians, and researchers as they continually strive to provide the right treatment for the right patient at the right time. It has been our pleasure and a distinct honor to serve as editors and oversee such wonderful scholarly work.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps

Key characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) include chest symptoms, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and exacerbations. Additional areas of impact are sleep, fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, and coping. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to evaluate symptoms, impact of symptoms on activities of daily living, and treatment response. This review summarizes COPD-specific PRO endpoints from randomized controlled trials of approved and commonly used COPD drugs. A search conducted in "ClinicalTrials.gov" to identify COPD clinical trials (only completed Phase III and IV) incorporating PRO endpoints yielded a total of 104 clinical trials for inclusion in this analysis. Both symptom-based and HRQoL-specific PRO measures were reported. Several COPD-specific PRO measures are available; however, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Indexes (BDI/TDI) were reported in the majority of the studies. Results reflected a gap in terms of full coverage of key impacted areas from a patient's perspective. Methodological issues identified in this review related to scoring of instruments require careful consideration, as these challenges may limit the complete assessment of drug benefits. Selection of PRO measures aligned with the expected treatment benefit of a drug in a clinical trial should reflect patients' perspective holistically.

Disease Modification in Emphysema Related to Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is associated with premature onset of emphysema resulting from low serum A₁-PI levels. The only available pharmacological treatment affecting the underlying cause of AATD is A₁-PI therapy. AATD-related emphysema is considered a good model to study disease-modifying effects of treatment as the causative process has been identified. Disease modification is a sustained improvement in disease state following therapeutic intervention that persists when therapy is discontinued. Appropriate trial design and the use of valid study endpoints are key to illustrating disease modification, particularly in clinical trials of rare diseases where it can be difficult to recruit sufficient numbers of patients. Delayed-start trials are advantageous ethically as all patients ultimately receive active treatment and imaging techniques have proven promising as valid study endpoints. Specifically, computed tomography (CT) measured lung density has been used to monitor emphysema and is considered a more sensitive outcome than pulmonary function tests to monitor disease progression. This review will discuss the importance of clinical endpoints and trial design to determine disease modification and will review the evidence for disease modification in AATD-related emphysema. Until recently, clinical studies have not shown a significant effect of A₁-PI therapy, possibly due to insufficient numbers of patients, short duration of clinical trials and lack of appropriate trial design. A recently completed randomised trial and open-label extension study followed a larger study population for a longer duration and incorporated a delayed-start design. The results demonstrated clinical efficacy of A₁-PI therapy and indicate that treatment is disease-modifying.

Effect of early rehabilitation on activities of daily living in patients with aspiration pneumonia

AIM

To assess the effect of early rehabilitation on improving activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly patients with aspiration pneumonia.

METHODS

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with aspiration pneumonia at admission who received early rehabilitation (n = 48 201) or did not receive any rehabilitation (n = 64 357) from July 2010 to March 2013. Early rehabilitation was defined as any type of physical rehabilitation initiated within 7 days after admission. The proportions of improved ADL scores from admission to discharge were compared between the early rehabilitation group and the non-rehabilitation group using a multivariable logistic regression analysis and instrumental variable analysis.

RESULTS

The proportion of improved ADL scores was higher in the early rehabilitation group than in the non-rehabilitation group (25.4% vs 33.9%; P < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the early rehabilitation group exhibited significant improvement in ADL (odds ratio 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.50-1.64; P < 0.001). The instrumental variable analysis showed that early rehabilitation was associated with increased proportion of improved ADL (risk difference 8.2%; 95% confidence interval 6.9-9.5%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that early rehabilitation might improve ADL during hospitalization in patients with aspiration pneumonia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 1181-1187.

The Prospective Non-Interventional DACCORD Study in the National COPD Registry in Germany: design and methods

Background

A variety of large randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) evaluating pharmacotherapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients does exist. One of the drugs that has been tested is the new long-acting anticholinergic glycopyrronium bromide.

Methods

As the generalizability of results from RCT’s is questionable we designed a longitudinal, prospective non-interventional study (DACCORD) of two years duration plus two years extension with at least 6000 participants in approximately 500 primary and secondary care practices in Germany (within the new established COPD National Prospective Registry), to assess patient reported outcomes (PRO’s), lung function, adherence and drug safety. To circumvent the hurdle of inappropriate COPD diagnosis in a non-interventional trial, patients have to fulfill the inclusion criteria of the COPD disease management program (DMP) of the German statutory health insurances. Patient management should follow the German national COPD guidelines, which are based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2007 (GOLD) report. Labels of prescribed drugs should also be taken into account. Patients received treatment as part of their standard care: at the discretion of the investigator patients were included in one of two arms. A: standard care with glycopyrronium containing regimen, and arm B: standard care without glycopyrronium.

Discussion

For 2016 we expect important results regarding longitudinal development of PRO’s including exacerbations, lung function, adherence and side effects. We also investigate applicability of the new GOLD staging system in usual care. Data on diagnostic and treatment modalities in current German primary and secondary care, as well as pharmaco-economic data will be generated.

Trial registration

1. German Register for non-interventional studies: http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/datenbanken-zu-arzneimitteln/nisdb.

2. EMA EnCePP http://www.encepp.eu/.