Evidence for molecular heterogeneity in human ganglioneuroblastoma

The neuroblastoma and ganglion components of nodular ganglioneuroblastoma are genetically similar: evidence against separate clonal origins

Nodular ganglioneuroblastoma is characterized by a macroscopic nodule of neuroblastoma within a ganglioneuromatous component. These two components have been considered to originate from separate clones, with the neuroblastoma clone accounting for the clinical behavior of nodular ganglioneuroblastoma. In order to investigate the clonal origin of the cellular components (neuroblasts, ganglion cells, and Schwann cells) of nodular ganglioneuroblastoma, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from eight cases were analyzed by single nucleotide polymorphism array and in situ hybridization. DNA was extracted separately from neuroblastomatous and ganglioneuromatous areas. By in situ hybridization, MYCN gain (4-10 gene copies/nucleus) was detected in 7/8 neuroblastoma samples. In ganglioneuromatous regions, gains were also detected in ganglion cells but not in Schwann cells. Single-nucleotide polymorphism array studies identified chromosome losses (11q and 14q) and gains (12, 13q, 17q and 18q) in the neuroblastoma component, whereas the ganglioneuromatous component showed fewer or no genetic alterations. There were no unique copy number changes distinguishing nodular ganglioneuroblastoma from other subtypes of neuroblastoma. By in situ hybridization, ganglion cells but not Schwann cells showed the same alterations detected in neuroblasts. Thus, neuroblasts and ganglion cells in nodular ganglioneuroblastoma are genetically related and may arise from the same clone. In contrast, the Schwann cells have a different origin and may be derived from a non-neoplastic neural crest precursor. Our results suggest that the clinical behavior of nodular ganglioneuroblastoma cannot be explained by the presence of separate clones with distinct genetic signatures.

Clinicopathological characteristics of ganglioneuroma and ganglioneuroblastoma: a report from the CCG and COG

BACKGROUND

The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) was the first to clearly define prognostic subgroups in ganglioneuroma (GN) and ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB).

PROCEDURE

Histopathology and tumor resectability of 552 GN/GNB cases from the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) and Children's Oncology Group (COG) neuroblastoma studies were reviewed. The results were analyzed along with clinical information and biological data of the cases.

RESULTS

According to the INPC, 300 tumors were classified into the Favorable Histology (FH) group and 252 were into the Unfavorable Histology (UH) group. Tumors in the FH group included 43 ganglioneuroma-maturing (GN-M), 198 ganglioneuroblastoma-intermixed (GNB-I), and 59 ganglioneuroblastoma-nodular, favorable subset (GNB-N-FS), and were often (91%) resected completely by single or multiple surgical procedures. Patients with the FH tumors had an excellent prognosis with no tumor-related deaths. The UH group included ganglioneuroblastoma-nodular, unfavorable subset (GNB-N-US) tumors. Patients with the UH tumors had a high incidence (53%) of distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, and their prognosis significantly depended on clinical stage (5-year EFS: 80.1% for non-stage 4 patients; 16.7% for stage 4 patients): Complete primary tumor resection was not beneficial to those GNB-N-US patients, regardless of whether metastasis was present or not. MYCN amplification was detected in four tumors in the FH group and six tumors in the UH group. The majority (160/191, 84%) of GN-M and GNB-I tumors had a diploid pattern determined by flow cytometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Stringent application of the INPC along with clinical staging was critical for prognostic evaluation of the patients with this group of tumors.

Revision of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification: confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular

BACKGROUND

Ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular (GNBn) comprises one of the categories of peripheral neuroblastic tumors. All tumors in this category, according to the original International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification, are classified into an unfavorable histology group. Subsequently, it has been reported that GNBn can be divided into two prognostic subsets, a favorable subset (FS) and an unfavorable subset (US).

METHODS

Histology slides from 70 patients who were enrolled in Children's Cancer Group studies 3881 and 3891 and who had a diagnosis of GNBn were reviewed jointly by the members of International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee (INPC): 1) to confirm the diagnosis of GNBn, 2) to identify the FS and US by applying the same age-linked criteria that were used to distinguish the favorable histology group and unfavorable histology group in conventional neuroblastoma tumors from the neuroblastomatous component of GNBn tumors, and 3) to verify the significant prognostic difference between these two subsets. The patients had been used in a previous study, and survival data for the patients were updated since the time of their last report.

RESULTS

The review clarified and illustrated morphologic characteristics of classical GNBn and it variants. The diagnosis of GNBn was confirmed in 67 of 70 patients. There were 22 patients with GNBn in the FS and 45 patients with GNBn in the US. The estimated survival differences between the FS and US patients with GNBn were statistically significant (8-year event free survival rate: 86.1% vs. 32.2%; P = 0.0003; overall survival rate: 90.5% vs. 33.2%; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the recently defined prognostic subsets of GNBn. The INPC proposes to modify the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification by distinguishing the FS and the US among patients with GNBn tumors.

Histopathology (International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification) and MYCN status in patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (International Classification), which was established in 1999, is significant prognostically and is relevant biologically for the evaluation and analysis of patients with neuroblastic tumors (NTs). MYCN amplification is a known molecular marker for aggressive progression of NTs. These have been used together as important prognostic factors to define risk groups for patient stratification and protocol assignment.

METHODS

A total of 628 NTs (535 neuroblastomas [NBs]); 21 ganglioneuroblastoma, intermixed [GNBi]; 9 ganglioneuromas [GN]; and 63 ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular [GNBn]) from the Children's Cancer Group studies were evaluated histologically (favorable histology [FH] tumors vs. unfavorable histology [UH] tumors) according to the International Classification and were tested molecularly for MYCN status (amplified vs. nonamplified). Four tumor subsets (FH-nonamplified, FH-amplified, UH-nonamplified, and UH-amplified) were defined by histopathology and MYCN status, and their prognostic effects were analyzed. Detailed analysis between morphologic indicators (grade of neuroblastic differentiation and mitosis-karyorrhexis index [MKI]) and MYCN status was done by using tumors in the NB category.

RESULTS

There were 339 FH-nonamplified tumors (5-year event free survival [EFS], 92.1%); 8 FH-amplified tumors (EFS, 37.5%); 172 UH-nonamplified tumors (EFS, 40.9%); and 109 UH-amplified tumors (EFS, 15.0%). The prognostic effects on patients with tumors in the four subsets were independent from the factors of patient age and disease stage (P < 0.0001). MYCN amplification was seen almost exclusively in tumors of the NB category, and no patients with tumors in either the GNBi category or in the GN category and only two patients with tumors in the GNBn category had amplified MYCN. Among the patients with tumors in the NB category, patients with FH-nonamplified tumors (309 patients) had an excellent prognosis, and patients with UH-amplified tumors (107 patients) had the poorest clinical outcome in any age group. The prognosis for children with UH-nonamplified tumors (111 patients) was poor when they were diagnosed at age > 1.5 years. It was also noted that patients with UH-amplified tumors (median age, 2.14 years) were diagnosed at a significantly younger age compared with the patients with UH-nonamplified tumors (median age, 3.55 years). Histologically, MYCN-amplified tumors lacked neuroblastic differentiation regardless of the age of patients. MYCN amplification also was linked generally to increased mitotic and karyorrhectic activities. However, MKI classes in patients with MYCN-amplified tumors varied significantly, depending on the age at diagnosis, and younger patients had higher MKI classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of histopathologic evaluation and MYCN status distinguishes four clinical and biologic tumor subsets in patients with NTs. MYCN amplification seems to be the powerful driving force for preventing cellular differentiation regardless of patient age and for increasing mitotic and karyorrhectic activities in an age dependent manner.