The effect of temperature of concurrently administered fluid on the onset of ipecac-induced emesis

Drug overdose — reducing the load

OBJECTIVE

To review available information about various methods for reducing gastrointestinal absorption of a poison or drug.

DATA SOURCES

Articles on overdose and accidental poisoning generated by the Australian Medlars Service and concentrating on the period between 1985 and 1990 were surveyed. Earlier studies were included if relevant.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English language articles with an emphasis on studies using objective methods to measure individual and comparative efficacy of gastrointestinal decontamination techniques were selected. A total of 65 articles were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Gastric emptying procedures (gastric lavage or emesis caused by syrup of ipecac) are only effective if performed within one hour of drug ingestion. Gastric lavage is superior to syrup of ipecac. Oral administration of activated charcoal is more effective than either gastric emptying procedure, and is recommended for most cases of poisoning. Cathartics (sorbitol) can be used with activated charcoal. Whole bowel lavage with polyethylene glycol is indicated in selected cases of potentially lethal overdose where the toxic substance cannot be absorbed by charcoal and has passed the pylorus.

CONCLUSIONS

Children--syrup of ipecac can be given at home to children older than 12 months. Most children who reach hospital can be treated by charcoal alone. ADULTS--Most patients are managed with supportive care and, in the absence of contraindications, a single dose of activated charcoal if seen within four hours of ingestion of the poison or drug. Gastric lavage is used if the patient presents within one hour of ingestion and has clinical features of toxicity.

The effect of fluid volume on syrup of ipecac emesis time

Large volumes of fluid have been recommended to aid rapid ipecac-induced emesis, however, large volume intake may also have deleterious effects. We prospectively studied 121 children treated at home by a regional poison center to determine if a relationship existed between fluid volume and time to emesis. These children were treated in the usual manner except that parents were asked to measure the volume of fluid given and to note the time that fluid was given and the time of first emesis. The time ranged from 6 to 58 minutes (mean 20.6) with two who failed to respond and the volume ranged from 0 to 28 ounces (mean 6.7 ounces). In children who respond to ipecac, there is no significant relationship between the amount of fluid given and the time until emesis. We conclude that the traditional recommendation of forcing fluid with syrup of ipecac does not hasten emesis in children.

Gastrointestinal decontamination for acute poisoning

Gastric decontamination remains an important element in the therapy of pediatric poisoning; however, several issues remain unresolved. Additional studies, particularly in the clinical setting, are necessary to establish optimal therapeutic recommendations. Based on the data presented in this review, the following general recommendations can be made for gastric decontamination in children: If it is necessary to remove an ingested toxin, ipecac syrup is the preferred method if contraindications to its use are not present. The dose should be 30 ml in children older than 1 year of age and 10 ml in children 6 to 12 months of age. Pending further studies, the use of emetics in children younger than 6 months of age cannot be generally recommended, particularly in the home setting. Gastric lavage should be considered to be of very limited use in pediatric patients. Lavage using small nasogastric tubes, except under special circumstances, is nonproductive and cannot be advocated. If it must be used, a large-bore orogastric hose should be used. Administration of activated charcoal prior to lavage should be considered. In situations in which prompt induction of emesis is not possible or contraindications to emesis exist, activated charcoal followed by, or mixed with, a cathartic (preferably sorbitol) should be used as an alternative to removal of gastric contents. Patients with significant symptoms from ingestion requiring hospitalization should receive repeat doses of charcoal and cathartic until symptoms resolve. Activated charcoal should be given in conjunction with other appropriate therapies. Although the data to substantiate this recommendation are limited, particularly in pediatric patients, it is a benign therapy that holds promise of increasing drug elimination.

Advances in clinical toxicology

New data are reviewed in two areas in the management of the acute overdose: gastrointestinal decontamination and systemic antidotes. The mechanism and effectiveness of Ipecac syrup, gastric aspiration and lavage, activated charcoal, gastrointestinal dialysis, and saline cathartics are discussed. Special problems posed by disc batteries and packet ingestion of cocaine (in transporting contraband) are highlighted. The pharmacology and uses of pyridoxine and naloxone as antidotes are detailed.

Effects of emetic and cathartic agents on the gastrointestinal tract and the treatment of toxic ingestion

Emetic drugs and saline cathartics produce direct or reflex changes in gastrointestinal motility. The changes in gastrointestinal smooth muscle function may be important in the rapid oral or rectal expulsion of gastrointestinal contents, effects which serve as a basis for emetic and cathartic drug use in the treatment of toxic ingestion. Because of difficulties in recording gastrointestinal smooth muscle contractile activity from the intact, unanesthetized animal or man, relatively few studies have attempted to characterize the changes in gastrointestinal motility preceding vomiting. Limited results from past studies and the results of more recent studies employing improved technology suggest that pharmacological activation of the emetic reflex is accompanied by characteristic movements of the stomach and small intestine. The gastric response consists of initial muscle relaxation and an expansion of gastric volume. The intestine responds with a contraction, which begins in the distal ileum and migrates orad over the entire small intestine immediately before active retching. The changes in gastric and intestinal motility may be initiated by structures in the central nervous system and may be an important component of the emetic reflex. This article urges more active research to characterize the gastrointestinal emetic response and to investigate more generally the therapeutic value of emesis in the treatment of toxic ingestion. Emphasis should be placed on the clinically important emetic drugs apomorphine and syrup of ipecac. Studies comparing the efficiency of removal of gastrointestinal contents, resultant blood levels of orally administered drugs with and without emesis, differences in the gastrointestinal emetic response between agents and the pharmacology of the gastrointestinal emetic response should be performed. Studies should also be conducted to determine the pharmacology of the emetic sensory receptors in the gastrointestinal tract and the intraluminal physical-chemical or gastrointestinal physiological factors influencing gastrointestinal emetic sensory receptor activation. The results would demonstrate the value of emesis in various poison cases and help establish criteria for use and selection of emetic drugs. No less experimental attention should be devoted to the cathartic drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)