Surveillance of loperamide ingestions: an analysis of 216 poison center reports

The Potential Mechanisms behind Loperamide-Induced Cardiac Arrhythmias Associated with Human Abuse and Extreme Overdose

Loperamide has been a safe and effective treatment for diarrhea for many years. However, many cases of cardiotoxicity with intentional abuse of loperamide ingestion have recently been reported. We evaluated loperamide in in vitro and in vivo cardiac safety models to understand the mechanisms for this cardiotoxicity. Loperamide slowed conduction (QRS-duration) starting at 0.3 µM [~1200-fold (×) its human Free Therapeutic Plasma Concentration; FTPC] and reduced the QT-interval and caused cardiac arrhythmias starting at 3 µM (~12,000× FTPC) in an isolated rabbit ventricular-wedge model. Loperamide also slowed conduction and elicited Type II/III A-V block in anesthetized guinea pigs at overdose exposures of 879× and 3802× FTPC. In ion-channel studies, loperamide inhibited hERG (IKr), INa, and ICa currents with IC50 values of 0.390 µM, 0.526 µM, and 4.091 µM, respectively (i.e., >1560× FTPC). Additionally, in silico trials in human ventricular action potential models based on these IC50s confirmed that loperamide has large safety margins at therapeutic exposures (≤600× FTPC) and confirmed repolarization abnormalities in the case of extreme doses of loperamide. The studies confirmed the large safety margin for the therapeutic use of loperamide but revealed that at the extreme exposure levels observed in human overdose, loperamide can cause a combination of conduction slowing and alterations in repolarization time, resulting in cardiac proarrhythmia. Loperamide's inhibition of the INa channel and hERG-mediated IKr are the most likely basis for this cardiac electrophysiological toxicity at overdose exposures. The cardiac toxic effects of loperamide at the overdoses could be aggravated by co-medication with other drug(s) causing ion channel inhibition.

DARK Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Loperamide

Loperamide, a popular and inexpensive over-the-counter antidiarrheal medicine, is a potent μ-opioid receptor agonist approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It has been on the market since 1976 and is relatively safe with no central nervous system-related side effects when used for a short period of time at the recommended therapeutic dose (2-8 mg/day). In recent years, loperamide has become notoriously known as the "poor man's methadone" for people with substance dependence due to the increase in loperamide overdoses from self-administered medication to treat opioid withdrawal symptoms. As a result, in 2018, the FDA decided to limit the available packaged dose of loperamide to stop prominent abuse. This review provides the synthesis and chemical properties of loperamide as well as the pharmacology and adverse effects of its use and the social effects of such abuse.

Loperamide Abuse and Its Sequelae

INTRODUCTION

Loperamide is an opioid available over the counter and in prescription form. Loperamide functions as a μ-agonist within the enteric nervous system to slow intestinal motility. Its antidiarrheal properties and primarily peripheral activity make loperamide an important tool in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

CASE REPORT

A 42-year-old man was found unconscious in cardiac arrest, and emergency medical personnel restored normal sinus rhythm. Family reported complaints of abdominal pain and that he "went through a lot" of loperamide. In the emergency department, the patient exhibited symptoms consistent with an opioid overdose. Mental status improved after administration of naloxone, an opioid antagonist. An electrocardiogram revealed a prolonged QTc interval, which progressed into Torsades de Pointes rhythm during admission. The patient succumbed from hypoxic brain injury, and there was evidence of acute pancreatitis at autopsy. Loperamide and desmethylloperamide (loperamide metabolite) were detected in blood samples. Cause of death was ruled loperamide toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Because of reduced central nervous system activity and associated euphoria at therapeutic doses, loperamide abuse is rarely reported. This case demonstrates that an overdose on loperamide can occur in patients seeking symptom alleviation, and may mimic the presentation of opioid overdose.

Loperamide overdose causing torsades de pointes and requiring Impella temporary mechanical support: a case report

Background

Loperamide is a widely available oral μ-opioid receptor agonist, and loperamide abuse is increasing by those seeking intoxication. Loperamide has potent QTc-prolonging properties, placing patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

Case summary

A 23-year-old woman was found to be in pulseless ventricular fibrillation with a QTc of 554 ms and received multiple defibrillations and IV lidocaine. Her toxicology studies were negative. She subsequently experienced multiple episodes of torsades de pointes and was found to be in cardiogenic shock with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 5%. Following multiple defibrillations, an Impella® mechanical circulatory support device was placed, and she was given IV magnesium and IV lidocaine. After mechanical circulatory support was withdrawn, she experienced major bleeding and was found to have a deep vein thrombosis, bilateral radial artery thrombosis, and multiple pulmonary embolisms in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. After stabilizing, she admitted to taking 80 tablets of loperamide 2 mg in pursuit of euphoria.

Discussion

Loperamide is an increasingly popular agent of abuse. Loperamide-associated ventricular arrhythmias are rare with normal doses but more common with high doses, chronic ingestion, or interacting medications. Loperamide cardiotoxicity may be prolonged due to a long half-life and accumulation. Loperamide abuse may be under-recognized, leading to delays in treatment. Intravenous fluids, magnesium supplementation, chronotropes, transcutaneous or transvenous pacing, and defibrillation may be helpful in mitigating loperamide-associated polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Clinicians should monitor for drug interactions in patients taking loperamide and screen for electrocardiographic abnormalities in those taking chronic or high-dose loperamide.

Clinical Review: Loperamide Toxicity

Loperamide is a nonprescription opioid widely used for the treatment of diarrhea. Although it is relatively safe at therapeutic doses, increasing reports describe its misuse and abuse at very high doses either for euphoric effects or to attenuate symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Life-threatening loperamide toxicity can result from the relatively new clinical syndrome of loperamide-induced cardiac toxicity. These patients are often young and may present in cardiac arrest or with unheralded, recurrent syncope in conjunction with ECG abnormalities, including marked QT-interval prolongation, QRS-interval widening, and ventricular dysrhythmias. Features of conventional opioid toxicity may also be present. The mainstays of treatment include advanced cardiac life support and supportive care, although selected patients may be candidates for overdrive pacing, intravenous lipid emulsion, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients who survive loperamide toxicity, consideration should be given to the treatment of an underlying opioid use disorder, if present.

Intentional Misuse and Abuse of Loperamide: A New Look at a Drug with "Low Abuse Potential"

BACKGROUND

Despite its opioid properties, loperamide has long been thought to have low abuse potential due to its poor absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and limited potential to cross the blood-brain barrier. A recent patient reportedly taking loperamide to avoid heroin withdrawal symptoms, at doses approximately 100 times those recommended, directed our attention to this issue.

OBJECTIVES

1) Investigate number of cases of intentional loperamide abuse and misuse reported to poison centers between 2009 and 2015; 2) Compile reports of clinical effects of loperamide abuse; and 3) Search for evidence of increasing Internet interest in the central opioid effects of loperamide.

METHODS

For the years 2009 thru 2015, we reviewed exposure calls related to misuse/abuse of loperamide in the Texas Poison Center Network's database and the National Poison Data System. We used Google trend analysis to detect evidence of increased Internet interest in the illicit use of loperamide.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2015, the number of misuse/abuse calls related to loperamide alone nearly doubled, with about one-third of cases occurring in teens and young adults in their 20s. Of particular concern are reports of significant cardiotoxic effects (∼18% of cases), including conduction defects and various dysrhythmias, sometimes leading to death. Google Trends analysis demonstrates an increasing number of searches for "loperamide high" and "loperamide withdrawal" beginning in 2011.

CONCLUSIONS

Loperamide misuse/abuse seems to be on the rise. Given its propensity to induce conduction disturbances and dysrhythmias at very high doses, emergency physicians should be vigilant for this form of drug abuse.

Loperamide, the "Poor Man's Methadone": Brief Review

Loperamide is widely available as an inexpensive, over-the-counter remedy commonly used for management of diarrhea. Although an opioid, at therapeutic doses it acts primarily on the gastrointestinal tissues; however, larger than recommended amounts facilitate central nervous system (CNS) penetration. Such high doses of loperamide have recently gained popularity among users of opioids to manage withdrawal symptomatology and, less frequently, to achieve psychoactive effects. Chronic loperamide use can result in development of tolerance and, upon abrupt cessation of use, withdrawal. With increasing prevalence of use, side-effects are noted, one particularly being life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Users are often not forthcoming and routine drug screens do not detect loperamide, so providers need to be alert to such practices in order to recognize intoxication, be able to screen for use, and facilitate entry into treatment.

Nonprescription Medication Use by Infants and Children: Product Labeling Versus Evidence-Based Medicine

Nonprescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medication use has been an increasing market over the past years. In addition to adult use of these medications, children also account for this trend. Although relatively safe when used according to package labeling and professional direction, serious adverse drug events and toxicity associated withOTC use among infants and children are becoming more common. The purpose of this review is to help the health care practitioner select and counsel on pediatric OTC products based on labeling and efficacy data in 3 main areas: cough and cold, analgesics, and treatment of gastroenteritis.

Loperamide Induced Torsades de Pointes: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Abuse of over the counter drugs often gets overlooked by health care providers. Loperamide is one such over the counter drug that is often abused by drug addicts. We present here a case of a young male attaining euphoria from taking massive doses of loperamide. He developed Torsades de Pointes and subsequent cardiac arrest. We found similarities in the progression of myocardial electrical conduction abnormalities among loperamide and other previously known arrhythmogenic drugs. We intend to raise concern over the ease of availability of such drugs over the counter and increase the index of suspicion for over the counter drug abuse from our experience.

Loperamide dependence and abuse

Loperamide is a common over-the-counter antidiarrheal considered safe in a broad range of dosages and thought devoid of abuse potential. We describe the first case of a patient with loperamide dependence due to misuse of its opiate-like effects achieved by chronic massive oral ingestions. A 26-year-old man who was taking 800 mg of loperamide per day presented requesting detoxification referral. Loperamide has potential for euphoric effects and information on how to facilitate such effects is easily available. It is important for physicians to be aware of the potential for misuse of and dependence on loperamide, with symptoms mimicking opiate use.

Loperamide overdose-induced catatonia: potential role of brain opioid system and P-glycoprotein

OBJECTIVE

Catatonic features are observed in several psychiatric illnesses but can also be found following substance misuse. Loperamide is an anti-diarrhoeal medication that acts on opioid receptors in the intestine, reducing peristalsis. It is normally unable to pass through the intestinal wall or the blood-brain barrier; however, high dosages can in fact induce the effects on the central nervous system.

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a 20-year-old man who presented with severe catatonia following excessive intake of loperamide, fully remitted with lorazepam.

CONCLUSION

We speculate on a possible increase of loperamide's bioavailability after overdose owing to reduced expression and functioning of P-glycoprotein.

"I just wanted to tell you that loperamide WILL WORK": a web-based study of extra-medical use of loperamide

AIMS

Many websites provide a means for individuals to share their experiences and knowledge about different drugs. Such User-Generated Content (UGC) can be a rich data source to study emerging drug use practices and trends. This study examined UGC on extra-medical use of loperamide among illicit opioid users.

METHODS

A website that allows for the free discussion of illicit drugs and is accessible for public viewing was selected for analysis. Web-forum posts were retrieved using web crawlers and retained in a local text database. The database was queried to extract posts with a mention of loperamide and relevant brand/slang terms. Over 1290 posts were identified. A random sample of 258 posts was coded using NVivo to identify intent, dosage, and side-effects of loperamide use.

RESULTS

There has been an increase in discussions related to loperamide's use by non-medical opioid users, especially in 2010-2011 Loperamide was primarily discussed as a remedy to alleviate a broad range of opioid withdrawal symptoms, and was sometimes referred to as "poor man's" methadone. Typical doses ranged 70-100mg per day, much higher than an indicated daily dose of 16mg.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that loperamide is being used extra-medically to self-treat opioid withdrawal symptoms. There is a growing demand among people who are opioid dependent for drugs to control withdrawal symptoms, and loperamide appears to fit that role. The study also highlights the potential of the Web as a "leading edge" data source in identifying emerging drug use practices.

Loperamide and P-glycoprotein inhibition: assessment of the clinical relevance

OBJECTIVES

Loperamide is a peripherally acting mu opioid receptor agonist and an avid substrate for P-glycoprotein. This may give rise to drug-drug interactions and increased risk for central adverse effects. The objective of this study was to re-evaluate the predictability of non-clinical data using loperamide as a probe P-glycoprotein substrate. We searched the literature for papers containing data on drug-drug interactions of loperamide-containing products in humans. We also reviewed the internal worldwide safety database of Johnson & Johnson for spontaneous case reports suggestive of a central opioid effect after coadministration of loperamide with a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate.

KEY FINDINGS

Only one of the ten studies in our review supported the finding that inhibition of P-glycoprotein is associated with clinically relevant signs or symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) depression/opioid toxicity of loperamide. None of the 25 spontaneous case reports of interest were suggestive of signs or symptoms of CNS depression/opioid toxicity due to coadministration of loperamide and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate.

SUMMARY

Based on a review of the literature and a cumulative review of the spontaneous case reports, there is insufficient evidence that an interaction between loperamide and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor or substrate is associated with clinical symptoms of CNS depression/opioid toxicity when loperamide is taken at the recommended dose.

Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide

OBJECTIVE

Loperamide is biotransformed in vitro by the cytochromes P450 (CYP) 2C8 and 3A4 and is a substrate of the P-glycoprotein efflux transporter. Our aim was to investigate the effects of itraconazole, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and gemfibrozil, an inhibitor of CYP2C8, on the pharmacokinetics of loperamide.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover study with 4 phases, 12 healthy volunteers took 100 mg itraconazole (first dose 200 mg), 600 mg gemfibrozil, both itraconazole and gemfibrozil, or placebo, twice daily for 5 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 4-mg dose of loperamide. Loperamide and N-desmethylloperamide concentrations in plasma were measured for up to 72 h and in urine for up to 48 h. Possible central nervous system effects of loperamide were assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and by subjective drowsiness.

RESULTS

Itraconazole raised the peak plasma loperamide concentration (Cmax) 2.9-fold (range, 1.2-5.0; P < 0.001) and the total area under the plasma loperamide concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) 3.8-fold (1.4-6.6; P < 0.001) and prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of loperamide from 11.9 to 18.7 h (P < 0.001). Gemfibrozil raised the Cmax of loperamide 1.6-fold (0.9-3.2; P < 0.05) and its AUC(0-infinity) 2.2-fold (1.0-3.7; P < 0.05) and prolonged its t(1/2) to 16.7 h (P < 0.01). The combination of itraconazole and gemfibrozil raised the Cmax of loperamide 4.2-fold (1.5-8.7; P < 0.001) and its AUC(0-infinity) 12.6-fold (4.3-21.8; P < 0.001) and prolonged the t(1/2) of loperamide to 36.9 h (P < 0.001). The amount of loperamide excreted into urine within 48 h was increased 3.0-fold, 1.4-fold and 5.3-fold by itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination, respectively (P < 0.05). Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination reduced the plasma AUC(0-72) ratio of N-desmethylloperamide to loperamide by 65%, 46% and 88%, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test or subjective drowsiness between the phases.

CONCLUSION

Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide. Although not seen in the psychomotor tests used, an increased risk of adverse effects should be considered during concomitant use of loperamide with itraconazole, gemfibrozil and especially their combination.

[Loss of consciousness in a child due to loperamide]

Loperamide is an antidiarrheal peripheral opiate agonist, with rare neurological secondary effects. We report the case of a 26-month-old child who had impaired consciousness under treatment by loperamide, and was treated successfully with naloxone. Limitations of the use of loperamide in young children are underlined. Naloxone may be used in case of impaired consciousness, for a diagnostic as well as therapeutic purpose.

Potential roles of P-gp and calcium channels in loperamide and diphenoxylate transport

This study examined the accumulation and transport of two related systemic opioids used as antidiarrhoeal drugs and compared their rates of transport with known P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates used in our in vitro environment. Cellular uptake and efflux and transcellular transport were all determined using Caco-2 cells after exposure to loperamide or diphenoxylate, with or without a range of efflux inhibitors. Bidirectional transport studies of 5 microM loperamide showed efflux to be fivefold higher than influx (42 x 10(-6) compared to 8 x 10(-6) cm/s); however, this decreased to twofold at 10 microM and was abolished using 100 microM loperamide. An uptake pathway was also discovered when P-gp was inhibited which, in the presence of Ca(2+) channel blockers, was amplified, providing a potential mechanism for central nervous system effects to be increased upon blockage of L-type calcium channels, quite separate from any P-gp inhibition. Diphenoxylate transport, however, showed little sign of P-gp-mediated efflux. Diphenoxylate accumulated readily within cells, yet transport through cells was very low. Additionally, efflux inhibitors had little impact on transport or accumulation, suggesting that diphenoxylate was not a substrate for an efflux mechanism.

Reporting of adverse drug reactions by poison control centres in the US

BACKGROUND

Although US poison control centres manage approximately 30,000 adverse drug reactions each year, the extent of voluntary reporting of these events to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) MedWatch spontaneous surveillance programme is unknown.

METHODS

A survey was mailed to directors of all 72 US poison control centres during April 1999 to determine their practices and opinions on reporting adverse drug reactions. The survey requested information on the poison control centre staff's practices in reporting adverse drug reactions to the FDA MedWatch programme during 1998.

RESULTS

A total of 56 fully completed surveys were returned. Of the respondents, 30 had not directly submitted adverse drug reaction reports to the FDA, 22 had submitted 10 or less, and 4 had submitted a total of 47 during 1998. Reasons given for not routinely reporting adverse drug reactions included adverse drug reactions reporting is not part of the regular routine (20%), lack of time to complete forms (15%), inability to determine causality (13%), most reactions are already reported and not unique (10%), reporting to the FDA is too much work (9%), and responsibility rests with the attending physician (7%). Direct reporting to MedWatch of any cases of adverse drug reactions was more likely when the poison control centre was certified by the American Association of Poison Control Centers (p < 0.05; odds ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 23.5); however, this practice was not associated with documenting deaths associated with adverse drug reactions, having more than 75% of the staff of the Poison Information Specialists composed of pharmacists or nurses, or managing greater than 20,000 or 34,000 human exposure cases during 1998. Approximately half of the poison control centres directly or indirectly reported some adverse drug reactions to the FDA by virtue of contacting the manufacturer or cooperating with postmarketing surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Poison control centres represent an underutilised source of reporting to MedWatch, but several internal and external obstacles limit the direct reporting of adverse drug reactions routinely.