Milrinone versus glucagon: comparative hemodynamic effects in canine propranolol poisoning

Massive metoprolol overdose requiring ECMO: brief review of the evidence behind recommended treatments

A man in his late 60s developed shock after ingesting 7500 mg of metoprolol tartrate that was refractory to all medical treatment including hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia, intravenous lipid emulsion and dialysis, eventually needing rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A brief review of the recommended treatments in beta-blocker overdose is therefore warranted.

Use of a Porcine Model to Evaluate the Risks and Benefits of Vasopressors in Propranolol Poisoning

INTRODUCTION

Vasopressors are a commonly used treatment in beta-blocker poisoning despite evidence they may be ineffective or harmful. The primary objective of the present study is to use previously collected data from two prior studies (high-dose insulin (HDI) versus vasopressin + epinephrine and a placebo-controlled HDI study) to compare survival between vasopressin + epinephrine and placebo. Secondary outcomes included a comparison with HDI as well as comparisons with hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

METHODS

Cardiogenic shock was induced in healthy pigs with a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg of intravenous propranolol followed by an infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/minute until the point of toxicity, defined as (0.75 × initial HR × initial MAP), at which point the infusion was reduced to 0.125 mg/kg/minute for 240 (vasopressin + epinephrine or HDI) or 360 minutes (placebo) or until death.

RESULTS

Survival was significantly lower in pigs receiving vasopressin + epinephrine (0%, 0/5) than in pigs receiving placebo (50%, 2/4) (p < 0.01). Survival was significantly higher with HDI compared with both groups (100%, 5/5) (p < 0.01). All vasopressin + epinephrine pigs died within 100 minutes after reaching toxicity. Over the course of the resuscitation, we observed a statistically significant steady decrease in CO and HR in the vasopressin + epinephrine group compared with placebo (p < 0.01). In contrast, we observed a statistically significant change in MAP and SVR that followed a parabolic arc, with MAP and SVR rising significantly initially in the vasopressin + epinephrine group then rapidly falling until death (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was higher with vasopressors compared with placebo in this porcine model of propranolol poisoning. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal timing and role of vasopressors in beta-blocker poisoning.

Pharmacology, Pathophysiology and Management of Calcium Channel Blocker and ??-Blocker Toxicity

Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and beta-blockers (BB) account for approximately 40% of cardiovascular drug exposures reported to the American Association of Poison Centers. However, these drugs represent >65% of deaths from cardiovascular medications. Yet, caring for patients poisoned with these medications can be extremely difficult. Severely poisoned patients may have profound bradycardia and hypotension that is refractory to standard medications used for circulatory support.Calcium plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular function. The flow of calcium across cell membranes is necessary for cardiac automaticity, conduction and contraction, as well as maintenance of vascular tone. Through differing mechanisms, CCB and BB interfere with calcium fluxes across cell membranes. CCB directly block calcium flow through L-type calcium channels found in the heart, vasculature and pancreas, whereas BB decrease calcium flow by modifying the channels via second messenger systems. Interruption of calcium fluxes leads to decreased intracellular calcium producing cardiovascular dysfunction that, in the most severe situations, results in cardiovascular collapse.Although, CCB and BB have different mechanisms of action, their physiological and toxic effects are similar. However, differences exist between these drug classes and between drugs in each class. Diltiazem and especially verapamil tend to produce the most hypotension, bradycardia, conduction disturbances and deaths of the CCB. Nifedipine and other dihydropyridines are generally less lethal and tend to produce sinus tachycardia instead of bradycardia with fewer conduction disturbances.BB have a wider array of properties influencing their toxicity compared with CCB. BB possessing membrane stabilising activity are associated with the largest proportion of fatalities from BB overdose. Sotalol overdoses, in addition to bradycardia and hypotension, can cause torsade de pointes. Although BB and CCB poisoning can present in a similar fashion with hypotension and bradycardia, CCB toxicity is often associated with significant hyperglycaemia and acidosis because of complex metabolic derangements related to these medications. Despite differences, treatment of poisoning is nearly identical for BB and CCB, with some additional considerations given to specific BB. Initial management of critically ill patients consists of supporting airway, breathing and circulation. However, maintenance of adequate circulation in poisoned patients often requires a multitude of simultaneous therapies including intravenous fluids, vasopressors, calcium, glucagon, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, high-dose insulin, a relatively new therapy, and mechanical devices. This article provides a detailed review of the pharmacology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment strategies for CCB and BB overdoses.

Glucagon in β‐Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Overdoses: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Glucagon is usually accepted as part of the standard treatment in the management of patients with beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker overdoses.

METHODS

A systematic review was done in order to evaluate the evidence supporting glucagon use in beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker overdoses. Studies evaluating glucagon for those uses were identified using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MedLine, ToxLine, and EMBASE searches, as well as reviewing medical toxicology textbooks and references of identified articles. Only controlled studies of human or animal studies were included, the latter only when it was an in vivo model of acute poisoning. The quality of the included studies was assessed.

RESULTS

The search found no study in humans but identified 30 in animals. In the five studies of animal models of beta-blocker overdose included, glucagon appeared to consistently increase the heart rate at least transiently but appeared to have no effect on mean arterial pressure even though it possibly increased cardiac output. Its effect on the survival rate in animal models of beta-blocker overdose was unclear. In the six studies of animal models of calcium channel blocker overdose included, glucagon appeared to increase heart rate and cardiac output and reverse second and third degree AV blocks, all at least transiently. There appeared to be no effect of glucagon on mean arterial pressure although it did increase in one model. Glucagon appeared to have no effect on survival rate. The included studies for both overdoses were not blinded, had limited numbers of animals, and some had inadequate glucagon regime.

CONCLUSION

The evidence supporting the use of glucagon in the management of patients with beta-blocker and calcium channel blocker overdoses is limited to animal studies.

The effect of hypertonic sodium and dantrolene on propranolol cardiotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether measures that lower cytosolic calcium (Ca) can reverse propranolol (PROP) toxicity in the isolated, perfused rat heart.

METHODS

Isolated rat hearts were perfused on a Langendorff apparatus with Krebs-Henseleit-bicarbonate (KHB) buffer solution. Toxicity was produced by perfusing the hearts with PROP (5 micrograms/mL) for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the hearts were treated for 30 minutes with buffer containing PROP plus experimental treatment. Three treatments were chosen: hypertonic sodium (Na) (160 mmol), to stimulate Na-Ca exchange, dantrolene (DAN) (10 mumol), to inhibit Ca release from sarcoplasmic reticulum, and combined hypertonic Na and DAN. The hearts were paced after 20 minutes of treatment. Heart rate (HR), left ventricular peak systolic pressure (LVP), the first derivative of LVP (dP/dt), and coronary flow were measured.

RESULTS

PROP decreased HR and rendered the hearts refractory to pacing. PROP did not alter dP/dt. PROP increased LVP consistent with increased cytosolic Ca. Combined hypertonic Na and DAN treatment restored the ability to pace PROP-toxic hearts to the basal HR. Individually, hypertonic Na or DAN treatment partially restored the ability to pace toxic hearts. As experimental treatments increased HR, dP/dt and LVP decreased, consistent with decreased cytosolic Ca availability.

CONCLUSION

These data are consistent with the hypothesis that bradycardia during beta-blocker cardiotoxicity is mediated by altered Ca homeostasis.

Insulin improves survival in a canine model of acute beta-blocker toxicity

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a novel antidote, insulin, with standard treatments, glucagon and epinephrine, in a canine model of acute beta-blocker toxicity.

METHODS

Anesthetized dogs were fitted with instruments by means of thoracotomy and vascular cutdown for multiple cardiodynamic, hemodynamic, metabolic, and electrical measures. After basal measurements were taken, animals received intravenous propranolol (.25 mg/kg/minute) continuously for the remainder of the experiment. Toxicity was defined as a 25% decrease in the product of heart rate times mean blood pressure. Thirty minutes after the development of toxicity, toxic measures were taken (treatment 0 minutes), and then the animals (n = 6 each group) received either sham (saline solution), insulin (4 IU/minute with glucose clamped), glucagon (50 micrograms/kg bolus, then 150 micrograms/kg/hour infusion), or epinephrine (1 microgram/kg/minute). Animals were monitored until death or for 240 minutes.

RESULTS

Propranolol decreased contractility, left ventricular pressure, and systemic blood pressure, and resulted in death of all sham-treated animals by 150 minutes. Six of six insulin-treated, four of six glucagon-treated, and one of six epinephrine-treated animals survived. Survival was greater for insulin-treated animals, compared with either glucagon-treated (P < .05) or epinephrine-treated animals (P < .02) by the log-rank test. Insulin-treated animals were characterized by improved cardiodynamics and hemodynamics, increased myocardial glucose uptake, and decreased serum potassium.

CONCLUSION

Insulin is a superior antidote compared with glucagon or epinephrine in an anesthetized canine model of acute beta-blocker toxicity.

Combined use of glucagon and milrinone may not be preferable for severe propranolol poisoning in the canine model

In a previous study of propranolol poisoning, glucagon and milrinone significantly increased cardiac output, but the improvement caused by glucagon was almost entirely due to the chronotropic effect. This study investigates the combined effect of glucagon, in a dose not inducing tachycardia, and milrinone on beta-blocker poisoning. Following the administration of 10 mg/kg propranolol IV over ten minutes, dogs (N = 20) were divided into four treatment groups, group S (saline), group G (glucagon 2.5 micrograms/kg), group M (milrinone 100 micrograms/kg), and group G + M (glucagon 2.5 micrograms/kg plus milrinone 100 micrograms/kg). Hemodynamic parameters were observed over the next thirty minutes. Heart rate, cardiac output, and mean arterial pressure were decreased in all groups after the administration of propranolol. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume recovered to the baseline values in group G + M. However, heart rate in group G + M showed a significant increase versus the other three groups. In a canine model of severe propranolol poisoning, the combined effect of glucagon 2.5 micrograms/kg and milrinone 100 micrograms/kg brought about a significant hemodynamic improvement, but it was accompanied by an excessive increase of heart rate. Combined therapy of milrinone and glucagon may not be preferable therapy in beta-blocker poisoning in the canine model.