Unilateral tacrolimus-associated optic neuropathy after liver transplantation

Analysis of clinical features of tacrolimus-induced optic neuropathy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Tacrolimus is associated with optic neuropathy. The clinical features of tacrolimus-induced optic neuropathy (TION) are unclear. The purpose of this article is to explore the clinical features of TION.

METHODS

TION-related case reports were collected and analysed by searching Chinese and English databases from 1989 to 31 December 2021.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twelve males and 7 females were included, with a median age of 54 years (range 23-66). TION onset time ranged from 2 months to 16 years after administration, and the main clinical features were blurred vision (4 cases), decreased visual acuity (7 cases), decreased visual acuity (5 cases), grey films (3 cases), visual field damage (3 cases) and headache (2 cases). Fifteen patients developed bilateral optic neuropathy. Ophthalmological examination showed visual acuity ranging from 20/25 to blindness, pupillary examination revealed relative afferent pupillary defect in 9 patients and marked decrease in colour vision in 15 eyes. The optic disc showed pallor (10 cases), oedema (8 cases), atrophy (4 cases) and haemorrhage (2 cases). After discontinuation or dose reduction of tacrolimus, symptoms improved in 10 patients, 1 patient recovered completely, and 4 patients did not recover.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

TION presents diverse clinical manifestations. TION should be promptly identified and treated to prevent severe and permanent vision loss.

Tacrolimus-induced optic neuropathy: A case report

Intrduction. Tacrolimus (fujimycin or FK506) is a potent immunosuppressive drug with growing usage. It is usually used in prevention of transplanted organ rejection. Its use is highly valuable, but like other immunosupressants, it has adverse effects. One of them is optic neuropathy. Case report. A 47-year-old white male patients who had received tacrolimus therapy for nine years, after kidney transplantation, developed a subacute, painless vision loss on both eyes. He was thoroughly examined on different possible optic neuropathies and other causes of vision loss. After exclusion of other possible causes, the diagnosis of toxic optic neuropathy was established. His therapy was converted to cyclosporine, by his nephrologist, but his vision had improved only slightly. Conclusion. Toxic optic neuropathies are presented in everyday ophthalmological practice, but they are underestimated. Diagnosis can be demanding, especially when it comes to drugs and substances whose possible toxic effect on the optic nerve is not widely known. Unlike other adverse effects of tacrolimus therapy on nervous system, optic neuropathy can causes great and permanent functional impairment.

Visual evoked potentials as a method for the prospective assessment of tacrolimus neurotoxicity in patients after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Neurotoxicity, including optic nerve injury, is one of the most common adverse effects of tacrolimus, the principal calcineurin inhibitor used after kidney transplantation (KTx). The electrophysiologic measurements of both pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP) are valuable when drug-induced optic neuropathy is suspected.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether VEP measurement is a sensitive and repeatable method for monitoring tacrolimus neurotoxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study focused on 35 patients (20 M, 15F, 69 eyes, mean age 43 ± 11 years) who were at a median of 3.0 (IQR, 2.2-3.7) months after KTx at the time of the initial VEP evaluation and were treated with tacrolimus since KTx. The follow-up VEP examination was done after a median of 24 (22-27) months (both VEP measurements followed the ISCEV standards). The P100 wave latency and amplitude for the 1° and 15' PVEP simulations, and the P2 wave latency and amplitude for the FVEP were analyzed.

RESULTS

For the 1° checks, the P100 wave latency and amplitude values were significantly worse in the follow-up examination compared to the early post-transplant time-point. Independent associations between FVEP parameters and the tacrolimus blood trough level were observed in the follow-up examination but not at the early post-transplant period. The P2 wave latency correlated with the tacrolimus trough level only in patients treated with the twice-daily, but not the once-daily, tacrolimus formulation. The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level correlated with the P100 (15') latency (R = 0.499; p = 0.005) and the P2 latency (R = 0.409; p = 0.025) only in patients treated with the once-daily, but not the twice-daily, tacrolimus formulation.

CONCLUSION

The observations in this study may support the rationale for the use of VEP measurements as non-invasive monitoring of subclinical tacrolimus neurotoxicity.

The Effect of Maintenance Treatment with Twice-Daily or Prolonged Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation on Visual Evoked Potentials in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), uraemia-induced central nervous system damage partly subsides, while the long-lasting exposure to tacrolimus may cause pathologic visual evoked potentials (VEP) findings, which have not been investigated yet. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the effect of tacrolimus maintenance treatment on bioelectrical function of optic nerves in stable KTRs. Sixty-five stable KTRs were enrolled, including 30 patients treated with twice-daily (Prograf) and 35 patients treated with prolonged once-daily (Advagraf) tacrolimus formulation. In all patients, pattern and flash VEP measurements were performed. Tacrolimus dosing and exposure were also analyzed. Overall, 129 eyes were analyzed. In pattern VEP, both (1°) and (15') latencies of P100 waves were significantly longer, whereas (1°) and (15') amplitudes were lower in the Advagraf group as compared with the Prograf group. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the use of Advagraf (vs. Prograf) was independently associated with longer (1°) and (15') P100 latencies and lower corresponding amplitudes, whereas log tacrolimus daily dose was only related to amplitudes in a whole study group. In flash VEP, log tacrolimus trough level was associated with negative changes in P2 wave amplitude irrespective of tacrolimus formulation, whereas its association with P2 latency was observed only in the Prograf group. Both the type of tacrolimus formulation and drug exposure influenced the VEP parameters in stable KTRs.

Delayed tacrolimus-induced optic neuropathy

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant agent utilized for solid organ transplantations. It has been associated with rare neurotoxic effects. This case highlights one possible delayed neurotoxic effect. A 52-year-old lady on tacrolimus (3mg daily) among her immunosuppressive regimen for her kidney transplant 16 year ago. She presented with unilateral left paracentral black dots progressing over a week, associated with periorbital and temporal pain. The patient was diagnosed with left papillitis. Tacrolimus was tapered and then changed to cyclosporine. However, patient did not show any improvement of any parameter. Reports have indicated such neurotoxic effects with Tacrolimus use. Here, the report emphasizes on the unilateral optic neuropathic effect of tacrolimus even after one decade.

Tacrolimus Optic Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (FK506, Prograf) is a potent immunosuppressant, which inhibits cytokine synthesis and blocks T-cell development. Optic neuropathy from tacrolimus toxicity is very uncommon but, when present, can result in severe vision loss.

METHODS

Case series and review of the literature.

RESULTS

We present 3 patients with tacrolimus optic neuropathy after bone marrow transplantation complicated by graft-vs-host disease and demonstrate the differing clinical and radiologic presentation of this presumed toxic optic neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus optic neuropathy can manifest in a multitude of clinical presentations and can have devastating visual consequences.

Bilateral Inflammatory Optic Neuropathy Related to Graft versus Host Disease Following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation for Hodgkin Disease

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a common and often troublesome complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Neurological complications usually involve the peripheral nervous system and muscle, but the central nervous system may be affected. When an optic neuropathy develops, it is often difficult to determine the cause quickly; infective complications and drug toxicity may have arisen, but an inflammatory disorder due to GvHD should also be considered, particularly since treatment with steroids and immune suppression may improve the outcome significantly. This brief case report shows how this may be the case and reviews our current understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of the disorder within the nervous system.

Tacrolimus-induced paranoid delusions and fugue-like state

We report the case of a 43 year old male with no prior psychiatric history with apparent tacrolimus-induced psychosis. Previous reports have identified other neurotoxic adverse effects due to tacrolimus, however, to our knowledge, there are few reports that describe psychosis induced by the immunosuppressant drug. Although psychosis may be a rare adverse effect, it can have significant impact on the long-term prognosis and treatment in transplant recipients. It is imperative to quickly identify patients who develop a mental status change while on tacrolimus and to work with the appropriate transplant team in managing these patients. Treatment usually calls for prompt discontinuation of tacrolimus, substituting with another immunosuppressant, and possible use of antipsychotics.